Skip to main content

The Subjective World of the Umwelt

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Jakob von Uexküll

Part of the book series: Biosemiotics ((BSEM,volume 9))

  • 1374 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter introduces the most important concept of Uexküll’s thought: the idea of the environment (Umwelt) as subjective world. Through the analysis of the first edition of Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere and of the article Die Umwelt, the chapter shows how (according to Uexküll) each animal species constitutes around itself a different subjective world, which (with an increasing order of complexity) can be composed of isolated stimuli, combinations and synthesis of stimuli, unitary objects, the functions of the objects, etcetera. The chapter also outlines two central themes of Uexküll’s theory, which will be examined later: the presence, in each Umwelt, of a felt and an unfelt part, and the cognitive relation between the Umwelt and the external reality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Which would be well-understood by Plessner, who in one citation from the second edition of Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere would make a significant contribution in brackets: “Functions simply make a chain that goes through the inner world (i.e. the body!)” (Plessner 1975: 249; Plessner quotes from von Uexküll 1921: 177).

  2. 2.

    Erich Wasmann (1859–1931). Austrian entomologist, his field of study consisted in the behavior of ants and termites; in Über die Stellung der vergleichenden Physiologie zur Hypothese der Tierseele Uexküll directly objects to one of Wasmann’s contributions (von Uexküll 1900; Wasmann 1900).

  3. 3.

    Georges John Romanes (1848–1894). Canadian physiologist and biologist close to Darwin, in his 1882 book Animal Intelligence – which, despite a certain lack of scientific rigor, was widely circulating and influenced later ethology – attempted to demonstrate the presence of intelligence in a large number of animal behaviors (Romanes 1882).

  4. 4.

    Uexküll does not go so far as to affirm that there is no relation between the physiological processes (those cerebral most importantly) and the emergence of quality and psychic phenomena; a relation exists, “even if it is not of a causal nature” (von Uexküll 1900: 500). On Uexküll’s stance on animal psychology, cf. Bassanese 2004: 60.

  5. 5.

    So writes Uexküll: “The harder the struggle for survival, the more varied the tasks assigned to the motor mechanism” (von Uexküll 1905: 7); “obviously, the organisms equipped with such receptors cannot not benefit greatly from them in the struggle for survival” (von Uexküll 1905: 7).

  6. 6.

    In Die Umwelt Uexküll draws an explicit methodological indication: “We have absolutely no right to affirm that the world of our sense organs is the animals’ world. On the contrary, every animal lives in a world specific to it, different from that of its neighbours. We must, therefore, speak of countless “environments”, amongst which the world surrounding us is only an isolated case, which should not be considered normative” (von Uexküll 1910a: 639; italics by Uexküll).

  7. 7.

    On the terminological and conceptual passage from milieu to Umwelt in philosophical and scientific terminology, as well as Uexküll’s role in this, see Canguilhem 2008: 98–121.

  8. 8.

    This formula, which is so pregnant in its conciseness, is taken up again by Uexküll in later works. He does so anytime it is necessary to underline the difference between the organisation of inferior and superior animals. See for example A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans: “Of all the various things located in its surroundings, its environment only ever admits the same perceptive mark through which the paramecium, when stimulated, is caused to flee. The same perceptive mark, hindrance, always brings forth the same movement of flight” (von Uexküll 2010: 73).

  9. 9.

    Elise Hanel was a German zoologist active in the early twentieth century. She studied the behavior of the earthworm in relation to Darwin’s work. She also studied the reproductive process of the freshwater polyp.

  10. 10.

    Karl Ritter von Frisch (1886–1982). Austrian ethologist who in 1973 received the Nobel prize for medicine with Konrad Lorenz and Nikolaus Tinbergen. The passage cited by Uexküll comes from the 1927 work The Dancing Bees (von Frisch 1954); the quote from Frisch testifies to the attention that Uexküll paid to nascent ethology.

  11. 11.

    As it is pertinent we shall take an expression used by Merleau-Ponty, who in his presentation on Uexküll’s contributions to contemporary natural philosophy distinguishes between environment “for the behavior of an animal” and environment “for its consciousness” (Merleau-Ponty 2003: 166); Merleau-Ponty demonstrates how for Uexküll the species-specific environment was the integration of these two elements, and how also in the first type of environment the characteristic of meaningfulness is phenomenologically present.

  12. 12.

    The reference to the hand of man puts Uexküll in a long line of thought that – from Aristotle to Gehlen – sees manuality as one of the characteristic traits of the human being.

  13. 13.

    Karl Camillo Schneider (1867–1943). Austrian zoologist, worked in the zoological stations of Naples and Rovinj. Professor of zoology at the University of Vienna from 1905 to 1932, where he initially dedicated himself to histological and anatomical research, then later to animal psychology, anthropology and parapsychology.

  14. 14.

    In Chap. 7 we shall see the reception of this feature of this Uexküllian concept on the part of authors such as Cassirer and Langer (cf. below, 188–197).

  15. 15.

    On the concept of impact in mechanical theories of environment and behavior and its Cartesian origin see G. Canguilhem 2008: 186.

  16. 16.

    Emanuel Rádl (1873–1942). Czechoslovakian biologist and philosopher, he was interested in the central nervous system and the phenomenon of animal phototropism; his interests in theoretical biology and the philosophy of nature focused on Goehte, Leibniz and Stahl. In the 1910s he obtained a certain notoriety thanks to his publication Geschichte der biologischen Theorien seit dem Ende der siebzehnten Jahrhunderts (Rádl 1905–1909). After World War I he became a university professor and his interests shifted towards political philosophy, specifically the relationship between religion and politics.

References

  • Bassanese, M. (2004). Heidegger e Von Uexküll. Trento: Verifiche.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canguilhem, G. (2008). Knowledge of Life. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1999). Critique of pure reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty M (2003) Nature. Course Notes from the Collège de France. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plessner, H. (1975). Die Stufen des Organischen und der Mensch. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rádl, E. (1905–1909). Geschichte der biologischen Theorien seit dem Ende der siebzehnten Jahrhunderts, 2 vols. Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanes, G. J. (1882). Animal intelligence. London: Kegan Paul Trench & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Frisch, K. (1954). The dancing bees. An account of the life and senses of the honey bee. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, J. (1900). Über die Stellung der vergleichenden Physiologie zur Hypothese von der Tierseele. Biologisches Centralblatt, 20(15), 497–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, J. (1902). Psychologie und Biologie in ihrer Stellung zur Tierseele. Ergebnisse der Physiologie, 1(2), 212–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, J. (1905). Leitfaden in das Studium der experimentellen Biologie der Wassertiere. Wiesbaden: Bergmann.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, J. (1909). Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, J. (1910a). Die Umwelt. Die neue Rundschau, 21, 638–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, J. (1910b). Mendelismus. Die neue Rundschau, 21, 1589–1596.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, J. (1910c). Die neuen Ziele der Biologie. Baltische Monatsschrift, 69(4), 225–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, J. (1912). Die Merkwelten der Tiere. Deutsche Revue, 37, 349–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, J. (1913). Bausteine zu einer biologischen Weltanschauung. Bruckmann, München: Gesammelte Aufsätze.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, J. (1921). Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. 2. vermehrte und verbesserte Auflage. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, J. (2010). A foray into the worlds of animals and humans, with: A theory of meaning. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasmann, E. (1900). Einige Bemerkungen zur vergleichenden Psychologie und Sinnesphysiologie. Biologisches Centralblatt, 20(10), 342–350.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brentari, C. (2015). The Subjective World of the Umwelt. In: Jakob von Uexküll. Biosemiotics, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9688-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics