Skip to main content

New Urbanisms: From Neo-Traditional Neighbourhoods to New Regionalism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Theme Cities: Solutions for Urban Problems

Part of the book series: GeoJournal Library ((GEJL,volume 112))

Abstract

In 1996 the New Urbanism Charter was developed by Americans who advocated a new approach to urban planning, outlining a series of principles at various scales to address contemporary problems. Since many ideas from older cities were used for new community designs, the approach is often described as Neo-Traditional in character, although design issues are only part of the principles identified. The ideas subsequently led to the development of related concepts, such as Smart Growth, Urban Villages and Transit Orientated Development. A review of the basic features of these various types of New Urbanism is followed by a critique of the concepts and their utility. Although the Charter has provided a useful summary of needed changes, not all have been given adequate attention, and many other problems of contemporary cities are not dealt with. In addition, few New Urbanists tackled the problems of creating effective governances in the fragmented political jurisdictions around central cities. New Regionalism ideas have partially filled this gap but most just cobble together existing jurisdictions in a variety of political forms to provide overview plans and sometimes services for a city region, often with limited effectiveness.

New urbanists have developed and propagated a formula for planning the good community, and have gained international attention in the process. Beauty is arguably a necessary condition for the good community, but is it sufficient?

(Grant 2006, Introduction)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aldous, T. (Ed.). (1992). Urban Villages: A concept for creating mixed-use urban developments on a sustainable scale. London: Urban Village Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. (1979). The timeless way of building. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C., Silverstein, M., & Ishikawa, S. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Hindi, K. F. (2001). The new urbanism: Where and for whom? Investigation of an emergent paradigm. Urban Geography, 22(3), 202–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. (20 May 1991). Oldfangled new towns. Time, 52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audirac, I., & Shermyen, A. (1994). An evaluation of neo-traditional designs social prescription: Postmodern placebo or remedy for suburban malaise? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 13, 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axhausen, K. W. (2000). Geographies of somewhere: A review of urban literature. Urban Studies, 37(10), 1849–1864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldassare, M. (1986). Trouble in paradise: The suburban transformation in America. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banai, R. (1996). A theoretical assessment of the neo-traditional settlement form by dimensions of performance. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 23, 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banai, R. (1998). The new urbanism: An assessment of the core commercial areas, with perspectives from (retail) location and land-use theories, and the conventional wisdom. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25(2), 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartling, H. (2004). The magic kingdom syndrome: Trials and tribulations of life in Disney’s Celebration. Contemporary Justice Review, 7(4), 375–3 93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basten, L. (2011). Stuttgart: A metropolitan city-region in the making? International Planning Studies, 16(3), 273–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxandall, R., & Ewen, E. (2000). How the suburbs happened. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookout, L. (1992). Neo-traditional town planning: A new vision for the suburbs? Urban Land. January 1992, pp. 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bressi, T. (1994). Planning the American dream. In P. Katz (Ed.), The new urbanism: Toward an architecture of community (pp. xxv–xlii). New York: McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Brindley, T. (2003). The social dimension of the urban village: A comparison of models for sustainable urban development. Urban Design International, 8, 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooke, S. (1995). Seaside. Gretna, LO: Pelican.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B., & Cropper, V. (2001). New urban and standard subdivisions: Evaluating psychological and social goals. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(4), 402–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calthorpe, P. (1993). The next American metropolis: Ecology, community and the American dream. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calthorpe, P. (1994). The region. In P. Katz (Ed.), The new urbanism: Toward an architecture of community (pp. xi–xx). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calthorpe, P. (2001). The regional city: Planning for the end of sprawl. New York: New Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC). (n.d.). Residential intensification case studies, built projects: Garrison Woods. http://www.cmhc-schl.gc.ca/en/inpr/su/sucopl/upload/Garrison-Woods-Calgary-Alberta.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2014.

  • Carma. (n.d.). A towne to call home: McKenzie Towne (24 page sales brochure).

