Skip to main content

Abstract

Since the 1980s, globalisation, marketisation and quality/efficiency driven reforms around the world have resulted in structural, ideological and qualitative changes in education and policy (Zajda 2014a). They including an increasing focus on the UNESCO’s concepts of knowledge society, the lifelong learning for all (a ‘cradle-to-grave’ vision of learning) representing the lifelong learning paradigm and the ‘knowledge economy’ and the global culture. In their quest for excellence, quality and accountability in education, governments increasingly turn to international and comparative education data analysis. All agree that the major goal of education is to enhance the individual’s social and economic prospects. This can only be achieved by providing quality education for all. Students’ academic achievement is now regularly monitored and measured within the ‘internationally agreed framework’ of the OECD’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). This was done in response to the growing demand for international comparisons of educational outcomes (see Zajda 2014b). To measure levels of academic performance in the global culture, the OECD, in co-operation with UNESCO, is using World Education Indicators (WEI) programme, covering a broad range of comparative indicators, which report on the resource invested in education and their returns to individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Theory Culture and Society, 7, 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, M. (2000, November 3). The evidence of things not seen: Reconceptualising public education. Paper presented to the OECD Schooling for Tomorrow Conference, Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, P. (1982). Critical world educational issues of the next two decades. International Review of Education, 28(1), 143–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delanty, G. (2001). Challenging knowledge: The University in the knowledge society. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, P. (2000). Universities and corporate universities. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, Z. (2000). Functional literacy of young Guyanese adults. International Review of Education, 46(1/2), 93–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, H. (1957). Equalizing educational opportunities and its problems. International Review of Education, 3(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, R. (1971). The degradation of the academic dogma. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2001). OECD annual report. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2002). Education policy analysis. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). Education at a glance. OECD indicators. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013a). Education at a glance. OECD indicators. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013b). Inequality rising faster than ever. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from http://inequality.org/oecd-report-inequality-rising-faster

  • OECD. (2013c). Crisis squeezes income and puts pressure on inequality and poverty. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/els/soc/OECD2013-Inequality-and-Poverty-8p.pdf

  • Psacharopoulos, G. (1989). Why educational reforms fail: A comparative analysis. International Review of Education, 35(2), 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psacharopoulos, G. (1995). Evaluation of education and training. International Review of Education, 41(3/4), 257–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S., Bonal, X., & Dale, R. (2002). GATS and the education service industry: The politics of scale and global re-territorialisation. Comparative Education Review, 43(3), 472–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, V., et al. (2003). Theory in comparative education. World Studies in Education, 4(1), 5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajda, J. (2011a). Globalisation and schooling: equity and access issues. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6(1), 143–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajda, J. (2011b). Globalisation and the impact of social change and economic transformation in lifelong learning in Russia. In M. London (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of lifelong learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajda, J. (2014a). Ideology. In D. Phillips (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational theory and philosophy. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajda, J. (2014b). Globalisation and neo-liberalism as educational policy in Australia. In H. Yolcu & D. Turner (Eds.), Neoliberal education reforms: A global analysis. New York: Taylor & Francis/Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Zajda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zajda, J. (2015). Overview and Introduction. In: Zajda, J. (eds) Second International Handbook on Globalisation, Education and Policy Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9493-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics