Skip to main content

Sexual Selection in the French School of Population Genetics: Claudine Petit (1920–2007)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Current Perspectives on Sexual Selection

Part of the book series: History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences ((HPTL,volume 9))

Abstract

This paper analyses Claudine Petit’s contributions to the experimental study of sexual selection. It examines the two sources of Petit’s work on the “advantage of the rare” in Drosophila melanogaster: the Tessier school of experimental genetics, with its methodology founded upon population cages, and the Dobzhansky/Mayr American school, which considered it mainly in relation with the problem of reproductive isolation. The evolution of Petit’s research is examined in detail, as well as the important role that her experimental work had in the issue of frequency-dependent selection. Petit’s final overtly non-adaptive interpretation of sexual selection is examined, in contrast with Dobzhansky’s conception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Source: personal communication, shortly before Claudine Petit’s death.

References

  • Bateman AJ (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex, vol. 2. John Murray, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky T (1944) Experiments on sexual isolation in Drosophila. III. Geographic strains of. Drosophila stutervanti Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 30:335–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky T, Koller PC (1938) An experiment on sexual isolation in Drosophila. Biol Zbl 58:589–607

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky T, Mayr E (1944) Experiments on sexual isolation between geographic strains of Drosophila willistoni. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 30:238–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky T, Streisiger G (1944) Experiments on sexual isolation in Drosophila. II. Geographic strains in Drosophila prosaltans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 30:340–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky T, Boesiger E (1968) Essais sur l’évolution. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky T, Boesiger E, (1983) Human culture: a moment in evolution (edited and completed by Bruce Wallace). New York University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Eherman L (1966) Mating success and genotypes frequency in Drosophila. Anim Behav 14:332–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman L, Petit C (1969) Sexual selection in Drosophila. Evol Biol 3:177–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayon J, Veuille M (2001) The genetics of experimental populations: L’Héritier and Teissier’s populations cages. In: Singh R, Krimbas C, Paul D, Beatty J (eds) Thinking about evolution: historical, philosophical, and political perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 77–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley JS, Teissier G (1936a) Terminology of relative growth. Nature 137:780–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley JS, et Teissier G (1936b) Terminologie et notation dans la description de la croissance relative. Comptes Rendus des Séances hebdomadaires de la Société de Biologie 121:934–937

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley JS, Teissier G (1936c) Zur Terminologie des relativen Grössenwachstums. Biol Centr 56(:):381

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin R (1974) The genetic basis of evolutionary change. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • L’Héritier P, et Teissier G (1934) Une expérience de sélection naturelle, Courbe d’élimination du gène Bar dans une population de Drosophila melanogaster. Comptes rendus des séances hebdomadaires de la Société de biologie 117:1049–1051

    Google Scholar 

  • L’Héritier P, et Teissier G (1936) Contribution à l’étude de la concurrence larvaire chez les Drosophiles. CR Soc Biol 122:264–267

    Google Scholar 

  • L’Héritier P, et Teissier G (1937a) Elimination des formes mutantes dans les populations de Drosophiles. Cas des Drosophiles Bar. Comptes rendus des séances hebdomadaires de la Société de biologie 124:880–882

    Google Scholar 

  • L’Héritier P, et Teissier G (1937b) Elimination des formes mutantes dans les populations de Drosophiles Cas des Drosophiles ebony. Comptes rendus des séances hebdomadaires de la Société de biologie 124:882–884

    Google Scholar 

  • L’Héritier P, et Teissier G (1937c) L’élimination des formes mutantes dans les populations de Drosophiles. Soixante-dixième Congrès des Sociétés Savantes 297–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather K, Harrison BJ (1949) The manifold effects of selection. Heredity 3:1–52 and 131–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1946a) Isolation between Drosophila pseudoobscura and. Drosophila persimilis their hybrids Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 32:128–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1946b) Experiments on sexual isolation in Drosophila. VII. The nature of isolating mecahnisms beteen D. pseudoobscura and D. Persimilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 32:128–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E, Dobzhansky T (1945) Experiments on sexual isolation in Drosophila. IV. Modification of the degree of isolation between D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis and of sexual preferences in. D prosaltans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 31:75–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl R, (1925) The biology of population growth. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl R (1927) The growth of populations. Q Rev Biol 2:532–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit C (1949) L’isolement sexuel chez Drosophila melanogaster: étude du mutant Bar. Bulletin de la Société française de génétique 3:7–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit C (1951a) Le rôle de l’isolement sexuel dans l’évolution des populations de Drosophila melanogaster. Bulletin biologique de la France et de la Belgique 85(4):392–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit C (1951b) Le rôle de l’isolement sexuel dans l’évolution des populations de Drosophila melanogaster. Comptes rendus de l’Académie des sciences 232:1482–2484

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit C (1952) La sélection sexuelle: étude théorique et expérimentale de la compétition entre Bar et sauvage. Bulletin de la Société française de génétique 4:8–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit C (1953) Les variations du coefficient d’isolement entre des souches isogéniques de Drosophila melanogaster. Comptes rendus de l’Académie des sciences 237:203–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit C (1954) L’isolement sexuel chez Drosophila melanogaster: étude du mutant white et de son allzlomorphe sauvage. Bulletin biologique de la France et de la Belgique 88:435–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit C (1955) Le déterminisme génétique de l’isolement sexuel. Comptes rendus de l’Académie des sciences 241:521–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit C (1958) Le déterminisme génétique et physiologique de la competition sexuelle chez Drosophila melanogaster. Bull biologique de la France et de la Belgique 92:248–329. (Thèse de Doctorat d’État)

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit C (1970) Quelques facteurs responsables de l’avantage du type rare chez Drosophila melanogaster. Comptes rendus de l’Académie des sciences 270:1719–1922

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit C (1974) L’avantage du rare, facteur du maintien du polymorphisme. In: Lamotte M. (éd) Le polymorphisme dans le règne animal. Mémoires de la Société Zoologique de France, Paris, pp 417–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit C (2000, unpublished) Souvenirs: la famille Petit dans la Résistance. Typographed manuscript, 79 pages. The foreword mentions 1997 as date of beginning of the manuscript. At the end of the text, the author mentions the date of completion, February the 20th, 2000. Personal communication

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit C, Prévost G (1967) Génétique et evolution. Hermann, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit C, Anxolabehere D (1968) Frequency-dependent selection and larvo-nymphal competition. Proc 12th International Congr of Genet 1:228

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit C, Nouaud (1975) Ecological competition and rare type mating advantage in. Drosophila melanogaster Evol 29:763–776

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit C, Zuckerkandl E (1976) Evolution; Génétique des populations. Evolution moléculaire. Hermann, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Provine WB (1986) Sewall wright and evolutionary biology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendel JM (1945) Normal and selective matings in Drosophila subobscura. J Genet 46:187–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timofeeff-Ressovsky N (1940) Mutations and geographical variation. In: J. Huxley (ed) The new systematics, pp. 73–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace B (1950) An experiment on sexual isolation Drosophila Information Service 24: 94–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1939) Statistical genetics in relation to evolution. Hermann, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S, Dobzhansky T (1946) Experimental reproduction of some of the changes caused by natural selection in certain populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura. Genetics 31:125–156

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean Gayon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gayon, J. (2015). Sexual Selection in the French School of Population Genetics: Claudine Petit (1920–2007). In: Hoquet, T. (eds) Current Perspectives on Sexual Selection. History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9585-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics