Skip to main content

Paternalism in Education and the Future

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Nature of Children's Well-Being

Part of the book series: Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research ((CHIR,volume 9))

Abstract

Paternalism is a recurrent theme in applied ethics because of the enduring tensions that make themselves felt between the principles of autonomy and beneficence in areas of societal concern such as public health, consumer protection and education. Though education is not inherently paternalistic, paternalistic acts are typical in education, especially of young children. The paper explores how far paternalism should be allowed in the context of education and by what other considerations it is limited. It identifies the time dimension as the key variable which distinguishes paternalistic interventions in education from other types of paternalism and provides a prima facie legitimation for thwarting the present interests of children for the protection and furtherance of their future interests. A number of rules (“tendency rules”) are formulated that may be of help in cases in which the principles of self-determination and best interest conflict.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ainslie, G. (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 463–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L. (1977). Paternalism and biobehavioral control. Monist, 60, 62–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of biomedical ethics (7th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benporath, S. R. (2003). Autonomy and vulnerability: On just relations between adults and children. Journal of the Philosophy of Education, 37, 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbacher, D. (2010). Paternalismus im Strafrecht – ethisch vertretbar? In A. von Hirsch, U. Neumann, & K. Seelmann (Eds.), Paternalismus im Strafrecht. Die Kriminalisierung selbstschädigenden Verhaltens (pp. 11–26). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brighouse, H. (2003). How should children be heard? Arizona Law Review, 45, 691–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brighouse, H., & Swift, A. (2006). Parents’ rights and the value of the family. Ethics, 117, 80–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A. E., & Brock, D. W. (1989). Deciding for others. The ethics of surrogate decision making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damm, R. (2010). Medizinrechtliche Grundprinzipien im Kontext von Pflege und Demenz – “Selbstbestimmung und Fürsorge”. Medizinrecht, 28, 451–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, G. (1972). Paternalism. Monist, 56, 64–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1979). Ulysses and the Sirens. Studies in rationality and irrationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, J. (1979). Legal paternalism. In R. Wasserstrom (Ed.), Today’s moral problems (2nd ed., pp. 434–451). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, J. (1986). Harm to self. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesinger, J. (2007). Autonomie und Verletzlichkeit. Der moralische Status von Kindern und die Rechtfertigung von Erziehung. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hügli, A. (1983). Lernzwang zum Wohle der Kinder? Aspekte des Zeitlichen im menschlichen Dasein. In Vierteljahresschrift für Heilpädagogik und ihre Nachbargebiete (Vol. 52, pp. 172–181).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinig, J. (1983). Paternalism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. (1971). Personal identity. Philosophical Review, 80, 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, T. (1975). Of identity. From T. Reid, Essays on the intellectual powers of man (1785). In J. Perry (Ed.), Personal identity (pp. 108–118). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schickhardt, C. (2012). Kinderethik: Der moralische Status und die Rechte der Kinder. Paderborn: Mentis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleiermacher, F. (2000). Grundzüge der Erziehungskunst (Vorlesungen 1826). Texte zur Pädagogik. In M. Winkler & J. Brachmann (Eds.), Kommentierte Studienausgabe (Vol. 2). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge. Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanDeVeer, D. (1986). Paternalistic intervention. The moral bounds of benevolence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dieter Birnbacher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Birnbacher, D. (2015). Paternalism in Education and the Future. In: Bagattini, A., Macleod, C. (eds) The Nature of Children's Well-Being. Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9252-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics