Skip to main content

Dark Green Religion: Advocating for the Sacredness of Nature in a Changing World

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Changing World Religion Map
  • 348 Accesses

Abstract

Religious individuals and institutions around the world have often been involved with important moral issues, guiding their communities in moral behavior and at times influencing policymakers. In the early twenty-first century, environmental problems such as anthropogenic climate change, resource depletion, and pollution are critical moral issues. While religious leaders offer vastly different solutions and perspectives, religious voices have gained influence in local, national, and global environmental policy debates. Traditionally-defined religious traditions and institutions are not the only emerging religious responses to environmental problems. Forms of nature-venerating religiosity—whether viewing the natural world as a sacred entity or finding wonder in natural ecological processes—have also emerged as critiques of anti-environmental practices and policies, forming a supportive activist spiritual network in the western world. Acknowledging that controversies exist I provide greater discussion on “dark green religion,” a diverse set of nature-revering values and practices often found among western environmentalist communities. Its many branches include Gaia Theory (a scientific theory understanding the whole world as a singular organism), Deep Ecology (an ethical theory positing inherent value in nature), and certain interpretations of Native North American religious traditions (at times problematic and romanticized), all of which define a complex and diverse religious milieu among western environmentalist communities. I discuss several examples from within the long-lived opposition movement to surface coal mining. Nature-venerating religiosity, including dark green religion, forms an important thread of contemporary religious response to burgeoning environmental problems. As some scientists argue that climate change, resource depletion, and other environmental issues will only worsen without proactive changes toward sustainable policies, dark green religiosity will likely continue to be important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There is an extensive body of literature on faith-based environmental efforts around the world. A good starting place for those interested in learning more is the FORE’s website (http://fore.research.yale.edu/), which includes numerous faith statements on environmental problems and scholarly resources for further study. Roger Gottlieb’s Oxford Handbook of Religion and Ecology (2010) and Ecospirit, by Laurel Kearns and Catherine Keller (2007), are also useful introductions to the field. See also Kalland (2005) and Taylor (2005) for more critical perspectives on the FORE and other similar academic projects.

  2. 2.

    I am not suggesting that the FORE and the “World Religions and Ecology” series should be seen as competing research projects to dark green religion, or that all of the hundreds of contributors to FORE projects share the same theoretical and methodological groundings. Adding the consideration of dark green religion only increases the number of approaches available to study religions and the environment.

  3. 3.

    For example, environmental ethicist Anna Peterson problematized simplistic causal connections between value traditions and environmental practices. She argued, “values and practices, desires and structures, are always interacting with and transforming each other; to single one out as the dominant or sole factor in any social process reflects a deep failure of understanding” (2009: 131). See also Heberlein (2012).

  4. 4.

    For lengthier introductions to mountaintop removal coal mining and its resistance, see Montrie (2003), Burns (2007), and Scott (2010).

  5. 5.

    Some of my interview subjects preferred to remain anonymous. I have given these individuals pseudonyms, which are indicated by quotation marks.

  6. 6.

    Sherman’s quotes and other details from the rally come from the author’s field notes, Marsh Fork Elementary, Sundial, West Virginia, 23 June 2009.

References

  • Albanese, C. (1990). Nature religion in America: From the Algonkian Indians to the new age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad, T. (1993). Genealogies of religion: Discipline and reasons of power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begley, J. (1987). Blackey, Kentucky oral history project, 2000OH02.1a. Frankfort: Kentucky Historical Society. Kentucky Oral History Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, F. (2003). The culture of extinction: Toward a philosophy of deep ecology. Amherst: Humanity Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (1999). Sacred ecology: Traditional ecological knowledge and resource management. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, T. (1988). The dream of the earth. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, S. (2007). Bringing down the mountains: The impact of mountain removal on southern West Virginia communities. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C. (2002). The cult, the cultic milieu and secularization. In J. Kaplan & H. Lööw (Eds.), The cultic milieu: Oppositional subcultures in an age of globalization (pp. 12–25). Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Carolyn.” (2009). Interviewed 8 July, Charleston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman-Crane, J. (2010). Interviewed 4 June, Eolia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronon, W. (1983). Changes in the land: Indians, colonists, and the ecology of New England. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, D. (2002). A religion of nature. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloria, P. (1998). Playing Indian. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devall, B., & Sessions, G. (1985). Deep ecology: Living as if nature mattered. Salt Lake City: Gibbs M. Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt, C. (1998). Caring for creation: Responsible stewardship of God’s handiwork. Grand Rapids: Baker Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatta, J. (2004). Making nature sacred: Literature, religion, and environment in America from the Puritans to the present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, L. (2009). Interviewed 5 July, Kayford Mountain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, S. (1987). Mother earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliat-Ray, S., & Bryant, M. (2011). Are British Muslims “green”? An overview of environmental activism among Muslims in Britain. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture, 5(3), 284–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glacken, C. (1967). Traces on the Rhodian shore: Nature and culture in western thought from ancient times to the end of the eighteenth century. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, R. (2010). Oxford handbook on religion and ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. (1990). Worlds of wonder, days of judgment: Popular religious belief in early New England. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, G. (2006). Animism: Respecting the living world. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heberlein, T. (2012). Navigating environmental attitudes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • “James.” (2010). Interviewed 26 September, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalland, A. (2005). The religious environmentalist paradigm. In B. Taylor (Ed.), The encyclopedia of religion and nature (pp. 1367–1370). London: Continuum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, L., & Keller, C. (Eds.). (2007). Ecospirit: Religions and philosophies for the earth. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krech, S., III. (1999). The ecological Indian: Myth and history. New York: W.W. Norton and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krech, S., III. (2005). American Indians as “first ecologists”. In B. Taylor (Ed.), The encyclopedia of religion and nature (pp. 42–45). London: Continuum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévy-Strauss, C. (1967). The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, J. (1979). Gaia: A new look at life on earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuzawa, T. (2005). The invention of world religions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McDuff, M. (2010). Natural saints: How people of faith are working to save God’s earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature: Women, ecology and the scientific revolution. San Francisco: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montrie, C. (2003). To save the land and people: A history of opposition to surface coal mining in Appalachia. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, R. (2001). Wilderness and the American mind (4th ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orsi, R. (1997). Everyday miracles: The study of lived religion. In D. Hall (Ed.), Lived religion in America: Toward a history of practice (pp. 3–21). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, A. (2009). Everyday ethics and social change: The education of desire. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, S. (2004). New age and neopagan religions in America. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockefeller, S. (2005). Earth charter. In B. Taylor (Ed.), The encyclopedia of religion and nature (pp. 516–518). London: Continuum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R. (2010). Removing mountains: Extracting nature and identity in the Appalachian coalfields. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleeth, J. M. (2006). Serve God, save the planet: A Christian call to action. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. Z. (1978). Map is not territory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1991, November/December). For all those who were Indian in a former life. Ms. Magazine, pp. 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. Z. (1998). Religion, religions, religious. In M. Taylor (Ed.), Critical terms for religious studies (pp. 269–284). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, J., & Tiedje, K. (2008). Guest editor’s introduction: Indigenous nature reverence and conservation—Seven ways of transcending an unnecessary dichotomy. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture, 2(1), 6–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swimme, B. (1994). The universe story: From the primordial flaring forth to the Ecozoic Era—A celebration of the unfolding of the cosmos. New York: HarperOne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. (2005). Religious studies and environmental concern. In B. Taylor (Ed.), The encyclopedia of religion and nature (pp. 1373–1379). London: Continuum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. (2010). Dark green religion: Nature spirituality and the planetary future. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B., & Zimmerman, M. (2005). Deep ecology. In B. Taylor (Ed.), The encyclopedia of religion and nature (pp. 456–460). London: Continuum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweed, T. (2006). Crossing and dwelling: A theory of religion. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tylor, E. B. (1871). Primitive culture: Researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, art, and custom. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L., Jr. (1967). The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science, 155, 1203–1207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Witt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Witt, J. (2015). Dark Green Religion: Advocating for the Sacredness of Nature in a Changing World. In: Brunn, S. (eds) The Changing World Religion Map. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9376-6_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics