Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Plant Pathology in the 21st Century ((ICPP,volume 6))

Abstract

Routine seed health testing is carried out in most countries for seed certification and plant quarantine. However, the majority of seed health tests used throughout the world have never been subject to rigorous validation. A fully validated test provides for analytical sensitivity, reproducibility and repeatability. Discrepancies between testing methods can occur, leading to costly phytosanitary disputes or liability claims. These issues can be avoided by working toward a system of universally accepted, standardized testing methods on a global level. To ensure that seed health tests are standardized and give reliable and reproducible results in accordance with the given specifications of the test methods, methods should go through a peer review system and/or collaborative study among laboratories. Three primary organizations publish standardized seed health tests: the International Seed Testing Association (ISTA), the International Seed Health Initiative (ISHI), and the U.S. National Seed Health System (NSHS). In 1957, the ISTA Plant Disease Committee (PDC) established a comparative seed health testing program to standardize techniques for detection of seed-borne pathogens. In 1993, the Seed Health Committee (SHC, formerly the PDC) began development of published guidelines for comparative testing. All ISTA validated methods are published in the International Rules for Seed Testing. Additionally, some ISHI-Veg methods have been accepted as ISTA Rules and as Standards by the NSHS. The procedures followed by ISTA, ISHI and the NSHS to achieve global standards in seed health testing are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agarwal VK, Sinclair JB (1987) Principles in seed pathology, vol 1. CRC Press, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon (1985) Fellows. P Paul, F M deNeergaard. Phytopathology 75(1):32–33

    Google Scholar 

  • AOSA (2013) Association of Official Seed Analysts. http://www.aosaseed.com. Accessed 18 Aug 2013

  • Doyer LC (1938) Manual for the determination of seed-borne diseases. International Seed Testing Association, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • EPPO (1954) Danger from seed-borne diseases. A practical approach to the problem of international safeguard. Report on the working party on seed-borne diseases. EPPO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register (2001) Accreditation standards for laboratory seed health testing and seed crop phytosanitary inspection. Fed Regist 66(138):37397–37401

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton J (2005) ISTA method validation. Seed Test Int 130:22–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton J (2007) ISTA method validation. Seed Test Int 133:39

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton J (2009) Report of the ISTA method validation advisory group. In: ISTA annual meeting 2009, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • ISF (2013) The International Seed Health Initiative (ISHI). http://www.worldseed.org/isf/ishi.html. Accessed 14 Aug 2013

  • ISTA (2007) ISTA method validation for seed testing. International Seed Testing Association, Basserdorf

    Google Scholar 

  • ISTA (2013) The International Seed Testing Association (ISTA). http://www.seedtest.org. Accessed 31 Jul 2013

  • Mathur SB, Jørgensen J (2002) A review of the activities of the plant disease committee of ISTA through its 75 years of existence, 1924–1999. ISTA Hist Pap 1:1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Munkvold GP (2009) Seed pathology progress in academia and industry. Annu Rev Phytopathol 47:285–311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muschick M (2010) The evolution of seed testing. Seed Test Int 139:3–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Neergaard P (1970) Seed pathology, international co-operation and organization. In: Proceedings of the International Seed Testing Association, vol 35, Copenhagen, pp 19–42

    Google Scholar 

  • NSHS (2013) National seed health system. http://www.seedhealth.org/. Assessed 14 Aug 2013

  • Sheppard J, Cockerell V (2000) ISTA handbook of method validation for the detection of seedborne pathogens, Plant disease communication. International Seed Testing Association, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard JW, Wesseling JBM (1998) ISTA/ISHI guide for comparative testing of methods for the detection of seed-borne pathogens. Seed Sci Technol 26:237–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner AM, Kruse M, Leist N (2008) ISTA method validation 2007: a historical retrospect. Seed Test Int 136:30–33

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theresa A. S. Aveling .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aveling, T.A.S. (2014). Global Standards in Seed Health Testing. In: Gullino, M., Munkvold, G. (eds) Global Perspectives on the Health of Seeds and Plant Propagation Material. Plant Pathology in the 21st Century, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9389-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics