Abstract
The traditional way to address the problem of multiple objective optimization is to associate a scalar objective, generally obtained through some linear combination of weighted objectives. Such an approach may be of interest in some cases—particularly if the weight of each criterion is known beforehand—but besides its ad hoc character, it has several drawbacks since there is a loss of information and a need to define the weights associated to each objective. Moreover, the behavior of the algorithm is very sensitive and is biased by the values of these weights. Schaffer was the first to propose a Genetic Algorithm approach in 1985 for multiple objectives through his Vector Evaluated Genetic Algorithms, but it was biased towards the extrema of each objective. Goldberg proposed a solution to this particular problem with both non-dominance Pareto-ranking and sharing, in order to distribute the solutions over the entire Pareto front. All of these approaches are based on Pareto ranking and use either sharing or mating restrictions to ensure diversity. In the following, a first section presents a Pareto-based multi -objective algorithm inspired by Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm. It is a cooperative approach which gives a whole set of non-dominated solutions—the Pareto front.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Schaffer JD (1985) Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms, pages 93.100. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Carnegie-Mellon
Coello-Coello C, Van Veldhuizen Da, Lamont GB (2002) Evolutionary algorithms for solving multiobjective problems. Kluwer, New York
Deb K. (2003) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, Hoboken
Pareto V (1896) Cours d’economie politique. Rouge, Lausanne
Nash JF (1950) Equilibrium points in N-person games. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 36:46–49
Sefrioui M, Periaux J (2000) Nash genetic algorithms: examples and applications. In Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation CEC00, pages 509-516, La Jolla Marriott Hotel La Jolla, California, USA, 6–9 July 2000. IEEE Press
Mühlenbein H, Schomisch M, Born J (1991) The parallel genetic algorithm as function optimiser. Parallel Comput 17(6–7):619–632
Sefrioui M (1998) Algorithmes Evolutionnaires pour le Calcul Scientifique. Application à l’Electromagnétisme et à la Mécanique des Fluides Numériques. PhD thesis, University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris
Loridan P, Morgan JA (1989) Theoretical approximation scheme for stackelberg games. J Optim Theory Appl 61(1):95–110. Plenum Press, New York
Lee DS, Gonzalez LF, Periaux J (2010) UAS mission path planning system (MPPS) using hybrid-game coupled to multi-objective design optimizer. J Dyn Syst Measure Control. doi:10.1115/1.4001336
Lee DS (2006) Uncertainty based multi-objective and multidisciplinary design optimisation in aerospace engineering. PhD Thesis, School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, J07 University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Periaux, J., Gonzalez, F., Lee, D. (2015). Multi-Objective EAs And Game Theory. In: Evolutionary Optimization and Game Strategies for Advanced Multi-Disciplinary Design. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, vol 75. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9520-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9520-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9519-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9520-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)