Skip to main content

The Political and Cultural Revolution of the CNRS: An Attempt at the Systematic Organisation of Research in Opposition to “the Academic Spirit”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sciences in the Universities of Europe, Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science ((BSPS,volume 309))

Abstract

Following the two world wars an important reflection on the role of universities and scientists in the development of political consciousness, citizenship, and national power took place in France. Debates often led by the Academy of Sciences centred on scientists’ mission and universities’ organization as well as on the relationship between academic knowledge and its applications, that is between science and technology. Proposals for enhancing research at the service of the nation’s needs were put forward, as for instance with the creation, in 1919, of the Division of Applications Division of Sciences in Industry within the Academy. From 1935 to 1948, these proposals led to the creation of independent research bodies—National Fund for Scientific Research, National Center for Applied Scientific Research, National Institute for Agronomic Research, Commission on the Atomic Energy—which resulted in the separation of French research from the universities, thus increasing the dichotomy between sciences and its applications. This paradox will be examined in this chapter. Where does this anomaly come from? There are long-standing causes: the French State has always been suspicious of the hotbeds of revolt that universities can provide; and the impact of the two world wars on the researchers’ awareness of the weakness of French science. As the report of the CNRS reorganization observed in October 1944 “the task of scientific research has always been underestimated in France.” The creation of CNRS in 1939 was to revolutionise the French university system for a long time to come. This is the turning point this chapter aims to discuss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    On the eve of the war this sanctuary of science seemed more dominated by “conservatism”, combined with a reticence in regard to new ideas and a tendency to retreat into fundamentalism.

  2. 2.

    The most important laboratories included the Laboratoire municipal de Paris; the Sorbonne (Professor Grignard was asked to evaluate the analyses of the Municipal Laboratory); the Ecole supérieure de Pharmacie (Professor Paul Lebeau); the Collège de France (Professor Mayer); the Faculty of Medicine (Professeur Achard).

  3. 3.

    He has invented the concept of “science industrielle”.

  4. 4.

    According to the mathematician Emile Picard, “science is becoming a means of domination for our neighbours”: Speech to the AFAS, 28 October 1916.

  5. 5.

    The division was closed in 1976, 4 years after the creation of the first French University of Technology. It was reborn in 1982 as Conseil pour les Applications de l’Académie des Sciences (CADAS: Council for the Applications of the Academy of Sciences), of Compiègne headed by Michel Lavalou who was the second director of the University of Technology of Compiègne. Michel Lavalou, address of 5 January 1998, in Académie des sciences de l’Institut de France, vol. I, 1997–1998, p. 77.

  6. 6.

    Minutes of the management committee meeting of 18 September 1944.

  7. 7.

    Académie des Sciences, session of 4 January 1927, p. 20.

  8. 8.

    Académie des Sciences, session of 3 January 1934, vol. 198, p. 19.

  9. 9.

    Archives nationales (France), F17/17463.

  10. 10.

    Irène Joliot-Curie was the first undersecretary of state for scientific research, from 5 June to 28 September 1938.

  11. 11.

    Académie des Sciences, session of 30 June 1930, vol. 190, p. 1533.

  12. 12.

    Six times in the years 1925–1940.

  13. 13.

    This was a professional initiative, primarily on the part of engineers of the Mines corps, to counter the emerging CNRS, which was seeking to create an institute for metallurgical research. It did not truly come into being until 1946.

  14. 14.

    Jacques Mehring, Félix Bertaut and Louis Weil.

  15. 15.

    Fondation Charles de Gaulle. 2003. Le général de Gaulle et la recherche scientifique. Cahier 12.

References

  • Belot, Robert. 2000. Quand l’Académie des sciences découvre la technologie (1915–1919). In La technologie au risque de l’histoire, ed. Robert Belot, Michel Cotte and Pierre Lamard, 413–428. Paris: UTBM/Berg International Editeurs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belot, Robert. 2002. L’aveu idéologique des vœux de l’AFAS. In Par la science, pour la patrie. Un projet politique pour une société savante, l’Association française pour l’avancement des sciences (1872–1914), ed. Hélène Gispert, 287–296. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blay, Michel. 2011. Quand la Recherche était une République. La recherche scientifique à la Libération. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claude, Georges. 1957. Ma vie et mes inventions. Paris: Plon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosland, Maurice. 1992. Science under control. The French Academy of sciences. 1795–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eidelman, Jacqueline. 1986. Science industrielle contre science pure: la professionnalisation de la recherche dans les années trente. In Les ingénieurs de la Crise, ed. André Grelon, 113–133. Paris: EHESS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Robert. 1984. Science, the university and the state in 19th century France. In Professions and the French State. 1700–1900, ed. Gerald L. Geison, 109. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillispie, Charles. 1981. Dictionary of scientific biography. vol. 7. New York: Charles Scribners’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthleben, Denis. 2009. Histoire du CNRS de 1939 à nos jours. Une ambition nationale pour la science. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthleben, Denis. 2011. Rêves de savants. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laugier, Henri. 1942. How science can win the war. Free World 1:55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laugier, Henri. 1955. Une puissante recherche scientifique, condition préalable à toute grandeur française, 148. Paris: Les Cahiers rationalistes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laugier, Henri. 1944. Le Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique en France. Revue d’Alger 1:6–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Chatelier, Henry. 1925. Science et industrie. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Chatelier, François. 1969. Henry Le Chatelier. Un grand savant d’hier. Un précurseur. Paris: Revue de Métallurgie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moureu. 1979. Index biographique de l’Académie des sciences, 1666–1978. Paris: Institut de France, Gauthier-Villars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicault, Catherine, and Virginie Durand. 2005. Histoire documentaire du CNRS. Tome 1 années 1930–1950. Paris: CNRS Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, Marie-Jo. 1974. Science and socialism: the case of Jean Perrin in the third republic. French Historical Studies 9:141–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ory, Pascal. 1991. Une cathédrale pour les temps nouveaux? Le Palais de la Découverte (1934–1940). In Masses et culture de masse dans les années trente, ed. Régine Robin, 180–204. Paris: Editions Ouvrières.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, Harry W. 1985. From Knowledge to power. The rise of the science empire in France, 1860–1939. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Picard, Emmanuelle. 1995. Henri Laugier et le CNRS (1936-1939). In Henri Laugier en son siècle, ed. Jean-Louis, Crémieux-Brilhac and Jean-François, Picard, 67. Paris: CNRS Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, J.-F., and E. Pradoura. 1988. La longue marche vers le CNRS, 1901–1945. Cahiers pour l’histoire du CNRS 1:30–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinault, Michel. 2000. Frédéric Joliot-Curie. Paris: Odile Jacob.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinault, Michel. 2006. La science au Parlement. Les débats d’une politique de recherches scientifiques en France. Paris: CNRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prochasson, Christophe, and Anne, Rasmussen. 1996. Au nom de la patrie. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zay, Jean. 1945. Souvenirs et solitude. Paris: Julliard.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Belot .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Belot, R. (2015). The Political and Cultural Revolution of the CNRS: An Attempt at the Systematic Organisation of Research in Opposition to “the Academic Spirit”. In: Simões, A., Diogo, M., Gavroglu, K. (eds) Sciences in the Universities of Europe, Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 309. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9636-1_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics