Abstract
While research on resilience and culture has been diverse and fruitful, it can be further enhanced by rigorous research design, implementation, and analysis. Notably, research would gain from further integration of qualitative and quantitative methods. Drawing on frameworks from quantitative cross-cultural methods, we first review construct, method, and item bias arising in resilience research involving multiple cultures, and the corresponding levels of equivalence in cross-cultural comparisons. Specifically, studies on resilience measures, validation and comparison of resilience across cultures, and large-scale resilience projects are examined. We then extend the discussion to qualitative (and mixed) methods. We argue that most methods for dealing with bias in quantitative research also apply to comparative qualitative research. We propose strategies including choice of data collection methods aimed at enhancing the design of the study; we also discuss procedures that affect the quality of quantitative and qualitative data analysis. It should be noted that qualitative procedures for comparative analyses are not well developed and that procedures for validating cross-cultural differences are largely absent in qualitative methods. As a consequence, much of our discussion focuses on how to examine comparability of cross-cultural data and examples of studies in which these procedures have been used. We integrate the use of mixed methods, as the conversion of qualitative to quantitative data opens a wide array of validation procedures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Abdou, C. M., Schetter, C. D., Jones, F., Roubinov, D., Tsai, S., Jones, L., & Hobel, C. (2010). Community perspectives: Mixed-methods investigation of culture, stress, resilience, and health. Ethnicity & Disease, 20(2), 41–48.
Bottery, M., Ngai, G., Wong, P. M., & Wong, P. H. (2008). Portraits of resilience: Headteachers in two different cultures. Education, 36, 183–199. doi:10.1080/03004270701577347.
Cameron, C. A., Lau, C., & Tapanya, S. (2009). Passing it on during a day in the life of resilient adolescents in diverse communities around the globe. Child & Youth Care Forum, 38, 305–325. doi:10.1007/s10566-009-9084-8.
Camfield, L., Guillen-Royo, M., & Velazco, J. (2010). Does need satisfaction matter for psychological and subjective wellbeing in developing countries: A mixed-methods illustration from Bangladesh and Thailand. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 497–516. doi:10.1007/s10902-009-9154-5.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.
Clauss-Ehlers, C. S. (2008). Sociocultural factors, resilience, and coping: Support for a culturally sensitive measure of resilience. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 197–212. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.02.004.
Dei, G. J. S., Mazzuca, J., McIsaac, E., & Zine, J. (1997). Reconstructing “drop-out”: A critical ethnography of the dynamics of Black students’ disengagement from school. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
Denzin, N. (2006). Sociological methods: A sourcebook (5th ed.). Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
Ebersöhn, L. (2010). Resilience and career counseling: Describing the utility of quadrant mapping. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 20, 385–393.
Eggerman, M., & Panter-Brick, C. (2010). Suffering, hope, and entrapment: Resilience and cultural values in Afghanistan. Social Science & Medicine, 71, 71–83. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.03.023.
Ellingson, L. L. (2009). Engaging crystallization in qualitative research: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fletcher, D., & Sarkar, M. (2013). Psychological resilience: A review and critique of definitions, concepts, and theory. European Psychologist, 18, 13–23. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000124.
Friborg, O., Martinussen, M., & Rosenvinge, J. H. (2006). Likert-based vs. semantic differential-based scorings of positive psychological constructs: A psychometric comparison of two versions of a scale measuring resilience. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 873–884. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.08.015.
He, J., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2012). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural research. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(2), 1–19. Retrieved from 10.9707/2307-0919.1111
Hurd, R. C. (2004). A teenager revisits her father’s death during childhood: A study in resilience and healthy mourning. Adolescence, 39, 337–354.
Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lamond, A. J., Depp, C. A., Allison, M., Langer, R., Reichstadt, J., Moore, D. J., … Jeste, D. V. (2008). Measurement and predictors of resilience among community-dwelling older women. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 43, 148–154. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.03.007.
Leung, K., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2008). Strategies for strengthening causal inferences in cross cultural research: The consilience approach. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 8, 145–169. doi:10.1177/1470595808091788.
Liebenberg, L., Didkowsky, N., & Ungar, M. (2012). Analysing image-based data using grounded theory: The negotiating resilience project. Visual Studies, 27, 59–74. doi:10.1080/1472586x.2012.642958.
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71, 543–562. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00164.
MacCallum, R. C., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201–226.
Metzl, E. S. (2009). The role of creative thinking in resilience after hurricane Katrina. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 112–123. doi:10.1037/a0013479.
Moscardino, U., Axia, G., Scrimin, S., & Capello, F. (2007). Narratives from caregivers of children surviving the terrorist attack in Beslan: Issues of health, culture, and resilience. Social Science & Medicine, 64, 1776–1787. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.11.024.
Pan, J. Y., Wong, D. F. K., Chan, C. L. W., & Joubert, L. (2008). Meaning of life as a protective factor of positive affect in acculturation: A resilience framework and a cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 505–514. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.08.002.
Pargament, K. I., & Cummings, J. (2010). Anchored with faith. In J. W. Reich, A. J. Zautra, & J. S. Hall (Eds.), Handbook of adult resilience (pp. 193–210). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Patel, V., Abas, M., Broadhead, J., Todd, C., & Reeler, A. (2001). Depression in developing countries: Lessons from Zimbabwe. British Medical Journal, 322(7284), 482.
Paton, D., Bajek, R., Okada, N., & McIvor, D. (2010). Predicting community earthquake preparedness: A cross-cultural comparison of Japan and New Zealand. Natural Hazards, 54, 765–781. doi:10.1007/s11069-010-9500-2.
Poortinga, Y. H., & Van der Flier, H. (1988). The meaning of item bias in ability tests. In S. H. Irvine & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Human abilities in cultural context (pp. 166–183). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Richardson, L. (2000). New writing practices in qualitative research. Sociology of Sport Journal, 17, 5–20.
Theron, L. C., Theron, A. M. C., & Malindi, M. J. (2013). Toward an African definition of resilience: A rural South African community’s view of resilient Basotho youth. Journal of Black Psychology, 39, 63–87. doi:10.1177/0095798412454675.
Tobin, G. A., & Begley, C. M. (2004). Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48, 388–396. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03207.x.
Ungar, M. (2001). The social construction of resilience among “problem” youth in out-of-home placement: A study of health-enhancing deviance. Child and Youth Care Forum, 30, 137–154. doi:10.1023/a:1012232723322.
Ungar, M. (2008). Resilience across cultures. British Journal of Social Work, 38, 218–235. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bc1343.
Ungar, M. (2010). Cultural dimensions of resilience among adults. In J. W. Reich, A. J. Zautra, & J. S. Hall (Eds.), Handbook of adult resilience (pp. 404–423). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Ungar, M., & Liebenberg, L. (2009). Cross-cultural consultation leading to the development of a valid measure of youth resilience: The international resilience project. Studia Psychologica, 51, 259–269.
Ungar, M., & Liebenberg, L. (2011). Assessing resilience across cultures using mixed methods: Construction of the child and youth resilience measure. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. doi:10.1177/1558689811400607.
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Chasiotis, A. (2010). Making methods meet: Mixed designs in cross-cultural research. In J. A. Harkness, M. Braun, B. Edwards, T. P. Johnson, L. Lyberg, P. P. Mohler, B. E. Pennell, & T. W. Smith (Eds.), Survey methods in multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts (pp. 455–473). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis of comparative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1997). Towards an integrated analysis of bias in cross-cultural assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13, 29–37. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.13.1.29.
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Tanzer, N. K. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée [European Review of Applied Psychology], 54, 119–135. doi:10.1016/j.erap.2003.12.004.
Windle, G., Bennett, K., & Noyes, J. (2011). A methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9, 1–18. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-9-8.
Yu, X., & Zhang, J. (2007). Factor analysis and psychometric evaluation of the Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC) with Chinese people. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 35, 19–30. doi:10.2224/sbp.2007.35.1.19.
Zautra, A. J., Hall, J. S., & Murray, K. E. (2010). Resilience: A new definition of health for people and communities. In J. W. Reich, A. J. Zautra, & J. S. Hall (Eds.), Handbook of adult resilience (pp. 3–29). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Three generations of DIF analyses: Considering where it has been, where it is now, and where it is going. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4, 223–233. doi:10.1080/15434300701375832.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
He, J., Van de Vijver, F.J.R. (2015). The Value of Keeping an Open Eye for Methodological Issues in Research on Resilience and Culture. In: Theron, L., Liebenberg, L., Ungar, M. (eds) Youth Resilience and Culture. Cross-Cultural Advancements in Positive Psychology, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9415-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9415-2_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9414-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9415-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)