Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Phenomenological Soliton

  • Chapter
BRST Symmetry and de Rham Cohomology

  • 634 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, in chiral models with SU(3) group structure, strange form factors of baryon octet are evaluated [129, 130] by constructing their sum rules to yield theoretical predictions comparable to recent experimental data of SAMPLE collaboration. We also study sum rules for flavor singlet axial currents for EMC experiment in modified quark model [130].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Here, we have used the same notation Q both for the momentum transfer and for the BRST charge. However, the differences are understood in the context.

  2. 2.

    In Ref. [272], similar equalities are used in connection with the quark loops.

  3. 3.

    In fact, in Ref. [271], \(\Delta \Sigma \) is evaluated using the sum rule for \(\Delta \Sigma \). However, here we have explicitly obtained the sum rules for its flavor components \(\Delta q\) (q = u, d, s) and F 2N s(0) as shown in Eqs. (8.34) and (8.39) to predict the values for \(\Delta s\) and F 2N s(0) in Eqs. (8.36) and (8.40).

References

  1. S.T. Hong, Y.J. Park, Phys. Rep. 358, 143 (2002)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Wess, B. Zumino, Phys. Lett. B 37, 95 (1971)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 223, 422 (1983)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 223, 433 (1983)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. S.T. Hong, B.Y. Park, Nucl. Phys. A 561, 525 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S.T. Hong, G.E. Brown, Nucl. Phys. A 564, 491 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. S.T. Hong, G.E. Brown, Nucl. Phys. A 580, 408 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. H. Yabu, K. Ando, Nucl. Phys. B 301, 601 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. H.K. Lee, D.P. Min, Phys. Lett. B 219, 1 (1989)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. S.T. Hong, Nucl. Phys. A 721, 421 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. S.T. Hong, Phys. Lett. B 585, 122 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. S.T. Hong, Phys. Rev. D 76, 094029 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. G.S. Adkins, C.R. Nappi, E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 228, 552 (1983)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Rho, A. Goldhaber, G. Brown, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 747 (1983)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. S.T. Hong, B.Y. Park, D.P. Min, Phys. Lett. B 414, 229 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Frisch, O. Stern, Z. Phys. 85, 4 (1933)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Coleman, S.L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 6, 423 (1961)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Bosshard et al., Phys. Rev. D 44, 1962 (1991)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. H.T. Diehl et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 804 (1991)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. D.B. Leinweber, T. Draper, R.M. Woloshyn, Phys. Rev. D 46, 3067 (1992)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. F. Schlumpf, Phys. Rev. D 48, 4478 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Linde, H. Snellman, Phys. Rev. D 53, 2337 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. M.N. Butler, M.J. Savage, R.P. Springer, Phys. Rev. D 49, 3459 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. F.X. Lee, Phys. Lett. B 419, 14 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. F.X. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 57, 1801 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. J. Linde, T. Ohlsson, H. Snellman, Phys. Rev. D 57, 5916 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. G.S. Yang, H.C. Kim, M. Praszalowicz, K. Goeke, Phys. Rev. D 70, 114002 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. E. Jenkins, M. Luke, A.V. Manohar, M. Savage, Phys. Lett. B 302, 482 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. S.J. Puglia, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, S.L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 63, 034014 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar, Phys. Lett. B 335, 452 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. R.F. Lebed, D.R. Martin, Phys. Rev. D 70, 016008 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. H.C. Kim, M. Polyakov, M. Praszalowicz, G.S. Yang, K. Goeke, Phys. Rev. D 71, 094023 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. R. Hasty et al., SAMPLE collaboration. Science 290, 2117 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. D.T. Spayde et al., SAMPLE collaboration. Phys. Lett. B 583, 79 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. R.D. McKeown, Phys. Lett. B 219, 140 (1989)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. R.D. McKeown, New Directions in Quantum Chromodynamics, ed. by C.R. Ji, D.P. Min (American Institute of Physics, Melville, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  37. K.A. Aniol et al., HAPPEX collaboration. Phys. Lett. B 509, 211 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. A. Acha et al., HAPPEX collaboration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 032301 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. R.D. McKeown, hep-ph/9607340 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  40. G.E. Brown, M. Rho, Phys. Lett. B 82, 177 (1979)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. T.H.R. Skyrme, Proc. R. Soc. A 260, 127 (1961)

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. A. Chodos et al., Phys. Rev. D 9, 3471 (1974)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. A. Chodos, R.L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, C.B. Thorn, Phys. Rev. D 10, 10 (1974)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. G. ’t Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B 72, 461 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  45. J. Ashman et al., Nucl. Phys. B 238, 1 (1990)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. J. Ashman et al., Phys. Lett. B 206, 364 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. M. Anselmino, A. Efremov, E. Leader, Phys. Rep. 261, 1 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. S.B. Treiman, R.W. Jackiw, B. Zumino, E. Witten, Current Algebra and Anomalies (World Scientific, Singapore, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  49. H.J. Lee, D.P. Min, B.Y. Park, M. Rho, V. Vento, Phys. Lett. B 491, 257 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. R. Dashen, E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar, Phys. Rev. D 49, 4713 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. J. Dai, R. Dashen, E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar, Phys. Rev. D 53, 273 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. U.-G. Meissner, S. Steininger, Nucl. Phys. B 499, 349 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 160, 57 (1979)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  54. R. Flores-Mendieta, E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar, Phys. Rev. D 58, 94028 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. K.A. Olive et al., Particle Data Group. Chin. Phys. C 38, 090001 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. M.J. Musolf, B.R. Holstein, Phys. Lett. B 242, 461 (1990)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. M.J. Musolf, T.W. Donnelly, J. Dubach, S.J. Pollock, S. Kowalski, E.J. Beise, Phys. Rep. 239, 1 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. R.D. McKeown, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 44, 313 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. J. Linde, H. Snellman, Z. Phys. C 64, 73 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  60. D.B. Leinweber, A.W. Thomas, Nucl. Phys. A 684, 35 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. D. Adams et al., Phys. Lett. B 357, 248 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. G.K. Mallot, Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on High-Energy Spin Physics, Amsterdam 1996, ed. by C.W. de Jager et al. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  63. M.J. Savage, J. Walden, Phys. Rev. D 55, 5376 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. E. Leader, A.V. Sidorov, D.B. Stamenov, Phys. Lett. B 488, 283 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  65. S.T. Hong, B.Y. Park, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 1, 131 (1992)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  66. M.A.B. Beg, B.W. Lee, A. Pais, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 514 (1964)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Science Education, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Soon-Tae Hong

Authors
  1. Soon-Tae Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hong, ST. (2015). Phenomenological Soliton. In: BRST Symmetry and de Rham Cohomology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9750-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation