Advertisement

The Epistemology of Ignorance

Embodied Emancipation
  • Kate MaguireEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Education book series (BRIEFSEDUCAT)

Abstract

In 2007, 29 years after the death of Margaret Mead, Sullivan and Tuana wrote as the opening words in their innovative work Race and the Epistemologies of Ignorance Epistemology and Ignorance—how could two such different things go together? Given that epistemology is the study of how one knows and ignorance is a condition of not knowing, epistemology would seem to have nothing to do with ignorance. For the editors and authors, this epistemology of ignorance is an examination of the complex phenomenon of ignorance. Sullivan and Tuana propose that ignorance is both a gap in knowledge, an epistemic oversight that can be ‘remedied’, which comes about due to lack of time to understand and a lack of knowledge or an unlearning of something previously known for negative purposes. Whatever its definition, its impacts are marginalisation, deprivation and exploitation of different groups and individuals. It excludes vast populations of the planet from challenging, proposing, exchanging and disseminating ideas and practices that could be of benefit in the present and future. In Mead’s terms, such ignorance excludes groups and individuals from the future by trapping them in co-generational struggles that are prolonged by inherited Western colonialism and enduring political paradigms of what the future should be rather than what can evolve if all voices contribute.

Keywords

Lifelong Learning Bare Breast Lifelong Education Cultural Paradigm Western Colonialism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bruns, G. L. (1992). Hemeneutics ancient & modern. North Carolina: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cassidy, R. (1982). Margaret Mead: A voice for the century. New York: New York Universe Books.Google Scholar
  3. Clark, T. (2005). Lifelong, life-wide or life sentence? Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 45(1), 47–62.Google Scholar
  4. Desjardins, R. (2003). Determinants of economic and social outcomes from a life-wide learning perspective in Canada. Education Economics, 11(1), 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Felder, D. G. (1998). The 100 greatest women. London: Past Times.Google Scholar
  6. Fisher, H. (2001). Introduction to the perennial edition: A way of seeing. In: M. Mead (Ed.), Sex and temperament in three primitive societies (1935). William Morrow: New York. Reprint 2001, (viii). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  7. Gerhardt, U. (1995). Margaret Mead’s ‘Male and Female’ revisited. In International Sociology 1995 (Vol. 10), p. 197. Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Harris, M. (1968). The rise of anthropological theory: A history of theories of culture. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company.Google Scholar
  10. Jackson, N. L. (Ed.). (2011). Learning for a complex world: A lifewide concept of learning, education and personal development. Indiana: Author House.Google Scholar
  11. Macintyre, B. (2014). How one slave deliciously got his own back. London: The Times newspaper.Google Scholar
  12. Malewski, E., & Jaramillo, N. (Eds.). (2011). Epistemologies of ignorance in education. Information Age Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Mayo, P. (1999). Gramsci, freire & adult education: Possibilities for transformative action. London: Zed. Google Scholar
  14. McDermott, R., & Varenne, H. (1995). Culture as disability. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 26(3), 324–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mead, M. (1928). Coming of age in Samoa: A psychological study of primitive youth for western civilization. New York: William Morrow & Company.Google Scholar
  16. Mead, M. (1949). Review of The American People by Geoffrey Gorer, a collection of essays on contemporary culture. Book reviews 1949 p. 156/157 August.Google Scholar
  17. Mead, M. (1968). Male and female. New York: Laurel Edition.Google Scholar
  18. Mead, M. (1976). Towards a human science. Science Magazine, 191(4230).Google Scholar
  19. Miller, C., & Swift, K. (1976). Words and women. Penguin.Google Scholar
  20. Sullivan, S., & Tuana, N. (Eds.). (2007). Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance. Albany: Suny.Google Scholar
  21. Textor, R. B. (Ed.). (2005). The world ahead: An anthropologist anticipates the future. Margaret Mead: The Study of Western Contemporary Cultures Vol. 6. USA: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  22. Tuttle, L. (1986). Encyclopaedia of feminism. New York: Arrow.Google Scholar
  23. Varenne, H., & Mc Dermott, R. (1998). Successful Failure: The school America builds. Westview.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© the Author(s) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Work Based LearningMiddlesex UniversityLondonUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations