Skip to main content

4.8 Problematizing Evaluative Categorizations: Collaborative and Multisited Interpretations of Constructions of Normality in Estonia and Finland

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Interpretation in Educational Research

Abstract

This chapter demonstrates collaborative and cross-cultural analysis combining ethnographic studies conducted in multiple educational settings. The authors give two examples of their work, illustrating how the interpretations are jointly built. In the first example, the analysis is focused on the construction of a ‘special student’ in a lower secondary school in post-communist Estonia. Interpretations, based mainly on data produced in Estonia, were generated with reflections drawn on data produced in Finnish lower secondary schools. In the second case, the analysis concentrates on representations of ‘normal’ childhood and youth in research reports and policy texts on education, and on the impact of these representations on the evaluation of normality made by educational professionals. Interpretations were based on two ethnographic data sets, one generated in the pre-primary education and the other in the lower secondary school. The main conclusions of the paper discuss the usefulness, as well as prerequisites, of the joint analysis. Contrasting and reflecting data from various fields helps to reveal the limitations of straight-forward analysis that would be expected to provide concrete answers to research questions that were defined beforehand. The authors suggest the importance of liberating themselves not only from the bounded site, but also from the idea that the ethnographer’s field could ever be coterminous with or the same thing as a geographically bounded location.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The project Citizenship, Difference and Marginality in Schools was supported by the Academy of Finland 1994–1998. Elina worked in this ethnographic project together with Tuula Gordon (director of the project), Pirkko Hynninen, Tuija Metso, Tarja Palmu, and Tarja Tolonen in Helsinki and Janet Holland in London.

  2. 2.

    This argument is based on a literature check, conducted 2003 (Lahelma and Gordon 2010).

  3. 3.

    The collaboration has taken place within the context of several successive research projects directed by Lahelma and supported by the Academy of Finland, the latest of which is Citizenship, Agency and Difference in Upper Secondary Education 2010–2013. The project of the Academy of Finland by Lappalainen (2010–2012) is interlinked with the above-mentioned project. The Research Community is part of the Nordic Centre of Excellence Justice through Education (2013–2017).

  4. 4.

    All names of the students and teachers in this chapter are pseudonyms.

References

  • Aapola, S. (1999). Murrosikä ja sukupuoli – Julkiset ja yksityiset ikämäärittelyt [Puberty and gender. Public and private constructions of age]. Helsinki: Finnish Youth Research Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alasuutari, P. (2006). Merkitys, toiminta ja rakenne sosiologiassa [Meaning, action and structure in sociology]. Sosiologia, 42(2), 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amit, V. (2000). Introduction. In V. Amit (Ed.), Constructing the field. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antikainen, A. (2006). In search of the nordic model in education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnesen, A.-L., & Lundahl, L. (2006). Still social and democratic? Inclusive education in the nordic welfare states. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnesen, A.-L., Mietola, R., & Lahelma, E. (2007). The language of inclusion and diversity: Policy discourses and social practices in Finnish and Norwegian schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11(1), 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora, V. (2008). Serendipity, complicity, and circumstantial activism in the production of ethnographic knowledge in Sikkim India. In H. Narmala, H. Eric, & O. Judith (Eds.), Knowing how to know. Fieldwork and ethnographic present (The EASA series, Vol. 9, pp. 130–150). Oxford: Bergham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (1984). Initial encounters in the classroom and the process of establishment. In M. Hammersley & P. Woods (Eds.), Life in school. The sociology of pupil culture. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2006). Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen J. Ball. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, C. (2008). Cultural studies. Theory and practice (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, D., Gordon, T., & Lahelma, E. (Eds.). (2003). Democratic education: Ethnographic challenges. London: Tufnell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benyon, J. (1985). Initial encounters in the secondary school. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1979/2002). Distinction. A social critique of the judgement of the taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, E. (2008). Deconstruction developmental psychology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candea, M. (2009). Arbitrary locations. In defense of the bounded field-sites. In M.-A. Falzon (Ed.), Multi-sited ethnography. Theory, praxis and locality in contemporary research. Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannella, Gaile, S., & Viruru, R. (2004). Childhood and postcolonization. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choy, T., Faier, L., Hathaway, M., Inoue, M., Satsuka, S., & Tsing, A. (2009). Strong collaboration as a method for multi-sited ethnography: On mycorrhizal relations. In M.-A. Falzon (Ed.), Multi-sited ethnography. Theory, praxis and locality in contemporary research. Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J., Laidlaw, J., & Mair, J. (2009). What if there is no elephant? Towards a conception of an un-sited field. In M.-A. Falzon (Ed.), Multi-sited ethnography. Theory, praxis and locality in contemporary research (pp. 47–72). Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. (2003). Frogs and snails and feminist tales. New York: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. (2004). Introduction: Poststructuralist lines of flight in Australia. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 17(1), 1–9. doi:10.1080/0951839032000150194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (1999). Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delamont, S., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Fighting familiarity. Essays on education and ethnography. Cresskill: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • El St.Pierre, A. (2000). Poststructural feminism in education. An overview. Qualitative Studies in Education, 13, 477–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, D., Fahey, J., & Kenway, J. (2013). Multi-sited global ethnography and travelling biography: Gendered journeys. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(4), 470–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falzon, M.-A. (Ed.). (2009). Multi-sited ethnography: Theory, praxis and locality in contemporary research. Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, T., Holland, J., & Lahelma, E. (2000). Making spaces: Citizenship and difference in schools. London/New York: Macmillan & St Martin’s Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, T., Lahelma, E., Hynninen, P., Metso, T., Palmu, T., & Tolonen, T. (1999). Learning the routines. Professionalisation of newcomers to secondary school. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 12(6), 689–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, T., Holland, J., Lahelma, E., & Tolonen, T. (2005). Gazing with intent: Ethnographic practice in classrooms. Qualitative Research, 5(1), 113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, T., Hynninen, P., Lahelma, E., Metso, T., Palmu, T., & Tolonen, T. (2006). Collective ethnography, joint experiences and individual pathways. Nordisk Pedagogik, 26(1), 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (2001). Foucault: Power, knowledge and discourse. In W. Margaret, T. Stephanie, & Y. Simeon (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 72–81). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannerz, U. (2009). Afterword. Long march of Anthropology. In M.-A. Falzon (Ed.), Multi-sited ethnography. Theory, praxis and locality in contemporary research. Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helne,T. (2002). Syrjäytymisen yhteiskunta [The society of exclusion]. Helsinki: Stakes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoikkala, T. (1993). Katoaako kasvatus, himmeneekö aikuisuus [Will upbringing vanish, will adulthood fade?]. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honkasalo, V. (2011). Tyttöjen kesken. Monikulttuurisuus ja sukupuolten tasa-arvo nuorisotyössä [Among girls. Youth work, multiculturalism and gender equality]. Helsinki: Nuorisotutkimusverkosto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hujala-Huttunen, E., & Nivala, V. (1996). Yhteistyö päivähoidossa: Kasvatuksen lapsikohtainen suunnittelu yhteistyössä vanhempien kanssa [Cooperation in day care: Planning individual education in cooperation with parents]. Oulu: Varhaiskasvatus 90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Järventie, I. (2001). Eriarvoisen lapsuuden muotokuvia [Portraits of unequal childhood]. In J. Irmeli, & H. Sauli (Eds.), Eriarvoinen lapsuus [Unequal childhood] (pp. 83–124). Helsinki: WSOY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvinen, T., & Jahnukainen, M. (2001). Kuka meistä onkaan syrjäytynyt? [Which one of us really is excluded?] In M. Suutari (toim.) Vallattomat marginaalit. Yhteisöllisyyksiä nuoruudessa ja yhteiskunnan reunoilla [Powerless margins. Youth communalities in the edges of society]. Helsinki: Nuoristotutkimusverkosto/Nuorisotutkimusseura, julkaisuja 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, B., & Troman, G. (2003). Time for ethnography. British Educational Research Journal, 30(4), 535–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalliala, M. (1999). Enkeliprinsessa ja itsari liukumäessä [Angel princess and suicide in the slide]. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivirauma, J., Klemelä, K., & Rinne, R. (2006). Segregation, integration, inclusion – The ideology and reality in Finland. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 21(2), 117–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahelma, E. (2011). Gender awareness into teacher education: An impossible mission? Education Inquiry, 2(2), 263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahelma, E., & Gordon, T. (1997). First day in secondary school: Learning to be a “professional pupil”. Educational Research and Evaluation, 3(2), 119–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahelma, E., & Gordon, T. (2010). Comparative and cross-cultural ethnography. In J. Kauko, R. Rinne, & H. Kynkäänniemi (Eds.), Restructuring the truth of schooling – Essays on discursive practices in sociology and politics of education (pp. 93–107). Turku: Publications of the Finnish Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahelma, E., Lappalainen, S., Mietola, R., & Palmu, T. (2014). Discussions that ‘Tickle our brains’: Constructing interpretations through multiple ethnographic data-sets. Ethnography & Education, 9(1), 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lappalainen, S. (2006). Liberal multiculturalism and national pedagogy in a Finnish preschool context: Inclusion or nation-making? Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 14(1), 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lappalainen, S. (2009). Making differences and reflecting on diversities: Embodied nationality among preschool children. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(1), 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lappalainen, S., Mietola, R., & Lahelma, E. (2013). Gendered divisions on classed routes to vocational education. Gender and Education. iFirst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leino, M. (1999). Different opinions as one reason of school conflicts. In T. Taimi (Ed.), Estonian social welfare at the threshold of the millennium (pp. 90–96). Tallinn: Tallinn University of Educational Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leino, M., & Lahelma, E. (2002). Constructing and educating “problem children”: The case of post-communist Estonia. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 6(1), 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblad, S., & Popkewitz, T. (2003). Comparative ethnography: Fabricating the new millennium and its exclusions. In D. Beach, T. Gordon, & E. Lahelma (Eds.), Democratic education: Ethnographic challenges (pp. 10–23). London: Tufnell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesko, N. (1988). The curriculum of the body: Lessons from a Catholic high school. In L. G. Gorman, L. K. Christian-Smith, & E. Ellsworth (Eds.), Becoming feminine: The politics of popular culture. London/New York/Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundahl, L., Erixon Arreman, I., Lundström, U., & Rönnberg, L. (2010). Setting things right? Swedish upper secondary school reform in a 40-year perspective. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system. The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, R. A., & Pattilo-McCoy, M. (2000). Do you see what I see? Examining a collaborative ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzei, L. (2011). Desiring silence: Gender, race and pedagogy in education. British Educational Research Journal, 37(4), 657–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mietola, R. (2010). Reippaasti itekseen vai kädestä pitäen? Monenlaiset oppilaat, ammatinvalinnanohjaus ja koulutusmarkkinoiden asiakkuus. In K. Teoksessa Komulainen, S. Keskitalo-Foley, M. Korhonen, & S. Ja Lappalainen (Eds.), Yrittäjyyskasvatus hallintana. Tampere: Vastapaino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mietola, R., & Lappalainen, S. (2005). Hullunkurisia perheitä. Perheen saamat merkitykset kasvatuksen kentällä [Funny families. Meanings of families in educational arenas]. In K. Tomi, V. Marjo, & T. Tomperi (Eds.), Kenen kasvatus? Kriittinen pedagogiikka ja toisin kasvatuksen mahdollisuus [Whose education? Critical pedagogy and possibility for educating other ways] (pp. 112–135). Tampere: Vastapaino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mietola, R., & Lappalainen, S. (2006). Storylines of worry in educational arenas. Nordisk Pedagogik, 26(3), 229–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, A.-M., & Kurki, T. Getting on the right track? Educational choice-making of students with special educational needs in pre-vocational education and training. Disability & Society. doi:10.1080/09687599.2014.966188.

  • Ojala, H. (2011). Opiskelemassa tavallaan : vanhat naiset ikäihmisten yliopistossa [Aged women at senior university]. Tampere: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T. (1998). Struggling for the soul. The politics of schooling and the construction of the teacher. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T., & Lindblad, S. (2000). Educational governance and social inclusion and exclusion. Some conceptual difficulties and problematics in policy and research. Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 21, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T. (2001). Rethinking the political: Reconstituting national imaginaries and producing difference. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 5(2/3), 179–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T. (2003). Governing the child and pedagogicalization of the parent: A historical excursus into the present. In M. N. Bloch, K. Holmlund, I. Moqvist, & T. Popkewitz (Eds.), Governing children, families and education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T. (2008). Cosmopolitanism and the age of school reform. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajander, S. (2010). School and choice: An ethnography of a primary school with bilingual classes. Helsinki: Finnish Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajander, S., & Lappalainen, S. (2011). Expectations and future prospects: The language of the cosmopolitan child. Finnish Journal of Ethnicity and Migration, 5(3), 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. S. (1998). Governing the soul. London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, B. (1999). Seeing differently. Ethnography and explanatory power. Australian Educational Researcher, 26(1), 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Søndergaard, D. M. (2002). Poststructuralist approaches to empirical analysis. Qualitative Studies in Education, 15, 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stainton Rogers, W. (2004). Promoting better childhoods: Constructions of child concern. In M. J. Kehily (Ed.), An introduction to childhood studies (pp. 125–144). Maidenhead/New York: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M. (2004). Partial connections. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolonen, T. (2001). Nuorten äänet ja tilat. Sukupuolten järjestykset koulun arjessa [The voices and spaces of young people. The gendered orders at everyday life of the school]. Helsinki: Gaudeamus & Finnish Youth Research Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troman, G., Jeffrey, B., & Beach, D. (2006). Researching education policy: Ethnographic experiences. London: Tuffnel Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winzer, M. (2007). Confronting difference: An excursion through the history of special education. In Lani Florian (ed.), The SAGE handbook of special education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynes, M. G. (2000). Contesting childhood. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We express our special gratitude to two colleagues, Dr. Mare Leino, University of Tallinn, Estonia, whose data and reflections are used in this chapter, and Dr. Tarja Palmu, University of Helsinki, Finland, who has been elaborating these ideas in the context of another article (Lahelma et al. 2014).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sirpa Lappalainen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lappalainen, S., Lahelma, E., Mietola, R. (2015). 4.8 Problematizing Evaluative Categorizations: Collaborative and Multisited Interpretations of Constructions of Normality in Estonia and Finland. In: Smeyers, P., Bridges, D., Burbules, N., Griffiths, M. (eds) International Handbook of Interpretation in Educational Research. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9282-0_40

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics