Skip to main content

Art and “Truth.” Heidegger’s Ontology in Light of Ernst Bloch’s Philosophy of Hope and Hans-Georg Gadamer’s Play-Metaphor. Three Impulses for a New Perspective of Musical Bildung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Philosophy of Music Education Challenged: Heideggerian Inspirations

Part of the book series: Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education ((LAAE,volume 15))

  • 1215 Accesses

Abstract

What is truth? Is there truth only in Religion or Science? Why not in Art? It is for many people surely surprising, that modern philosophers as Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Graf York, Dewey, Bloch, Heidegger, Gadamer, Blumenberg, Ricoeur and Waldenfels has dared, to say: Art is more than entertainment or illusion (Platon). Art is an important example of sensual-symbolic truth. But why has this perception, which seems to be a “declaration of war” against Cartesianism, no echo in present cultural policy and education? This article tries to show some bridges between philosophy and (Music-)education: (1) Heideggers “Sein zum Tode” and music as “meditatio mortis”, (2) Heideggers “Kehre” (turn) and his exploration of beauty in poetry as “Sein” (being), (3) Blochs “Prinzip Hoffnung”, exposed in Beethoven’s Fidelio and Brahms’ Ein deutsches Requiem, and (4) Gadamers ontology of “Spiel” (game) as phenomenon of Art.

This chapter was translated from German by Hanne Fossum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Weizsäcker’s most known book Der Gestaltkreis (1940) begins with the sentence: “In order to understand life, you have to participate.” See as well: Natur und Geist (Weizsäcker 1986).

  2. 2.

    See also: Ehrenforth (1971, 1993, 2001, 2013).

  3. 3.

    Heidegger only once makes concrete political statements in Being and Time (p. 403f). Here he states, fairly awkward and anti-democratic: “To dissolve elemental public opinion, and, as far as possible, to make possible the molding of individuality in seeing and looking, would be a pedagogical task for the state.”

  4. 4.

    The discussion about whether the myth lives or long since is dead shall not be discussed here. See Hübner (1985).

  5. 5.

    In Heidegger’s Epilogue to The Origin of the Work of Art (2011: 133ff.), he refers to this dictum of Hegel, yet he does not take a view on the matter about whether his own thinking after the “turn” rejects Hegel’s view or not. However, this question has been addressed later by Heidegger’s interpreters.

  6. 6.

    See Bloch (1986).

  7. 7.

    It is notable that agnostic music lovers have such experiences. The philosopher Hans Blumenberg has a similar experience in his encounter with Bach’s St. Matthew Passion. See: Blumenberg (1988).

  8. 8.

    See also Martin Buber’s philosophy of dialogue, particularly his book I and Thou (Leipzig 1923, here cited after the edition: Buber, Martin (1970): I and Thou. A new translation with a prologue “I and you” and notes by Walter Kaufmann, New York: Scribner’s Sons) where art is given a field “in-between”: art is to Buber neither merely an “it” (“Es” – an object, a thing) nor merely a “thou” (“Du,” a person). “This is the eternal origin of art that a human being confronts a form that wants to become a work through him” (Ibid: 60).

References

  • Bloch, E. (1959). Das Prinzip Hoffnung (Gesamtausgabe, Vol. 5). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, E. (1985). The exceeding of limits and the world of man at its most richly intense in music. In E. Bloch (Ed.) (P. Palmer, Trans.), Essays on the philosophy of music (pp. 195–243). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, E. (1986) The principle of hope (N. Plaice, S. Plaice, & P. Knight, Trans., 3 Vols.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenberg, H. (1988). Matthäuspassion (1 Auflage). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1970). I and Thou, a new translation with a prologue “I and you” and notes by Walter Kaufmann. New York: Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, W. (1933). Von deutscher Dichtung und Musik. Aus den Studien zur Geschichte des deutschen Gbasic forceeistes. Leipzig/Berlin: Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenforth, K. H. (1971). Verstehen und Auslegen. Die hermeneutischen Grundlagen einer Lehre von der didaktischen Interpretation der Musik. Frankfurt am Main: M. Diesterweg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenforth, K. H. (1993). Musik als Leben. Zu einer lebensweltlich orientierten ästhetischen Hermeneutik. In Musik und Bildung 6/1993 (pp. 14–19). Mainz: Schott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenforth, K. H. (Hrsg.). (2001). Musik. Unsere Welt als andere. Phenomenologie und Musikpädagogik im Gespräch. Würzburg: Verlag Königshausen & Neumann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenforth, K. H. (2013). Verstehen und Zuhören – Hinhören – Durchhören. Eine dialogische Hermeneutik der Musik in vermittelnder Absicht. Mainz: Schott (Im Druck).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1977). Anrufung des entschwundenen Gottes. Evangelischer Kommentar, 10(1977), 204ff., cited by Macquarrie. (1985). In search of deity: An essay in dialectical theism (p. 154). New York: Crossroad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1986). The relevance of the beautiful. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. ([1960] 1990). Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik (6 Auflage). Tübingen: J.C.B.Mohr (Paul Siebeck).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1998). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed.). New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). New York: Harper Collins Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (2001). Sein und Zeit (18 Auflage). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (2011). The origin of the work of art. In D. F. Krell (Ed.), Basic writings (pp. 89–139). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hübner, K. (1985). Die Wahrheit des Mythos. München: Verlag C. H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, J. ([1938] 1955). Homo Ludens: A study of the play element in culture. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénomenologie de la perception (p. 2). Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Fulda, A. (1490). De musica. In M. Gerbert (Ed.), Scriptores ecclesiastici de musica sacra potissimum (Band 3, 1784). Neudruck Mailand 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Weizsäcker, V. (1940). Der Gestaltkreis. Leipzig: Georg Thieme Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Weizsäcker, V. (1986). Natur und Geist. Begegnungen und Entscheidungen. Bearbeitet von Mechthilde Kütemeyer und Wilhelm Rimpau. Frankfurt: Surkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl Heinrich Ehrenforth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ehrenforth, K.H. (2015). Art and “Truth.” Heidegger’s Ontology in Light of Ernst Bloch’s Philosophy of Hope and Hans-Georg Gadamer’s Play-Metaphor. Three Impulses for a New Perspective of Musical Bildung. In: Pio, F., Varkøy, Ø. (eds) Philosophy of Music Education Challenged: Heideggerian Inspirations. Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9319-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics