Skip to main content

Ballast Water Management Decision Support System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Maritime Transport and Ballast Water Management

Part of the book series: Invading Nature - Springer Series in Invasion Ecology ((INNA,volume 8))

  • 1727 Accesses

Abstract

A Decision Support System (DSS) is a supporting tool enhancing a decision-making process. Decision-makers are frequently faced with the problem to take decisions on very complex issues, which requires large data inputs, and a timely decision process. DSSs provide decision makers with a tool to reduce uncertainties, and to simplify and speed-up the decision process as well as to avoid subjectivism induced by the decision-maker and to guarantee transparency of a decision process. The DSS approach has been introduced in the ballast water management (BWM) field and the need primarily arose with the introduction of the selective BWM approach. More precisely, it was recognised that a supporting tool is needed to aid transparency and consistency when deciding on BWM requirements to achieve better environmental protection and lessen burden on vessels. The DSS process starts with communication and data input, continues with risk assessment, BWM decisions, vessel’s action(s), and ends with monitoring and review processes. Throughout the entire decision process information needs to be exchanged with outer (e.g., vessel, other ports) and inner sources (e.g., vessel’s particulars, compliance history), and therefore needs to be supported by adequate communication processes and data management. When required BWM measures were not conducted properly the BWM DSS endpoints range from situations where unmanaged ballast water can be discharged to cases where vessels may be turned away. The chapter provides a detailed step-by-step DSS model which may be used by administrations and other authorities involved in the decision making processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Permit to start operations in a port, including anchorage, after having complied with port State requirements and submitted all required documents for port entry.

  2. 2.

    e.g., alternative ballast water discharge area, port reception facilities.

  3. 3.

    Permit to leave the port after having complied with port State requirements and submitted all required documents for leaving the port.

  4. 4.

    Decision on the need for BWM practice may rely also on trustworthiness, i.e., compliance history of a vessel, master or responsible officer.

  5. 5.

    i.e., vessel’s carrying capacity, which includes cargo and all weights (e.g., fuel, ballast water, stores), crew and passengers that may be loaded onboard a vessel up to her permissible limits, which is regulated by IMO international conventions, mainly the Load Lines Convention.

  6. 6.

    this is dependent on the port State environmental legislation, and the perception, values and ethics of the assessors.

  7. 7.

    The vessel may also consider a slight deviation and change “the shortest” route to be able to conduct BWE according to the BWM Convention limits, i.e., >50 NM distance of shore and >200 m of depth.

  8. 8.

    Reasonable distance is to be decided based upon regional specifics and deviation related costs.

  9. 9.

    If valid, it shall be accepted.

References

  • Adelman L (1992) Evaluating decision support and expert systems. J Multi Crit Dec Anal 2(2):63–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt GD, Zaveri J (2002) The enabling role of decision support systems in organizational learning. Dec Sup Sys 32:297–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David M (2007) A decision support system model for ballast water management of vessels: doctoral dissertation. University of Ljubljana, Portorož

    Google Scholar 

  • David M, Malej A (2002) Bio-pollution risk assessment with fuzzy logic. In: Jencek P, Štrubelj M (eds) ICTS 2002 proceedings. University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Maritime Studies and Transport, Portorož, pp 116–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzer R (2005) Generic integration of environmental decision support systems – state-of-the-art. Environ Model Softw 20:1217–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekel PY (2002) Fuzzy sets and models of decision making. Comp Math Appl 44:863–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham I, Jones PL (1988) Expert systems: knowledge, uncertainty, and decision. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • IMO (2006) Guidelines on designation of areas for ballast water exchange (G14). International Maritime Organization, Marine Environment Protection Committee, Resolution MEPC.151(55), 13 Oct 2006. London

    Google Scholar 

  • IMO (2008) Guidelines for ballast water sampling (G2). International Maritime Organization, Marine Environment Protection Committee, Resolution MEPC.173(58), 10 Oct 2008. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquez AC, Blanchar C (2006) A decision support system for evaluating operations investments in high-technology business. Dec Supp Sys 41:472–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paradice D (2006) Expanding the boundaries of DSS. Dec Sup Sys 43:1549–1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ru WG, Eloff JHP (1996) Risk analysis modelling with the use of fuzzy logic. Elsevier Comp Secur 15(3):239–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sojda RS (2007) Empirical evaluation of decision support systems: needs, definitions, potential methods, and an example pertaining to waterfowl management. Environ Model Software 22(2): 269–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague RH, Carlson ED (1982) Building effective decision support systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincke P (1993) Multicriteria decision-aid. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Part of these results were obtained in the framework of the research project Decision Model and Control of Ballast Water Management in the Slovenian Sea (L2-6291), which was financially supported by the Slovenian Research Agency and the Port of Koper (Luka Koper d.d.) and as Matej David’s PhD work, supervised by Prof. Livij Jakomin, Slovenia and Prof. Chad Hewitt, Australia. The research leading to part of these results has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under Grant Agreement No. [266445] for the project Vectors of Change in Oceans and Seas Marine Life, Impact on Economic Sectors (VECTORS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matej David .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

David, M., Gollasch, S. (2015). Ballast Water Management Decision Support System. In: David, M., Gollasch, S. (eds) Global Maritime Transport and Ballast Water Management. Invading Nature - Springer Series in Invasion Ecology, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9367-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics