Abstract
In this chapter we present the aerodynamics about two-dimensional lift-producing wing sections (airfoils) at low transonic conditions. It is shown how various design parameters influence the velocity distribution and the shock formation over an airfoil. The development of supercritical airfoils is explained from a historic perspective. First the advantages of natural laminar flow sections are explained for subsonic conditions prior to the formation local supersonic flow. It is shown how the supercritical airfoil distinguishes itself in terms pressure distribution and drag behavior once transonic conditions are encountered. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that transonic flow limitations can play a major role in the maximum lift coefficient of (multi-element) airfoils at Mach numbers as low as 0.25. A theoretical limit of the local Mach number is derived that effectively limits the amount of suction that can be generated over the upper surface of an airfoil. Also the concept of shock-boundary layer interaction is further expanded in this chapter. It is shown how periodic separation at the shock foot and shock oscillation can interact to produce a high-frequency pressure fluctuation known as transonic buffet. This chapter contains 4 examples and 16 practice problems at the end of the chapter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The program that is used for this evaluation is Xfoil version 6.94. XFOIL carries out a vortex-panel analysis of subsonic isolated airfoils and has the option to include a boundary layer. More information can be found on http://web.mit.edu/drela/Public/web/xfoil/.
- 2.
- 3.
This prediction is carried out by Xfoil 6.94 using an \(e^N\) method for transition prediction with \(N_{\text {crit}}=10\).
- 4.
One drag count equals a drag coefficient variation of 0.0001.
- 5.
This calculation procedure for obtaining the pressure drag is often called a “near-field analysis”.
- 6.
The prediction was made by assuming the flow to be inviscid (Euler solution).
- 7.
A monotonic curvature means that the Mach wave is either entirely convex or entirely concave. If Mach wave curvature is not monotonic it means an inflection point is present somewhere on the Mach wave.
- 8.
The data presented in this problem is based on an experiment described in [43]. In this experiment the shock movement was introduced trough a periodic change in angle of attack around \(\alpha =3.0\) of a NLR 7301 airfoil at \(M=0.70\).
References
Abbott, I.H., von Doenhoff, A.E.: Theory of Wing Sections. Dover Publications, New York (1959)
Anderson, J.: Modern Compressible Flow with Historic Perspective, 3rd edn. McGraw Hill, New York (2003)
Anderson, J.: Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, 5th edn. McGraw Hill, New York (2010)
Anon.: The supercritical airfoil. NASA TF-2004-13 DFRC (2004)
Axelson, J.A.: Estimation of transonic aircraft aerodynamics to high angles of attack. AIAA paper 75-996, Los Angeles (1975)
van den Berg, B.: Reynolds number and Mach number effects on the maximum lift and the stalling characteristics of wings at low speed. NLR TR 69025 U, Amsterdam (1969)
Blackerby, W., Johnson, J.: Application of advanced technologies to improve C-141 cruise performance. In: 17th Aerospace Sciences Meeting. AIAA 79-0066, New Orleans (1979)
Boerstoel, J.W., Uijlenhoet, R.: Lifting aerofoils with supercritical shockless flow. In: Proceedings of ICAS (1970)
Carpentieri, G.: An adjoint-based shape-optimization method for aerodynamic design. Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology (2009)
Drela, M., Giles, M.B.: Viscous-inviscid analysis of transonic and low Reynolds number airfoils. AIAA J. 25(10), 1347–1355 (1987). doi:10.2514/3.9789
Emmons, H.W.: The theoretical flow of a frictionless, adiabatic, perfect gas inside of a two-dimensional hyperbolic nozzle. NACA TN 1003 (1946)
Fischenberg, D., Jategaonkar, R.V.: Identification of aircraft stall behavior from flight test data. In: RTO SCI Symposium on “System Identification for Integrated Aircraft Development and Flight Testing”. RTO MP-11, Madrid, Spain (1998)
Flaig, A., Hilbig, R.: High-lift design for large civil aircraft. In: AGARD Conference Proceedings CP-515, pp. 31.1–31.12. AGARD (1993)
Gibb, J.: The cause and cure of periodic flows at transonic speeds. In: Proceedings of ICAS, pp. 1522–1530. ICAS-88-3.10.1 (1988)
Giles, M.B., Drela, M.: Two-dimensional transonic aerodynamic design method. AIAA J. 25(9), 1199–1206 (1987). doi:10.2514/3.9768
Göthert, B.: Widerstandsanstieg bei Profilen im Bereich hoher Unterschallgeschwindigkeiten, Deutche Versuchsanstalt fur Luftfahrt, E.V. Untersuchungen und Mitteilungen Nr. 1167 (1944)
Harris, C.D.: NASA supercritical airfoils; a matrix of family related airfoils. NASA TP2969, Langley (1990)
Hemenover, A.D.: Tests of the NACA 64-010 and 64A010 airfoil sections at high subsonic Mach numbers. NACA-RM-A9E31. Moffett Field (1949)
Hoak, D.E., Anderson, R., Goss, C.R.: USAF Stability and Control Datcom. Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio (1978)
Iovnovich, M., Raveh, D.E.: Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes study of the shock-buffet instability mechanism. AIAA J. 50(4), 880–890 (2012). doi:10.2514/1.J051329
Jameson, A., Ou, K.: 50 years of transonic aircraft design. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 47(5), 308–318 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2011.01.001
Johnson, D.A., Spaid, F.W.: Supercritical airfoil boundary-layer and near-wake measurements. J. Aircr. 20(4), 298–305 (1983)
Kacprznski, J., Ohman, L.H., Garabedian, P.R., Korn, D.G.: Analysis of the Flow Past a Shockless Lifting Airfoil in Design and Off-Design Conditions. NRCC LR-554, Ottawa (1971)
Laitone, E.: Local supersonic region on a body moving at subsonic speeds. In: Oswatitish, K. (ed.) Symposium Transsonicum, vol. I, pp. 57–70. Springer, Heidelberg (1964)
LeBalleur, J.C., Girodroux-Lavigne, P.: Viscous-inviscid strategy and computation of transonic buffet. In: Zierep, J., Oertel, H. (eds.) Symposium Transsonicum III. IUTAM, pp. 49–63. Springer, Berlin (1988)
Lee, B.: Self-sustained shock oscillations on airfoils at transonic speeds. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 37(2), 147–196 (2001). doi:10.1016/S0376-0421(01)00003-3
Lin, C.C., Rubinov, S.I.: On the flow behind curved shocks. J. Math. Phys. 27(2), 105–129 (1948)
Maki, R., Hunton, L.: Investigation at subsonic speeds of several modifications to the leading-edge region of the NACA 64A010 airfoil section designed to increase maximum lift. NACA TN 3871. Moffett Field (1956)
Mayer, J.P.: A limit pressure coefficient and an estimation of limit forces on airfoils at supersonic speeds. NACA RM L8F23, Langley Field (1948)
McCullough, G.B., Gault, D.E.: Examples of three representative types of airfoil-section stall at low speed. NACA TN 2502. Moffett Field (1951)
McGhee, R., Beasley, W.: Low-speed aerodynamic characteristics of a 17%-thick-airfoil section for general aviation applications. NASA TN-D-7428. Hampton (1973)
Nieuwland, G.Y., Spee, B.M.: Transonic airfoils: recent developments in theory, experiment, and design. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 5, 119–150 (1973)
Obert, E.: Aerodynamic Design of Transport Aircraft. IOS Press, Delft (2009)
Pearcey, H.H.: Some Effects of Shock-induced Separation of Turbulent Boundary Layers in Transonic Flow Past Aerofoils. National Physics Laboratory R&M 3108 (1955)
Pearcey, H.H.: The aerodynamic design of section shapes for swept wings. Adv. Aeronaut. Sci. 3, 277–322 (1963)
Ringleb, F.: Exakte Loesungen der Differntialgleichungen einer adiabatischen Gasstroemung. Zeitschrift fur angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik 20(4), 185–198 (1940)
Roskam, J.: Airplane Design, Part 6: Preliminary Calculation of Aerodynamic, Thrust and Power Characteristics. DARcorp, Lawrence (2006)
Smith, A.M.O.: High-lift aerodynamics. J. Aircr. 12(6), 501–530 (1975)
Sobieczky, H., Seebass, A.R.: Supercritical airfoil and wing design. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 16, 337–363 (1984)
Spreiter, J.R., Steffen, P.J.: Effect of Mach and Reynolds numbers on maximum lift coefficient. NACA TN 1044 (1946)
Standish, K.J., van Dam, C.P.: Aerodynamic analysis of blunt trailing edge airfoils. J. Sol. Energy Eng. 125(4), 479 (2003). doi:10.1115/1.1629103
Stanewsky, E., Basler, D.: Mechanism and Reynolds Number Dependence of Shock-Induced Buffet on Transonic Airfoils. In: Zierep, J., Oertel, H. (eds.) Symposium Transsonicum III. IUTAM. Springer, Berlin (1988)
Tijdeman, H., Seebass, A.R.: Transonic flow past oscillating airfoils. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 12, 181–222 (1980)
Torenbeek, E.: Elements of aerodynamic wing design. Advanced Aircraft Design, Chap. 10. Wiley, Chichester (2013)
Viken, J., Wagner, R.D.: Design limits of compressible NLF airfoils. In: 29th Aerospace Sciences Meeting. AIAA-91-0067, Reno (1991). doi:10.2514/6.1991-67
Vogelaar, H.: Wind-tunnel investigation on the two-dimensional F-29 model 12-1 airfoil section with various high lift devices at various Mach and Reynolds numbers. NLR TR 83059C (1983)
Whitcomb, R.T., Clark, L.R.: An Airfoil Shape for Efficient Flight at Supercritical Mach Numbers. NASA TM X-1109. Langley (1965)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vos, R., Farokhi, S. (2015). Airfoil Aerodynamics. In: Introduction to Transonic Aerodynamics. Fluid Mechanics and Its Applications, vol 110. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9747-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9747-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9746-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9747-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)