Abstract
Mandatory reporting requires certain professionals, who have contact with children in their work, to report to child protective services when they have a reasonable suspicion that maltreatment has occurred. Despite these laws, there is a lack of consistency in reporting by mandated reporters. The purpose of this paper is to describe and compare the reporting data of five mandated reporting groups across the USA. Data from the 2010 National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS) were utilized for the analysis of reporting practices of mandated reporters. Results indicated some unique differences among specific mandated reporters as a function of how and when they interact with children.
The National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS) Child File data were provided by the National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect at Cornell University and have been used with permission. The data were originally collected under the auspices of the Children’s Bureau, US Department of Health and Human Services. The collector of the original data, the funder, NDACAN, Cornell University, and the agents or employees of these institutions bear no responsibility for the analyses or interpretations presented here. The information and opinions expressed reflect solely the opinions of the authors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Days necessary to investigate were determined by the elapsed time, in days, between the date of CPS initial investigation and report disposition.
- 2.
Current estimates from the US Census Bureau (2012) of the racial makeup of children 0–17 in the USA are White, 73 %; African American, 15 %; Asian, 5 %; and others, 7 %. Hispanic origin is an ethnicity not a race. Children of Hispanic origin could be any race: 24 %.
References
Bensley, L., Simmons, K., & Ruggles, D. (2004). Community responses and perceived barriers to responding to child maltreatment. Journal of Community Health, 29(2), 141–153.
Drake, B., & Jonson-Reid, M. (2007). A response to Melton based on the best available data. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 343–360.
Feng, J., Chen, Y., Fetzer, S., Feng, M., & Lin, C. (2012). Ethical and legal challenges of mandated child abuse reporters. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(1), 276–280.
Finkelhor, D., & Jones, L. (2006). Why have child maltreatment and child victimization declined? Journal of Social Issues, 62(4), 685–716.
Finkelhor, D., Jones, L., & Shattuck, A. (2013). Updated trends in child maltreatment, 2011. Durham: Crimes Against Children Research Center.
Flaherty, E. G. (2006). Does the wording of the mandate to report suspected child abuse serve as another barrier to child abuse reporting? Child Abuse & Neglect, 30(4), 341–343.
Foreman, T., & Bernet, W. (2000). A misunderstanding regarding the duty to report suspected abuse. Child Maltreatment, 5, 190–196.
Gilbert, R., Kemp, A., Thoburn, J., Sidebotham, P., Radford, L., Glaser, D., & MacMillan, H. L. (2009). Recognising and responding to child maltreatment. The Lancet, 373(9658), 10–16.
Hinkelman, L., & Bruno, M. (2008). Identification and reporting of child sexual abuse: The role of elementary school professionals. Elementary School Journal, 108(5), 376–391.
Huck, S. W., & Cormier, W. H. (1996). Reading statistics and research. New York: Harper Collins.
Kemp, G. R., Thoburn, A., Sidebotham, P., Radford, L., Glaser, D., & MacMillan, H. (2009). Recognising and responding to child maltreatment. The Lancet, 373(9658), 10–16.
Kohl, P., Jonson-Reid, M., & Drake, B. (2009). Time to leave substantiation behind: Findings from a national probability study. Child Maltreatment, 14(1), 17.
Mathews, B., & Kenny, M. (2008). Mandatory reporting legislation in the USA, Canada and Australia: A cross-jurisdictional review of key features, differences and issues. Child Maltreatment, 13, 50–63.
Mennena, F., Kimb, K., Sanga, J., & Trickett, P. (2010). Child neglect: Definition and identification of youth’s experiences in official reports of maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34, 647–658.
Takis, A. (2008). The mandatory reporting debate. Macquarie Law Journal, 8, 125–152.
U.S. Census Bureau (2012) Annual estimates of the resident population by sex, race, and Hispanic origin for the United States, 1 April 2010 to 1 July 2011 (NC-EST2011-03)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2006). Child maltreatment 2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). Child maltreatment 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2012). Child maltreatment 2011. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Webster, S. W., O’Toole, R., O’Toole, A. W., & Lucal, B. (2005). Overreporting and underreporting of child abuse: Teachers’ use of professional discretion. Child Abuse and Neglect, 29, 1281–1296.
Zeman, L. (2005). Hotline tip to probable cause: Filling the gap between suspicion and physical abuse findings for mandated reporters. The Journal of Long Term Home Health Care, 6(2), 66–72.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kesner, J.E., Dever, B.V. (2015). An Inter-reporter Analysis of Mandated Child Maltreatment Reporting in the USA. In: Mathews, B., Bross, D. (eds) Mandatory Reporting Laws and the Identification of Severe Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Maltreatment, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9685-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9685-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9684-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9685-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)