    Google Scholar 

  • Congress for the New Urbanism. (1999). Charter of the new urbanism: Region/neighbourhood, district, and corridor/Block, street, and building. New York: McGraw-Hill Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coroux, D., Keough, N., Miller, B. & Row, J. (2006). Overcoming barriers to sustainable urban development: Toward smart growth in Calgary. A Discussion Paper Prepared for the Calgary Citizens’ Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotugno, A., & Seltzer, E. (2011). Towards a metropolitan consciousness in the Portland, Oregon metropolitan area. International Planning Studies, 16(3), 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, R. (1996). On form versus function: Will the new urbanism reduce traffic, or increase it? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 15, 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, W. K. D. (1984). Factorial ecology. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, W. K. D. (1992). Affective dimensions of community character. Unpublished paper read at IGU Commission on Urban Systems and Development, Detroit. Subsequently extended and published in W. K. D. Davies (1995). The power of communities. Acta Wasaensis (Finland), 45(6), 49–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, W. K. D., & Herbert, D. T. (1993). Communities within cities: An urban social geography. London/New York: Belhaven Press/Halstead-Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCoursey, W., & Athey, L. (2007). Transit-oriented design: Illustration of TOD characteristics. Institute for Public Administration, College of Human Services, Education & Public Policy University of Delaware.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environment Transportation and Regions (1999). Millenium villages and sustainable communities. London: DETR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, R. (1998). Neo-traditionalism in the suburban landscape: cultural geographies of exclusion in Vancouver, Canada. Urban Geography, 19(2), 105–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duany, A., & Plater-Zyberk, E. (1992). The second coming of the American small town. Wilson Quarterly, 19–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C. (2002). The new urbanism: Critiques and rebuttals. Journal of Urban Design, 7(3), 261–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fader, S. (2000). Density by design. Urban Land, 59(7), 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foglesong, R. E. (1986). Planning the capitalist city: The colonial era to the 1920s. New York: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, L. R. (1999). Lynch revisited. New urbanism and theories of good city form. Cities, 16(4), 247–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, B., & Tait, M. (2002). Constructing an image: The urban village concept in the U.K. Planning Theory, 1(3), 250–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frantz, D., & Collins, C. (1999). Celebration, U.S.A.: Living in Disney’s brave new world. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, W. (1996). The new urbanism: Hope or hype for American communities. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garreau, J. (1991). Edge city: Life on the new frontier. New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, P. (1915). Cities in evolution: An introduction to the town planning movement and to the study of civics. London: Williams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, J. (2010). Cities are for People. Washington D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller, A. L. (2003). Smart growth: A prescription for liveable cities. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1410–1415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, K., & Abbott, C. (2002). Portland, Oregon. Cities, 19, 425–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, J. (2006). Planning the good community: New urbanism in theory and practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyourko, J., & Rybczynski, W. (2000). Financing new urbanism projects: Obstacles and solutions. Housing Policy Debate, 11(3), 733–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, T. (2008). New urbanism and beyond. New York: Rizzoli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (1988). Cities of tomorrow. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. (1998). Community in the new urbanism: Design vision and symbolic crusades. Traditional Dwellings and Settlement Review, 9(11), 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (2000). Urban renaissance/new urbanism: Two sides of the same coin? Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(4), 359–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halligan, D. (2000). Maryland’s smart growth and neighborhood conservation initiative. Institute of Transportation Engineers. ITE Journal, 70, 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1994). Flexible accumulation through urbanization: reflections on ‘Post-Modernism’ in the American City. In A. Amin (Ed.), Post-Fordism: A Reader (pp. 361–386). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, E. (1898). Garden cities of tomorrow (Introduction by Lewis Mumford). Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1965. (Originally published as Tomorrow: A peaceful path to real reform, 1898).

    Google Scholar 

  • H.R.H. The Prince of Wales. (1989). A vision of Britain. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S. (2000). Copperopolis: Landscapes of the early industrial period in Swansea. Royal Commission on Ancient Monuments in Wales, Cardiff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, T. A. (2011). Re-thinking metropolis: From the ‘liveable region’ to the ‘sustainable metropolis’ in Vancouver. International Planning Studies, 16(3), 237–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen-Jansen, L. B. (2011). From Amsterdam to Amsterdam metropolitan area: A paradigm shift. International Planning Studies, 16(3), 237–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen-Jansen, L.B. & Hutton, T.A. (2011a). Re-thinking the metropolis. International Planning Studies, 16(3), 201–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen-Jansen, L. B., & Hutton, T. A. (2011b). Reconfiguring the governance structures of the twenty-first century city-region: Observations and conclusions. International Planning Studies, 16(3), 305–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K., & Simmons, J. (1987). Location, location, location: Analyzing the retail environment. New York: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, P. (1994). The new urbanism: Toward an architecture of community. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelbaugh, D. (1989). The pedestrian pocket book: A new urban design strategy. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khattak, A. J., & Rodriguez, D. (2005). Travel behaviour in neo-traditional neighbourhood developments: A case study in U.S.A. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(6), 481–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. A., & Kaplan, R. (2004). Physical and psychological factors in sense of community: New urbanist Kentlands and nearby Orchard Village. Environment and Behaviour, 36(3), 313–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, G., & Talen, E. (2005). New urbanism and smart growth: A few words from the academy. International Regional Science Review, 28(2), 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knox, P. (1992). The packaged landscapes of post-suburban America. In P. J. Larkham & J. W. R. Whitehand (Eds.), Urban Landscapes: International Perspectives (9th ed., pp. 207–233). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, A. (Ed.). (1991). Andres Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk: Towns and town-making principles. New York: Rizzoli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krier, L. (1991). Afterword. In A. Krieger (Ed.), Andres Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk: Towns and town-making principles (pp. 117–119). New York: Rizzoli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krier, L. (1998). Architecture: Choice or fate. Great Britain: Andraes Papadakis Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroen, A., & Goodman, R. (2012). Implementing metropolitan strategies: Lessons from Melbourne. International Planning Studies, 17(3), 303–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunstler, J. H. (1993). The geography of nowhere: The rise and decline of America’s man-made landscape. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langdon, P. (1994). A better place to live: Reshaping the American suburbs. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennertz, W. (1991). Town-making fundamentals. In A. Krieger (Ed.), Towns and town-making principles (pp. 21–24). New York: Rizzoli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovering, J. (1999). Theory led by policy: The inadequacies of the new regionalism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(2), 379–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund, H. (2003). Testing the claims of new urbanism: Local access, pedestrian travel, and neighbouring behaviour. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(4), 414–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A. (1999). Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: The case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Regional Studies, 33(9), 575–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E. J. (1995). Neo-traditional developments: The anatomy of a new urban form. Urban Geography, 16, 210–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, E. (1994). Privatopia: Homeowner associations and the rise of residential private government. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohney, D., & Easterling, K. (Eds.) (1991). Seaside: Making a town in America. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, L. (1922). The story of utopia. New York: Boni and Liveright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, L. (1938). The culture of cities. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, L. (1939). Regional planning in the north-west. Portland City Club Bulletin, 18(July), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, L. (1961). The city in history. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murrain, P. (1996). Congress for the new urbanism charter: Developing an agenda for action. Urban Design International, 1(2), 183–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasar, J. (2003). Does neotraditional development build community? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23(1), 58–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, C. (1929). The neighbourhood unit. Monograph 1, Neighborhood and Community Planning, Regional Survey of New York and Environs (Vol. VII). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogharian, S. (1996). Street design: Learning from suburbia. Plan Canada, 36(5), 41–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, U. (2004). New regionalism contested: Some remarks in light of the case of the Mezzogiorno of Italy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(2), 466–4 76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sancton, A. (2001). Canadian cities and the new regionalism. Journal of Urban Affairs, 23(5), 543–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleimer, J. (1993). Buyers of homes in neo-traditional communities voice their opinions. Land Development, Spring-Summer, 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. W. (2005). The new regionalism as a contingent governance paradigm: European and North American perspectives. In Y. Murayma & G. Du (Eds.), Cities in global perspective (pp. 452–461). Tokyo: College of Tourism, Rikkyo University and I.G.U. Urban Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. W. (2009). Decoding the new regionalism. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scully, V. (1994). The Architecture of Community. In P. Katz (Ed.), The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of community (pp. 221–230). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • SG: Smart Growth Network. (2013). http://www.smartgrowth.org. Accessed 15 Aug 2013.

  • Soderbaum, F., & Shaw, T. M. (2003). Theories of new regionalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave, Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Song, Y. (2005). Smart growth and urban development pattern: A comparative study. International Regional Science Review, 28, 239–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southworth, M. (1997). Walkable suburbs: an evaluation of neo-traditional communities at the urban edge. Annals American Planning Association, 63(1), 28–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southworth, M. (2005). Designing the walkable city. Journal of Urban Planning Development, 131, 246–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, R. (1998). Traditional shopping centres. Access, 12, 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, R. B. (1999). A vision of green: Lewis Mumford’s legacy in Portland, Oregon. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(3), 259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suttles, G. (1972). The social construction of communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talen, E. (1999). Sense of community and neighbourhood form: An assessment of the social doctrine of new urbanism. Urban Studies, 36(8), 1361–1379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talen, E. (2002). The social goals of new urbanism. Housing Policy Debate, 13(1), 165–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telo, M. (Ed.). (2007). European Union and new regionalism. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson-Fawcett, M. (1996). The urbanist revision of development. Urban Design International, 1(4), 301–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Till, K. (1993). Neo-traditional towns and urban villages: The cultural production of a geography of otherness. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 11, 709–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townshend, I. J. (2002). Monitoring community dimensions: City-wide characteristics and differentiation by social region. In W. K. D. Davies & I. J. Townshend (Eds.), Monitoring cities: International perspectives (pp. 435–459). Calgary: International Geographical Union and Urban Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townshend, I. J., & Davies, W. K. D. (1999). Identifying the elements of community character: A case study of community dimensionality in old age residential areas. Research in Community Sociology, 9, 219–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tregoning, H., Agyeman, J., & Shenot, C. (2002). Sprawl, smart growth and sustainability. Local Environment, 7, 341–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unwin, R. (1969). Town planning in practice. New York: Ayer Company Publications (Reprint of 1934 edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ryn, S., & Calthorpe, P. (1986). Sustainable communities: A new design synthesis for cities, suburbs, and towns. San Francisco: Sierra Books Clubs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, C. (2002). Property rights and the public realm: Gates, green belts, and gemeinschaft. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29(3), 397–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, S. (2002). The new regionalism: Key characteristics of an emerging movement. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(3), 267–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, L., Mandpe, S., & Meyer, P. B. (2005). What is “smart growth?”-Really? Journal of Planning Literature, 19, 301–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wayne K.D. Davies .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davies, W., Townshend, I. (2015). New Urbanisms: From Neo-Traditional Neighbourhoods to New Regionalism. In: Davies, W. (eds) Theme Cities: Solutions for Urban Problems. GeoJournal Library, vol 112. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9655-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics