Advertisement

Living Alone and Living Together – Their Significance for Wellbeing

  • Elizabeth EckermannEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life book series (IHQL)

Abstract

Differential rates of demographic change between the developed and developing nations contribute to disparate living arrangements and contrasting cultural understandings of living together and alone. Among some cohorts in the developed world, who can afford it, living alone is seen as a lifestyle choice and representative of independence, thus not compromising of wellbeing. In some contexts living arrangements have minimal impact on wellbeing. However, in parts of the developing world, and among other cohorts in developed countries, living alone represents despair, abandonment and loneliness leading to diminished wellbeing. Overriding this cultural difference is the unambiguous population level data from across the world showing that intimate partnerships, particularly marriage, provide a protective shield against low personal wellbeing scores. The jury is still out on whether this protective effect necessarily involves cohabitation. The current rise in living- apart-together relationships and the possible future trend of living together virtually, through second life and other digital media, raises further questions about the nexus between living arrangements and wellbeing.

Keywords

Demographic change Family structures Living arrangements Relationship formation Quality of life Subjective wellbeing Living-apart-together Marriage Cohabitation 

References

  1. Bernard, J. (1976). The Future of Marriage. New Haven: Yale Uni Press.Google Scholar
  2. Binstock, G., & Thornton, A. (2003). Separations, reconciliations, and living apart in cohabiting and marital unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(2, May), 432–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Botha, F., & Booysen, F. (2013). The relationship between marital status and life satisfaction among South African adults. ACTA Academia, 45(2), 150–178.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, S. L. (2000a). The effect of union type on psychological well-being: Depression among cohabitors versus marrieds. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41, 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, S. L. (2000b). Union transitions among cohabitors: The role of relationship assessments and expectations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 833–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, S. L. (2004). Moving from cohabitation to marriage: Effects on relationship quality. Social Science Research, 33(2004), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, S. L., & Booth, A. (1996). Cohabitation versus marriage: A comparison of relationship quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 668–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chou, K. L., Ho, A. H. Y., & Chi, I. (2006). Living alone and depression in Chinese older adults. Aging and Mental Health, 6(6), 583–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cummins, R. (2006). International wellbeing group. Retrieved September 12, 2013, from http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/iwbg/
  10. De Vaus, D. (2002, Winter). Marriage and mental health, Family Matters, 62, 26–32.Google Scholar
  11. Fine-Davis, M. (2013). Gender role attitudes, family formation and well-being in Ireland. In L. Eckermann (Ed.), Gender, lifespan and quality of life: An international perspective. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Glenn, N. D. (1975). The contribution of marriage to the psychological well-being of males and females. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37, 594–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gove, W. R. (1973). Sex, marital status and mortality. The American Journal of Sociology, 79(1), 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gove, W. R., Hughes, M., & Briggs Style, C. (1983). Does marriage have positive effects on the psychological well-being of the individual? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(2), 12–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayford, S. R., & Morgan, S. P. (2008). The quality of retrospective data on cohabitation. Demography, 45(1, February), 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (Eds.). (2012). World happiness report. Columbia: Earth Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Iwasawa, M. (2004). Partnership transition in contemporary Japan: Prevalence of non-cohabiting couples. Japanese Journal of Population, 2(1), 76–92.Google Scholar
  18. Klinenberg, E. (2012). Going solo: The extraordinary rise and surprising appeal of living alone. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lim, L. L., & Kua, F. (2011). Living alone, loneliness and psychological well-being of older persons in Singapore. Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research, 2011, 673182. doi: 10.1155/2011/673181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Michon, P. (2013). Mothers and quality of life in 26 EU countries. In E. Eckermann (Ed.), Gender, lifespan and quality of life: An international perspective. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Milan, A., & Peters, A. (2003, Summer). Couples living apart. Canadian Social Trends, pp. 2–6.Google Scholar
  22. OECD. (2011). OECD better life index. Retrieved September 12, 2013, from www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/
  23. Reich, S. M. (2010). Adolescents’ sense of community on Myspace and Facebook: A mixed methods approach. Journal of Community Psychology, 38(6), 688–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reimondos, A., Evans, A., & Gray, E. (2011). Living-apart-together (LAT) relationships in Australia. Family Matters, 87, 43–55.Google Scholar
  25. Strohm, C., Selzer, J. A., Cochran, S. D., & Mays, V. (2010). “Living apart together” relationships in the United States. Demographic Research, 21(7), 177–214.Google Scholar
  26. Sun, X., Lucas, H., Meng, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2011). Associations between living arrangements and Health-related quality of life of urban elderly people: a study from China. Quality of Life Research, 20(3, April), 359–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Treas, J., & Giesen, D. (2000). Sexual infidelity among married and cohabiting Americans. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(1, February), 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. UNDP. (2013). Human development report 2013. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
  29. UNFPA. (2012). Ageing in the twenty-first century: A celebration and a challenge. New York: UNFPA. Retrieved November 1, 2013. from http://www.unfpa.org/webdav/site/global/shared/documents/publications/2012/UNFPA-Report-Chapter1.pdf
  30. Upton-Davis, K. (2012). Living Apart Together relationships (LAT): Severing intimacy from obligation. Gender Issues, 29(1–4, December), 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Veenhoven, R. (1983). The growing impact of marriage. Social Indicators Research, 12(1983), 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Velkoff, V. A. (2000). Living arrangements and well-being of the older population: Future research directions. New York: US Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar
  33. Verbrugge, L. M. (1979). Marital status and health. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41(2, May), 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Weinberg, M. K., & Cummins, R. A. (2012). Part A Chapter 10 “The wellbeing of Australians – The impact of marriage on wellbeing”. Australian unity wellbeing index, report no 28, Deakin University, Melbourne. http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/auwbi/survey-reports/index.php
  35. Wikipedia. (2013). Retrieved November 1, 2013, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cohabitation
  36. Wilmoth, J., & Koso, G. (2002). Does marital history matter? Marital status and wealth outcomes among preretirement adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(February), 254–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xiaojie, S., Lucas, H., Qingyue, M., & Yaoguang, Z. (2011). Associations between living arrangements and health-related quality of life of urban elderly people: A study from China. Quality of Life Research, 20, 359–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yahaya, N., Abdullaha, S. S., Momtaza, Y. A., & Hamida, A. (2010). Quality of life of older Malaysians living alone. Educational Gerontology, 36(10–11), 893–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang, Z. (2011). Feeling the sense of community in social network usage. IEEE Transitions in Engineering Management, 57(2), 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Deakin UniversityGeelongAustralia

Personalised recommendations