Skip to main content

Practice-Based Learning of Novices in Higher Education: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (LPP) Revisited

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Practice-based Learning in Higher Education

Part of the book series: Professional and Practice-based Learning ((PPBL,volume 10))

  • 1115 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter extends Lave and Wenger’s Legitimate Peripheral Participation concept to Higher Education and intends to review the concept of LPP by placing the role of novices and technical materiality at the heart of practice-based learning. A narrated description of the events observed in the lab shall attempt to show how a novice learns through practice and with others (both human and non-human), emphasizing the idea that in Higher Education too, and particularly in the passage from the lecture hall to the laboratory practice-based learning is situated, socio-material and participated. The pedagogy of practice, activated in the scientific laboratory context fosters the co-existence of learning practices and academic interests, producing tension between codified knowledge and unstable expertise in evolution, between the procedural standards and artisan skills incorporated by both novices and experts. Only by integrating these two types of knowledge can a robust university training and qualification be achieved.

A different version of this paper it was published in the 2012 (Viteritti A. “Sociomaterial Assemblages in learning scientific practice: Margherita’s first PCR in TECNOSCIENZA: Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies http://www.tecnoscienza.net/index.php/tsj/article/view/91). Now, in this new version I would to explore some different elements that permit a re-conceptualization of learning and in particular the role of LPP in Higher Education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Polymerase Chain Reaction, commonly conveyed by the acronym PCR, is a molecular biology technique which allows fragments of nucleic acids from DNA to be amplified. Amplifying using PCR allows scientists to obtain the quantity of genetic material necessary for successive applications and experiments very rapidly in vitro. The technique was invented in 1983 by Kary B. Mulis, who won the Nobel Prize for Chemistry for this in 1993.

References

  • Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., Delamont, S., Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. (2001). (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography, London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2002). Toward a workplace pedagogy: Guidance, participation, and engagement. Adult Education Quarterly, 53(1), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2011). Curriculum and pedagogic bases for effectively integrating practice-based experiences. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, A. (2013). “Technologically dense environments: What for? What next?” in tecnoscienza. Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 4(2) (being printed).

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. (2010). Tacit and explicit knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collins A., Brown J. S., Newman S. E., (1987) Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics (Technical Report No. 403), BBN Laboratories, Cambridge, MA. Centre for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B. (2007). Shadowing and other techniques for doing fieldwork in modern societies. Copenhagen: Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engestom, Y. (1995). Non scholae sed vitae discimus. Come superare l’incapsulamento dell’apprendimento scolastico. In A. M. Ajello, C. Pontecorvo, & C. Zucchermaglio (Ed.), (a cura di). I contesti sociali dell’apprendimento. Milano: LED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor network theory and education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2012). Researching education through actor-network-theory. London: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (2000). Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in “organizations”. Organisation, 7(2), 211–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (2001). From organizational learning to practice- based knowing. Human Relations, 54(1), 131–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge: The texture of workplace learning. Oxford: Blackwell publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (2009). Community of pratice or practices of a community? In The sage handbook of management learning, education, and development (pp. 514–530). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (2011). Organizational learning: The sociology of practice. In M. Easterby-Smith & M. Lyles (eds), The blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (pp. 43–65). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S., Nicolini, D., & Odella, F. (1998). Toward a social understanding of how people learn in organisations: The notion of situated curriculum. Management Learning, 29(3), 273–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S., Nicolini, D., & Strati, A. (2007). The passion for knowing. Organization, 14(3), 315–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to perception. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, A. (2004). Une sociologie des attachments. D’une sociologie de la culture une pragmatique de l’amateur. Sociètès, 85(3), 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, D. (2005). Pedagogy and the practice of science: Historical and contemporary perspectives. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina, K. (1997). Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Culture & Society, 14(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina, K. (2001). Objectual practice. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 175–188). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landri, P., & Viteritti, A. (2010). Tracing socio-materiality in education, Paper for Conference Theorising Education, First International Theorising Education Conference, Stirling Management Centre, University of Stirling, UK, June 24–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (1987). Technologies and heterogeneous engineering: The case of the Portuguese expansion. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. J. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technical systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 111–134). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1985). Art and artifact in laboratory science: A study of shop work and shop talk in a research laboratory. Boston: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., & Yanow (2003). Knowing in organization. a practice-based-approach. New York: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday & Company Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning technology and knowledge in educational practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, L. S., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strati, A. (2007). Sensible knowledge and practice-based learning. Management Learning, 38(1), 61–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viteritti, A. (2012). “Sociomaterial Assemblages in learning scientific practice: Margherita’s first PCR in TECNOSCIENZA. Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 3(1), 29–48 http://www.tecnoscienza.net/index.php/tsj/article/view/91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viteritti, A. (2013). “It’s the body (that does it)! The production of knowledge through body in scientific learning practice”. Scandinavian Journal Of Management, 29(4), 367–376 (Edited by S. Gherardi, S. Merilainen, A. Strati, A. Valtonen, Special Issue “Body, senses and knowing in organization. Stockholm: Elsevier Science Publishing Company).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakhlef, A. (2010). The corporeality of practice-based learning. Organization Studies, 31(4), 409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Assunta Viteritti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Viteritti, A. (2015). Practice-Based Learning of Novices in Higher Education: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (LPP) Revisited. In: Kennedy, M., Billett, S., Gherardi, S., Grealish, L. (eds) Practice-based Learning in Higher Education. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9502-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics