Skip to main content

Suffering in Online Interactions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
World Suffering and Quality of Life

Part of the book series: Social Indicators Research Series ((SINS,volume 56))

Abstract

Due to the growing relevance of online communication, the questions arise: Why do care seekers turn to the social web? How does virtual interaction of personal suffering affect those who share their grief? How does it impact their quality of life, health, and social well-being? After a review of relevant findings, three different bereavement platforms were examined in a qualitative content analysis. The analysis revealed that the meeting of likeminded is crucial in online communication. Online platforms provide a social space in which one may bond in an environment of support and participate in a process of mutual understanding. Emotional communication chains and interactive roles are discovered. Communicative effects disclose that care seekers in time become care givers. Implications for online communication of suffering are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    So called phase or stage models, as most notably, Kübler-Ross’ (1969) well known stage model, implying a logical development in grief work, have been intensively criticized as they do not take the complexity and distinctness in grieving processes into account. Grief is thus a complex emotional process (cf. Stroebe and Schut 1999; cf. also Neimeyer in this volume). As Klass et al. (1996) note, grieving can also entail a continuous bond with the deceased.

  2. 2.

    Trauerverlustforum [sadnesslossplatform] will be abbreviated TVF; Youngwings will be abbreviated YW; MeineTrauer [MySadness] will be abbreviated MT. The research project was led and supervised by Katrin Döveling and conduced in a team at the TU Dresden: Supervisor: Katrin Döveling, Research Team: Katrin Wasgien, Kevin Klamert, Charlotta Knigge, Lisa Krämer, Carolin Pohl, Anne Schier.

  3. 3.

    For the follow up quantitative analysis see Döveling, K. (2014). Emotion regulation in bereavement: searching for and finding emotional support in social network sites, New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, DOI: 10.1080/13614568.2014.983558

References

  • Aldwin, C. M. (2007). Stress, coping, and development. An integrative perspective. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. E. (2011). World suffering—Conceptualization, measurement, and findings. Paper presented at the 2011 meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) in Phoenix. Retrieved from http://www.compassionatesocieties.org/attachments/article/684/Suffering-paper-for-aapor2011-18may11.pdf. Accessed 17 Apr 2013.

  • Anderson, R. E. (2014). Human suffering and quality of life conceptualizing stories and statistics. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bambina, A. (2007). Online social support. The interplay of social networks and computer-mediated communication. Youngstown: Cambria Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59(1), 20–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, G. A., Goorin, L., & Coifman, K. G. (2008). Sadness and grief. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. Feldman Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 797–810). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, E. J. (1991). The nature of suffering and the goals of medicine. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K., & Milligan, M. J. (2006). Grief. In J. E. Stets & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions (pp. 516–543). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1984). The role of emotion in social structure. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 385–396). Hillsdale/London: L. Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1987). Interaction ritual chains, power and property: The micro–macro connection as an empirically based theoretical problem. In J. C. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Münch, & N. J. Smelser (Eds.), The micro–macro-link (pp. 193–206). Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1990). Stratification, emotional energy, and the transient emotions. In T. D. Kemper (Ed.), Research agendas in the sociology of emotions (pp. 27–57). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derks, D., Fischer, A. H., & Bos, A. E. R. (2008). The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 766–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derlega, V., Metts, S., Petronio, S., & Margulis, S. T. (1993). Self-disclosure. Thousand Oaks/London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doka, K. J. (2008). Disenfranchised grief in historical and cultural perspective. In M. S. Stroebe, R. O. Hansson, H. Schut, & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research and practice (pp. 223–240). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Döveling, K. (2005). Emotionen—Medien—Gemeinschaft: eine kommunikationssoziologische Analyse [Emotions—Media—Community: A media-sociological perspective]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Döveling, K. (2012). Emotionsmanagement im Netz: Bewältigung von Krankheit, Sterben und Tod in Sozialen Netzwerken. Emotional Sharing = Coping [Emotion management in the internet: Coping with illness, dying and death in social networks. Emotional sharing = Coping]. Zeitschrift für Palliativmedizin, 13(05). Retrieved from https://www.thieme-connect.com/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-0032-1322890. Accessed 17 Feb 2013.

  • Döveling, K. (2014). Emotion regulation in bereavement: searching for and finding emotional support in social network sites. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, published online 6 December 2014. doi:10.1080/13614568.2014.983558

  • Döveling, K, & Wasgien, K. (2014). Emotionsmanagement im Netz. Kindertrauer online. Ein aktueller Forschungsbeitrag [Emotion management in the Web. Children’s sadness online. Current Research]. In Franziska Röseberg und Monika Müller (Eds.), Handbuch Kindertrauer (pp. 421–434). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1984). Expression and the nature of emotion. In K. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 319–343). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1971). Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17(2), 124–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrel, B. (2005). Ethical perspectives on pain and suffering. Pain Management Nursing, 6(3), 83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L. E. (2006). Emotions and health. In J. E. Stets & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions (pp. 591–610). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Geise, S. (2011). Vision that matters. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J., & Thompson, R. A. (2007). Emotion regulation. Conceptual foundations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 3–26). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart. Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. (2008). Empathy and prosocial behavior. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. Feldman Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 440–455). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. E. (1991). The psychology of emotions. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jakoby, N. (2012a). Trauer als Forschungsgegenstand der Emotionssoziologie [Grief as scholarly topic in emotion-sociology]. In A. Schnabel & R. Schützeichel (Eds.), Emotionen, Sozialstruktur und Moderne (pp. 407–424). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jakoby, N. (2012b). Grief as a social emotion: Theoretical perspectives. Death Studies, 36, 679–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kappas, A., & Müller, M. G. (2006). Bild und Emotion—ein neues Forschungsfeld [Picture and emotions—a new field of study]. Publizistik, 51(1), 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kast, V. (1982). Trauern: Phasen und Chancen des psychischen Prozesses [Grieving: Phases and chances of the psychological process]. Freiburg: Kreuz Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klass, D., & Walter, T. (2001). Processes of grieving: How bonds are continued. In M. S. Stroebe, R. O. Hansson, W. Stroebe, & H. Schut (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping and care (pp. 431–448). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Klass, D., Silverman, P. R., & Nickman, S. L. (Eds.). (1996). Continuing bonds. New understandings of grief. Washington, DC/Bristol/London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman, A., Das, V., & Lock, M. (Eds.). (1997). Social suffering. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kübler-Ross, E. (1969). On death and dying. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kübler-Ross, E. (1975). Death: The final stage of growth. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luminet, O., Bouts, P., Delie, F., Manstead, S. R., & Rimé, B. (2000). Social sharing of emotion following exposure to a negatively valenced situation. Cognition and Emotion, 14(5), 661–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative content analysis: Basics and techniques] (7th ed.). Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg galaxy. The making of typographic man. Toronto/Buffalo/London: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misoch, S. (2006). Online-Kommunikation [Online-communication]. Konstanz: UVK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. M. (2000). Responding to the cues of suffering. Health Care for Women International, 21(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagappan, R. (2005). Speaking havoc: Social suffering & South Asian narratives. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neimeyer, R. A. (1998). Lessons of loss: A guide to coping. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neimeyer, R. (2015). Meaning in bereavement. In R. Anderson (Ed.), World suffering and quality in life. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, C. M. (1993). Bereavement as a psychosocial transition: Processes of adaptation to change. In M. S. Stroebe, W. Stroebe, & R. O. Hansson (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement (pp. 91–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, G. R., Sarason, I. G., & Sarason, B. R. (1996). Coping and social support. In M. Zeidner & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Handbook of coping. Theory, research, applications (pp. 434–451). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 2–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radcliffe, A. M., Lumley, M. A., Kendall, J., Stevenson, J. K., & Beltran, J. (2010). Written emotional disclosure. Testing whether social disclosure matters. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26(3), 362–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rimé, B. (2007). Interpersonal emotion regulation. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 466–485). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimé, B. (2009). Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion. Theory and empirical review. Emotion Review, 1(1), 60–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rimé, B., Mesquita, B., Boca, S., & Philipot, P. (1991). Beyond the emotional event. Six studies on the social sharing of emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 5(5/6), 435–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southam-Gerow, M. A. (2013). Emotion regulation in children and adolescents. A practitioner’s guide. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroebe, M. S., & Schut, H. (1999). The dual process model of coping with bereavement: Rationale and description. Death Studies, 23, 197–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stylianos, S. K., & Vachon, M. L. S. (1993). The role of social support in bereavement. In M. S. Stroebe, W. Stroebe, & R. O. Hansson (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement: Theory, research, and intervention (8th ed., pp. 397–410). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. W., Grube, J. A., & Meyers, J. (2001). Developing an optimal match within online communities: An exploration of CMC support communities and traditional support. Journal of Communication, 51(2), 231–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katrin Döveling .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Döveling, K., Wasgien, K. (2015). Suffering in Online Interactions. In: Anderson, R. (eds) World Suffering and Quality of Life. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 56. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9670-5_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics