Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Life Cycle Impact Assessment pp 1–16Cite as

Introducing Life Cycle Impact Assessment

  • Chapter

Abstract

This chapter serves as an introduction to the presentation of the many aspects of life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) in this volume of the book series ‘LCA Compendium’. It starts with a brief historical overview of the development of life cycle impact assessment driven by numerous national LCIA methodology projects and presents the international scientific discussions and methodological consensus attempts in consecutive working groups under the auspices of the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) as well as the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, and the (almost) parallel standardisation activities under the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO). A brief introduction is given on the purpose and structure of LCIA. As a common background for the 11 chapters dealing with the characterisation modelling of the most common impact categories, the chapter concludes with an introduction of the general principles and features of characterisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahbe S, Braunschweig A, Müller-Wenk R (1990) Methodik für Ökobilanzen auf der Basis ökologischer Optimierung, vol 133. Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft (BUWAL), Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Bare JC, Hofstetter P, Pennington DW, Udo de Haes HA (2000) Life cycle impact assessment midpoints vs. endpoints: the sacrifices and the benefits. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5(5):319–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bare JC, Norris GA, Pennington DW, McKone TE (2003) The tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts. J Ind Ecol 6(3–4):49–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesamt für Umweltschutz (BUS) (1984) Ökobilanzen von Packstoffen, Schriftenreihe Umweltschutz Nr. 24. Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • de Haes HA U, Finnveden G, Goedkoop M, Hauschild MZ, Hertwich E, Hofstetter P, Klöpffer W, Krewitt W, Lindeijer E, Jolliet O, Mueller-Wenk R, Olsen S, Pennington D, Potting J, Steen B (eds) (2002) Life cycle impact assessment: striving towards best practice. SETAC Press, Pensacola. ISBN 1-880611-54-6

    Google Scholar 

  • De Schryver A, van Zelm R, Humbert S, Pfister S, McKone TE, Huijbregts MAJ (2011) Value choices in life cycle impact assessment of stressors causing human health damage. J Ind Ecol 15(5):796–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Schryver A, Humbert S, Huijbregts MAJ (2013) The influence of value choices in life cycle impact assessment of stressors causing human health damage. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:698–706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer LC, Niemann AL, Hauschild MZ (2003) Comparison of three different LCIA methods: EDIP97, CML2001 and eco-indicator 99. Does it matter which one you choose? Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(4):191–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Franke M (1984) Umweltauswirkungen durch Getränkeverpackungen – Systematik zur Ermittlung der Umweltauswirkungen von komplexen Prozessen am Beispiel von Einweg-und Mehrweg-Getränkebehältern. TechnischeUniversität Berlin, Institut für Technischen Umweltschutz, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedkoop MJ, Spriensma R (2000) Eco-indicator 99, a damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment, methodology report (update April 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts MAJ, De Schryver A, Struijs J, Van Zelm R (2009) ReCiPe 2008 A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level. Report I: characterisation, 1st edn. 6 Jan 2009. http://www.lcia-recipe.net

  • Guinée JB (ed), Gorrée M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, de Koning A van Oers L, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Suh S, Udo de Haes HA, de Bruijn JA, van Duin R and Huijbregts MAJ (2002) Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment: operational guide to the ISO standards. Eco-efficiency in industry and science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (Hardbound, ISBN 1-4020-0228-9; Paperback, ISBN 1-4020-0557-1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauschild MZ, Pennington D (2002) Indicators for ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Chapter 6. In: de Haes HA U, Finnveden G, Goedkoop M, Hauschild MZ, Hertwich E, Hofstetter P, Klöpffer W, Krewitt W, Lindeijer E, Jolliet O, Mueller-Wenk R, Olsen S, Pennington D, Potting J, Steen B (eds) Life cycle impact assessment: striving towards best practice. SETAC Press, Pensacola. ISBN 1-880611-54-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauschild M, Potting J (2005) Spatial differentiation in life cycle impact assessment – the EDIP2003 methodology. Environmental News No. 80. The Danish Ministry of the Environment, Environmental Protection Agency, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauschild MZ, Huijbregts M, Jolliet O, MacLeod M, Margni M, van de Meent D, Rosenbaum RK, McKone T (2008) Building a model based on scientific consensus for life cycle impact assessment of chemicals: the search for harmony and parsimony. Environ Sci Technol 42(19):7032–7037

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hauschild MZ, Goedkoop M, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, Jolliet O, Margni M, De Schryver A, Humbert S, Laurent A, Sala S, Pant R (2013) Identifying best existing practice for characterization modelling in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(3):683–697

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heijungs R, Guinée J, Huppes G, Lankreijer RM, Udo de Haes HA, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Ansems AMM, Eggels PG, van Duin R, Goede HP (1992) Environmental life cycle assessment of products: guide and backgrounds, october 1992. Centre of Environmental Science, Leiden University, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann IT, Jørgensen A, Bruun S, Hauschild MZ (2013) Potential for optimized production and use of rapeseed biodiesel. Based on a comprehensive real-time LCA case study in Denmark with multiple pathways. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(2):418–430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hertwich E, Hammitt JK, Pease W (2000) A theoretical foundation for life-cycle assessment: recognizing the role of values in environmental decision making. J Ind Ecol 4:13–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstetter P (ed) (1998) Perspectives in life cycle impact assessment. A structured approach to combine models of the technosphere, ecosphere and valuesphere. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstetter P, Baumgartner T, Scholz RW (2000) Modeling the valuesphere and the ecosphere: integrating the decision makers’ perspectives into life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5:161–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huijbregts MAJ (1998) Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA. Part I: a general framework for the analysis of uncertainty and variability in life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3:273–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huijbregts MAJ, Helweg S, Hertwich E (2011) Do we need a paradigm shift in life cycle impact assessment? Environ Sci Technol 45:3833–3834

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt RG, Franklin WE, Welch RO, Cross JA, Woodall AE (1974) Resource and environmental profile analysis of nine beverage container alternatives, United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Office of Solid Waste Management Programs, EPA/530/SW-91c, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Huppes G, Curran MA (2012) Environmental life cycle assessment: background and perspective. In: Curran MA (ed) (2012) Life cycle assessment handbook – A guide for environmentally sustainable products. Scrivener Publishing, Salem, MA, and Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 14040 (1997) Environmental management – life cycle assessment – principles and framework. International Standards Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management – life cycle assessment – principles and framework. International Standards Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 14041 (1998) Environmental management – life cycle assessment – goal and scope definition and inventory analysis. International Standards Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 14042 (2000) Environmental management – life cycle assessment – life cycle impact assessment. International Standards Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 14043 (2000) Environmental management – life cycle assessment – life cycle interpretation. International Standards Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 14044 (2006) Environmental management – life cycle assessment − requirements and guidelines. International Standards Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Itsubo N, Sakagami M, Washida T, Kokubu K, Inaba A (2004) Weighting across safeguard subjects for LCIA through the application of conjoint analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9:196–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliet O, Margni M, Charles R, Humbert S, Payet J, Rebitzer G, Rosenbaum R (2003) IMPACT 2002+: a new life cycle impact assessment methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8:324–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliet O, Frischknecht R, Bare J, Boulay A-M, Bulle C, Fantke P, Gheewala S, Hauschild M, Itsubo N, Margni M, McKone TE, Mila I, Canals L, Posthuma L, Prado-Lopez V, Ridoutt B, Sonnemann G, Rosenbaum RK, Seager T, Struijs J, Van Zelm R, Vigon B, Weisbrod A (2014) Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: findings of the scoping phase. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(4):962–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klöpffer W (2006) The role of SETAC in the development of LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(Special Issue 1):116–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundholm MP, Sundström G (1985) Resource and environmental impact of Tetra Brik carton and refillable and non-refillable glass bottles, Tetra Brik aseptic environmental profile. AB Tetra Pak, Malmö

    Google Scholar 

  • Margni M, Gloria T, Bare J, Seppälä J, Steen B, Struijs J, Toffoletto L, Jolliet O (2007) Guidance on how to move from current practice to recommended practice in life cycle impact assessment: UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative

    Google Scholar 

  • Pant R, Van Hoof G, Schowanek D, Feijtel TCJ, de Koning A, Hauschild M, Pennington DW, Olsen SI, Rosenbaum R (2004) Comparison between three different LCIA methods for aquatic ecotoxicity and a product environmental risk assessment – insights from a detergent case study within OMNIITOX. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9:295–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Potting J, Hauschild MZ (1997) Predicted environmental impact and expected occurrence of actual environmental impact. Part 2: spatial differentiation in life-cycle assessment via the site-dependent characterisation of environmental impact from emissions. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2(4):209–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potting J, Hauschild M (2006) Spatial differentiation in life cycle impact assessment – a decade of method development to increase the environmental realism of LCIA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(Special Issue 1):11–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum RK, Bachmann TM, Gold LS, Huijbregts MAJ, Jolliet O, Juraske R, Köhler A, Larsen HF, MacLeod M, Margni M, McKone TE, Payet J, Schuhmacher M, van de Meent D, Hauschild MZ (2008) USEtox – the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterization factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:532–546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spadaro JV, Rabl A (2002) Air pollution damage estimates: the cost per kilogram of pollutant. Int J Risk Assess Manage 3(1):75–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steen B (1999a) A systematic approach to environmental priority strategies in product development (EPS). Version 2000-general system characteristics; CPM report 1999:4, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen B (1999b) A systematic approach to environmental priority strategies in product development (EPS). Version 2000-Models and data of the default method; CPM report 1999:5, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffoletto L, Bulle C, Godin J, Reid C, Deschênes L (2007) LUCAS – a new LCIA method used for a Canadian-specific context. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:93–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Udo de Haes HA, Jolliet O, Finnveden G, Hauschild M, Krewitt W, Müller-Wenk R (1999a) Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment (1). Int J Life Cycle Assess 4:66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udo de Haes HA, Jolliet O, Finnveden G, Hauschild M, Krewitt W, Müller-Wenk R (1999b) Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment (2). Int J Life Cycle Assess 4:167–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Zelm R, Huijbregts MAJ (2013) Quantifying the trade-off between parameter and model structure uncertainty in life cycle impact assessment. Environ Sci Technol 47:9274–9280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel H, Hauschild MZ and Alting L (1997) Environmental assessment of products, vol 1, Methodology, tools and case studies in product development, 544 p. Chapman & Hall, London, and Kluwer Academic Publishers, Hingham. ISBN 0 412 80800 5

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division for Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Produktionstorvet, Building 424, 2800, Lyngby, Denmark

    Michael Z. Hauschild

  2. Department of Environmental Science, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Mark A. J. Huijbregts

Authors
  1. Michael Z. Hauschild
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark A. J. Huijbregts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Z. Hauschild .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Division for Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Lyngby, Denmark

    Michael Z. Hauschild

  2. Department of Environmental Science, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Mark A.J. Huijbregts

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hauschild, M.Z., Huijbregts, M.A.J. (2015). Introducing Life Cycle Impact Assessment. In: Hauschild, M., Huijbregts, M. (eds) Life Cycle Impact Assessment. LCA Compendium – The Complete World of Life Cycle Assessment. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9744-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation