Skip to main content

Globalisation and Neoliberalism: A New Theory for New Times?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Second International Handbook on Globalisation, Education and Policy Research

Abstract

The chapter discusses the general nature of globalisation theory and identifies the key arguments. After that the chapter points out the centrality of media and communications in several noted globalisation theorists’ work, calling into question their preoccupation with new media technologies and their assumption that the impact of those technologies is historically so significant that it necessitates a complete renewal of social theory. A consequent point, developed in the final two sections of the chapter, is that at the same time as globalisation theorists have diverted attention to new communication technologies and networks, they have shown a massive disinterest in powerful political and economic forces that continue to shape the society. I will argue that this feature is not unrelated to the specific historical conjuncture in which globalisation theory rose to prominence, that is, the post-1989 period characterised by the collapse of the Eastern Bloc and the global triumph of neoliberal capitalism. Besides analysing the contours of globalisation theory, the chapter also addresses its political implications, namely, the question of whether or to what extent neoliberalism, as a political ideology, has affected the focuses and ways of reasoning that are typical for globalisation theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albrow, M. (1996). The global age. State and society beyond modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ampuja, M. (2012). Theorizing globalization. A critique of the mediatization of social theory. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large. Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1998). Globalization: The human consequences. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society. Towards a new modernity (M. Ritter, Trans.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2000). What is globalization? (P. Camiller, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2006). Cosmopolitan vision (C. Cronin, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, S. (1999). The space of flows and timeless time. Manuel Castells’ The Information Age. Radical Philosophy, 97, 6–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callinicos, A. (2007). Social theory. A historical introduction (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1998). A rejoinder: On power, identities and culture in the network society. New Political Economy, 3(3), 473–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2000). The information age: Economy society and culture. Volume I: The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, B. (2010). Theories of social capital. Researchers behaving badly. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M. (2009). Capitalist Realism: Is there no alternative? London: Zero Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. B., & McChesney, R. W. (2011). The Internet’s unholy marriage to capitalism. Monthly Review, 62(10). Retrieved from http://monthlyreview.org/2011/03/01/the-internets-unholy-marriage-to-capitalism

  • Friedman, T. (2006). The world is flat. A brief history of the twenty-first century (Updated and Expanded.). New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, C. (2009). Some reflections on Manuel Castells’ book ‘Communication Power’. TripleC, 7(1), 94–101. Retrieved from http://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/viewFile/136/90

  • García Canclini, N. (1995). Hybrid cultures: Strategies for entering and leaving modernity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1998). The third way: The renewal of social democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (2002). Runaway world. How globalization is reshaping our lives (New Edition). London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug, W. F. (2005). New elements of a theory of commodity aesthetics. Retrieved from http://www.wolfgangfritzhaug.inkrit.de/documents/NewElementsCommodityAesthetics.pdf

  • Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton, J. (1999). Global transformations: Politics, economics and culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. (2010). Globalization. Key thinkers. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash, S. (1999). Another modernity, a different rationality. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (1986). The sources of social power. Vol. 1: A history of power from the beginning to A.D. 1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1973). Grundrisse: Foundations of the critique of political economy (rough draft) (M. Nicolaus, Trans.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg galaxy: The making of a typographic man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: A Signet Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosco, V. (2004). The digital sublime. Myth, power, and cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G., & Goodman, D. J. (2003). Sociological theory (6th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization. Social theory and global culture. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J. (2000). The follies of globalization theory. Polemical essays. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J. (2005). Globalization theory: A post mortem. International Politics, 42(1), 2–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, J. A. (2005). Globalization. A critical introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W. (2012). The crises of democratic capitalism. New Left Review, 71, 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Therborn, G. (2007). After dialectics. Radical social theory in a post-communist world. New Left Review, 43, 63–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, J. (1997). Cultural globalization and cultural imperialism. In A. Mohammadi (Ed.), International communication and globalization (pp. 170–190). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, G. (2010). Ordinary people and the media. The demotic turn. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies. Mobilities for the twenty-first century. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2003). Global complexity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Bly, M. C. E. (2005). Globalization: A triumph of ambiguity. Current Sociology, 53(6), 875–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winseck, D. R., & Pike, R. M. (2007). Communication and empire. Media, markets, and globalization, 1860–1930. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E. M. (2002). The origin of capitalism. A longer view. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajda, J. (2014). Globalisation and neo-liberalism as educational policy in Australia. In H. Yolcu & D. Turner (Eds.), Neoliberal education reforms: A global analysis (pp. 164–183). New York: Taylor & Francis/Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marko Ampuja .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ampuja, M. (2015). Globalisation and Neoliberalism: A New Theory for New Times?. In: Zajda, J. (eds) Second International Handbook on Globalisation, Education and Policy Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9493-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics