Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Adaptive Management and Law

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Adaptive Management of Social-Ecological Systems

Abstract

Although adaptive management has been widely discussed in the fields of ecology and conservation biology for decades, its incorporation into natural resource management in the United States is relatively recent. It is increasingly recognized as a valuable approach to natural resource and environmental management challenges that involve high degrees of uncertainty. The legal rules and requirements that drive environmental protection efforts in the United States, however, are often considered barriers to successful implementation of adaptive management. This chapter explores the challenges and opportunities associated with the integration of adaptive management into current legal and regulatory frameworks in the United States. It summarizes current literature on adaptive management and law, with particular emphasis on scholarship that highlights the challenges associated with incorporating adaptive management into current institutional arrangements. It then provides some basic background regarding the overall structure of government in the United States and explains the critical role of the executive and judicial branches in implementation and enforcement of adaptive management plans. A summary of current federal court decisions regarding how agencies are using adaptive management is provided to highlight the challenges associated with balancing the need for administrative flexibility with the competing need for legal enforceability. Finally, we conclude with some suggestions for more successful incorporation of adaptive management by federal agencies in the United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allan, C., Curtis, A., Stankey, G., & Shindler, B. (2008). Adaptive management and watersheds: A social science perspective. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 44, 166–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, C., Fontaine, J., Pope, K., & Garmestani, A. (2011). Adaptive management for a turbulent future. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 1339–1345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelo, M. J. (2009). Stumbling toward success: A story of adaptive management law and ecological resilience. Nebraska Law Review, 87, 951–952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter of Communities for a Great Oregon. (1995). 115 U.S. 2407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M. H. (2009). Integrating adaptive management and oil and gas development: Existing obstacles and opportunities for reform. Environmental Law Reporter, 39, 10962–10978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M. H. (2010). Adaptive management approaches by resource management agencies in the United States: Implications for energy development in the interior West. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law, 28, 87–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M. H., & Garmestani, A. S. (2011). Embracing panarchy, building resilience and integrating adaptive management through a rebirth of the National Environmental Policy Act. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 1420–1427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M. H., & Stone, A. B. (2013). Practitioner perceptions of adaptive management implementation in the United States. Ecology and Society, 18(3), 32. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05613-180332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., & Seixas, C. (2005). Building resilience in lagoon social-ecological systems: A local-level perspective. Ecosystems, 8, 967–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biber, E. (2011). The problem of environmental monitoring. University of Colorado Law Review, 83, 66–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumm, M. C., & Bosse, S. L. (2007). Norton v. SUWA and the unraveling of federal public land planning. Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum, 18, 105–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodin, Ã. R., Crona, B., & Ernstson, H. (2006). Social networks in natural resource management: What is there to learn from a structural perspective? Ecology and Society, 11(2), r2. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/resp2/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugnach, M., Dewulf, A., Pahl-Wostl, C., & Taillieu, T. (2008). Toward a relational concept of uncertainty: About knowing too little, knowing too differently, and accepting not to know. Ecology and Society, 13(2), 30. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/issues/view.php?id=71#Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, K., & Koontz, T. (2005). Theory into practice: Implementing ecosystem management objectives in the USDA Forest Service. Environmental Management, 35, 138–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center for Biological Diversity v. Rumsfeld. (2002). 198 F. Supp. 2d. (D. Arizona).

    Google Scholar 

  • Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). (2010). Final guidance for federal departments and agencies on the appropriate use of mitigation and monitoring and clarifying the appropriate use of mitigated findings of no significant impacts. CEQ, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, R. K. (2010). Stationarity is dead: Long live transformation: Five principles for climate change adaptation law. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 31, 9–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doremus, H. A. (2002). Adaptive management, the Endangered Species Act, and the institutional challenges of “new age” environmental protection. Washburn Law Journal, 41, 50–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischman, R. L. (2007). From words to action: The impact and legal status of the 2006 National Refuge System Management Policies. Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 26, 77–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flournoy, A. C. (2008). Protecting a natural resource legacy while promoting resilience: Can it be done? Nebraska Law Review, 87, 1009–1035.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Pritchard, L., Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Svedin, U. (2007). The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: Ten years later. Ecology and Society, 12(1), 30. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/issues/view.php?id=67#Insight.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. Kempthorne. (2008). 557 F. Supp. 2d. 183 (D. D.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. Servheen. (2009). 672 F. Supp, 2d, 1105 (D. Montana).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grumbine, E. (1994). What is ecosystem management? Conservation Biology, 8, 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L., & Light, S. S. (2006). Adaptive management and adaptive governance in the everglades ecosystem. Policy Sciences, 39, 323–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L., & Holling, C. S. (Eds.). (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (Ed.). (1978). Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houck, O. A. (2009). Nature or nurture: What’s wrong and what’s right with adaptive management. Environmental Law Reporter, 39, 10923–10924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, S. K., Morris, J. K., Sanders, J. S., Wiley, E. N., Brooks, M., Bennetts, R. E., Percival, H. F., & Marynowski, S. (2006). Understanding barriers to implementation of an adaptive land management program. Conservation Biology, 20, 1516–1527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karkkainen, B. C. (2005). Panarchy and adaptive change: Around the loop and back again. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology, 7, 59–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J., & Brown, C. 2006. Environmental flows: Striking the balance between development and resource protection. Ecology and Society, 11(2): 26 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/issues/view.php?id=66#Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. Boody. (2006). 468 F.3d 549, 553 (9th Circuit).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. N. (1999). Appraising adaptive management. Ecology and Society, 3(2), 3. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/issues/view.php?id=6#Perspective.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, M. A., & Possingham, H. P. (2007). Active adaptive management for conservation. Conservation Biology, 21, 956–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarity, T. O. (1990). Judicial enforcement of NEPA-inspired promises. Environmental Law, 20, 569–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natural Resources Defense Council v. Kempthorne. (2007). 506 F. 2d. 322 (E.D. California).

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance. (2004). 542 U.S. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • In re: Operation of the Missouri River System Litigation. (2008). 516 F.3d 688 (8th Circuit).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oregon Natural Resources Council Action v. USFS. (1999). 59 F. Supp. 2d 1085 (W.D. Washington).

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, D. (2009/2010). Probabilities, planning failures, and environmental law. Tulane Law Review, 84, 265–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacific Coast Federation of Fisherman’s Associations v. Gutierrez. (2008). 606 F. 2d. 1122 (E.D. California).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl, C. (2007). The implications of complexity for integrated resources management. Environmental Modelling and Software, 22, 561–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl, C., Sendzimir, J., Jeffrey, P., Aerts, J., Berkamp, G., & Cross, K. (2007). Managing change toward adaptive water management through social learning. Ecology and Society, 12(2), 30. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/issues/view.php?id=68#Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raadgever, G. T., Mostert, E., Kranz, N., Interwies, E., & Timmerman, J. G. (2008). Assessing management regimes in transboundary river basins: Do they support adaptive management? Ecology and Society, 13(1), 14. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/issues/view.php?id=69#Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council. (1989). 490 U.S. 322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruhl, J. B. (2005). Regulation by adaptive management - is it possible? Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology, 7, 21–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruhl, J. B. (2008). Adaptive management for natural resources-inevitable, impossible, or both? Rocky Mountain Law Institute, 54, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruhl, J. B., & Fischman, R. L. (2010). Adaptive management in the courts. Minnesota Law Review, 95, 424–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salafsky, N., Margoluis, R., & Redford, K. (2001). Adaptive management: A tool for conservation practitioners. Biodiversity Support Program, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, C. (2008). Dealing with scientific uncertainty in forest policy and planning. Environmental Science and Policy, 11, 253–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, C., & Nie, M. (2012). Decision making triggers, adaptive management, and natural resources policy and planning. Natural Resources Journal, 52, 443–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, L. E., Camacho, A. E., & Schenk, T. (2010). Collaborative planning and adaptive management in Glen Canyon: A cautionary tale. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 35, 2–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, C. V., Sheikh, P. A., & Brass, C. T. (2011). Adaptive management for ecosystem restoration: Analysis and issues for congress. Congressional Research Service, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, L. C., Dougill, A. J., Fraser, E., Hubacek, K., Prell, C., & Reed, M. S. (2006). Unpacking “participation” in the adaptive management of social-ecological systems: A critical review. Ecology and Society, 11(2), 39. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/issues/view.php?id=66#Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrower, J. (2006). Adaptive management and NEPA: How a nonequilibrium view of ecosystems mandates flexible regulation. Ecology Law Quarterly, 33, 871–895.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Army Corps. (2002). Guidance on compensatory mitigation projects for aquatic resource impacts under the Corps Regulatory Program pursuant to Sect. 404 of the Clean Water Act and Sect. 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. http://www.usace.army.mil/CECW/Documents/cecwo/reg/rgls/RGL2-02.pdf.

  • Walters, C. J. (2002). Adaptive management of renewable resources. Caldwell: The Blackburn Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C. J., & Holling, C. S. (1990). Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology, 71, 2060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. K., & Brown, E. D. (2012). Adaptive management: The U.S. Department of the Interior applications guide. Adaptive Management Working Group, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. K., Szaro, R. C., & Shapiro, C. D. (2009). Adaptive management: The U.S. Department of the Interior technical guide adaptive management working group, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellmer, S., & Gunderson, L. (2009). Why resilience may not always be a good thing: Lessons in ecosystem restoration from Glen Canyon and the Everglades. Nebraska Law Review, 87, 894–947.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of New Mexico, 87131-0001, Albuquerque, NM, USA

    Melinda Harm Benson

  2. Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado State University, 80523-1472, Fort Collins, CO, USA

    Courtney Schultz

Authors
  1. Melinda Harm Benson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Courtney Schultz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melinda Harm Benson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Nebraska Cooperative Fish & Wildlife UResearch Unit-USGS, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA

    Craig R. Allen

  2. Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

    Ahjond S. Garmestani

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht (outside the USA)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Benson, M., Schultz, C. (2015). Adaptive Management and Law. In: Allen, C., Garmestani, A. (eds) Adaptive Management of Social-Ecological Systems. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9682-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation