Abstract
This chapter deals with a case of failure in regulating a relatively small higher education system, one which is embedded in a still undereducated and unequal society. The first section presents the current regulatory framework and the two subsequent sections deal with the post-1996 developments by contrasting the different orientations that shaped the higher education sector with regard to expansion and market regulation, which also entails quality assurance policies. Section 2 deals with the 1995–2003 period under President Fernando Henrique Cardoso, which witnessed major efforts to couple expansion with the establishment of a quality-driven environment. Section 3 deals with the current Worker’s Party administrations and its continuous efforts to tighten the control over the private sector as well as to expand access, including to the public sector and to students from lower socioeconomic groups.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
In tertiary and lower level schools.
- 2.
These are the cases of Whitney, DeVry, Apollo, and Laureate.
References
Castro, C., Barros, H., Ito-Adler, J., & Schwartzman, S. (2012). Cem Mil Bolsistas no Exterior. Interesse Nacional, 5 (17), 25–36.
Catani, A., Hey, A., & Gilioli, R. (2007). PROUNI: democratização do acesso às Instituições de Ensino Superior? (PROUNI: Democratization of the access to Higher Education Institutions?) In Latin American Studies Association Congress, Montreal: SciELO Brasil.
Durham, E. (2005). Educação superior, pública e privada. In S. Schwartzman & C. Brock (Eds.), Os desafios da educação no Brasil (pp. 191–233). Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira.
Ferraz, M., Jelihovschi, Ê., & da Silveira, F. (2010). Análise do desempenho acadêmico do primeiro ano de implantação do sistema de reserva de vagas na UESC. In 19 SINAPE—Simpósio Nacional de Probabilidade e Estatística. São Pedro.
Garcia, M., Vianna, N., & Suñé, L. (2012). Diagnósticos e Propostas para a Avaliação da Educação Superior no Brasil, ABMES: Associação Brasileira de Mantenedoras de Ensino Superior.
IPEA. (2008). Igualdade Racial. Políticas Sociais: Acompanhamento e análise, 14, 207–231.
Knobel, M. (2011). Internationalizing Brazil's universities: Creating coherent national policies must be a priority. Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of California, Berkeley.
Koike, B. (2012). Fusões batem recorde no setor de educação. In Valor Econômico.
Monteiro, C. (2011). Contexto e Impacto das mudanças no setor educacional. Estudos e Projeções: Panorama e Propostas. In Congresso Brasileireo da Educação Superior Particular. Salvador.
Nunes, E., & de Carvalho M. (2004). Universidade Brasileira: Acesso, exclusão social e perspectivas dos egressos. In L. Morhy (Ed.), Universidade em Questão (pp. 428–453). Brasilia: Editora da UNB.
Nunes, E., Martignoni, E., & Ribeiro, L. (2005). Economia política e regulação da educação superior no Brasil. In D. A. Ximenes (Ed.), Avaliação e Regulação da Educação Superior: Experiência e Desafios (pp. 263–311). Brasília: Funadesp.
Schwartzman, S. (2010). The national assessment of courses in Brazil. In D. D. Dill & M. Beerkens (Eds.), Public policy for academic quality—Analyses of innovative policy instruments (pp. 293–312). Dordrecht: Springer.
Schwartzman, S. (2011). Dilemmas of expansion: Can the Brazilian government assure the quality of new institutions? In Inside higher education—The world view, Sept 20, 2011. At http://app3.insidehighered.com/blogs/the_world_view/schwartzman.
Sécca, R., & Leal R. (2009). Análise do setor de ensino superior privado no Brasil. BNDES setorial 30–Educação, pp. 103–156.
Velloso, J. (2009). Cotistas e não-cotistas: Rendimento de alunos da Universidade de Brasília, Vol. 39, pp. 621–644.
Verhine, R., Dantas, L., & Soares J. (2006). Do Provão ao ENADE: Uma análise comparativa dos exames nacionais utilizados no Ensino Superior Brasileiro. Ensaio—Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação, 14, 291–310.
Waltenberg, F., & de Carvalho M. (2012). Cotas Aumentam a Diversidade dos studantes sem Comprometer o Desempenho? Sinais Sociais, 7, 36–77.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Magalhães Castro, M. (2015). Higher Education Policies in Brazil: A Case of Failure in Market Regulation. In: Schwartzman, S., Pinheiro, R., Pillay, P. (eds) Higher Education in the BRICS Countries. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 44. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9570-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9570-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9569-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9570-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)