Skip to main content

Globalisation and the New Zealand Numeracy Standards: In Pursuit of Excellence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

What do the Olympic movement and education systems internationally have in common? Standards, it seems. The impact of globalisation is manifest in demand-driven education systems that also impose accountability measures on schools, students and teachers in the form of standards. In New Zealand the politically driven imposition of standards for literacy and mathematics was met with widespread concern. From his own experience as writer of the mathematics standards, the author tells the inside story of ethical and practical tensions that surrounded their creation, especially in regard to assessment. Reasons for the strong opposition to standards are given and implications are drawn about the likely future implementation of the standards initiative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • ACARA. (2011). Australian curriculum: Mathematics. Retrieved from: http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/Mathematics/Rationale

  • ACARA. (2013). National assessment programme. Retrieved from: http://www.nap.edu.au/

  • Adijage, R., & Pluvinage, F. (2008). Four levels of competence for assessment of mathematics achievement. Paper presented at the 11th international congress on mathematics education. Retrieved from: http://tsg.icme11.org/tsg/show/37

  • Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global economy. Theory, Culture and Society, 7, 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. W. (2006). Educating the “right” way: Markets, standards, God, and inequality (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, M., & Caygill, R. (2012). Key findings from New Zealand’s participation in the progress in international reading literacy study (PIRLS) and trends in international mathematics and science study (TIMSS) in 2010/11. Wellington: New Zealand Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, B. (2010). National standards: A parent’s perspective. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 7(1), 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, D. M. (2013). Pre-service teacher education in the postmodern state. Unpublished Ph.D., Australian Catholic University, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darr, C. (2010). National standards for mathematics: Where to set the bar? Retrieved from: http://www.nzcer.org.nz/system/files/national-standards-maths-set-bar.pdf

  • Darr, C., Neill, A., & Stephanou, A. (2006). Progressive achievement test: Mathematics: Teacher manual. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Review Office. (2006). Quality of teaching in years 4 and 8: Mathematics. National Reports. Retrieved from: http://www.ero.govt.nz/National-Reports/The-Quality-of-Teaching-in-Years-4-and-8-Mathematics-June-2006

  • Elley, W. (2010). Twenty fundamental flaws in the national standards policy. Retrieved from: http://www.educationaotearoa.org.nz/all-stories/2010/7/18/twenty-fundamental-flaws-in-the-national-standards-policy.html

  • Flockton, L. (2010). 21 very serious problems with the National Standards Policy of the government, and its system developed by the Ministry of Education with its contractors. Retrieved from: http://www.nzpf.ac.nz/sites/default/files/Very_Serious_Concerns_Flockton.pdf

  • Flockton, L., Crooks, T., Smith, J., & Smith, L. (2006). National education monitoring project: Mathematics assessment results 2005. Dunedin: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. New York/Buckingham: Teachers’ College Press/Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2009). Horizons and whirlpools: The well-travelled pathway of national standards. Retrieved from: http://growthmindseteaz.org/files/Nat_20_20Standards_20Horizons_20and_20Whirlpools_20-J_20Hattie_202009.pdf

  • Hattie, J. A. C., Brown, G. T. L., Keegan, P. J., MacKay, A. J., Irving, S. E., Patel, P., et al. (2004). Assessment tools for teaching and learning (asTTle) Version 4, 2005: Manual. Wellington: University of Auckland/Ministry of Education/Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawes, E. (2011). An alignment of the trends in international mathematics and science mathematics scale with the ‘By the end of Year 5’ national standard in mathematics. In M. Hodis & S. Kaiser (Eds.), Symposium on assessment and learner outcomes (Vol. 1, pp. 164–176). Wellington: Jessie Hetherington Centre for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, S., Cowles, S., & Lamy, M. (2013). PISA 2012 New Zealand summary report. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (1992). Mathematics in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media. Retrieved from http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/cont…file/The-New-Zealand-Curriculum.pdf

  • Ministry of Education. (2010a). Making an overall teacher judgment. Retrieved from: http://assessment.tki.org.nz/Overall-tecaher-judgment/Making-an-overall-teacher-judgment

  • Ministry of Education. (2010b). A method for aligning assessment tools to national standards using expert judgments informed by student responses. Retrieved from: http://assessment.tki.org.nz/Assessment-tools-resources/Alignment-of-assessment-tools-with-National-Standards

  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, C. o. C. S. S. O. (2010). Common core state standards. Retrieved from: http://www.corestandards.org/

  • Openshaw, R., & Walshaw, M. (2012). Are our standards slipping? Wellington: NZCER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozga, J., & Lingard, R. (2007). Globalisation, education and politics. In J. Ozga & R. Lingard (Eds.), The RoutledgeFalmer reader in education and politics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlberg, P. (2006). Education reform for raising economic competitiveness. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 259–287. doi:10.1007/s10833-005-4884-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 12(2), 88–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telford, M., & May, S. (2010). PISA 2009: Our 21st century learners at age 15. From: http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/86814/PISA-2009-Our-21st-century-learners-at-age-15.pdf

  • Thomas, G., & Tagg, A. (2005). The impact of the numeracy development project on mathematics achievement. In S. Slaughter (Ed.), Findings from the New Zealand numeracy development projects 2004 (pp. 35–46). Wellington: Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G., & Tagg, A. (2007). Do they continue to improve?: Tracking the progress of a cohort of longitudinal students. In S. Slaughter (Ed.), Findings from the New Zealand numeracy development projects 2006 (pp. 8–15). Wellington: Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrupp, M. (2013). Research, analysis and insight into National Standards (RAINS) Project, second report: Understanding New Zealand’s very local national standards. Hamilton: Wilf Malcolm Institute of Educational Research, University of Waikato.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J., & Thomas, G. (2013). National standards: School sample monitoring and evaluation project, 2010–2012. Dunedin: NZ Maths Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, C., Hodgen, E., & Darr, C. (2009). National standards consultation analysis. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young-Loveridge, J. (2005). Patterns of performance and progression: Analysis of 2004 data. In S. Roach (Ed.), Findings from the New Zealand numeracy development project 2004 (pp. 5–20, 115–129). Wellington: Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young-Loveridge, J. (2006). Patterns of performance and progress on the New Zealand numeracy project: Looking back from 2005. In D. Holton (Ed.), Findings from the New Zealand numeracy projects 2005 (pp. 6–23). Wellington: Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young-Loveridge, J. (2007). Patterns of performance and progress on the numeracy development project: Findings from 2006 for years 5–9 students. In S. Slaughter (Ed.), Findings from the New Zealand numeracy development projects 2006 (pp. 16–32, 154–177). Wellington: Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajda, J. (2009). Globalisation and its impact on education and policy. In J. Zajda & V. Rust (Eds.), Globalisation, policy and comparative research. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zajda, J. (2014). Globalisation and neo-liberalism as educational policy in Australia. In H. Yolcu & D. Turner (Eds.), Neoliberal education reforms: A global analysis. New York: Taylor & Francis/Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vince Wright .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wright, V. (2015). Globalisation and the New Zealand Numeracy Standards: In Pursuit of Excellence. In: Zajda, J. (eds) Second International Handbook on Globalisation, Education and Policy Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9493-0_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics