Advertisement

Wellbeing in Slovakia

  • Jozef DžukaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life book series (IHQL)

Abstract

The specific situation of the Slovak Republic (SR), which was found five years after the fall of the Iron Curtain in Europe 20 years’ ago, determines the content of the present chapter. The first section describes the approach to the understanding of wellbeing in the Slovak research, including an attempt to contribute to the definition and measurement of wellbeing. The second part presents the results of the comparative research regarding wellbeing of Slovak youth in the first decade of the new Slovak Republic and the youth from three European countries – Switzerland, Austria and Germany. The third part compares wellbeing of selected groups with wellbeing values within the survey conducted since 2003 by European Quality of Life Survey (EQLS) on representative samples of people from 28 EU countries, including Slovakia.

Keywords

Wellbeing in Slovak research Processual model of wellbeing Scale of emotional habitual wellbeing (SEHW) Wellbeing of Slovak Youth in comparison Slovakia as a part of the global comparison of wellbeing 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This publication is supported by “Agentúra na podporu výskumu a vývoja” contract no. APVV-0374-10

References

  1. Anderson, R., Dubois, H., Leoncikas, T., & Sándor, E. (2012). Third European quality of life survey – Quality of life in Europe: Impacts of the crisis. http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/pubdocs/2012/64/en/1/EF1264EN.pdf. Accessed 14 Aug 2013.
  2. Balatsky, G., & Diener, E. (1993). Subjective wellbeing among Russian students. Social Indicators Research, 28, 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction on social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, P. (1991). Theoretische Grundlagen. In A. Abele & P. Becker (Eds.), Wohlbefinden (pp. 13–49). Weinheim: Juventa.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, P., Krieger, W., Kamm, U., & Schörer, S. (1989). Alltagskorrelate und -verläufe der emotionalen Befindlichkeit. Trierer Psychologische Berichte, Band 16, Heft 3.Google Scholar
  6. Böhnke, P. (2005). First European Quality of Life Survey: Life satisfaction, happiness and sense of belonging. http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/pubdocs/2005/91/en/1/ef0591en.pdf. Accessed 14 Aug 2013.
  7. Bolger, N., DeLongis, A., Kessler, R. C., & Schilling, E. A. (1989). Effects of daily stress on negative mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 808–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  9. Brebner, J. (1998). Happiness and personality. Personal and Individual Differences, 25, 279–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 668–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cummins, R. A., Džuka, J., & Arita, B. Y. (2003). A comparison of the Personal Wellbeing Index in Slovakia, Mexico, and Australia. In Challenges for quality of life in contemporary societies. Fifth conference of the international society for quality of life studies, July 20 2003, Frankfurt, Germany (p. 30), Abstracts.Google Scholar
  13. Dalbert, C. (1992). Subjektives Wohlbefinden junger Erwachsener: Theoretische und empirische Analysen der Struktur und Stabilität. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 4, 207–220.Google Scholar
  14. Dalbert, C., Montada, L., Schmitt, M., & Schneider, A. (1984). Existentielle Schuld: Ergebnisse der Item- und Skalenanalysen (=Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe “Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral” Nr. 24). Trier: Universität Trier, FB I – Psychologie.Google Scholar
  15. Deusinger, I. M. (1986). Die Frankfurter Selbstkonzeptskalen (FKSN). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  16. Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31, 103–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diener, E., & Iran-Nejad, A. (1986). The relationship in experience between various types of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1031–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diener, E., Sandvik, E., & Pavot, W. (1991). Happiness is the frequency not the intensity of positive versus negative affect. In F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Subjective well-being: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 119–139). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  19. Diener, E., Diener, M., & Diener, C. (1995). Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 851–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Džuka, J. (1995). Faktorová analýza modifikovanej verzie Bernského dotazníka subjektívnej pohody (BDP) (Factor analysis of the modified version of the Berne questionnaire of subjective well-being (BDP)). Československá psychologie, 39, 512–522.Google Scholar
  21. Džuka, J. (2001). Time sampling of unemployment experiences by Slovak youth. In H. Brandstätter & A. Eliasz (Eds.), Person, situations and emotions: An ecological approach (pp. 147–162). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Džuka, J., & Dalbert, C. (1997). Model aktuálnej a habituálnej subjektívnej pohody (Model of current and habitual subjective well-being). Československá psychologie, 41, 385–398.Google Scholar
  23. Džuka, J., & Dalbert, C. (2002). Vývoj a overenie validity Škál emocionálnej habituálnej subjektívnej pohody (SEHP) (Elaboration and verification of Emotional habitual subjective well-being scales). Československá psychologie, 46, 234–250.Google Scholar
  24. Džuka, J., Flammer, A., Grob, A., & Neuenschwander, M. (1993). Výskum psychickej pohody u slovenských a švajčiarských adolescentov pomocou Bernského dotazníka subjektívnej pohody (Research on psychological well-being among Slovak and Swiss adolescents suing the Berne questionnaire of subjective well-being). Psychológia a patopsychológia dieťaťa, 28, 309–322.Google Scholar
  25. Emmons, R. A., & Diener, E. (1985). Personality correlates of subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fahrenberg, J., Selg, H., & Hampel, R. (1978). Das Freiburger Persönlichkeitsinventar FPI. Handanweisung 3., ergänzte Auflage, Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  27. Frank, R. (1991). Körperliches Wohlbefinden. In A. Abele & P. Becker (Eds.), Wohlbefinden (pp. 71–95). Weinheim: Juventa.Google Scholar
  28. Frijda, N. H., Mesquita, B., Sonnemans, J., & van Goozen, S. (1991). The duration of affective phenomena or emotions, sentiments and passions. International Review of Studies on Emotion, 1, 187–222.Google Scholar
  29. Grob, A., Lüthi, R., Kaiser, F. G., Flammer, A., Mackinnon, A., & Wearing, A. J. (1991). Berner Fragebogen zum Wohlbefinden Jugendlicher (BFW) (Berne questionnaire on adolescents subjective well-being (BSW-Y)). Diagnostica, 37, 66–75.Google Scholar
  30. Grob, A., Stetsenko, A., Sabatier, C., Botcheva, L., & Macek, P. (1999). A cross-national model of subjective well-being in adolescence. In F. D. Alsaker & A. Flammer (Eds.), The adolescent experience. European and American adolescents in the 1990s (pp. 115–130). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. Gurková, E., Džuka, J., Sováriová Soósova, M., Žiaková, K., Haroková, S., & Šerfelová, R. (2012). Measuring subjective quality of life in Czech and Slovak nurses: Validity of the Czech and Slovak versions of personal wellbeing index. Journal of Social Research & Policy, 3, 95–110.Google Scholar
  32. Headey, B., Holmström, E., & Wearing, A. J. (1984). Well-being and ill-being. Different dimensions? Social Indicators Research, 14, 115–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. International Wellbeing Group. (2006). Personal wellbeing index. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University. http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/wellbeing_index.htm. Accessed 14 Aug 2013.
  34. Kammann, R., & Flett, R. (1983). Affectometer 2: A scale to measure current level of general happiness. Australian Journal of Psychology, 35, 259–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mees, U. (1991). Die Struktur der Emotionen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  36. Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pekrun, R. (1988). Emotion, Motivation und Persönlichkeit. München: Psychologie Verlag Union.Google Scholar
  38. Solomon, R. L. (1980). The opponent-process theory of acquired motivation: The costs of pleasure and the benefits of pain. American Psychologist, 35, 691–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Veenhoven, R. (1991). Is happiness relative? Social Indicators Research, 24, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Veenhoven, R. (1997). Advances in understanding happiness. Revue Québécoise de Psychologie, 18, 29–74.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ArtsInstitute of PsychologyPrešovSlovakia

Personalised recommendations