Skip to main content

The Role of Proteomics in the Development of Personalized Medicine, Diagnostic Methods and Large Scale Biobanking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Genomics and Proteomics for Clinical Discovery and Development

Part of the book series: Translational Bioinformatics ((TRBIO,volume 6))

  • 1362 Accesses

Abstract

The current field of biobanking is emerging and expanding very fast with both private and governmental support. We present here based on our own developments recommendations and outlines for standardization in biobanking processes in clinical studies.

The biobank processes are important for the use of samples in developing assays. These measurements are very important in order to document states of health and disease. The data generation and diagnostic indications are beneficial for academic research, commercial healthcare, drug development industry and government regulating agencies.

There is a need for an improved awareness within proteomic and genomic communities regarding the basic concepts of collecting, storing and utilizing clinical samples. In this respect, the aspects of quality control and sample suitability for analysis need to be documented and validated to ensure data integrity and establish contexts for interpretation of results. The current presentation and outline is of major relevance to the proteomic and genomic fields. The standardization aspects of biobanking and the requirements that are needed to run future clinical studies that will benefit the patients where OMICS science will play a major role. A global view of the field is given where best practice and conventional acceptances are presented along with ongoing large-scale biobanking projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

SNPs:

Single Nucleotide polymorphisms

IRB:

Institutional Review Board

LIMS:

Laboratory Intelligence Management Systems

BBMRI:

The Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure

EC:

European Commission

EU:

European Union

References

  • Apweiler R. Approaching clinical proteomics: current state and future fields of application in fluid proteomics. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2009;47(6):724–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baker M. Biorepositories: building better biobanks. Nature. 2012;486:141–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bozovic A, Kulasingam V. Quantitative mass spectrometry-based assay development and validation: from small molecules to proteins. Clin Biochem. 2013;46:444–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers E, Wagrowski-Diehl DM, Lu Z, Mazzeo JR. Systematic and comprehensive strategy for reducing matrix effects in LC/MS/MS analyses. J Chromatogr. 2007;852(1–2):22–34.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamburg MA, Collins FS. The path to personalized medicine. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:301–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt RE. Biobanking: the foundation of personalized medicine. Curr Opin Oncol. 2011;23(1):112–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khleif SN, Doroshow JH, Hait WN. AACR–FDA–NCI cancer biomarkers collaborative consensus report: advancing the use of biomarkers in cancer drug development. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(13):3299–318.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lasso RO. The ethics of research biobanking. JAMA. 2010;304(8):908–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malm J, Fehniger TE, Danmyr P, Vegvari A, Welinder C, Lindberg H, Appelqvist R, Sjödin K, Wieslander E, Laurell T, Hober S, Berven FS, Fenyö D, Wang X, Andrén PE, Edula G, Carlsohn E, Fuentes M, Nilsson CL, Dahlbäck M, Rezeli M, Erlinge D, Marko-Varga G. Developments in biobanking workflow standardization providing sample integrity and stability. J Proteomics. 2013;95:38–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marko-Varga G. BioBanking as the central tool for translational medicine CTM issue 2013. Clin Trans Med. 2013;2(4):1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marko-Varga G, Ogiwara A, Nishimura T, Kawamura T, Fujii K, Kawakami T, Kyono Y, Tu HK, Anyoji H, Kanazawa M, Akimoto S, Hirano T, Tsuboi M, Nishio K, Hada S, Jiang H, Fukuoka M, Nakata K, Nishiwaki Y, Kunito H, Peers IS, Harbron CG, South MC, Higenbottam T, Nyberg F, Kudoh S, Kato H. Personalized medicine and proteomics: lessons from non-small cell lung cancer. J Proteome Res. 2007;6(8):2925–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marko-Varga G, Vegvari A, Welinder C, Lindberg H, Rezeli M, Edula G, Svensson KJ, Belting M, Laurell T, Fehniger TE. Standardization and utilization of biobank resources in clinical protein science with examples of emerging applications. J Proteome Res. 2012;11:5124–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park A. Biobanks. “Ten ideas changing the world right now.” TIME Magazine. 2009, March 9 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riegman PHJ, Morente MM, Betsou F, De Blasio P, Geary P, Marble Arch Int Working G. Biobanking for better healthcare. Mol Oncol. 2008;2(3):213–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott MG. When do new biomarkers make sense? Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2010;70 suppl 242:90–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simeon-Dubach D, Perren A. Better provenance for biobank samples. Nature. 2011;475(7357):454–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PJ. Matrix effects: the Achilles heel of quantitative high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Biochem. 2005;38(4):90–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaught JB. Biorepository and biospecimen science: a new focus for CEBP. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:1572–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welinder C, Jonsson G, Ingvar C, Lundgren L, Olsson H, Breslin T, Végvári A, Laurell T, Rezeli M, Jansson B, Baldetorp B, Marko-Varga G. Establishing a Southern Swedish Malignant Melanoma OMICS and biobank clinical capability. Clin Transplant Med. 2013;2(1):1326–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement and Funding

This work was supported by grants from Mrs. Berta Kamprad Foundation, Swedish Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences, the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research, Vinnova, Fundacion Federico SA, Ingabritt & Arne Lundbergs forskningsstiftelse and the Crafoord Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johan Malm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Malm, J., Marko-Varga, G. (2014). The Role of Proteomics in the Development of Personalized Medicine, Diagnostic Methods and Large Scale Biobanking. In: Marko-Varga, G. (eds) Genomics and Proteomics for Clinical Discovery and Development. Translational Bioinformatics, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9202-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics