Abstract
The nested nature of social-ecological systems across scales requires a multi-scale approach for monitoring and response. However, in many cases this flow is hindered by hierarchical structures and bureaucratic procedures. Recent research suggests that bridging organizations that facilitate collaboration and learning across sectors and scales are key to adaptive governance. Bridging organizations can facilitate cross-scale linkages, enabling formal management entities operating at discrete scales to improve communication channels and create opportunities for collaboration. This allows for management to set new target levels and modify policy to reach those target levels as new information is generated on scale-specific system attributes. Bridging organizations also incubate new ideas for environmental management, provide a forum for coming to agreement on contentious issues, and foster the capacity to manage for resilience of social-ecological systems and the provisioning of ecosystem services that are directly and indirectly important on a regional and international scale.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging Âorganizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1692–1702.
Brock, W. A. (2006). Tipping points, abrupt opinion change, and punctuated policy change. In R. Repetto (Ed.), Punctuated equilibrium and the dynamics of U.S. Environmental Policy Â(pp. Â47–77). New Haven: Yale.
Brock, W. A., & Carpenter, S. R. (2007). Panaceas and diversification of environmental policy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, Â15206–15211.
Brown, L. D. (1991). Bridging organizations and sustainable development. Human Relations, 44, 807–831.
Brown, L. D., Khagram, S., Moore, M. H., & Frumkin, P. (2000). Globalization, NGOs and Âmultisectoral relations. In J. S. Nye & J. D. Donohue, editors. Governance in a Globalizing World (pp. 271–296). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
Cash, D. W., Adger, W. N., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., Olsson, P., Pritchard, L., & Young, O. (2006). Scale and cross-scale dynamics: Governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society, 11(2), 8. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art8/http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art8/ .
Costanza, R., D’Aarge, R., De Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O´Neill, R., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., & Van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260.
Crona, B., & Parker, J. (2012). Learning in support of governance: Theories, methods and findings to assess how bridging organizations contribute to adaptive resource governance. Ecology and Society, 17(1), 32. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04534-170132 .
Cronert, H., & Lindblad, T. (2004). Strandängsinventering längs nedre Helgeån i Kristianstads Vattenrike våren 2003. ANSER 2/04: pp. 65–78.
Daily, G. (Ed). (1997). Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.
Garmestani, A. S., Allen, C. R., & Cabezas, H. (2009). Panarchy, adaptive management and Âgovernance: Policy options for building resilience. Nebraska Law Review, 87, 1036–1054.
Green, O. O., & Garmestani, A. S. (2012). Adaptive management to protect biodiversity, best available science and the Endangered Species Act. Diversity, 4, 164–178.
Gunderson, L. H. (1999). Stepping back: Assessing for understanding in complex regional Âsystems. In K. N. Johnson, F. Swanson, M. Herring, & S. Greene (Eds), Bioregional Âassessments: ÂScience at the crossroads of management and policy (pp. 27–40). Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Gunderson, L. H., & Holling, C. S. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Gunderson, L. H., Holling, C. S., & Light, S. S. (1995). Barriers and bridges to renewal of Âecosystems and institutions. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hahn, T. (2011). Self-organized governance networks for ecosystem management: Who is Âaccountable? Ecology and Society, 16(2), 18. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss2/art18/.
Hahn, T., Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Johansson, K. (2006). Trust-building, knowledge generation and organizational innovations: The role of a bridging organization for adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden. Human Ecology, 34, 573–592.
Hahn, T., Schultz, L., Folke, C., & Olsson, P. (2008). Social networks as sources of resilience in social-ecological systems. In J. Norberg & G. Cumming (Eds), Complexity theory for a Âsustainable future (pp. 119–148). New York: Columbia University Press.
Holling, C. S. (1978). Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Chichester: Wiley.
Karkkainen, B. C. (2002). Collaborative ecosystem governance: Scale, complexity and dynamism. Virginia Environmental Law Journal, 21, 189–244.
Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. New York: Harper Collins ÂCollege.
Kinzig, A., Starrett, D., Arrow, K., Aniyar, S., Bolin, B., Dasgupta, P., Ehrlich, P., Folke, C., ÂHanemann, M., Heal, G., Hoel M., Jansson, A., Jansson, B. O., Kautsky, N., Levin, S., ÂLubchenco, J., Maler, K. G., Pacala, S. W., Schneider, S. H., Siniscalco, D., & Walker, B. (2003). Coping with uncertainty: A call for a new science-policy forum. Ambio, 32, 330–335.
Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Office. (2011). http://www.vattenriket.kristianstad.se/eng/index.php. Accessed 13 Sep 2011.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystem and human well-being: Synthesis. ÂWashington, D.C.: Island.
Magnusson, S. E. (2004). The changing perception of the wetlands in and around Kristianstad, Sweden—from waterlogged areas toward a future Water Kingdom, Kristianstad Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1023, 323–327.
Magnusson, S. E., Andersson, J., & Vägren, G. (1989). Markhävdkartering 1989. HelgeÃ¥ns ÂvattenomrÃ¥de frÃ¥n Torsebro till havet [Mapping of land-use practices. Lower HelgeÃ¥ River catchment from Torsebro to the sea]. Kristianstad. Sweden: Nordöstra SkÃ¥nes FÃ¥gelklubb and Kristianstads Vattenrike.
Magnusson, S. E., Magntorn, K., Wallsten, E., Cronert, H., & Thelaus, M. (2004). Kristianstads Vattenrike biosphere reserve nomination form.
Malayang, B. S. III, Hahn, T., & Kumar, P. (2007). Responses to ecosystem change and to their Âimpacts on human well-being. Pages 203–226 in Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, ÂEcosystems and Human Well-being: Multiscale Assessments, Findings of the Sub-global ÂAssessments Working Group. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Nekoro, M., & Svedén, J. (2009). Ekosystemtjänstanalys i Kristianstads Vattenrike 2008 - Pilotstudie strandängar [Ecosystemservices in Kristianstads Vattenrike—pilot study flooded Âmeadows, Report in the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency series], NaturvÃ¥rdsverket, Rapport 5947, May 2009. ISBN 978-91-620-5947-7pdf. ISSN 0282–7298
Odum, E. P. (1989). Ecology and our endangered life support systems. Sunderland: Sinauer ÂAssociated.
Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Berkes, F. (2004). Adaptive co-management for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environmental Management, 34, 75–90.
Olsson, P., Gunderson, L. H., Carpenter, S. R., Ryan, P., Lebel, L., Folke, C., & Holling, C. S. (2006). Shooting the rapids: Navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 18. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art18/ .
Olsson, P., Folke, C., Galaz, V., Hahn, T., & Schultz, L. (2007). Enhancing the fit through adaptive co-management: creating and maintaining bridging functions for matching scales in the ÂKristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve Sweden. Ecology and Society, 12(1), 28. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art28/ .
Oveson, P. (2009). Markhävdkartering 2008 hävdtillstÃ¥ndet pÃ¥ betesmarker och slÃ¥tterängar inom nedre HelgeÃ¥ns vÃ¥tmarksomrÃ¥de i Kristianstads Vattenrike, Vattenriket i fokus 2009:05 ÂMapping of traditional land-use 2008: current maintenance of pastures and hay meadows in the lower HelgeÃ¥ wetland area in Kristianstads Vattenrike.
Roy, A. H., Wenger, S. J., Fletcher, T. D., Walsh, C. J., Ladson, A. R., Shuster, W. D., Thurston, W., & Brown, R. R. (2008). Impediments and solutions to sustainable, watershed-scale Âurban stormwater management: Lessons from Australia and the United States. Environmental ÂManagement, 42, 344–359.
Ruitenbeek, J., & Cartier, C. (2001). The invisible wand: Adaptive co-management as an emergent strategy in complex bio-economic systems. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research.
Ruhl, J. B., Kraft, S. E., & Lant, C. L. (2007). The law and policy of ecosystem services. ÂWashington, D.C.: Island Press.
Scheffer, M., Westley, F., & Brock, W. (2003). Slow response of societies to new problems: Causes and costs. Ecosystems, 6, 493–502.
Schultz, L. (2009). Nurturing resilience in social-ecological systems: Lessons learned from Âbridging organizations. Dissertation, Stockholm University.
Schultz, L., & Lundholm, C. (2010). Learning for resilience? Exploring learning opportunities in Biosphere Reserves. Environmental Education Research, 16, 5–6.
Schultz, L., Folke, C., & Olsson, P. (2007). Enhancing ecosystem management through Âsocial-ecological inventories: Lessons from Kristianstads Vattenrike, Sweden. Environmental Conservation, 34, 140–152.
Skjaerseth, J. B. (2006). Protecting the northeast Atlantic: One problem, three institutions. In S. Oberthur & T. Gehring, (Eds), Institutional interaction in global environmental governance (pp. 103–125). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Stokke, O. S., & Coffey, C. (2006). Institutional interplay and responsible fisheries: Combating subsidies, developing precaution. In S. Oberthur & T. Gehring (Eds), Institutional interaction in global environmental governance (pp. 127–155). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Walker, B., & Salt, D. (2006). Resilience thinking—sustaining ecosystems and people in a Âchanging world. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Westley, F. (1995). Governing design: The management of social systems and ecosystems Âmanagement. In L.H. Gunderson, C. S. Holling, & S. S. Light (Eds), Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions (p. 20). New York: Columbia University Press.
Wood, B. D., & Doan, A. (2003). The politics of problem definition: Applying and testing Âthreshold models. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 640–653.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht (outside the USA)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Odom Green, O., Schultz, L., Nekoro, M., Garmestani, A. (2015). The Role of Bridging Organizations in Enhancing Ecosystem Services and Facilitating Adaptive Management of Social-Ecological Systems. In: Allen, C., Garmestani, A. (eds) Adaptive Management of Social-Ecological Systems. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9682-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9682-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9681-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9682-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)