Abstract
In this chapter we discuss the aerodynamics of swept wings in transonic flow. To demonstrate the merits of swept-back wings, simple sweep theory is presented. It is shown why a swept wing can experience local supersonic flow while still being in subcritical conditions, thereby postponing the onset of strong shock waves and drag divergence. It is also shown how the wave drag coefficient of a swept wing can be estimated based on the wave drag coefficient of an unswept wing. This method can be used to show the favorable effect of wing sweep on the wave drag coefficient over the transonic Mach number range. Apart from these advantages the chapter also presents the adverse effects of wing sweep. It is shown how the chordwise pressure distribution changes over the center section and tip section of a swept wing of finite span. It is explained what shape modifications (both in airfoil and in planform) can be applied to reduce the form drag of the center section of an aft-swept wing. In addition, viscous effects on swept wings are detailed. In particular, the transition mechanisms of attachment-line instabilities and crossflow vortices are explained. It is also shown why aft-swept wings are susceptible to tip stall and how a controlled form of stall can lead to a stable leading-edge vortex. Finally, the aeroelastic implications of (aft-)swept wings are detailed: a change in aerodynamic twist due to wing bending and a resulting reduction in control surface effectiveness. This chapter contains 7 examples and closes with 24 practice problems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The Oswald factor, \(e\), of a full airplane is not the same as the span efficiency factor. However, the two are related according to \(\frac{1}{e}=X\pi A +\frac{1}{\phi }\). \(X\) is the coefficient that relates the profile and parasite drag to \(C_L^2\). For more information on this relation, the reader is referred to Ref. [53].
- 2.
- 3.
A negative incidence angle of the wing is often termed “washout”. This wing would therefore have \(+3^\circ \) of washout at the tip.
- 4.
The dihedral angle is the upward angle of the wing measured with respect to the horizontal.
- 5.
For more information on Fourier transformations, the reader is referred to [61].
References
Abbott, I.H., von Doenhoff, A.E.: Theory of Wing Sections. Dover Publications, New York (1959)
Adler, A.: Effects of Combinations of Aspect Ratio and Sweepback at High Subsonic Mach Numbers. NACA RM L7C24, Langley Field (1947)
Aly, S., Ogot, M., Pelz, R., Siclari, M.: Jig-shape static aeroelastic wing design problem: a decoupled approach. J. Aircr. 39(6), 1061–1066 (2002). doi:10.2514/2.3035
Anderson, J.: Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, 5th edn. McGraw Hill, New York (2010)
Anderson, J.D.: Introduction to Flight. McGraw Hill, New York (2000)
Anon.: Transonic data memorandum; method for predicting the pressure distribution on swept wings with subsonic attached flow. ESDU TM 73012, London (1973)
Anon.: Airbus Industrie A 310. L’Aeronautique et L’Astronautique 6(91), 15 (1981)
Anon.: Fact Sheets: X29. www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden (2008)
Arnal, D., Casalis, G.: Laminar-turbulent transition prediction in three-dimensional flows. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 36, 173–191 (2000)
Bendiksen, O.O.: Transonic limit cycle flutter of high-aspect-ratio swept wings. J. Aircr. 45(5), 1522–1533 (2008). doi:10.2514/1.29547
Bendiksen, O.O.: Influence of shocks on transonic flutter of flexible wings. In: Proceedings of the 50th AIAA/ASME/AHS/ACS Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, AIAA 2009-2313, pp. 1–29. Palm Springs, CA, May 2009. doi:10.2514/6.2009-2313
Bergrun, N.R.: An Empirically Derived Basis for Calculating the Area, Rate, and Distribution of Water-Drop Impingement on Airfoils. NACA TR 1107 (1952)
Biao, Z., Zhide, Q., Chao, G.: Transonic flutter analysis of an airfoil with approximate boundary method. In: Grant, I. (ed.) Proceedings of the 26th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences. ICAS 2008-7.10.5 (2008)
Bisplinghof, R.L., Ashley, H., Halfman, R.: Aeroelasticity. Dover Publications, Mineola, New York (1996)
Boyne, W.J.: Boeing B-52: A Documentary History. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington (1981)
Broadbent, E.G., Mansfield, O.: Aileron Reversal and Wing Divergence of Swept Wings, ARC Technical Report R&M 2817, London (1954)
Chambers, J.R.: Concept to Reality: Contributions of the NASA Langley Research Center to U.S. Civil Aircraft of the 1990s. SP 2003-4529, NASA (2003)
Collar, A.R.: The first fifty years of aeroelasticity. Aerospace 5(2), 12–20 (1978)
Deyhle, H., Bippes, H.: Disturbance growth in an unstable three-dimensional boundary layer and its dependence on environmental conditions. J. Fluid Mech. 316(1), 73–113 (1996). doi:10.1017/S0022112096000456
Dowell, E.H., Hall, K.C., Thomas, J.P., Kielb, R.E., Spiker, M.A., Li, A., Charles, M., Denegri, J.: Reduced order models in unsteady aerodynamic models, aeroelasticity and molecular dynamics. In: Grant, I. (ed.) Proceedings of the 26th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences. ICAS 2008-0.1 (2008)
Drela, M., Giles, M.B.: Viscous-inviscid analysis of transonic and low Reynolds number airfoils. AIAA J. 25(10), 1347–1355 (1987). doi:10.2514/3.9789
Dusto, A.R.: An analytical method for predicting the stability and control characteristics of large elastic airplanes at subsonic and supersonic speeds, part I—analysis. In: Aeroelastic Effects from a Flight Mechanics Standpoint, vol. 46. AGARD (1970)
Dykins, D.H., Jupp, J.A., McRae, D.M.: Esso energy award lecture, 1987. Application of aerodynamic research and development to civil aircraft wing design. Proc. R. Soc. Ser. A. Math. Phys. Sci. 416(1850), 43–62 (1988)
Garrick, I.E., Rubinov, S.I.: Flutter and Oscillating Air-Force Calculations for an Airfoil in a Two-Dimensional Supersonic Flow. NACA Report No. 846, Langley Research Center, Hampton Virginia (1946)
Gere, J.M., Timoshenko, S.P.: Mechanics of Materials, 4th edn. Stanley Thornes Ltd, Cheltenham (1972)
Giles, M.B., Drela, M.: Two-dimensional transonic aerodynamic design method. AIAA J. 25(9), 1199–1206 (1987). doi:10.2514/3.9768
Görtler, H.: Über eine dreidimensionale Instabilität laminarer Grenzschichten an konkaven Wänden. Ges. d. Wiss. Göttingen, Nachr. a. d. Math. 2(1) (1940)
Hadcock, R.: X-29 composite wing. In: Presented at the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Symposium on the Evaluation of Aircraft/Aerospace Structures and Materials. Air Force Museum, Dayton, Ohio (1985)
Hall, M.G.: Transonic flows. In: Proceedings of IMA Conference on Numerical Methods and Problems in Aeronautical Fluid Mechanics. Academic Press (1975)
Harper, C.W., Maki, R.L.: A Review of the Stall Characteristics of Swept Wings. NACA TN D-2373 (1964)
Hoak, D.E., Anderson, R., Goss, C.R.: USAF Stability and Control Datcom. Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio (1978)
Hunton, L.W.: A study of the application of airfoil section data to the estimation of the high-subsonic-speed characteristics of swept wings. NACA-RM-A55C23 (1955)
Jenkinson, L.R., Simpkin, P., Rhodes, D.: Civil Jet Aircraft Design. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA (1999)
Jenks, M.: The Boeing 787 dreamliner programme. In: Grant, I. (ed.) Proceedings of the 26th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences. ICAS 2008-0.8 (2008)
Johnson, R.: Minimum Drag Coefficient of Wings. RAND RM-604, Santa Monica (1951)
Kehoe, M.W., Freudinger, L.C.: Aircraft Ground Vibration Testing at the NASA Dryden Flight Research Facility. Technical Memorandum 104275, NASA (1993)
Kuechemann, D.: The distribution of lift over the surface of swept wings. Aeronaut. Q. 4, 261–278 (1953)
Kuechemann, D.: The Aerodynamic Design of Aircraft. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1978)
Kuechemann, D., Weber, J.: The Subsonic Flow Past Swept Wings at Zero Lift Without and With Body. Aeronautical Research Council Reports and Memoranda 2908, London (1956)
Kuzmina, S., Karas, O., Ishmuratov, F., Zichenkov, M., Chedrik, V.: Analysis of static and dynamic aeroelastic characteristics of airplane in transonic flow. In: Grant, I. (ed.) Proceedings of ICAS 2012, pp. 1–10. Brisbane, Australia (2012)
Livne, E.: Future of airplane aeroelasticity. J. Aircr. 40(6), 1066–1092 (2003). doi:10.2514/2.7218
Meier, G.E.A.: Unsteady phenomena. In: Zierep, J., Oertel, H. (eds.) Symposium Transsonicum III, IUTAM, pp. 441–464. Springer, Berlin (1988)
Nelson, H.C., Berman, J.H.: Calculations on the Forces and Moments for an Oscillating Wing-Aileron combination in Two-Dimensional Potential Flow at Sonic Speed. NACA TN 2590. Langley Research Center, Hampton (1952)
Newberry, C.F.: Consideration of stability augmentation systems for large elastic aircraft. In: Aeroelastic Effects from a Flight Mechanics Standpoint, vol. 46. AGARD (1970)
Obert, E.: Aerodynamic Design and Aircraft Operation, Part III. Aerodynamics of Combat Aircraft. Delft University of Technology, Delft (1996)
Obert, E.: Aerodynamic Design of Transport Aircraft. IOS Press, Delft (2009)
Pfenniger, W.: Laminar flow control - laminarization. In: Special Course on Concepts for Drag Reduction, AGARD R-654, pp. 3.1–3.75 (1977)
Poll, D.I.A.: On the generation and subsequent development of spiral vortex flow over a swept-back wing. In: AGARD-CP-342, pp. 6.1–6.14 (1983)
Poll, D.I.A.: Some observations of the transition process on the windward face of a long yawed cylinder. J. Fluid Mech. 150, 329–356 (1985). doi:10.1017/S0022112085000155
Reed, H., Saric, W.: Stability of three-dimensional boundary layers. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 21, 235–284 (1989)
Ringleb, F.: Some Aerodynamic Relations for an Airfoil in Oblique Flow. NACA TM 1158 (1947)
Roskam, J.: Airplane Design, Part 6: Preliminary Calculation of Aerodynamic, Thrust and Power Characteristics. DARcorporation, Lawrence, KS (2006)
Ruijgrok, G.J.J.: Elements of Airplane Performance. Delft University Press, Delft, the Netherlands (1989)
Saric, W., Reed, H.: Crossflow instabilities—theory & technology. In: 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit. AIAA 2003-0771, Reno, NV (2003)
Saric, W.S.: Görtler vortices. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 26, 379–409 (1994)
Saric, W.S., Reed, H.L., White, E.B.: Stability and transition of three-dimensional boundary layers. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 35(1), 413–440 (2003). doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.35.101101.161045
Schlichting, H., Truckenbrot, E.: Aerodynamik des Flugzeuges. Springer, Heidelberg (1960)
Schoernack, W., Hässler, E.: Theoretical investigation of aeroelastic influences on the lift distribution and the aerodynamic derivatives of swept wings at symmetric and antisymmetric stationary flight conditions. In: Aeroelastic Effects from a Flight Mechanics Standpoint, vol. 46. AGARD (1970)
Shevell, R.S., Kroo, I.: Compressibility drag: 3D effects and sweep. In: Aircraft Design: Synthesis and Analysis. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University, CA (1992)
Stack, J., Lindsey, W.: Characteristics of Low Aspect Ratio Wings at Supercritical Mach Numbers. NACA TN 1665. Langley Air Force Base (1948)
Strauss, W.A.: Partial Differential Equations, An Introduction. Wiley, Chichester, UK (1992)
Sturdza, P.: An Aerodynamic Design Method for Supersonic Natural Laminar Flow Aircraft. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University (2003)
Tempelmann, D.: Stability and Receptivity of Three-Dimensional Boundary Layers. Dissertation, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden (2009)
Tijdeman, H.: Investigations of the Transonic Flow Around Oscillating Airfoils. Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands (1977)
Timmons, L.M.: Improving Business Jet Performance: The Mark Five Sabreliner. SAE Paper 790582 (1979)
Torenbeek, E.: Synthesis of Subsonic Airplane Design. Delft University Press, Delft (1976)
Van der Wees, A.: A Nonlinear Multigrid Method for Three-Dimensional Transonic Potential Flow. Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands (1988)
Van Muijden, J., Broekhuizen, A.J., Van der Wees, A.J., Van der Vooren, J.: Flow analysis and drag prediction for transonic transport wing/body configurations using a viscous-inviscid interaction type method. In: Proceedings of the 19th ICAS Congress. Anaheim, California (1994)
Weaver, J.H.: A method of wind tunnel testing through the transonic range. J. Aeronaut. Sci. 15(1) (1948)
Weber, J.: The Calculation of the Pressure Distribution over the Surface of Two-Dimensional and Swept Wings with Symmetrical Aerofoil Sections. Aeronautical Research Council Reports and Memoranda No. 2918 (1953)
Weber, J., Kuechemann, D., Brebner, G.: 2882 Low-Speed Tests on 45-deg Swept-Back Wings, Aeronautical Research Council Reports and Memoranda No. 2882 (1958)
Weisshaar, T.A.: Aircraft Aeroelastic Design and Analysis. Purdue University, West Lafayette (2009)
Wright, J., Cooper, J.: Introduction to Aeroelasticity and Loads. Wiley, Chichester, UK (2007)
Yates, E.C.: 765 AGARD Standard Aeroelastic Configurations for Dynamic Response I- Wing 445.6, AGARD Report 765 (1985)
Young, A.D., Booth, T.B.: The Profile Drag of Yawed Wings of Inifinite Span, Cranfield College of Aeronautics Report No. 38 (1950)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vos, R., Farokhi, S. (2015). Aerodynamics of Swept Wings. In: Introduction to Transonic Aerodynamics. Fluid Mechanics and Its Applications, vol 110. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9747-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9747-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9746-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9747-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)