Abstract
We examine the origins of the disagreement of Alfred Russel Wallace and Charles Darwin regarding the significance and mechanism of sexual selection and relate this to differences in their views of human evolution, and of cognitive ability and esthetic sensibilities of various human and nonhuman populations. We trace subsequent versions of these differing views into the twentieth century, and the controversy between R.A. Fisher’s Darwinian “runaway” model of sexual selection by female choice (the “sexy son” model), and Wallacean models of sexual selection based on signs of greater fitness of males (the “healthy gene” hypothesis). Models derived from the latter, the “honest signal” and “handicap” models, are discussed, and we note that these different models, based on utility or beauty, are not necessarily mutually inconsistent.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Argyll, GD Campbell, 8th Duke of (1867) The reign of law. Alexander Straban, London
Argyll, GD Campbell, 8th Duke of (1869) Primeval man: an examination of some recent speculations. Strahan & co, London
Bartley M (1994) Conflicts in human progress: sexual selection and the Fisherian ‘runaway’. Brit J Hist Sci 27:177–196
Beddall BG (1968) Wallace, Darwin, and the theory of natural selection. A study in the development of ideas and attitudes. J Hist Biol 1(2):261–323
Beddall BG (1988) Wallace’s annotated copy of Darwin’s. Orig Species J Hist Biol 21(2):265–289
Bock WJ (2009) The Darwin-Wallace Myth of 1858. Proc Zool Soc 62(1):1–12
Bowler PJ (1976) Alfred Russel Wallace’s concepts of variation. J Hist Med 31:17–29
Bowler PJ (1983) The Eclipse of darwinism: anti-darwinian evolution theories in the decades around 1900. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
Bowler PJ (1984) Evolution. The history of an Idea. University of California Press, Berkeley
Bowler PJ (1988) The Non-Darwinian revolution. Reinterpreting a historical myth. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Brooks WK (1883) The law of heredity. A study of the cause of variation, and the origin of living organisms. John Murphy & Co, Baltimore
Browne J (1995) Charles darwin. voyaging, (A Biography: vol I). Princeton University Press, Princeton
Cronin H (1991) The ant and the peacock. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Dakin R, Montgomerie R (2011) Peahens prefer peacocks displaying more eyespots, but rarely. Anim Behav. doi:10:1016/j.anbehav.2011.03.01
Darwin E (1794) Zoonomia, or, the laws of organic life. J. Johnson, London
Darwin CR (1858) On the tendency of species to form varieties; and on the perpetuation of varieties and species by natural means of selection. J Proc Linnaean Soc Zool 3:46–50
Darwin CR (1859) On the origin of Species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray, London
Darwin CR (1868) The variation of animals and plants under domestication. John Murray, London
Darwin CR (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, 2 vol. London
Darwin CR (1872) The expression of the emotions in man and animals. John Murray, London. (reprinted 2009. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt)
Darwin CR (1874) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex, 2nd ed. John Murray, London
Darwin CR (1991) The correspondence of Charles Darwin. In: Burkhardt F, Smith S (eds) (vol 7). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Desmond A, Moore J (2009) Darwin’s sacred cause: how a hatred of slavery shaped darwin’s views on human evolution. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston
Fisher RA (1915) The evolution of sexual preference. Eugen Res 7:184–191
Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. The Clarendon Press, Oxford (Reprinted 1958, New York: Dover Publications).
Flannery M (ed) (2008) Alfred Russel Wallace’s theory of inteligent evolution. The Discovery Institute, Seattle
Flannery M (2011) Alfred Russel Wallace: a rediscovered life. The Discovery Institute, Seattle
Gayon J (1998) Darwinism’s struggle for survival. Heredity and the hypothesis of natural selection. (Translation, Matthew Cobb). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Gayon J (2009a) Darwin et Wallace: un débat constitutif pour la théorie de l’évolution par sélection naturelle. In L’évolution aujourdhui à la croisée de la biologie et des sciences humaines. Actes du colloque des 29, 30 et 31 janvier 2009 à l’Académie royale de Belgique. Académie royale de Belgique, Bruxelles, pp 89–122
Gayon J (2009b) Sexual selection: another Darwinian process. C R Biol 333(2010):134–144
Geddes P, Thomson AJ (1889) The evolution of sex. Walter Scott, London
Gillespie NC (1977) The Duke of Argyll, evolutionary anthropology, and the art of scientific controversy. Isis 68(241):40–54
Grafen A (1990) Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process. J Theor Biol 144:473–516
Griffin D (2001) Animal minds: beyond cognition to consciousness. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Haldane JBS (1964) A defense of beanbag genetics. Perspect Biol Med 7:343–343
Hale M, Verduijn M, Moller A, Wolff K, Petrie M (2009) Is the peacock’s train an honest signal of genetic quality at the major histocompatibility complex? J Evol Biol 22:1284–1294
Hartmann E von (1877) Le Darwinisme. Ce qu’il y a de vrai et de faux dans cette théorie. Baillière, Paris
Hoquet T (2009) Darwin contre Darwin. Comment lire l’Origine des Espèces? Le Seuil, Collection “L’Ordre Philosophique.” Paris
Hoquet T (2011) Translating natural selection: true concept but false term? Bionomina 3:1–23
Hrdy SB (1981) The woman that never evolved. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Irvine W (1955) Apes, angels and victorians. McGraw-Hill, New York
Kirkpatrick M (1982) Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evol Int J org Evol 36:1–12
Kirkpatrick M, Price T, Arnold SJ (1990) The Darwin-Fisher theory of sexual selection in monogamous birds. Evol Int J org Evol 44:180–193
Kottler M (1980) Darwin, Wallace and the origin of sexual dimorphism. Proc Am Phil Soc 124:203–226
Kottler M (1985) Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace: two decades of debate over natural selection. In: Kohn D (ed) The Darwinian heritage. Princeton University, Princeton, pp 317–432
Lande R (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection in polygenic traits. PNAS 78:3721–3725
Loyau A, Gomez D, Moureau B, Thery M, Hart N, Saint Jaime M, Bennett A, Sorci G (2007) Iridescent structurally based coloration of eyespots correlates with mating success in the peacock. Behav Ecol 18:1123–1131
Loyau A, Petrie M, Saint Jaime M, Sorci G (2008) Do peahens not prefer peacocks with more elaborate tails? Anim Behav 76:e5–e9
Lutz FE (1911) The effect of sexual selection (1909) In Experiments with Drosophila ampelophila concerning evolution. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC
Marchant J (1916) Alfred Russel Wallace, letters and reminiscences. Cassell, London
Maynard Smith J, Harper D (2003) Animal signals. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Mayr E, Provine WB (eds) (1980) The evolutionary synthesis. Perspectives on the unification of biology. Harvard University Press, reprint Cambridge (Mass)-London (England). (1998)
Morgan TH (1903) Evolution and adaptation. MacMillan, New York
Møller A, Alatalo R (1999) Good genes effects in sexual selection. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 266:85–91
Milam EK (2010) Looking for a few good males. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Nicholson AJ 1960. The role of population dynamics in natural selection. In: Sol Tax (ed) Evolution after Darwin, (vol 1). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 477–522
Nordenskjöld E (1920-1924) Biologins Historia; English trans. L. Bucknall Byre, The history of biology. A survey, Tudor Publishing Co., 1928.
O’Donald P (1967) A general model of sexual and natural selection. Heredity 22:499–518
Osborn HF (1894) From the Greeks to Darwin. Columbia University Press, New York
Petrie M (1992) Peacocks with low mating success are more likely to suffer predation. Anim Behav 44:585–586
Petrie M (1994) Improved growth and survival of offspring of peacocks with more elaborate trains. Nature 371:598–599
Petrie M, Halliday T, Sanders C (1991) Peahens prefer peacocks with elaborate trains. Anim Behav 41:323–331
Pomiankowski A (1987) Sexual selection: the handicap principle does work—sometimes. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 231:123–145
Prum R (2010) The Lande-Kirkpatrick mechanism is the null model of evolution by intersexual selection: implications for meaning, honesty, and design in intersexual signals. Evol Int J Org Evol 64:3085–3100. doi:1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01054.x
Prum RO (2012) Aesthetic evolution by mate choice: Darwin’s really dangerous idea. Philo Trans Royal Soc B 367:2253–2265
Radick G (2010) Darwin’s puzzling. Expression CR Biologie 333:181–187
Ràdl E (1913) Geschichte der biologischen Theorien in der Neuzeit. Engelmann, Leipzig-Berlin
Ridley M (1993) The red queen: sex and the evolution of human nature. Viking, London
Romanes G (1892) Darwin, and after Darwin: an exposition of the Darwinian theory and a discussion of post-Darwinian questions (3 vols). Longmans Green, London
Roughgarden J (2009) The genial gene. University of California Press, Berkeley
Slotten RA (2004) The Heretic in Darwin’s court: the life of Alfred Russel Wallace. Columbia University Press, New York
Takahashi M, Arita H, Hiraiwa-Hasegawa M, Hasegawa T (2008) Peahens do not prefer peacocks with more elaborate trains. Anim Behav 75:1209–1219
Thiselton-Dyer WT (1888) Mr. Romanes’s paradox. Nature 39:7–9
Wallace AR (1858) On the tendency of varieties to depart indefinitely from the original type. J Proc Linnean Society Zoology 3:53–62
Wallace AR (1869) Sir Charles Lyell on geological climates and the origin of species. The quarterly review (April), 359–394. http://people.wku.edu/charles.smith/wallace/S146.htm
Wallace AR (1871) Review of the descent of man and selection in relation to sex, by Charles Darwin. The academy, March 15, 177–183. http://people.wku.edu/charles.smith/wallace/S186.htm
Wallace AR (1889) Darwinism. An exposition of the theory of natural selection with some of its applications. Macmillan and Co, London
Wallace AR (1890) Review of E.B. Poulton’s The colours of animals. Nature 42(1082):289–291. http://wallace-online.org
Wallace AR (1905) My life. Chapman and Hall, UK
Wallace AR (1913) Social environment and moral progress. Cassell & Co, London
Whately R (1855) On the origin of civilization, Young Men’s Christian association lectures, (1854–1855). James Nisbet & Co, London
White RG (1871) The fall of man, or the loves of Gorillas. A popular scientific lecture upon the Darwinian theory of development by sexual selection, by a learned Gorilla. Carleton & Co, New York
Zahavi A (1975) Mate selection: a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol 53:205–214
Zahavi A, Zahavi A (1997) The handicap principle: a missing piece of Darwin’s puzzle. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hoquet, T., Levandowsky, M. (2015). Utility vs Beauty: Darwin, Wallace and the Subsequent History of the Debate on Sexual Selection. In: Hoquet, T. (eds) Current Perspectives on Sexual Selection. History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9585-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9585-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9584-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9585-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)