Skip to main content

One Substance or More?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science ((BSPS,volume 306))

Abstract

Chemistry builds on distinctions of substance, which presupposes that matter can be divided into substances and these exemplars compared with others on different occasions to determine whether they are the same substance. Even the notion of a quantity comprising a single substance presupposes the same substance relation, i.e. being a quantity all of whose spatial parts are the same substance. Criteria of purity have been important for isolating substances and investigating their characteristic properties, which can in turn be used for establishing sameness of substance. With the development of chemistry into a theoretical science it became important that such criteria and characteristics should have a systematic theoretical basis. Thermodynamics was, perhaps, the first comprehensive theory to systematically divide the mass of the bodies with which it deals into distinct substances and offer general criteria governing the number of substances present. But the applicability of such macroscopic criteria is restricted to equilibrium conditions on a macroscopic time scale. They can be compared with microscopic conceptions of molecular structure, with which they have been complemented—some would say superseded. Since many substances are not molecular, however, the general formulation of a microscopic sameness of substance criterion remains unclear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Duhem (1892, pp. 271–273; 1893, p. 304; 1894, pp. 240–1), Tisza (1977), p. 128 and further remarks in this spirit in Needham (2007), pp. 41–2.

  2. 2.

    For an explicit formulation of this and related principles governing the same substance relation, see Needham (ms).

  3. 3.

    In general, there is a connection between the chemical potentials of all the substances in a given phase given by the Gibbs-Duhem equation (f connections for f phases) and there are c(f – 1) interphase conditions given by the equality of the chemical potentials of each substance between any two phases. Thus, the variance = 2 + cf – (f + c(f – 1)) = cf + 2, the “2” deriving from the two intensive variables pressure and temperature (each having the same values for each phase).

  4. 4.

    It is apposite to note that in his final chapter, Denbigh (1981) emphasises the importance of the concept of equilibrium even in kinetics: “There is no theory of rates which stands … on its own feet; all existing theories depend, in one form or another, on ideas carried over from the study of matter at equilibrium” (p. 439).

  5. 5.

    Isotopes of oxygen might all be called oxygen just as isomers of heptane might all be called heptane. The substantial point is whether isotopes are counted different substances as isomers are.

  6. 6.

    Armstrong (1927, p. 478) regarded Bragg’s claim that in sodium chloride there are “no molecules represented by NaCl. The equality in number of sodium and chlorine atoms is arrived at by a chess-board pattern of these atoms; it is a result of geometry and not of a pairing-off of the atoms” as “repugnant to common sense” and “not chemical cricket”.

  7. 7.

    I suggest that the macroscopic quantities to which the two-place predicate applies for macroscopic intervals of time are structureless mereological sums of all the material bits that partake of these interconversions at the microlevel (Needham 2010b).

References

  • Aristotle (1984) In: Barnes J (ed) The complete works of Aristotle, vol 1. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong HE (1927) Poor common salt! Nature 120(Issue 3022):478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aston FW, Baxter GP, Bohuslav Brauner A, Debierne A, Leduc TW, Richards FS, Urbain G (1923) Report of the International Committee on Chemical Elements. J Am Chem Soc 45:867–874

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Atkins PW, Gomes JAN (1976) The optical activity of methane. Chem Phys Lett 39:519–520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Callen HB (1985) Thermodynamics and an introduction to thermostatistics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Daintith J (ed) (1990) A concise dictionary of chemistry. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Denbigh K (1981) The principles of chemical equilibrium, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Denbigh KG, Denbigh JS (1985) Entropy in relation to incomplete knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem P (1898) On the general problem of chemical statics. J Phys Chem 2(1–42):91–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duhem P (1892–4) “Commentaire aux principes (1892), 269–330. “Deuxième Partie”, 9 (1893), 293–359. “Troisième Partie”, de la Thermodynamique. Première Partie”, Journal de Mathématiques Pure et Appliquées, 8 10 (1894), 207–85. Translated by Paul Needham in Commentary on the Principles of Thermodynamics, Springer, Dordrecht, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem P (1902) Le mixte et la combinaison chimique: Essai sur l’évolution d’une idée, C. Naud, Paris. Translated by Paul Needham as Mixture and Chemical Combination, and Related Essays, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliel EL (1962) Stereochemistry of carbon compounds. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Furukawa Y (1998) Inventing polymer science: Staudinger, Carothers and the emergence of macromolecular chemistry. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. W. (1876–8) On the equilibrium of heterogeneous substances. Trans Conn Acad Arts Sci, 3, pt. 1, 108–248; 3, pt. 2, 343–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry RF (2010) Entropy and chemical substance. Philos Sci 77:921–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokke WCMC, Oossterhoff LJ (1972) Optical activity due to isotopic substitution: circular dichroism of (1R)-[2-18O]-α-fenchocamphoronequinone. J Am Chem Soc 94:7583–7584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kokke WCMC, Oossterhoff LJ (1973) Optical activity due to isotopic substitution: circular dichroism of (1R)-[1-2H]-α-fenchocamphoronequinone. J Am Chem Soc 95:7159–7160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mislow K, Bickart P (1977) An epistemological note on chirality. Isr J Chem 15:1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Needham P (2007) Macroscopic mixtures. J Philos 104:26–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham P (2008a) Is water a mixture?—Bridging the distinction between physical and chemical properties. Stud Hist Philos Sci 39:66–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Needham P (2008b) Resisting chemical atomism: Duhem’s argument. Philos Sci 75:921–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Needham P (2009) Reduction and emergence: a critique of Kim. Philos Stud 146:93–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Needham P (2010a) Nagel’s analysis of reduction: comments in defence as well as critique. Stud Hist Philos Mod Phys 41:163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Needham P (2010b) Substance and time. Br J Philos Sci 61:485–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Needham P (ms) Determining sameness of substance

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott RL (1977) Modification of the phase rule for optical enantiomers and other symmetric systems. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 73(11):356–360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tisza L (1977) Generalized thermodynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Vet P (1979) The debate between F. A. Paneth, G. von Hevesy and K. Fajans on the concept of chemical identity. Janus 66:285–303

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Vet P (1987) The aborted takeover of chemistry by physics: a study in he relations between chemistry and physics in the present century. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler JC (1980) On Gibbs phase rule for optical enantiomers. J Chem Phys 73:5771–5777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wisniak J (2003) Hendrik-Willem Bakhuis Roozeboom: equilibrium and phase topology. J Phase Equilib 24(5):422–430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zandvoort H (1988) Macromolecules, dogmatism, and scientific change: the prehistory of polymer chemistry as testing ground for philosophy of science. Stud Hist Phil Sci 19:489–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zernike J (1951) Vapour pressures of saturated ammonium bicarbonate solutions. Recueil des travaux chimiques des Pays-Bas 70:711–719

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zernike J (1954) Three-phase curve of ammonium bicarbonate. Recueil des travaux chimiques des Pays-Bas 73:95–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Needham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Needham, P. (2015). One Substance or More?. In: Scerri, E., McIntyre, L. (eds) Philosophy of Chemistry. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 306. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9364-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics