Skip to main content

Archaeological Approaches to Sacred Landscapes and Rituals of Place Making

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The last 20 years have witnessed a new-found interest in the archaeology of sacred landscapes and ritual performance. Anthropological archaeologists are now increasingly concerned with interpreting meaningful places, an objective often dependent on investigations of the construction, experience, and modification of sacred geographies. Ritual practices, defined heuristically and cross-culturally as highly formalized and symbolically charged acts, have dramatically shaped archaeological landscapes as diverse as households, agricultural fields, and monumental henges. This chapter critically reviews archaeological approaches to religion and landscape arguing that archaeologists have much to offer geographers and others interested in the fundamental spatial mediation of religious experience. More specifically, the contribution examines how ritual performances orchestrated within evocative built environments created charged thirdspaces, a process which engendered a critical consciousness of place and social identity. The presentation of a particular case-study from the Moche culture of Peru (ca. AD 600–800) demonstrates the affective power of ceremonial constructions to create political subjectivities and generate plural social meanings and imaginings. The chapter concludes with an exploration of the thirdspace and heterotopic qualities of archaeological sites in contemporary northern Peru. Scholars have recently investigated the heterotopic aura of ruins as places of alterity associated with decidedly other times and peoples. The analysis draws attention to the continued political efficacy of ancient ruins and to the potential ethical challenges facing archaeologists excavating sacred sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Neo-evolutionary (selectionist) and cultural ecological studies of ceremonial architecture are also still undertaken in the discipline but are not considered here given their general disregard of religious meaning and experience (see Graves and Ladefoged 1995). However, archaeologists adopting historical ecological theories have successfully dispelled the myth that the environment constitutes an objective reality transcending the social context of its production and experience. At the same time, this perspective is equally critical of theories that reduce landscapes to a cultural construction and ignore the agency of anthropogenically transformed places (see Schann 2012).

  2. 2.

    For similar analyses on the disconnect between the spatial signifier and the social signified in capitalist postmodern geographies see Baudrillard 1995 and Sorkin 1992.

  3. 3.

    Such a perspective resonates with Jones’s notion of “ritual-architectural events… occasions in which specific communities and individuals apprehend specific buildings in specific and invariably diversified ways” (Jones 2000: xiii).

References

  • Abrams, E. M. (1989). Architecture and energy: An evolutionary perspective. Archaeological Method and Theory, 1, 47–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abu-El-Haj, N. (2001). Facts on the ground: Archaeological practice and territorial self-fashioning in Israeli society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, M., & Wilshusen, R. (1990). Large-scale integrative facilities in tribal societies: Cross-cultural and southwestern U.S. examples. World Archaeology, 22(2), 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcock, S. E. (1993). Graecia capta: The landscapes of Roman Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alva, W., & Donnan, C. B. (1993). Royal tombs of Sipán. Los Angeles: Fowler Museum of Cultural History, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B., & Harrison, P. (2010). The promise of non-representational theory. In B. Anderson & P. Harrison (Eds.), Taking-place: Non-representational theories and geographies (pp. 1–36). Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore, W. (1989). Construction and cosmology: Politics and ideology in lowland Maya settlement patterns. In W. F. Hanks & D. E. Rice (Eds.), Word and image in Maya culture: Explorations in language, writing and representation (pp. 272–286). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore, W., & Knapp, B. (1999). Archaeology of landscapes: Contemporary perspectives. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachelard, G. (1994). The poetics of space. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J. C. (1993). Fragments from antiquity: An archaeology of social life in Britain, 2900–1200 BC. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J. C. (2001). Agency, the duality of structure, and the problem of the archaeological record. In I. Hodder (Ed.), Archaeological theory today (pp. 141–164). New York: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basso, K. (1996). Wisdom sites in places. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1995). Simulacra and simulation: The body, in theory: Histories of cultural materialism (S. F. Glaser, Trans.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawden, G. (1996). The Moche. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C. (1997). Ritual: Perspectives and dimensions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, W., & Tiedemann, R. (1999). The Arcades project. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergquist, A. (2001). Ethics and the archaeology of world religion. In T. Insoll (Ed.), Archaeology and word religion (pp. 182–192). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billman, B. R. (2002). Irrigation and the origins of the southern Moche state on the north coast of Peru. Latin American Antiquity, 13(4), 371–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1962). Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity, 28(2), 217–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, E. (2002). Spatiality past and present: An interview with Edward Soja. Journal of Social Archaeology, 2(2), 139–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourget, S. (2006). Sex, death and sacrifice in Moche religion and visual culture. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowser, B. J., & Zedeño, M. N. (2009). The archaeology of meaningful places. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. (2005). Ritual and domestic life in prehistoric Europe. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brück, J. (2001). Monuments, power, and personhood in the British Neolithic. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 7(4), 649–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck-Morss, S. (1989). The dialectics of seeing: Walter Benjamin and the Arcades project. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carl, P. (2000). Were cities built as images? Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 10(2), 327–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, E. S. (1997). The fate of place: A philosophical history. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, E. S. (1998). The production of space or the heterogeneity of place: A commentary on Edward Dimendberg and Neil Smith. In A. Light & J. M. Smith (Eds.), Philosophy and geography II: The production of public space (pp. 71–80). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, L. J. (2001). The last of the Mochicas. In J. Pillsbury (Ed.), Moche art and archaeology in ancient Peru (pp. 307–332). New Haven: National of Gallery of Art & Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, L. J. (2010). Moche politics in the Jequetepeque valley: A case for political opportunism. In J. Castillo & J. Quilter (Eds.), New perspectives in Moche political organization (pp. 1–26). Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, L. J., & Donnan, C. B. (1994). Los Mochica del norte y los Mochica del sur. In K. Makowski & C. B. Donnan (Eds.), Vicús (pp. 143–181). Lima: Colección Arte y Tesoros del Perú, Banco de Credito.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caton, S. C., & Zacka, B. (2010). Abu Ghraib, the security apparatus, and the performativity of power. American Ethnologist, 37, 203–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choay, F. (1986). Urbanism in question. In M. Gottdiener & A. P. Lagopoulos (Eds.), The City and the sign: An introduction to urban semiotics (pp. 241–258). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, V. (2007). Life and words: Violence and the descent into the ordinary. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawdy, S. L. (2009). Millennial archaeology. Locating the discipline in the age of insecurity. Archaeological Dialogues, 16(2), 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawdy, S. L. (2010). Clockpunk anthropology and the ruins of modernity. Cultural Anthropology, 51(6), 761–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillehay, T. D. (2001). Town and country in late Moche times: A view from two northern valleys. In J. Pillsbury (Ed.), Moche art and archaeology in ancient Peru (pp. 259–284). New Haven: National of Gallery of Art & Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillehay, T. D., Kolata, A. L., & Swenson, E. R. (2009). Paisajes culturales en el Valle del Jequetepeque: Los Yacimientos arqueológicos. Lima: Ediciones Sian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnan, C. B. (1978). Moche art of Peru. Los Angeles: Museum of Culture History, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1972). Natural symbols: Explorations in cosmology. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edensor, T. (2008). Mundane hauntings: Commuting through the phantasmagoric working-class spaces of Manchester, England. Cultural Geographies, 15(3), 313–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, R. A. (1987). Architectural evidence for the development of nonegalitarian social systems in coastal Peru. In J. Hass, T. Pozorski, & S. Pozorski (Eds.), The origins and development of the Andean state (pp. 10–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, A. (2006). Post-processual landscape archaeology: A critique. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 16(3), 267–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogelin, L. (2008). Delegitimizing religion: The archaeology of religion as … archaeology. In D. S. Whitley & K. Hays-Gilpin (Eds.), Belief in the past: Theoretical approaches to the archaeology of religion (pp. 129–142). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1986). Of other spaces. Diacritics, 16, 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowles, S. (2013). An archaeology of doings: Secularism and the study of Pueblo religion. Santa Fe: SAR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung Pineda, R. (1988). The late preceramic and initial period. In R. Keatinge (Ed.), Peruvian prehistory (pp. 67–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, J. (2006). The spaces of violence. Birmingham: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, M. W., & Ladefoged, T. N. (1995). The evolutionary significance of ceremonial architecture in Polynesia. In P. A. Teltser (Ed.), Evolutionary archaeology: Methodological issues (pp. 149–174). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, M. W., & Van Keuren, S. (2011). Ancestral Pueblo villages and the panoptic gaze of the commune. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 21(2), 263–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gündüz, R. (2001). El mundo ceremonial de los Huaqueros. Lima: Universidad Ricardo Palma, Editorial Universitaria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, O. J. T., & Sørensen, T. F. (2010). Rethinking emotion and material culture. Archaeological Dialogues, 17(2), 145–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, C. (1954). Archaeological theory and method: Some suggestions from the Old World. American Anthropologist, 56(2), 155–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckenberger, M. J. (2005). The ecology of power: Culture, place and personhood in southern Amazonia AD 1,000–2000. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, K. (1997). The badlands of modernity: Heterotopia and social ordering. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B. (1996). Space is the machine: A configurational history of architecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (2010). Probing religion at Catalhoyuk: An interdisciplinary experiment. In I. Hooder (Ed.), Religion in the emergence of civilization; Catalhoyuk as a case study (pp. 1–31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I., & Hutson, S. (2003). Reading the past: Current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, J. (2006). Enchanted spaces: The séance, affect, and geographies of religion. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(1), 182–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, C., & Laidlaw, J. (1994). The archetypical actions of ritual: A theory of ritual illustrated by the Jain Rite of worship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inomata, T., & Coben, L. S. (2006). Overture: An invitation to the archaeological theater. In T. Inomata & L. S. Coben (Eds.), Archaeology of performance: Theaters of power, community, and politics (pp. 11–46). New York: Altamira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insoll, T. (2004). Archaeology, ritual, religion. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (2006a). On the nature of theoretical archaeology and archaeological theory. Archaeological Dialogues, 13(2), 117–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. (2006b). Unravelling Foucault’s “different spaces”. History of the Human Sciences, 19(4), 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (2007). Ideas of landscape. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. (2000). The hermeneutics of sacred architecture: Experience, interpretation, comparison (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapferer, B. (2004). Ritual dynamics and virtual practice: Beyond representation and meaning. In D. Handelman & G. Lindquist (Eds.), Ritual in its own right (pp. 35–54). New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knappett, C., & Malafouris, L. (2008). Material agency: Towards a non-anthropocentric approach. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolata, A. (1993). The Tiwanaku: Portrait of an Andean civilization. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köpping, K. P. (1997). The ludic as creative disorder: Framing, de-Framing, and boundary crossing. In K. P. Köpping (Ed.), The games of God and man: Essays in play and performance (pp. 1–39). Hamburg: Lit Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyriakidis, E. (2007). The archaeology of ritual. Los Angeles: Costen Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilley, K. D. (2004). Cities of God? Medieval urban form and their Christian symbolism. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(3), 296–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden, S. (2004). The production of space at Nineveh. British Institute for the Study of Iraq, 55, 187–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddern, J., & Adey, P. (2008). Editorial: Spectro-geographies. Cultural Geographies, 15, 921–925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrifield, A. (1993). Space and place: A Lefebvrian reconciliation. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 18(4), 516–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L. (2003). Memory’s materiality: Ancestral presence, commemorative practice, and disjunctive locales. In R. M. Van Dyke & S. E. Alcock (Eds.), Archaeologies of memory (pp. 34–55). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L. (2005). Archaeologies of materiality. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2005). Materialities. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Rowlands, M., & Tilley, C. (1989). Domination and resistance. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, B. J., & Walker, W. H. (2008). Memory work: Archaeologies of material practice. Santa Fe: SAR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mock, S. (1998). The sowing and the dawning. Termination, dedication, and transformation in the archaeological and ethnographic record of Mesoamerica. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. D. (1992). Pattern and meaning in Prehistoric Peruvian architecture: The architecture of social control in the Chimu state. Latin American Antiquity, 3(2), 95–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. D. (1996). Architecture and power in the Ancient Andes: The archaeology of public buildings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. D. (2004). The social basis of sacred space in the prehispanic Andes: Ritual landscapes of the dead in Chimú and Inka societies. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 11(1), 83–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. D. (2005). Cultural landscapes of the ancient Andes: Archaeologies of place. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, B. (1987). Anthropological studies of religion: An introductory text. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, B. A. (1995). Complexity, hierarchy, and scale: A controlled comparison between Chaco Canyon, New Mexico, and La Quemada, Zacatecas. American Antiquity, 60(4), 597–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauketat, T. R. (2001). Practice and history in archaeology: An emerging paradigm. Anthropological Theory, 1(1), 73–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauketat, T., & Alt, S. M. (2005). Agency in a postmold? Physicality and the archaeology of culture making. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 12(3), 213–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plunket, P. (2002). Domestic ritual in ancient Mesoamerica (Monograph 46). Los Angeles: The Costen Institute of Archaeology, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preucel, R. (2010). Archaeological semiotics. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quilter, J. (2002). Moche politics, religion, and warfare. Journal of World Prehistory, 16, 145–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quilter, J., & Castillo, L. J. (2010). New perspectives on Moche political organization. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. (1982). The meaning of the built environment: A nonverbal communication approach. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, C. (1985). The archaeology of cult: The sanctuary at Phylakopi (Supplementary Vol. 18). Athens: The British School of Archaeology at Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, J. (2010). Of other spaces; Archaeology, landscape, and heterotopia in fascist Sicily. Archaeologies: Journal of the World Archaeology Congress, 6(1), 62–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schann, D. P. (2012). Sacred geographies of ancient Amazonia. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, M., & Tilley, C. (1990). Archaeology into the 1990s. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 22(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, R. (1990). Places on the margin: Alternate geographies of modernity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, R. (1999). Lefebvre, love and struggle: Spatial dialectics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimada, I. (1994). Pampa grande and the Mochica culture. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillar, B. (2009). The social agency of things? Animism and materiality in the Andes. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 19(3), 367–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. Z. (1987). To take place: Toward theory in ritual. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. T. (2003). The political landscape: Constellations of authority in early complex polities. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. T. (2004). The end of the essential archaeological subject. Archaeological Dialogues, 11(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. L. (2005). Looting and the politics of archaeological knowledge in northern Peru. Ethnos, 70, 149–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorkin, M. (1992). Variations on a theme park: The new American city and the end of public space. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoler, A. L. (2008). Imperial debris: Reflections on ruins and ruination. Cultural Anthropology, 23, 191–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, E. R. (2003). Cities of violence: Sacrifice, power, and urbanization in the Andes. Journal of Social Archaeology, 3(2), 256–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, E. R. (2006). Competitive feasting, religious pluralism, and decentralized power in the Late Moche Period. In W. H. Isbell & H. Silverman (Eds.), Andean archaeology III: North and south (pp. 112–142). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, E. R. (2008). The disjunctive approach to the archaeological analysis of ritual politics. In L. Fogelin (Ed.), Religion in the material world (pp. 237–261). Carbondale: Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, E. R. (2010). Revelation and resolution: Anthropologies of religion, cognition, and power. Reviews in Anthropology, 39, 173–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, E. R. (2011). Stagecraft and the politics of spectacle in ancient Peru. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 21(2), 285–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, E. R. (2012). Moche ceremonial architecture as third space: The politics of place-making in ancient Peru. Journal of Social Archaeology, 12(1), 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, E. R., & Warner, J. (2012). Crucibles of power: Forging copper and forging subjects at the Moche ceremonial center of Huaca Colorada, Peru. Journal of Anthropological, 31(3), 314–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, E. R, Chiguala, J., & Warner, J. (2011). Proyecto de Investigación de Arqueología, Jatanca-Huaca Colorada, Valle de Jequetepeque 2010. Lima: Technical report submitted to the Instituto Nacional de Cultura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, E. R, Chiguala, J., & Warner, J. (2012). Proyecto de Investigación de Arqueología, Jatanca-Huaca Colorada, Valle de Jequetepeque 2011. Lima: Technical report submitted to the Instituto Nacional de Cultura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. (1994). The politics of vision and the archaeologies of landscape. In B. Bender (Ed.), Landscape: Politics and perspectives (pp. 19–48). Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. (2001). Archaeologies of place and landscape. In I. Hodder (Ed.), Archaeological theory today (pp. 165–186). New York: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, C. (1994). A phenomenology of landscape: Places, paths and monuments. New York: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, C., & Bennett, W. (2001). An archaeology of supernatural places: The case of West Penwith. Journal of Royal Anthropological Institute, 7(2), 335–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, R. F. (1982). Pyramid and Sacred Mountain. In A. F. Aveni & G. Urton (Eds.), Ethnoastronomy and archaeoastronomy in the American tropics (Annals of the New York Academy of Science 385, pp. 37–62). New York: New York Academy of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, B. (1990). Monumental architecture: A thermodynamic explanation of symbolic behavior. World Archaeology, 22(2), 119–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. (1967). The forest of symbols: Aspects of Ndembu ritual. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uceda, S. (2001). Investigations at Huaca de la Luna, Moche Valley: An example of Moche religious architecture. In J. Pillsbury (Ed.), Moche art and archaeology in ancient Peru (pp. 47–68). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uceda, S., & Mujica, E. (1994). Moche: Propuestas y perspectiva. Lima: Travaux de l’Institut Français d’Etudes Andines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uceda, S., & Mujica, E. (2003). Moche hacia el final del milenio (Vols. 1 & 2). Lima & Trujillo: Fondo Editorial, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú and Universidad Nacional de Trujillo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyke, R. M. (2003). Memory and the construction of Chacoan society. In R. M. Van Dyke & S. E. Alcock (Eds.), Archaeologies of memory (pp. 180–200). New York: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyke, R. M., & Alcock, S. E. (2003). Archaeologies of memory: An introduction. In R. Van Dyke & S. E. Alcock (Eds.), Archaeologies of memory (pp. 1–14). New York: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. (2004). Digging the dirt: Archaeology and the Romantic imagination. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, H. (2004). Modes of religiosity: A cognitive theory of religious transmission. Walnut Creek: Alta Mira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersema, J. (2010). Architectural vessels of the Moche of Peru (C.E. 200–850): Architecture of the afterlife. PhD dissertation. College Park: University of Maryland, Department of Anthropology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. (2002). Thinking from things: Essays in the philosophy of archaeology. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward Swenson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Swenson, E. (2015). Archaeological Approaches to Sacred Landscapes and Rituals of Place Making. In: Brunn, S. (eds) The Changing World Religion Map. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9376-6_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics