Advertisement

Multiple Modes of Wellbeing in Asia

  • Takashi InoguchiEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life book series (IHQL)

Abstract

In this chapter I propose the typology of societies in Asia on the basis of 50 odd thousand respondents to the AsiaBarometer Surveys conducted every year between 2003 and 2008. Each respondent was asked to choose five from among 25 lifestyle aspects such as health, home, diet, job and family. I factor-analyzed responses society by society with five societal types using the two heavily loaded dimensions after varimax rotation: materialism, post-materialism and public sector dominance. Ab type (materialism dominance followed by post-materialism: Japan, Indonesia, Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan), Ac type (materialism followed by public sector dominance: China, South Korea, Taiwan, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Mongolia), B type (post-materialism followed by materialism: Hong Kong, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, Kyrgyzstan), Ca type (post-materialism followed by public sector dominance: Brunei, the Philippines, Bhutan, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Kazakhstan), Cb type (public sector dominance followed by materialism: Singapore and the Maldives. This is a thoroughly evidence-based typology of societies as seen from bottom in the daily lives of ordinary people in Asia.

Keywords

Lifestyle aspects Materialism Post-materialism Public sector dominance Evidence-based typology of societies AsiaBarometer 28 Asian societies 

References

  1. Bates, R. H., Levi, M., et al. (1998). Analytic narratives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Blondel, J. (2012, November 7). Telephone discussion on the distinction between presidential and parliamentary systems.Google Scholar
  3. Blondel, J., & Inoguchi, T. (2006). Political cultures in Asia and Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Dadabaev, T. (2006). Mahalla no Jitsuzo: Chuo-Asia Shakai no Dento to Henyo (Realities of Mahalla: Changing cultures and societies of central Asia). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dadabaev, T. (2010). Kioku no naka no Soren (The Soviet Union as Living in the Memory of Central Asians). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation & opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Eisenstadt, S. N. (2002). Multiple modernities. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Eisenstadt, S. N. (2006). The great revolutions and the civilizations of modernity. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Fave, A. D., & Knoop, H. H. (Eds.). (2012). Wellbeing and cultures: Perspectives from positive psychology (Cross-cultural advancements in positive psychology). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Gunther, R., Montero, J. R., & Linz, J. (2002). Political parties: Old concepts and new challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Henderson, G. (1968). Korea: The politics of vortex. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Humphrey, C., & Sneath, D. A. (1999). The end of Nomadism?: Society, state, and the environment in Inner Asia. Durham: Duke University Press Books.Google Scholar
  13. Inglehart, R. (1977). Silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among western publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Inglehart, R. (1989). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization cultural change and democracy: The human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Inoguchi, T. (2004). Social capital in ten Asian societies. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 5(1), 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Inoguchi, T., Mikami, S., & Fuji, S. (2007). Social capital in east Asia: Comparative political culture in Confucian societies. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 8(3), 409–426.Google Scholar
  20. Inoguchi, T. (2011, December). Keynote address and panel discussion at Center for Social Capital Studies Institute for the Development of Social Intelligence. Sensyu University, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  21. Inoguchi, T. (2012). AsiaBarometer’s achievements, Underutilized areas of the survey materials, and future prospects. American Political Science Association Comparative Democratization Newsletter, 10(3), 2, 13–15.Google Scholar
  22. Inoguchi, T., & Fujii, S. (2012). The quality of life in Asia: A comparison of quality of life in Asia. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Kato, T. (2012). Buki to shiteno Shakai Ruikeiron (Typology of societies as a looking glass). Tokyo: Kodansha.Google Scholar
  24. Koh, G., & Ling, O. G. (Eds.). (2000). State-society relations in Singapore. Singapore: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lieven, A. (2012). Pakistan: A hard country. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  26. Linz, J. (2000). Totalitarian and authoritarian regimes. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  27. Matsui, T. (2011). Seinan-Asia no Sabaku Bunka (Desert culture in southwest Asia). Kyoto: Jimbun Shoin.Google Scholar
  28. Nakane, C. (1970). Japanese Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  29. Steinberg, D. (2009). Burma/Myanmar: what everyone needs to know. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Taylor, R. H., & Hlaing, K. Y. (Eds.). (2005). Myanmar: Beyond politics to societal imperatives. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  31. Woodside, A. (2006). Lost modernities: China, Vietnam, Korea, and the hazards of world history. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Wright, T. (2010). Accepting authoritarianism: State-society relations in China’s reform era. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.University of Niigata PrefectureNiigataJapan

Personalised recommendations