Skip to main content

Solution in Time

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Seismic Ground Response Analysis

Part of the book series: Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering ((GGEE,volume 36))

  • 1460 Accesses

Abstract

Solution in space is described in the previous chapter, whereas solution in time is described in this section. There are two methods. One is made in the time domain by solving the step-by-step time integration scheme, and the other is made by converting the time domain into the frequency domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    S-wave velocity of the saturated soil depends on frequency because of the interaction between the soil particle and porewater in the exact sense (Miura et al. 2001), but it can be considered constant in the engineering practice as translation occurs at very high frequency. This is a quite different nature discussed here.

References

  • Association for Disaster Prevention Research (1990) Report on investigation and research on development of two-dimensional liquefaction analysis computer program (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough RW, Penzien J (1975) Dynamics of structures. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Tokyo, 634 pp

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Finn WDL, Martin GR, Lee MKW (1978) Comparison of dynamic analyses for saturated sands. In: Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, ASCE, GT special conference, vol 1, pp 472–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudehus G (ed) (1977) Finite elements in geomechanics. Wiley, London, 673 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagiwara T, Kiyota Y (1992) Seismic response analysis based on equivalent linearization of soil constants in modal region Part I theory and example of inverse analysis, summaries of the technical papers of annual meeting of AIJ (Hokuriku), pp 487–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson M, Idriss IM, Beikae M (1994) User’s manual for QUAD4M, a computer program to evaluate the seismic response of soil structures using finite element procedures and incorporating a compliant base. Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwasaki T, Kawashima K, Tatsuoka F (1980) Effect of strain dependence of soil properties on seismic response of subsurface grounds. Civ Eng J PWRI 22(12):27–32 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokusho T (1982) Dynamic deformation characteristics of soil and nonlinear response of ground, Report no. 301, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokusho T, Satoh K, Matsumoto M (1995) Nonlinear dynamic response of soil ground during 1995 Hyogo-ken nanbu earthquake. Tsuchi-To-Kiso 43(9):39–43 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuda T (2001) Study on damage to electric facilities due to earthquake and remedial measures against it. Theses submitted to the University of Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuda T, Yasuda S, Yoshida N, Sato M (2001) Field investigations and laboratory soil tests on heterogeneous nature of alluvial deposits. Soils Found 41(4):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miura K, Yoshida N, Kim Y (2001) Frequency-dependent property of waves in saturated soil. Soils Found 42(2):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newmark NM (1959) A method of computation for structural dynamics. Proc ASCE J Eng Mech Div 85:67–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigam NC, Jennings PC (1964) Calculation of response spectra from strong motion earthquake records. BSSA 59(2):909–922

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozawa T, Ohki H, Annaka T (1987) Analysis of amplification characteristics of ground by one-dimensional wave propagation theory considering frequency dependent characteristics of damping. In: Proceedings of the 19th JSCE earthquake engineering symposium 1987, JSCE, Tokyo, pp 109–112 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohsaki Y (1994) Introduction of spectrum analysis of ground motion, new edn. Kajima Institute Publishing, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakai H, Yoshida N, Sawada S (2005) Numerical errors in non-linear earthquake response analyses caused by time integration procedures. J Struct Mech Earthq Eng Proc JSCE No. 794/I-72:291–300 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnabel PB, Lysmer J, Seed HB (eds) (1972) SHAKE a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites. University of California, Berkeley, Report No. EERC72-12

    Google Scholar 

  • Sezawa K (1932) Theory of vibration, Iwanami Shoten, 799 pp; facsimile edition (1971), Gendai Kogaku-sha, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibata A (2010) Dynamic analysis of earthquake resistant structures. Tohoku University Press, Sendai, 369 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza AFD, Garg VK (1984) Advanced dynamics, modeling and analysis. Prentice-Hill, Englewood Cliffs, pp 213–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Suetomi I, Yoshida N (1996) A comparison of frequency-dependent damping in equivalent linear analysis. In: Proceedings of the 31st symposium of geotechnical engineering, JGS, Kitami, pp 1119–1120 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugito M, Goda H, Masuda T (1994) Frequency dependent equi-linearized technique for seismic response analysis of multi-layered ground. J Geotech Eng Proc JSCE 493/III-27:49–58 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato T, Hino T (1982) Error measure for time integration schemes in structural dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 6th Japan symposium of earthquake engineering, Tokyo, pp 1049–1056

    Google Scholar 

  • Tazoh T, Sato M, Shimizu K, Koyama K, Watanabe O (1987) Effect of layer-subdivision and effective strain coefficient in nonlinear seismic response analysis. In: The 22nd Japan national conference of soil mechanics and foundation engineering, pp 655–658 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Togawa H (1975) Vibration analysis by finite element method. Science-sha (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida N (1994) Applicability of conventional computer code SHAKE to nonlinear problem. In: Proceeding symposium on amplification of ground shaking in soft ground, JSSMFE, Tokyo, pp 14–31 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida N (1995) DYNEQ a computer program for DYNamic response analysis of level ground by EQuivalent linear method, version 3.25 (September 2004), http://www.civil.tohoku-gakuin.ac.jp/yoshida-j.html/ [2010]

  • Yoshida N, Kobayashi S, Suetomi I, Miura K (2002) Equivalent linear method considering frequency dependent characteristics of stiffness and damping. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22(3):205–222, Elsevier

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yoshida, N. (2015). Solution in Time. In: Seismic Ground Response Analysis. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol 36. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9460-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics