Advertisement

Monitoring and Analyzing Quality of Life – An Introduction

  • Wolfgang GlatzerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life book series (IHQL)

Abstract

The approach of monitoring and analyzing quality of life rests on concepts and methods which are a combination of thinking from the fields of social science, philosophy, psychology, politics, economics and social statistics. Quality of life and wellbeing are goals that have explicit emerged since the last century. The components of quality of life are mainly focused on positive wellbeing but also to negative wellbeing and to future expectations. Quality of life research is interested in evaluations of good and bad states of society, which easily leads to disputes about their value basis. The world is divided into objective and subjective reality; the subjective reality is the perception of ordinary people, whereas the objective reality refers to the definition of experts after having made carefully investigations of reality. There are many possible ways to monitor and analyze quality of life. The problem is that the methods influence the results. A main problem of quality of life can be seen in the relationship between diversity and inequality on the globe. This chapter gives an overview of the topic of quality of life as well of the structure and content of the book.

Keywords

Quality of life and well-being Positive well-being Quality of life research Subjective reality Analyzing quality of life Global diversity and inequality 

References and Selected Contributions

  1. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  3. Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, A. (1981). The sense of well-being in America. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  5. Caplow, T., Hicks, L., & Wattenberg, J. (2001). The first measured century. Washington, DC: The AEI Press.Google Scholar
  6. Council of Europe. (2008). Well-being for all. Concepts and tools for social cohesion. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  7. Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Applied Research Quality Life, 1(2), 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diener, E. (2009). The science of well-being (Social indicators research series). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gallup International Research Institute, Interview with Humanity. (1978). Human needs and satisfactions: A global survey. Basle/Bâle: Baloise Insurance Group.Google Scholar
  10. Gallup World Poll. (2010). www.gallup.com. Last accessed on 15 Dec 2011.
  11. Glatzer, W. (Ed.). (2002). Rich and poor. Disparities, perceptions, concomitants. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Glatzer, W. (2011). Cross-national comparisons of quality of life in developed nations, including the impact of globalization. In K. Land, A. C. Michalos, & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Glatzer, W., von Below, S., & Stoffregen, M. (2004). Challenges for quality of life in the contemporary world. Advances in quality of life studies, theory and research. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Land, K. C., Michalos, A. C., & Sirgy, M. J. (2012). Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Langlois, S. (Ed.). (1994). Convergence or divergence? Comparing recent social trends in industrial societies. Frankfurt am Main: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Michalos, A. C. (Ed.). (2005). Citation classics from social indicators research (Social indicators research series). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Michalos, A. (2014). Encyclopedia of quality of life and wellbeing research. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Møller, V., & Huschka, D. (2009). Quality of life and the millennium challenge (Social indicators research series). Dordrecht/London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Møller, V., Huschka, D., & Michalos, A. C. (2008). Barometers of quality of life around the globe. How are we doing? (Social indicators research series, Vol. 33). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. OECD. (1972). Subjective elements of well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. OECD. (2013). OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Pigou, A. C. (1920/2009). The economics of welfare. New Brunswick.Google Scholar
  23. Veenhoven, R. (2009). Well-being in nations and well-being of nations. Social Indicators Research, 91(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Veenhoven, R. (Dir.). World database of happiness. http://www1.eur.nl/fsw/happiness/. Accessed 25 Mar 2014.
  25. Word Value Survey Wave 5. (2005–2008). Banco de Datos ASEP/JDS. http://www.jdsurvey.net. Accessed 24 Mar 2014.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Goethe-UniversityFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations