Abstract
In this chapter we present, first, general conclusions to the book. Afterward, we discuss three different sets of issues regarding the results presented in this book. First, we outline the need for a general framework that combines statistical programming and natural language processing. Second, we discuss the challenges that our results pose to the design of bureaucratic organizations and how improvised solutions should be integrated into organizational memories. Third, we relate our results with further paths of research about procedural rationality and expertise.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Benjamins, V. R., P. Casanovas, J. Contreras, J. López-Cobo, and M. Lemus. 2005. Iuriservice: An intelligent frequent asked questions system to assist newly appointed judges. In Law and the semantic web: Legal ontologies, methodologies, legal information retrieval, and applications. Lecture notes in computer science, ed. V. Benjamins, P. Casanovas, J. Breuker, and A. Gangemi. vol. 3369, 205–222. Berlin: Springer.
Benoit, K., and M. Laver. 2002. Estimating Irish party policy positions using computer wordscoring: the 2002 election. Research note, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Blázquez, M., R. Pe˜na-Ortiz, J. Contreras, V. R. Benjamins, P. Casanovas, J.-J. Vallbé, and N. Casellas. 2005. D10.3.1 legal case study: Prototype. Technical report, SEKT, EU-IST Project IST-2003-506826, Intelligent Software Components S.A. (iSOCO) and Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona (UAB).
Bösser, T., E.-M. Melchior, I. Thurlow, S. Close, D. Alsmeyer, J. Contreras, J.-J. Vallbé, and R. Zeilbeck. 2005. User needs and opportunities for business improvement with knowledge technology. Deliverable D8.2.1 WP8 Usability and business benchmarking, SEKT Project (EU-IST Project IST-2003-506826 SEKT), Springer, Switzerland.
Casanovas, P., N. Casellas, J.-J. Vallbé, M. Poblet, F. Ramos, J. Gorro˜nogoitia, J. Contreras, M. Blázquez, and V. R. Benjamins. 2005. Iuriservice II: Ontology development and architectural design. Proceedings of the international conference on artificial intelligence and law, ICAIL-05,AAAI-ACM, 188–195, Bologna, Italy.
Casanovas, P., N. Casellas, J.-J. Vallbé, M. Poblet, V. R. Benjamins, M. Blázquez, R. Pe˜na-Ortiz, and J. Contreras. 2006a. Semantic web: A legal case study. In Semantic web technologies: Trends and research in ontology-based systems, ed. J. Davies, R. Studer, and P. Warren, Chap. 12, 259–280. Chichester: Wiley.
Casanovas, P., J.-J. Vallbé, N. Casellas, M. Poblet, M. Blázquez, J. Contreras, V. R. Benjamins, and J. López-Cobo. 2006b. Legal case study after analysis D10.4.1. case study: Intelligent integrated decision suppot for legal professionals. Technical Report D10.4.1, SEKT Project (EU-IST Project IST-2003-506826 SEKT), Barcelona.
Casellas, N. 2011. Legal ontology engineering: Methodologies, trends, and the ontology of professional judicial knowledge. Dordrecht: Springer.
Casellas, N., A. Jakulin, J.-J. Vallbé, and P. Casanovas. 2006. Acquiring an ontology from the text. In Advances in applied artificial intelligence. 19th international conference on industrial, engineering and other applications of applied intelligent systems, IEA/AIE 2006. Lecture notes in computer science, ed. M. Ali and R. Dapoigny, vol. 4031, 1000–1013. Berlin: Springer.
Casellas, N., P. Casanovas, J.-J. Vallbé, M. Poblet, M. Blázquez, J. Contreras, J. López-Cobo, and V. R. Benjamins. 2007. Semantic enhancement for legal information retrieval: IURISERVICE performance. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on artificial intelligence and law (ICAIL), 49–57. ACM: Stanford.
Chase, W. G., and H. A. Simon. 1973. Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology 4 (1): 55–81.
Currey, J., and M. Botti. 2003. Naturalistic decision making: A model to overcome methodological challenges in the study of critical care nurses` decision making about patients` hemodynamic status. American Journal of Critical Care 12 (3): 206–211.
Cyert, R. M., and H. A. Simon. 1956. Observation of a business decision. The Journal of Business 29 (4): 237–248.
de Groot, A. 1978. Thought and choice in chess. 2nd edn. The Hague:Mouton de Gruyter.
Ericsson, K. A., and M. T. H. Chi. 1996. Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology 47:273–305.
Fabri, M., ed. 2007. Information and communication technology for the public prosecutor’s office. Bologna: CLUEB.
Fabri, M., and F. Contini, ed. 2001. Justice and technology in Europe: How ICT is changing the judicial business. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Fabri, M., P. M. Langbroek, and H. Pauliat, ed. 2003. The administration of justice in Europe: Towards the development of quality standards. IRSIG-CNR, Unversity of Bologna. Bologna: Lo Scarabeo.
Feinerer, I. 2008. tm: Text Mining Package, R package version 0.3-3 edition.
Gigerenzer, G., and ABC-Research-Group, ed. 2008. Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gigerenzer, G., and E. Engel, ed. 2006. Heuristics and the Law. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gigerenzer, G., and R. Selten, ed. 2001. Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. Dahlem Workshop Reports. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hoffman, R., ed. 2007. Expertise out of context: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on naturalistic decision making. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hopkins, D., and G. King. 2007. Extracting systematic social science meaning from text. Technical report, Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Jiménez-Asensio, R., ed. 2001. El acceso a la función judicial. Estudio comparado. Manuales de formación continuada. Consejo General del Poder Judicial, Madrid, Spain.
Koehler, D. J., and N. Harvey, ed. 2007. Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making. Oxford: Blackwell.
Langbroek, P. M., and M. Fabri, ed. 2004. Case assignment to courts and within courts: A comparative study in seven countries. Maastricht: Shaker.
Laver, M., K. Benoit, and J. Garry. 2003. Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. The American Political Science Review 97 (2): 311–331.
Levitt, B., and J. G. March. 1988. Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology 14:319–340.
Lowe, W. 2008. Understanding wordscores. Political Analysis 16:356–371.
March, J. G. 1990. Introduction: A chronicle of speculations about decision-making in organizations. In Decisions and organizations, ed. J. G. March, 1–21. Oxford: Blackwell.
March, J. G., and H. A. Simon. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.
Poblet, M., and P. Casanovas. 2005. Recruitment, professional evaluation and career of judges and prosecutors in Spain. In Recruitment, professional evaluation and career of judges and prosecutors in Europe: Austria, France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands and Spain, ed. G. Di Federico, 185–213. Bologna: Lo scarabeo. (IR).
Poblet, M., J.-J. Vallbé, N. Casellas, and P. Casanovas. 2008. Judges as sc it users: The sc iuriservice example. In E-justice, using information communication in the court system, ed. A. Cerrillo and P. Fabra. Hershey: IGI Books.
Rosen, M. A., E. Salas, R. Lyons, and S. M. Fiore. 2008. Experts and naturalistic decision making in organizations: mechanisms of effective decision making. In The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making, ed. G. P. Hodgkinson and W. H. Starbuck, 211–230. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Royer, I., and A. Langley. 2008. Linking rationality, politics, and routines in organizational decision making. In The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making, ed. G. P. Hodgkinson and W. H. Starbuck, 250–270. New York: Oxford University Press.
Salas, E., and G. A. Klein, ed. 2001. Linking expertise and naturalistic decision making. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schraagen, J., L. Militello, T. Ormerod, and R. Lipshitz, ed. 2008. Naturalistic decision making and macrocognition. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Shapira, Z. 2008. On the implications of behavioral decision theory for managerial decision making: Contributions and challenges. In The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making, ed. G. P. Hodgkinson and W. H. Starbuck, 287–304. New York: Oxford University Press.
Simon, H. A. 1947. Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. 1st edn. New York: Macmillan.
Simon, H. A. 1996. The sciences of the artificial. 3rd edn. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Simon, H. A., and F. Stern. 1955. The effect of television upon voting behavior in Iowa in the 1952 presidential election. The American Political Science Review 49 (2): 470–477.
Todd, P., and G. Gigerenzer. 2001. Putting naturalistic decision making into the adaptive toolbox. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 14 (5): 381–382.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vallbé, JJ. (2015). Conclusions and Further Work. In: Frameworks for Modeling Cognition and Decisions in Institutional Environments. Law, Governance and Technology Series, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9427-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9427-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9426-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9427-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)