Skip to main content

Ethical Problems of Interpretation in Educational Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2723 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

Abstract

Ethics address questions of the “good” and how benefits and disadvantages accrued in society are earned and distributed. Research ethics, then, concern how the “good” translates into research practice. The chapter addresses ethics in the conduct of research and what will happen to participants, and ethics in interpretation, or what happens to data after they are collected, how and what kind of interpretations researchers assign to research results, and what consequences those interpretations have for human beings. Ethical concerns are divided into procedural or formal matters and everyday or ordinary (Lambek 2010) matters, and the differences among them are discussed. Also discussed are whether epistemological differences mandate different approaches to ethics, what interpretation really means and how it has ethical valence, and what standard concerns about ethics mean in the twenty-first century, as they are redefined for research in non-Western cultural settings and on groups, rather than individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abu-Lughod, L. (1991). Writing against culture. In R. G. Fox (Ed.), Recapturing anthropology: Working in the present (pp. 137–162). Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P., & Adler, P. (1998). Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. Published in NetLibrary.com, 2000. Published digitally with Questia Media, Inc., 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, D. E. (2003). Who defines success? An analysis of competing models of education for American Indian and Alaska native students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Education, University of Colorado, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annas, G. J. (1992). The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg code: Human rights in human experimentation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumslag, N. (2005). Murderous medicine: Nazi doctors, human experimentation, and typhus. New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, P., & Lewis O’Neill, K. (2007). Facing risk: Levinas, ethnography and ethics. Anthropology of Consciousness, 18(2), 29–55. American Anthropological Association. Retrieved from www.anthrosource.net.

  • Bloom, L. R. (2003). Under the sign of hope: Feminist methodology and narrative interpretation. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosted, J., Dahl, J., Gray, A., Gullov, H. C., Hendriksen, G., Jorgensen, J. B., & Kleivan, I. (1985). Native power: The quest for autonomy and nationhood of indigenous peoples. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget AS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Code of Federal Regulations. (2009). Title 45 Part 46, Protection of human subjects. Public Welfare, Department of Health and Human Services. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/ohrpregulations.pdf. Revised January 15, 2009, Effective July 14, 2009.

  • Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1978). The Belmont report. http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html.

  • D’Andrade, R. (1995). Moral models in anthropology. Current Anthropology, 36(3), 399–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deyhle, D., & LeCompte, M. D. (1994). Conflict over child development: Navajo culture and the middle schools. Theory Into Practice, 23(3), 156–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deyhle, D., Hess, G. A., & LeCompte, M. D. (1992). Approaching ethical issues for qualitative researchers in education. In M. D. LeCompte, W. L. Millroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 815–861). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, D. E. (1994). Learning capitalist culture: Deep in the heart of Tejas. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, D. E. (1995). The heartland chronicles. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973). Interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1989–1990). Works and lives: The anthropologist as author. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, M. A. (1985). Collaborative educational ethnography: Problems and profits. In: Applying educational anthropology, special issue of the Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 16(2), (Summer), 124–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greaves, T. (Ed.). (1994). Intellectual property rights for indigenous peoples: A sourcebook. Oklahoma City: Society for Applied Anthropology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagstrom, R. M., Glasser, S. R., Brill, A. B., & Heyssel, R. M. (1969). Long term effects of radioactive iron administered during human pregnancy. American Journal of Epidemiology, 90(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, C., Banks, W. C., & Zimbardo, P. (1973). Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 1(1), 69–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, L. (1970). The tearoom trade: Impersonal sex in public places. Aldine Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. (1981). Bad blood: The Tuskegee syphilis experiment. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, S., & Ward, R. (1961). Infectious diseases of children. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 242(2), 128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambek, M. (2010). Introduction, and towards an ethics of the act. In: Ordinary ethics: Anthropology, language and action. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P., & Smithies, C. (1997). Troubling the angels: Women living with AIDS. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCompte, M. D. (1993a). The loss of community culture in the culture of school reform: Teaching Navajo culture vs teaching culturally Navajo. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association Meetings, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCompte, M. D. (1993b). Controlling the discourse of culture: School reform as an obstacle to reform in an American Indian public school district. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Meetings, Atlanta 12–16 Apr 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCompte, M. D., & McLaughlin, D. (1994). Witchcraft and blessings, science and rationality: Discourses of power and silence in collaborative work with Navajo schools. In A. Gitlin (Ed.), Power and method: Political activism and educational research (pp. 147–166). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCompte, M. D., & Schensul, J. J. (1999). Designing and conducting ethnographic research (Book One of the Ethnographer’s toolkit). Lanham: Altamira Press, a division of Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCompte, M. D., & Schensul, J. J. (2010). Designing and conducting ethnographic research: An introduction (Book One of the Ethnographer’s toolkit 2nd ed.). Lanham: Altamira Press, a division of Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCompte, M. D., & Schensul, J. J. (2013). Analysis and interpretation of ethnographic data: A mixed methods approach (Book Five of the Ethnographer’s toolkit 2nd ed.). Lanham: Altamira Press, a division of Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCompte, M. D., & Schensul, J. J. (2015). Ethics in ethnographic research: A mixed methods approach (Book Six of the Ethnographer’s toolkit 2nd ed.). Lanham: Altamira Press, a division of Rowman and Littlefield Publishers. in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCompte, M. D., Schensul, J. J., Weeks, M., & Singer, M. (1999). Researcher roles and research partnerships (Book Six of the Ethnographer’s toolkit 1st ed.). Lanham: Altamira Press, a division of Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1981). Otherwise than being: or, beyond essence (trans: Alphonso Lingis). Hague: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R. J. (1998). The “best proven” therapeutic method” standard in clinical trials in technologically developing countries. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 1, 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lurie, P., & Wolfe, S. M. (1997). Unethical trials of interventions to reduce perinatal transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus in developing countries. New England Journal of Medicine, 337, 853–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manderson, L., Kelaher, M., Williams, G., & Shannon, D. (1998). The politics of community: Negotiation and consultation in research on women’s health. Human Organizations, 57, 222–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangual Figueroa, A. (2014). La carta de responsabilidad: The problem of departure. In D. Paris & M. T. Winn (Eds.), Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 129–146). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medicine, B. (2001). In S. Jacobs (Ed.), Learning to be an anthropologist and remaining “Native”. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (1973). Obedience to authority. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noe, T. D., Manson, S. M., Croy, S., McGough, H., Henderson, J. A., & Buchwald, D. S. (2006). In their own voices: American Indian decisions to participate in health research. In J. E. Trimble & C. B. Fisher (Eds.), The handbook of ethical research with ethnocultural populations and communities. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. R., & Writer, J. (2005). Yellow jack: How yellow fever ravaged America and Walter Reed discovered its deadly secrets. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfield, R. (1956). The little community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, D. J. (1982). Were Tuskeegee and Willowbrook “studies in nature? The Hastings Center Report, 12(2), 5–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of the mind. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. W. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. W. (1994). Culture and imperialism. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schensul, J. J., & LeCompte, M. D. (2013). Essential ethnographic methods: A mixed methods approach (Book Three of the Ethnographer’s toolkit 2nd ed.). Lanham: Altamira Press, a division of Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schensul, J. J., & LeCompte, M. D. (2015). Ethnography in practice: A mixed methods approach (Book Seven of the Ethnographer’s toolkit 2nd ed.). Lanham: Altamira Press, a division of Rowman and Littlefield Publishers. forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schensul, J. J., Diaz, N., & Wooley, S. (1996). Measuring activity expenditures of Puerto Rican children. In The Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference of the National Puerto Rican Studies Association, San Juan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schensul, J. J., Schensul, S., & LeCompte, M. D. (2013). Initiating ethnographic research: A mixed methods approach (Book Two of the Ethnographer’s toolkit 2nd ed.). Lanham: Altamira Press, a division of Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheper-Hughes, N. (1995). Primacy of the ethical. Current Anthropology, 36(3), 409–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, R. R., & Webb, R. B. (1988). Qualitative research in education. New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Basingstoke: MacMillan Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trimble, J. E., & Fisher, C. B. (2006). The handbook of ethical research with ethnocultural populations and communities. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1949). The methodology of the social sciences (translated and edited by E. Shils and H. Finch). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Guenter, R., & Claus, W. (Eds.). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteford, L. M., & Trotter, R. T., III. (2008). Ethics for anthropological research and practice. Long Grove: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. F. (1991). Participatory action research. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Medical Association. (1997). Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 277(11), 925–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret D. LeCompte .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

LeCompte, M.D. (2015). Ethical Problems of Interpretation in Educational Research. In: Smeyers, P., Bridges, D., Burbules, N., Griffiths, M. (eds) International Handbook of Interpretation in Educational Research. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9282-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics