Skip to main content

Developing and Testing a Health Promotion Theory—An Example of Creating a Model of School Staff’s Occupational Well-Being

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Schools for Health and Sustainability

Abstract

Developing a theory is a long-term, multi-phased process that can be used to produce models applicable to workplace health promotion in school communities. The study described in this chapter employed the action research method to empirically test a theoretical model for the occupational well-being of school staff. Inductive and deductive research approaches were applied to the development in that both quantitative and qualitative research materials (national and international data) and analysis methods were methodically utilised during 2002–2012 (until 2014). By developing and testing the theory, we produced a middle-level theory and the Content model for the promotion of school community staff’s occupational well-being, which continues to be tested and developed. The content model is theoretically clear and flexible. It contains the premises for planning comprehensively through four aspects, and it serves as a suitable model for implementing and evaluating the development of school staff’s occupational well-being, which also affects the learning, health and well-being of children and adolescents. The content model can therefore be used in various situations. It has been applied to, and tested in, comprehensive and upper secondary school communities, but it can also be applied to other schools and work communities where its functionality will also be tested in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Academy of Finland. (2003). Guidelines on research ethics. http://www.aka.fi/Tiedostot/Tiedostot/Julkaisut/Suomen%20Akatemian%20eettiset%20ohjeet%202003.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2013.

  • Antonovsky, A. (1996). The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promotion International, 11(1), 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1998). Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychology & Health, 13(4), 623–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bonell, C., Harden, A., Wells, H., et al. (2011). Protocol for a systematic review of the effects of school and school-environment interventions on health: Evidence mapping and syntheses. BMC Public Health, 11, 453. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, M. (2011). Interorganisational partnership arrangements: A new model for nursing and midwifery education. Nurse Education Today, 31(3), 304–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2007). Communication from the commission to the council and the European parliament. Improving the quality of teacher education (3.8.2009. COM (2007) 392 final). Brussels. Available at: http://www.atee1.org/uploads/EUpolicies/improving_the_quality_of_teacher_education_aug2007.pdf. Accessed 9 June 2014.

  • Crosby, R., & Noar, S. M. (2010). Theory development in health promotion: Are we there yet? Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 33(4), 259–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R. (2010). Health promotion theory, models and approaches. In D. Whitehead & F. Irvine (Eds.), Health promotion & health education in nursing. A framework for practice (pp. 22–44). Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, D. K., Marx, E., & Bowie, S. E. (2007). Faculty and staff health promotion: Results from the school health policies and programs study 2006. Journal of School Health, 77(8), 557–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasson, J., Chang, E. M. L., & Bidewell, J. W. (2008). The value of participatory action research in clinical nursing practice. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 14(1), 34–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, S., Varava, L., & Streimann, K. (2009). Establishing the network of health promoting kindergartens and schools in Estonia in 2005–2009. In Better schools through health: The third European conference on Health Promoting Schools, 15–17 June, Vilnius, Lithuania (pp. 50–51). The conference book. Vilnius, Lithuania “Kriventa”: State Environment Health Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. E., Taris, T. W., Schaufeli, W. B., & Schreurs, P. J. G. (2004). The structure of occupational well-being: A study among Dutch teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(3), 365–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilmarinen, J., Gould, R., Järvikoski, A., & Järvisalo, J. (2008). Diversity of work ability. In R. Gould, J. Ilmarinen, J. Järvisalo, & S. Koskinen (Eds.), Dimensions of work ability. Results of the health 2000 survey (pp. 13–24). Vaasa: Waasa Graphics Oy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juniper, B. (2011). Defining employee wellbeing. Occupational Health, 63(10), 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guidford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konu, A., Alanen, E., Lintonen, T., & Rimpelä, M. (2002). Factor structure of the school well-being model. Health Education Research, 17(6), 732–742.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lepp, K., Villeruca, A., & Jociute, A. (2007). Self-assessment tool for dissemination of health-promoting schools on the school level: Collaboration between Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. In V. Barnekow, G. Buijs, S. Clift, B. B. Jensen, P. Paulus, D. Rivett, & I. Young (Eds.), Health-promoting schools: a resource for developing indicators (pp. 95–101). European Network of Health Promoting Schools. Kailow Graphic. http://www.nepes.eu/files/Report%20Health%20Promoting%20Schools.pdf. Accessed 9 June 2014.

  • Lippke, S., & Ziegelmann, J. P. (2008). Theory based health behavior change: Developing, testing, and applying theories for evidence-based interventions. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57(4), 698–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohrmann, D. K. (2010). A complementary ecological model of the coordinated school health program. Journal of School Health, 80(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, C., Finch, T., Mair, F., et al. (2007). Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: The normalization process model. BMC Health Services Research, 19(7), 148. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-7-148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, C., Mair, F., Finch, T., et al. (2009). Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implementation Science, 4, 29. http://www.implementationscience.com/content/4/1/29. Accessed 7 June 2013.

  • Ministry of Employment and the Economy. (2012). National working life development strategy to 2020. http://www.tem.fi/files/35434/Tyoelaman_kehittamisstrategia2020_A4_eng.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2013.

  • Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. (2011). Työterveyshuolto ja työkyvyn tukeminen työterveysyhteistyönä. Työryhmän loppuraportti [Occupational health services and support for work ability through occupational health cooperation. Final working group report.] Sosiaali-ja terveysministeriön selvityksiä 2011:6. Helsinki. http://www.stm.fi/c/document_library/get_file?folderId=2872962&name=DLFE-14934.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2013.

  • Ozer, E. J., Ritterman, M. L., & Wanis, M. G. (2010). Participatory action research (PAR) in middle school: Opportunities, constraints, and key process. The American Journal of Community Psychology, 46(1/2), 152–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2011). Nursing research. Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (9th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rütten, A., Röger, U., Abu-Omar, K., & Frasha, A. (2009). Assessment of organizational readiness for health promotion policy implementation: Test of a theoretical model. Health Promotion International, 24(3), 243–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rütten, A., Abu-Omar, K., Gelius, P., et al. (2012). Policy assessment and policy development for physical activity promotion: results of an exploratory intervention study in 15 European Nations. Health Research Policy and Systems, 10, 14. http://www.health-policy-systems.com/content/10/1/14. Accessed 7 June 2013.

  • Saaranen, T., Tossavainen, K., & Turunen, H. (2005). School staff members’ and occupational health nurses’ evaluation of the promotion of occupational wellbeing—With good planning to better practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(5), 465–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaranen, T., Tossavainen, K., Turunen, H., & Vertio, H. (2006). Occupational wellbeing in a school community—Staff’s and occupational health nurses’ evaluations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(6), 740–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaranen, T., Tossavainen, K., Turunen, H., Kiviniemi, V., & Vertio, H. (2007). Occupational wellbeing of school staff members: A structural equation model. Health Education Research, 22(2), 248–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaranen, T., Sormunen, M., Streimann, K., Pertel, T., Hansen, S., Varava, L., Lepp, K., Turunen, H., & Tossavainen, K. (2012a). The occupational well-being of school staff and maintenance of their ability to work in Finland and Estonia—Focus on the school community and professional competence. Health Education (Special Issue), 112(3), 236–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaranen, T., Pertel, T., Kalle, T., Hansen, S., Varava, L., Lepp, K., Turunen, H., & Tossavainen, K. (2012b). School staffs’ experiences of work and working conditions in Finnish and Estonian schools. Open Public Health Journal, 5, 40–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaranen, T., Tossavainen, K., Ryhänen, E., & Turunen, H. (2013). Promoting the occupational well-being of teachers for the Comenius program. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(2), 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. J. (2008). Disciplinary perspectives linked to middle range theory. In M. J. Smith & P. R. Liehr (Eds.), Middle range theory for nursing (pp. 1–11). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soh, K. L., Davidson, P. M., Leslie, G., & Rahman, A. B. A. (2011). Action research studies in the intensive care setting: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48(2), 258–268.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sormunen, M., Saaranen, T., Tossavainen, K., & Turunen, H. (2012). Process evaluation of an elementary school health learning intervention in Finland. Health Education (Special Issue), 112(3), 272–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannahill, A. (2008). Health promotion: The Tannahill model revisited. Public Health, 112(12), 1387–1391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiollent, M. (2011). Action research and participatory research: An overview. International Journal of Action Research, 7(2), 160–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tones, B. K., & Tilford, S. (1994). Health education: Effectiveness, efficiency and equity (2nd ed.). London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Broucke, S. (2012). Theory-informed health promotion: Seeing the bigger picture by looking at the details. Health Promotion International, 27(2), 143–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Wright, G. H. (1976). Determinism and the study of man. In J. Manninen & R. Tuomela (Eds.), Essays on explanation and understanding (pp. 415–435). Dordrecht: D Reide.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weare, K. (1998). The health promoting school—An overview of concept, principles and strategies and the evidence for their effectiveness. First workshop on practice of evaluation of the Health Promoting School—Models, experiences and perspectives, Bern/Thun, Switzerland (Executive summary, pp. 9–18).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weare, K. (2000). Promoting mental, emotional and social health. A whole school approach. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, D. (2010). Setting based health promotion. In D. Whitehead & F. Irvine (Eds.), Health promotion & health education in nursing. A framework for practice (pp. 95–120). Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (1986). Ottawa charter for health promotion. http://www.who.int/hpr/NPH/docs/ottawa_charter_hp.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2013.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terhi Saaranen Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Saaranen, T., Tossavainen, K., Sormunen, M., Laine, S., Turunen, H. (2015). Developing and Testing a Health Promotion Theory—An Example of Creating a Model of School Staff’s Occupational Well-Being. In: Simovska, V., Mannix McNamara, P. (eds) Schools for Health and Sustainability. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9171-7_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics