Skip to main content

Abstract

Trapping of tephritid fruit flies forms the backbone of many activites related to phytosanitary issues and regulation of trade of fresh fruits and vegetables between countries. Detection of incipient fruit fly populations can occur through a number of means, such as visual surveys, fruit cutting (to reveal the presence of eggs and larvae), collection and holding of fruits to determine if fruit flies emerge from the collected fruits, and perhaps the most commonly used method, trapping of adult flies using some combination of specific trap types, such as the McPhail, MultiLure, Jackson, etc., and semiochemical attractant, such as a food lure, pheromone, or male lure and kairomonal attractant.

Trapping for surveillance of adult fruit flies is generally a reliable method that has a long history and has been largely accepted by trading partners as a standard means to detect, delimit, and monitor tephritid fruit fly populations. Although trapping remains the most effective means for detecting early introductions of invasive exotic or native fruit fly pests into eradicated and/or pest free areas, factors, such as trap type, source and formulation of attractant, trap spacing, and frequency of trap servicing, all influence the reliability and effectiveness of the system. Over the last 30 years there has been increasing interest in the “harmonization” of fruit fly detection methods for use in regulatory programs worldwide. This has led to the development of international standards (systems approaches, areas of low prevalence, host status, pest free areas, etc), which are discussed below, that advocate the use of verifiable “surveys” to detect or confirm fruit fly presence or absence. Pest risk analysis forms the basis of nearly all trade between countries. It is apparent that trapping serves a number of roles in the establishment, verification, and subsequent maintenance of a phytosanitary condition. In this chapter we discuss the framework for international phytosanitary agreements and trapping as it relates to the regulations that support such agreements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aluja M, Mangan RL (2008) Fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) host status determination: critical conceptual and methodological considerations. Ann Rev Entomol 53:473–502

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • APPPC (Asia and Pacific Plant Protection Commission) RSPM No. 4 (2005) Guidelines for the confirmation of non-host status of fruit and vegetables to tephritid fruit flies. APPPC, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker AC, Stone WE, Plummer CC, McPhail M (1944) A review of studies on the Mexican fruit fly and related Mexican species. USDA Misc Publ 531:1–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowley J, Baker RT, Harte DS (1992) Definition and determination of host status for multivoltine fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidade) species. J Econ Entomol 85(2):312–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Enkerlin W (2005) Sterile insect technique. In: Dyck VA, Hendrichs J, Robinson AS, IAEA (eds) Principles and practice in area-wide integrated pest management. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 651–676

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (1995) Requirements for the establishment of pest free areas. ISPM No. 4, International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC). FAO, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (1997) Guidelines for surveillance. ISPM No. 6, International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC). FAO, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (1998) Guidelines for pest eradication programmes. ISPM No. 9, International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC). FAO, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (1999) Requirements for the establishment of pest free places of production and pest free production sites. ISPM No. 10, International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC). FAO, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (2002) The use of integrated measures in a systems approach for pest risk management. ISPM No. 14, International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC). FAO, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (2004) Pest risk analysis for quarantine pests including analysis of environmental risk and living modified organisms. ISPM No. 11, International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC). FAO, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (2005) Requirements for the establishment of areas of low pest prevalence. ISPM No. 22, International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC). FAO, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (2006a) Phytosanitary principles for the protection of plants and the application of phytosanitary measures in international trade. ISPM No. 1, International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC). FAO, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (2006b) Establishment of pest free areas for fruit flies (Tephritidae). ISPM No. 26, International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC). FAO, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (2007) Recognition of pest free areas and areas of low pest prevalence. ISPM No. 29, International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC). FAO, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (2008) Establishment of areas of low pest prevalence for fruit flies (Tephritidae). ISPM No. 30, International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC). FAO, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (2012) Systems approach for pest risk management of fruit flies (Tephritidae). ISPM No. 35, International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC). FAO, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (2013) Glossary of phytosanitary terms. ISPM No. 5, International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC). FAO, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • IICA (Instituto Interamericano de Cooperacion para la Agricultura) (2009) Evaluacion economica del Programa Moscamed en Mexico (1978–2008). In: Diznarda Salcedo Baca, Refugio Lomeli Flores J, Terrazas Gonzalezy GH. Impresora Kavers S.A, p 144. ISBN 13:978-92-9248-142-1

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) (2003) FAO/IAEA trapping guidelines for area-wide fruit fly programmes, IAEA/FAO-TG/FFP, 2003. IAEA, Vienna. http://www-naweb.iaea.org/nafa/ipc/public/trapping-web.pdf

  • IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) (2010) FAO/IAEA guidelines for implementing systems approaches for pest risk management of fruit flies. Report and recommendations of the consultants group meeting organized by the Joint FAO/IAEA division of nuclear techniques in food and agriculture, Vienna, Austria, 7–11 June 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) (2013) FAO/IAEA trapping manual for area-wide fruit fly programmes. http://www-naweb.iaea.org/nafa/ipc/public/Trapping-Manual-Final-sept13.pdf

  • IPPC (International Plant Protection Convention) https://www.ippc.int

  • Jang E, Moffitt H (1994) Systems approaches to achieving quarantine security. In: Sharp JL, Hallman GJ (eds) Quarantine treatments for pests and food plants. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA, pp 225–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Liquido N, Griffin R, Vick K (1995) Quarantine security for commodities: current approaches and potential strategies. In: Proceedings of joint workshops of the ARS and APHIS. Beltsville, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscamed Regional Program (2011) Memoria Anual de Labores. USDA-APHIS, SAGARPA-SENASICA y MAGA-VISAR. Guatemala, Centro America

    Google Scholar 

  • NAPPO (North American Plant Protection Organization) (2010) RSPM No. 30 Guidelines for the determination and designation of host status of a fruit or vegetable for fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). NAPPO, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Orden D, Romano E (1996) The avocado dispute and other technical barriers to agricultural trade under NAFTA. Paper presented at the conference on NAFTA and agriculture: is the experiment working. San Antonio, Texas, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts D, Krissoff B (2004) Regulatory barriers in international horticultural markets. Electronic outlook report from the economic research service. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)

    Google Scholar 

  • SAG (Servicio AgrÚcola y Ganadero) (2010) Guía para la detección de moscas de la fruta de importancia económica. Editor: Carlos Lobos Aguirre. Gobierno de Chile, p 198

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw JG, Lopez-D F, Chambers DL (1970) A review of research done with the Mexican fruit fly and citrus blackfly in Mexico by the Entomology Research Division. Bull Entomol Soc Am 16:186–193

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (World Trade Organization) The WTO agreement on the application of sanitary and phytosanitary measures (SPS agreement). http://www.wto.org

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric B. Jang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jang, E.B., Enkerlin, W., “Ed” Miller, C., Reyes-Flores, J. (2014). Trapping Related to Phytosanitary Status and Trade. In: Shelly, T., Epsky, N., Jang, E., Reyes-Flores, J., Vargas, R. (eds) Trapping and the Detection, Control, and Regulation of Tephritid Fruit Flies. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9193-9_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics