Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Science and Literacy: Considering the Role of Texts in Early Childhood Science Education

  • Chapter
Research in Early Childhood Science Education

Abstract

This chapter examines the integration of science and literacy in early childhood education. We begin with a review of research on the types of science texts designed for young children and for early childhood classrooms – commercially produced, trade literature, and researcher-created. Such science texts present unique challenges in their content, their linguistic structures, and their varied visual representations. As relates specifically to trade literature, genre and subject matter can be sources of concern – genre in that texts that conflate story with scientific information and explanations may produce little science learning or scientific misconceptions, and subject matter in that current trade literature for young children chiefly addresses life science, with very few books written on physical science topics. Despite their importance, science texts have a very limited presence in current early childhood classrooms. Further, early childhood teachers appear reluctant to include such texts in common early childhood instructional practices, such as read alouds; this may be due to their own insecurities regarding science instruction. Given the importance of inquiry science, multiple researchers, working to enhance the quality of early childhood science instruction, have integrated text and inquiry science. We examine various Text Integrated Inquiry Science (TIIS) programs, acknowledging both unique and common program features, as well as limitations in research designs. A consideration of promising TIIS practices concludes this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, P. A. (1997). Knowledge-seeking and self-schema: A case for the motivational dimensions of exposition. Educational Psychologist, 32(2), 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. A., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, A. M. (2013). Report of the 2012 national survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill: Horizon Research, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, J., Berger, L., Hosoume, K., Kopp, J., Sneider, C., & Willard, C. (1993). Once upon a GEMS guide: Connecting young people’s literature to great explorations in math and science. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California at Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, J., Catz, K. N., & Arya, D. (2006, May). Improving science content acquisitions through a combined science/literacy approach: A quasi-experimental study. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, R. M., Rowe, M. P., Ozuru, Y., & McNamara, D. S. (2005). Deep-level comprehension of science texts: The role of the reader and the text. Topics in Language Disorders, 25(1), 65–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, F. (1930). Review of the book Green magic. Science Education, 15(1), 70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, M., Rose, S. A., & Berlin, L. J. (1978). The language of learning: The preschool years. New York: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, B. T., Donovan, M. S., & Burns, M. S. (Eds.). (2000). Eager to learn: Educating our preschoolers. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brabham, E., Boyd, P., & Edgington, W. D. (2000). Sorting it out: Elementary students’ responses to fact and fiction in informational storybooks as read‐alouds for science and social studies. Literacy Research and Instruction, 39(4), 265–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L. G., & Donovan, C. A. (2010). Information book read-alouds as models for second-grade authors. The Reading Teacher, 64(4), 246–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenneman, K., & Louro, I. F. (2008). Science journals in the preschool classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(2), 113–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, L. J., & Duke, N. K. (1998). Non-narrative as a catalyst for literacy development. Language Arts, 75, 108–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervetti, G. N., & Barber, J. (2009). Text in hands-on science. In E. H. Hiebert & M. Sailors (Eds.), Finding the right texts: What works for beginning and struggling readers (pp. 89–108). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervetti, G. N., Barber, J., Dorph, R., Pearson, P. D., & Goldschmidt, P. G. (2012). The impact of an integrated approach to science and literacy in elementary school classrooms. Journal of research in science teaching, 49(5), 631–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervetti, G. N., Bravo, M. A., Hiebert, E. H., Pearson, P. D., & Jaynes, C. A. (2009). Text genre and science content: Ease of reading, comprehension, and reader preference. Reading Psychology, 30(6), 487–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervetti, G. N., Jaynes, C. A., & Hiebert, E. H. (2009). Increasing opportunities to acquire knowledge through reading. In E. H. Hiebert (Ed.), Reading more, reading better (pp. 79–100). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. M., McTigue, E. M., & Smolkin, L. B. (2011). Elementary teachers’ use of graphical representations in science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(7), 613–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy

  • Conezio, K., & French, L. (2002). Science in the preschool classroom. Young Children, 57(5), 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, C. M., & Morrison, F. J. (2013). Knowledge acquisition in the classroom: Literacy and content knowledge. In A. M. Pinkham, T. Kaefer, & S. B. Neuman (Eds.), Knowledge development in early childhood: Sources of learning and classroom implications (pp. 220–241). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, C. M., et al. (2010). Content area literacy: Individualizing student instruction in second-grade science. The Reading Teacher, 63(6), 474–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, C. M., et al. (2012). Child characteristics by science instruction interactions in second and third grade and their relation to students’ content-area knowledge, vocabulary, and reading skill gains. Elementary School Journal, 113(1), 52–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, D. (2002). Shifting images of developmentally appropriate practice as seen through different lenses. Education Researcher, 31(1), 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, D. K., & Porche, M. V. (2011). Relation between language experiences in preschool classrooms and children’s kindergarten and fourth‐grade language and reading abilities. Child Development, 82(3), 870–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockrell, J. E., Braisby, N., & Best, R. M. (2007). Children’s acquisition of science terms: Simple exposure is insufficient. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 577–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, C. A., & Smolkin, L. B. (2001). Genre and other factors influencing teachers’ book selections for science instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(4), 412–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, C. A., & Smolkin, L. B. (2002). Considering genre, content, and visual features in the selection of trade books for science instruction. The Reading Teacher, 55(6), 502–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, C. A., & Smolkin, L. B. (2006). Children selections of science trade books. In D. W. Rowe, R. Jimenez, D. L. Compto, D. D. Dickinson, Y. Kim, K. Leander, & V. Risko (Eds.), Fifty-sixth yearbook of the national reading conference (pp. 218–234). Oak Creek: National Reading Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, C. A., Smolkin, L. B., & Lomax, R. G. (2000). Beyond the independent-level text: Considering the reader? Text match in first graders’ self-selections during recreational reading. Reading Psychology, 21(4), 309–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, M. (2003). The noisy airplane ride. Berkeley: Tricycle Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, N. K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(2), 202–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, N. K., & Bennett-Armistead, V. S. (2003). Reading & writing informational text in the primary grades: Research based practices. New York: Scholastic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, N. K., Caughlan, S., Juzwik, M. M., & Martin, N. M. (2012). Reading and writing genre with purpose in K–8 classrooms. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Z. (2005). Scientific literacy: A systemic functional linguistics perspective. Science Education, 89(2), 335–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Z. (2006). The language demands of science reading in middle school. International Journal of Science Education, 28(5), 491–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fingeret, L. (2012). Graphics in children’s informational texts: A content analysis. Michigan State University, ProQuest, UMI Dissertations (Publishing, 2012. 3524408. Downloaded 2013, Aug 12)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. J. (2004). Highly recommended trade books: Can they be used in inquiry science? In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 277–290). Newark: IRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. J. (2006). Representations of science within children’s trade books. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 214–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, L. (2004). Science as the center of a coherent, integrated early childhood curriculum. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 138–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, G. (1995). Planet earth/inside out. New York: Morrow Junior Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, S. R., & Murray, J. D. (1992). Knowledge of connectors as cohesion devices in text: A comparative study of native-English and English-as-a-second-language speakers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 504–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, J. E., et al. (2011). Developing low-income preschoolers’ social studies and science vocabulary knowledge through content-focused shared book reading. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4(1), 25–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Leong, J. A., & Otero, J. (2002). Introduction to the psychology of science text comprehension. In J. Otero, J. A. Leon, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 1–15). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J. T., Van Meter, P., Hancock, G. R., Alao, S., Anderson, E., & McCann, A. (1998). Does concept-oriented reading instruction increase strategy use and conceptual learning from text? Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti, B. J., Snyder, T. E., & Glass, G. V. (1992). Promoting conceptual change in science: Can texts be used effectively? Journal of Reading, 35(8), 642–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannus, M., & Hyönä, J. (1999). Utilization of illustrations during learning of science textbook passages among low- and high-ability children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(2), 95–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hapgood, S., Magnusson, S. J., & Sullivan Palincsar, A. (2004). Teacher, text, and experience: A case of young children’s scientific inquiry. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(4), 455–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experiences of young American children. Baltimore: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisey, N., & Kucan, L. (2010). Introducing science concepts to primary students through read‐alouds: Interactions and multiple texts make the difference. The Reading Teacher, 63(8), 666–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubitz, J. (2001). Report on a study of middle school physical science texts. Physics Teacher, 39(5), 304–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jetton, T. L. (1994). Information-driven versus story-driven: What children remember when they are read informational stories. Reading Psychology, 15(2), 109–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, J. (1934). Ulysses. New York: Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesidou, S., & Roseman, J. E. (2002). How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061s curriculum review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 522–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kletzien, S. B., & Dreher, M. J. (2004). Informational text in K-3 classrooms: Helping children read and write. Newark: International Reading Association, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 87–113). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, S. J., & Palincsar, A. S. (2001). The interplay of first-hand and second-hand investigations to model and support the development of scientific knowledge and reasoning. In Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 151–194). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, S. J., & Palincsar, A. S. (2004). Learning from text designed to model scientific thinking in inquiry-based instruction. In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 316–339). Newark: IRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantzicopoulos, P., Samarapungavan, A., & Patrick, H. (2009). “We learn how to predict and be a scientist”: Early science experiences and kindergarten children’s social meanings about science. Cognition and Instruction, 27(4), 312–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. J. (Ed.). (2011). Elementary science methods: A constructivist approach. Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marulis, L. M., & Neuman, S. B. (2010). The effects of vocabulary intervention on young children’s word learning a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 300–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, D. (1995). How can we best use literature in teaching? Science and Children, 32(6), 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • McTigue, E. M., & Flowers, A. C. (2011). Science visual literacy: Learners’ perceptions and knowledge of diagrams. The Reading Teacher, 64(8), 578–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • McTigue, E. M., & Slough, S. W. (2010). Student-accessible science texts: Elements of design. Reading Psychology, 31(3), 213–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, K. A. J. (2006). Children’s choices for recreational reading: A three-part investigation of selection preferences, rationales, and processes. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(1), 81–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, S. E., Bus, A. G., & de Jong, M. T. (2009). Interactive book reading in early education: A tool to stimulate print knowledge as well as oral language. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 979–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moschovaki, E., & Meadows, S. (2005). Young children’s cognitive engagement during classroom book reading: Differences according to book, text genre, and story format. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 7(2), 1–8. http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v7n2/moschovaki.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, G. (2003). Putting the text back into practice: Junior-age non-fiction as objects of design. In C. Jewitt & G. Kress (Eds.), Multimodal literacy (pp. 73–87). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Education Association. (1893). Report of the committee on secondary school studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, D. P., & Newton, L. D. (2000). Do teachers support causal understanding through their discourse when teaching primary science? British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 601–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olshtain, E., & Cohen, E. (2005). Logical connectors in Hebrew: How well do eighth graders master them? In D. Ravid & H. Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman (pp. 315–326). New York: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, C. V. (2003). Nonsense, sense and science: Misconceptions and illustrated trade books. Journal of Children’s Literature, 29(1), 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappas, C.C. (1986, December). Exploring the global structure of “information books.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the national reading conference, Austin. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 278 952)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappas, C. C. (1991). Fostering full access to literacy by including information books. Language Arts, 68(6), 449–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappas, C. C. (1993). Is narrative “primary”? Some insights from kindergarteners’ pretend readings of stories and information books. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25(1), 97–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappas, C. C. (2006). The information book genre: Its role in integrated science literacy research and practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(2), 226–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappas, C. C., Varelas, M., Gill, S., Ortiz, I., & Keblawe-Shamah, N. (2009). Research directions: Multimodal books in science-literacy units: Language and visual images for meaning making. Language Arts, 86(3), 201–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, P. D., Moje, E., & Greenleaf, C. (2010). Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other. Science, 328(5977), 459–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pentimonti, J. M., Zucker, T. A., & Justice, L. M. (2011). What are preschool teachers reading in their classrooms? Reading Psychology, 32(3), 197–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L. M., & Norris, S. P. (2009). Bridging the gap between the language of science and the language of school science through the use of adapted primary literature. Research in Science Education, 39(3), 313–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkham, A. M., Kaefer, T., & Neuman, S. B. (Eds.). (2013). Knowledge development in early childhood: Sources of learning and classroom implications. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozzer-Ardenghi, L., & Roth, W. M. (2005). Making sense of photographs. Science Education, 89(2), 219–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, L. H., Kleeck, A., & Huberty, C. J. (2009). Talk during book sharing between parents and preschool children: A comparison between storybook and expository book conditions. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(2), 171–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D. (2004). Emergence of linguistic complexity in written expository texts: Evidence from later language acquisition. In D. Ravid & H. Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development (pp. 337–355). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, D. C. (2002). Using trade books in teaching elementary science: Facts and fallacies. The Reading Teacher, 55(6), 552–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. L., Norman, R. R., Duke, N. K., Morsink, P., Martin, N. M., & Knight, J. A. (2013). Diagrams, timelines, and tables—Oh, my!: Fostering graphical literacy. The Reading Teacher, 67(1), 12–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (1992). A curriculum strategy that expands time for in-depth elementary science instruction by using science‐based reading strategies: Effects of a year-long study in grade four. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 545–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (2001). Implementing an in-depth expanded science model in elementary schools: Multi-year findings, research issues, and policy implications. International Journal of Science Education, 23(4), 373–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K. J., Druker, S. L., Garnier, H. E., Lemmens, M., Chen, C., Kawanaka, T., et al. (2006). Teaching science in five countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study (NCES 2006–011). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, F. J. (1991). Vital connections: Children, books, and science. In W. Saul & S. A. Jagusch (Eds.), Vital connections: Children, science, and books. Papers from a symposium sponsored by the Children’s Literature Center (pp. 21–30). Washington, DC: Library of Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saçkes, M. (2012). How often do early childhood teachers teach science concepts? Determinants of the frequency of science teaching in kindergarten. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 22, 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saçkes, M., Trundle, K. C., Bell, R. L., & O’Connell, A. A. (2011). The influence of early science experience in kindergarten on children’s immediate and later science achievement: Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 217–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saçkes, M., Trundle, K. C., & Flevares, L. M. (2009). Using children’s books to teach inquiry skills. Young Children, 64(6), 24–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samarapungavan, A., Mantzicopoulos, P., & Patrick, H. (2008). Learning science through inquiry in kindergarten. Science Education, 92(5), 868–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samarapungavan, A., Patrick, H., & Mantzicopoulos, P. (2011). What kindergarten students learn in inquiry-based science classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 29(4), 416–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saul, E. W., & Dieckman, D. (2005). Choosing and using information trade books. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(4), 502–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schussler, E. E. (2008). From flowers to fruits: How children’s books represent plant reproduction. International Journal of Science Education, 30(12), 1677–1696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepardson, D. P., & Pizzini, E. L. (1991). Questioning levels of junior high school science textbooks and their implications for learning textual information. Science Education, 75(6), 673–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. (1991). Dear Mr. Blueberry. New York: M. K. McElderry Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra, G. M., & Broughton, S. H. (2011). Bridging comprehension and conceptual change in science education: The promise of refutational text. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(4), 369–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolkin, L. B., & Donovan, C. A. (2001). The contexts of comprehension: The information book read aloud, comprehension acquisition, and comprehension instruction in a first-grade classroom. Elementary School Journal, 102(2), 97–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolkin, L. B., & Donovan, C. A. (2004a). How not to get lost on the magic school Bus: What makes high science content read-alouds. In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 291–313). Newark: IRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolkin, L. B., & Donovan, C. A. (2004b). Improving science instruction with information books: Understanding multimodal presentations. In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 190–208). Newark: IRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolkin, L. B., & Donovan, C. A. (2005). Looking closely at a science trade book: Gail Gibbons and multimodal literacy. Language Arts, 83(1), 52–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolkin, L. B., & Donovan, C.A. (2015). Making the most of the explanatory power of the science trade book read aloud. [Manuscript submitted for publication.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolkin, L. B., McTigue, E. M., & Donovan, C. A. (2008). Explanation and science text: Overcoming the comprehension challenges in nonfiction text for elementary students. In C. C. Block & S. R. Parris (Eds.), Comprehension instruction, second edition: Research-based practices (pp. 183–196). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolkin, L. B., McTigue, E. M., Donovan, C. A., & Coleman, J. M. (2009). Explanation in science trade books recommended for use with elementary students. Science Education, 93(4), 587–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolkin, L. B., McTigue, E. M., & Yeh, Y. F. Y. (2013). Searching for explanations in science trade books: What can we learn from Coh-Metrix? International Journal of Science Education, 35(8), 1367–1384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolkin, L. B., Yaden, D. B., Brown, L., & Hofius, B. (1992). The effects of genre, visual design choices, and discourse structure on preschoolers’ responses to picture books during parent–child read-alouds. In C. K. Kinzer & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Literacy research, theory, and practice: Views from many perspectives. Forty-first yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 291–301). Chicago: National Reading Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (Vol. 2, pp. 53–120). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trundle, K. C., Troland, T. H., & Pritchard, T. G. (2008). Representations of the moon in children’s literature: An analysis of written and visual text. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20(1), 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Kleeck, A., Gillam, R., Hamilton, L., & McGrath, C. (1997). The relationship between middle-class parents’ book sharing discussion and their preschoolers’ abstract language development. Journal of Speech, Language, Hearing Research, 40(6), 1261–1271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varelas, M., & Pappas, C. C. (2006). Intertextuality in read-alouds of integrated science-literacy units in urban primary classrooms: Opportunities for the development of thought and language. Cognition and Instruction, 24(2), 211–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varelas, M., & Pappas, C. C. (2013). Forms and functions. In M. Varelas & C. C. Pappas (Eds.), Children’s ways with science and literacy: Integrated multimodal enactments in urban elementary classrooms (pp. 3–19). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varelas, M., Pappas, C. C., Kokkino, S., & Ortiz, I. (2008). Students as authors. Science & Children, 45(7), 58–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veel, R. (1997). Learning how to mean- scientifically speaking: Apprenticeship into scientific discourse in the secondary school. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions. Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 161–195). London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitale, M. R., & Romance, N. R. (2011). Adaptation of a knowledge-based instructional intervention to accelerate student learning in science and early literacy in grades 1 and 2. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 5(2), 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walpole, S. (1998). Changing texts, changing thinking: Comprehension demands of new science textbooks. The Reading Teacher, 52(4), 358–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walpole, S., & Smolkin, L. (2004). Teaching the page: Teaching learners to read complex text. In A. Peacock & A. Cleghorn (Eds.), Missing the meaning: The development and use of print and non-print materials in diverse school settings (pp. 197–212). New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. (2005). Evaluation of seeds of science/roots of reading project: Shoreline science and terrarium investigations. Los Angeles: CRESST, UCLA (http://scienceandliteracy.org/sites/scienceandliteracy.org/files/biblio/wang_herman_2005_cresst_pdf_21395.pdf)

  • Yager, R. E. (2004). Science is not written, but it can be written about. In W. E. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 95–107). Arlington: National Science Teachers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, Y., & McTigue, E. (2009). Frequency, variation, and function of graphical representations within standardized state science tests. School Science and Mathematics, 109(8), 435–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yopp, R. H., & Yopp, H. K. (2006). Informational texts as read-alouds at school and home. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(1), 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yopp, R. H., & Yopp, H. K. (2012). Young children’s limited and narrow exposure to informational text. The Reading Teacher, 67(7), 480–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, C. (2000). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 20(1), 99–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, T. A., Justice, L. M., Piasta, S. B., & Kaderavek, J. N. (2010). Preschool teachers’ literal and inferential questions and children’s responses during whole-class shared reading. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25(1), 65–83.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Laura B. Smolkin

  2. University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA

    Carol A. Donovan

Authors
  1. Laura B. Smolkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carol A. Donovan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura B. Smolkin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA

    Kathy Cabe Trundle

  2. Necatibey School of Education, Balikesir University, Balikesir, Turkey

    Mesut Saçkes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smolkin, L.B., Donovan, C.A. (2015). Science and Literacy: Considering the Role of Texts in Early Childhood Science Education. In: Cabe Trundle, K., Saçkes, M. (eds) Research in Early Childhood Science Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9505-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation