Advertisement

Emotions in Expectation States Theory

  • Murray Jr. WebsterEmail author
  • Lisa Slattery Walker
Chapter
Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Abstract

Status and expectation state processes ordinarily apply to task focused, collective groups, creating, maintaining, or alleviating inequality. Emotions, affect, and sentiments often function as causes or consequences of status processes. Emotions appeared in Bales discussion groups of the 1950s as individuals reacted to each other’s skill and control attempts. By 1990, Ridgeway and Johnson showed how group position intertwines with emotion, and explained the common finding that positive expressions outnumber negative ones in task groups. Contemporary research documents effects in diverse settings. Business situations highlight the important difference between experiencing and expressing emotions generated by different positions in an organizational hierarchy. Behavior produced by status position may be incorrectly attributed to socialized traits, especially for gender (instrumental males, expressive females). Thus status fosters personality inferences as people try to understand what kinds of people they and others actually are. Justice and legitimation trigger other emotional consequences, again conditioned by status position. Future work may address situations where the scope conditions of status theories are met only weakly or inconsistently. Such work could expand the scope of applicability of the theories, as well as refine the propositions to incorporate emotional experience and expression.

Keywords

Status Expectation states Legitimation Justice Organizational hierarchy Gender Small groups Compatible emotions 

References

  1. Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422–436.Google Scholar
  2. Amabile, T. M., Barsade S. G., Mueller J. S., & Staw B. M. (2006). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 367–403.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, B., Berger, J., Zelditch, M., Jr., & Cohen, B. P. (1969). Reactions to inequity. Acta Sociologica, 12, 1–12.Google Scholar
  4. Angel, R. J., Frisco, M., Angel, J. L., & Chirlboga, D. (2003). Financial strain and health among elderly Mexican-origin individuals. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44, 536–551.Google Scholar
  5. Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Cambridge: Addison- Wesley.Google Scholar
  6. Bales, R. F. (1953). The equilibrium problem in small groups. In T. Parsons, R. F. Bales, & E. A. Shils (Eds.), Working papers in the theory of action (pp. 111–161). Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bales, R. F. (1956). Task status and likeability as a function of talking and listening in decision-making groups. In L. D. White (Ed.), The state of the social sciences (pp. 148–183). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bales, R. F. (1970). Personality and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  9. Bales, R. F. (1999). Social interaction systems: Theory and measurement. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Bales, R. F., & Hare, A. P. (1965). Diagnostic use of the interaction profile. Journal of Social Psychology, 67, 239–258.Google Scholar
  11. Bales, R. F., & Slater, P. E. (1955). Role differentiation in small decision making groups. In T. Parsons & R. F. Bales (Eds.), Family, socialization, and interaction process (pp. 259–306). Glencoe: Free PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Barsade, S., & Gibson, D. E. (2007). Why does affect matter in organizations? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 36–59.Google Scholar
  13. Bavelas, A., Hastorf, A. H., Gross, A. E., & Kite, W. R. (1965). Experiments on the alteration of group structure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 55–70.Google Scholar
  14. Berger, J. (1958). Relations between performance, rewards, and action-opportunities in small groups. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  15. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.Google Scholar
  16. Berger, J. (1988). Directions in expectation states research. In M. Webster, Jr. & M. (Eds.), Status generalization: New theory and research (pp. 450–474). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Berger, J., Wagner, D. G., & Webster, M. (2014). Expectation states theory: Growth, opportunities, and challenges. In Thye, S. R., & Lawler, E. J. (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 31, pp. 19–56). New York: Emerald.Google Scholar
  18. Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1966). Status characteristics and expectation states. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (Vol. 1, pp. 29–46). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  19. Berger, J., & Conner, T. L. (1974). Performance expectations and behavior in small groups: A revised formulation. In J. Berger, T. L. Conner, & M. Hamit Fisek (Eds.), Expectation states theory: A theoretical research program (pp. 85–109). Cambridge: Winthrop Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Berger, J., Wagner, D. G., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1998). A working strategy for constructing theories: State organizing processes. In J. Berger & M. Zelditch, Jr. (Eds.), Status, power and legitimacy: Strategies and theories (pp. 39–53). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Berger, J., & Webster, M., Jr. (2006). Expectations, status and behavior. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 268–300). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Berger, J., Zelditch M., Jr., Anderson, B., & Cohen B. P. (1972). Structural aspects of distributive justice: A status-value formulation. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, Jr. & Bo Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress volume II (pp. 119–146). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  23. Bianchi, A. J. (2004). Rejecting others’ influence: Negative sentiment and status in task groups. Sociological Perspectives, 47, 339–355.Google Scholar
  24. Blau, P. (1964). Justice in social exchange. Sociological Inquiry, 34, 193–206.Google Scholar
  25. Bonito, J. A. (2000). The effect of contributing substantively on perceptions of participation. Small Group Research, 31, 528–553.Google Scholar
  26. Britt, L., & Heise, D. (2000). From shame to pride in identity politics. In S. Stryker, T. J. Owens, and R. W. White (Eds.), Self, identity, and social movements (pp. 252–268). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  27. Burke, P. J. (1968). Role differentiation and the legitimation of task activity. Sociometry, 31, 404–411.Google Scholar
  28. Burke, P. J. (1971). Task and socioemotional leadership role performance. Sociometry, 34, 22–40.Google Scholar
  29. Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (2009). Identity theory. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  30. Burke, P. J., Stets, J. E., & Cerven, C. (2007). Gender, legitimation, and identity verification in groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70, 27–42.Google Scholar
  31. Cacioppo, J. T., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 191–214.Google Scholar
  32. Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. (1997). Working for equity in heterogeneous classrooms. Teachers College Press: New York.Google Scholar
  33. Collett, J. L., & Lizardo, O. (2010). Occupational status and the experience of anger. Social Forces, 88, 2079–2104.Google Scholar
  34. Collins, R. (1993). Emotional energy as the common denominator of rational action. Rationality and Society, 5, 203–230.Google Scholar
  35. Conway, M., Roberto, D. F., & Shari, M. (1999). Judging others’ emotions as a function of the others’ status. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 291–305.Google Scholar
  36. Cook, K. S. (1975). Expectations, evaluations and equity. American Sociological Review, 40, 372–388.Google Scholar
  37. Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS Map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 631–648.Google Scholar
  38. Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of emotions in man and animals. London: Watts.Google Scholar
  39. Diefendorff, J. M., & Greguras G. J. (2009). Contextualizing emotional display rules: Examining the roles of targets and discrete emotions in shaping display rule perceptions. Journal of Management, 35, 880–898.Google Scholar
  40. Dippong, J. (2012). The effects of scope condition-based participant exclusion on experimental outcomes in expectation states research: A meta-analysis. Social Science Research, 41, 359–371.Google Scholar
  41. Doan, L. (2012). A social model of persistent mood states. Social Psychology Quarterly, 75, 198–218.Google Scholar
  42. Driskell, J. E., Jr., & Webster ,M. Jr. (1997). Status and sentiment in task groups. In J. Szmatka, J. Skvoretz, & J. Berger (Eds.), Status, network and structure: Theory construction and theory development (pp. 179–200). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Entwisle, D. R., & Webster, M., Jr. (1978). Raising expectations indirectly. Social Forces, 57, 257–264.Google Scholar
  44. Fessler, D. M. T., Pillsworth, E. G., & Flamson, T. J. (2004). Angry men and disgusted women: An evolutionary approach to the influence of emotions on risk taking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95, 107–123.Google Scholar
  45. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.Google Scholar
  46. Foschi, M. (1997). On scope conditions. Small Group Research, 28, 535–555.Google Scholar
  47. Foschi, M. (2008). On collective orientation and the standardized expectation-states experiment: Review and assessment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Boston.Google Scholar
  48. Foschi, M. (Forthcoming). Hypotheses, operationalizations, and manipulation checks. In M. Webster & J. Sell (Eds.), Laboratory experiments in the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  49. Francis, L. E. (1997). Ideology and interpersonal emotion management: Redefining identity in two support groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 153–171.Google Scholar
  50. Gerber, G. L. (1996). Status in same-gender and mixed-gender police dyads: Effects on personality attributions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 350–363.Google Scholar
  51. Gerber, G. L. (2001). Women and men police officers: Status, gender, and personality. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  52. Gerber, G. L. (2009). Status and the gender stereotyped personality traits: Toward and integration. Sex Roles, 61, 297–316.Google Scholar
  53. Gibson, D. E., & Scott, J. S. (2002). Grinning, frowning, and emotionlessness: Agent perceptions of power and their effect on felt and displayed emotions in influence attempts. In N. M. Ashkanasy, W. J. Zerbe, & C. E. J. Hartel (Eds.), Managing emotions in the workplace (pp. 184–211). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  54. Goar, C., & Sell, J. (2005). Using task definition to modify racial inequality within task groups. The Sociological Quarterly, 46, 525–543.Google Scholar
  55. Gordon, S. L. (1989). The socialization of children’s emotions: Emotional culture, competence, and exposure. In C. Saarni & P. L. Harris (Eds.), Children’s understanding of emotion (pp. 319–349). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Hegtvedt, K. A. (1990). Effects of relationship structure on emotional responses to inequity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 214–228.Google Scholar
  57. Heise, D., & Calhan, C. (1995). Emotion norms in interpersonal events. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 223–240.Google Scholar
  58. Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. The American Journal of Sociology, 85, 551–575.Google Scholar
  59. Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: The commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  60. Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
  61. Houser, J., & Lovaglia, M. J. (2002). Status, emotions and the development of solidarity in stratified task groups. In S. R. Thye & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Advances in group processes (pp. 109–138). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  62. Hurwitz, J. I., Zander, A. F., & Hymovitch, B. (1960). Some effects of power on the relations among group members. In D. Cartwright & A. F. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics (pp. 448–456). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  63. Hysom, S. J. (2009). Status valued goal objects and performance expectations. Social Forces, 87, 1623–1648.Google Scholar
  64. Jasso, G. (1980). A new theory of distributive justice. American Sociological Review, 45, 3–32.Google Scholar
  65. Jasso, G. (1986). A new representation of the just term in distributive justice theory: Its properties and operation in theoretical derivation and empirical estimation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 12, 251–274.Google Scholar
  66. Jasso, G. (2007). Emotion in Justice Processes. In J. E. Stets & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions (pp. 321–346). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  67. Johnson, C., Ford, R., & Kaufman, J. (2000). Emotional reactions to conflict: Do dependence and legitimacy matter? Social Forces, 79, 107–137.Google Scholar
  68. Johnston, J. R. (1988). The structure of ex-spousal relations: An exercise in theoretical integration and application. In M. Webster and M. Foschi (Eds.), Status generalization: New theory and research (pp. 309–326). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Johnston, J. R., Walters, M. G., & Friedlander, S. (2001). Therapeutic work with alienated children and their families. Family Court Review, 39, 316–333.Google Scholar
  70. Kalkhoff, W. (2005). Collective validation in multi-actor task groups: The effects of status differentiation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 57–88.Google Scholar
  71. Keltner, D., & Buswell, B. N. (1997). Embarrassment: Its distinct form and appeasement functions. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 230–270.Google Scholar
  72. Keltner, D., Young, R. C., and Buswell, B. N. (1997). Appeasement in human emotion, social practice, and personality. Aggressive Behavior, 23, 359–374.Google Scholar
  73. Kemper, T. D. (1978). A social interactional theory of emotions. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  74. Kemper, T. D. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules and social structure. The American Journal of Sociology, 85, 551–575.Google Scholar
  75. Kemper, T. D. (1981). Social constructionist and positivist approaches to the sociology of emotions. The American Journal of Sociology, 87, 336–362.Google Scholar
  76. Kemper, T. D. (1984). Power, status, and emotions: A sociological contribution to a psychophysiological domain. In K. R. Schereer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 369–383). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  77. Kemper, T. D. (1987). How many emotions are there? Wedding the social and the autonomic components. The American Journal of Sociology, 93, 263–289.Google Scholar
  78. Kemper, T. D. (1991). Predicting emotions from social relations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 330–342.Google Scholar
  79. Kivlighan, D. M., Jr., & Kivlighan, D. M. III. (2010). Are group leader knowledge structures related to member satisfaction with the leader? Small Group Research, 41, 175–197.Google Scholar
  80. Lawler, E. J., Thye, S. R., & Yoon, J. (2009). Social commitments in a depersonalized world. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  81. Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Meyers, R. A., Kauffeld, S., Neininger, A., & Henschel, A. (2011). Verbal interaction sequences and group mood: Exploring the role of team planning communication. Small Group Research, 42, 639–668.Google Scholar
  82. Lewis, G. H. 1972. Role Differentiation. American Sociological Review, 37, 424–434.Google Scholar
  83. Lively, K. J. (2000). Reciprocal emotion management: Working together to maintain stratification in private law firms. Work and Occupations, 27, 32–63.Google Scholar
  84. Lively, K. J., & Heise, D. (2004). Sociological realms of emotional experience. The American Journal of Sociology, 109, 1109–1136.Google Scholar
  85. Lively, K. J., & Powell, B. (2006). Emotional expression at work and at home: Domain, status, or individual characteristics? Social Psychology Quarterly, 69, 17–38.Google Scholar
  86. Lively, K. J., Steelman, L., & Powell, B. (2010). Equity, emotion, and household division of labor response. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73, 358–379.Google Scholar
  87. Lovaglia, M. J., & Houser, J. A. (1996). Emotional reactions and status in groups. American Sociological Review, 61, 867–883.Google Scholar
  88. Lucas, J. W. (2003). Status processes and the institutionalization of women as leaders. American Sociological Review, 68, 464–480.Google Scholar
  89. Lucas, J. W. & Lovaglia, M. (1998). Leadership status, gender, group size, and emotion in Face-to-Face groups. Sociological Perspectives 41, 617–637.Google Scholar
  90. McLeod, J. D., & Owens, T. J. (2004). Psychological well-being in the early life course: Variations by socioeconomic status, gender, and race/ethnicity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 257–278.Google Scholar
  91. Meeker, B. F., & Weitzel-O’Neill, P. A. (1977). Sex roles and interpersonal behavior in task-oriented groups. American Sociological Review, 42, 91–105.Google Scholar
  92. Niedenthal, P. M., & Brauer, M. (2012). Social functionality of human emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 259–285.Google Scholar
  93. Ng, S. K., Bell, D., & Brooke, M. (1993). Gaining turns and achieving influence ranking in small conversation groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 265–275.Google Scholar
  94. O’Campo, P., Eaton, W. W., & Muntaner, C. (2004). Labor market experience, work organization, gender inequalities and health status: Results from a prospective analysis of U.S. employed women. Social Science and Medicine, 3, 585–594.Google Scholar
  95. Overbeck, J. R., Neale, M. A., & Govan, C. L. (2010). I feel, therefore you act: Intrapersonal and interpersonal effects of emotion on negotiation as a function of social power. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112, 126–139.Google Scholar
  96. Parsons, T. (1942). Age and sex in the social structure of the united states. American Sociological Review, 7, 604–616.Google Scholar
  97. Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  98. Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1955). Family, socialization and interaction process. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  99. Pierce, J. L. (1995). Gender trials: Emotional lives in contemporary law firms. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  100. Propp, K. M. (1995). An experimental examination of biological sex as a status cue in decision-making groups and its influence on information use. Small Group Research, 26, 451–474.Google Scholar
  101. Pugh, M., & Wahrman, R. (1983). Neutralizing sexism in mixed-sex groups: Do women have to be better than men? The American Journal of Sociology, 88, 746–762.Google Scholar
  102. Rashotte, L. S., & Webster, M., Jr. (2005). Gender status beliefs. Social Science Research, 34, 618–633.Google Scholar
  103. Ridgeway, C. L. (1978). Conformity, group-oriented motivation, and status attainment in small groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 41, 175–188.Google Scholar
  104. Ridgeway, C. L. (1982). Status in groups: the importance of motivation. American Sociological Review, 47, 76–88.Google Scholar
  105. Ridgeway, C. L. (2007). Expectation states theory and emotion. In J. E. Stets and J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions (pp. 347–367). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  106. Ridgeway, C. L. (2009). Status construction theory. In J. M. Levine & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Encyclopedia of group processes and intergroup relations (Vol. 2, pp. 848–850). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  107. Ridgeway, C. L. (2011). Framed by gender. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  108. Ridgeway, C. L., & Berger, J. (1986). Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in groups. American Sociological Review, 51, 603–617.Google Scholar
  109. Ridgeway, C. L., & Johnson, C. (1990). What is the relationship between socioemotional behavior and status in task groups? The American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1189–1212.Google Scholar
  110. Ridgeway, C. L., Johnson, C., & Diekema, D. (1994). External status, legitimacy, and compliance in male and female groups. Social Forces, 71, 1051–1077.Google Scholar
  111. Ridgeway, C. L., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1999). The gender system and interaction. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 191–216.Google Scholar
  112. Ross, C. E., & Willigen, M. V. (1996). Gender, parenthood, and anger. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 572–584.Google Scholar
  113. Shelly, A. C., & Shelly, R. K. (20 Sept. 2011). An empirical test of legitimation as a status process. Current Research in Social Psychology, 1–28. http://www.uiowa.edu/~grpproc/crisp/crisp.html.
  114. Shelly, R. K. (1993). How emotions organize interaction. In E. J. Lawler, B. Markovsky, K. Heimer, & J. O’Brien (Eds.), Advances in group processes (pp. 113–132). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  115. Shelly, R. K. (2001). How performance expectations arise from sentiments. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64, 72–87.Google Scholar
  116. Shelly, R. K. (2004). Emotions, sentiments, and performance expectations. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research on human emotions (pp. 141–165). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  117. Shelly, R. K., & Webster, M., Jr. (1997). How formal status, liking, and ability status structure interaction. Sociological Perspectives, 40, 81–107.Google Scholar
  118. Simon, R. W., & Nath, L. E. (2004). Gender and emotion in the united states: Do men and women differ in self-reports of feelings and expressive behavior? The American Journal of Sociology, 109, 1137–1176.Google Scholar
  119. Sinaceur, M., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2006). Get mad and get more than even: When and why anger expression is effective in negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 314–322.Google Scholar
  120. Sloan, M. (2012). Controlling anger and happiness at work: An examination of gender differences. Gender, Work and Organization, 19, 370–391.Google Scholar
  121. Smith-Lovin, L. (1995). The sociology of affect and emotion. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 118–148). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  122. Smith-Lovin, L., & Brody, C. (1989). Interruptions in group discussions: The effects of gender and group composition. American Sociological Review, 54, 424–435.Google Scholar
  123. Smith-Lovin, L., Skvoretz, J. V., & Hudson, C. G. (1986). Status and participation in six-person groups: A test of skvoretz’s comparative status model. Social Forces, 64, 992–1005.Google Scholar
  124. Spence, J. T., Deaux, K., & Helmreich, R. I. (1985). Sex roles in contemporary American society. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology: Special fields and applications (Vol. 2, 3rd ed., pp. 149–178). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  125. Staske, S. A. (1996). Talking feelings: The collaborative construction of emotion in talk between close relational partners. Symbolic Interaction, 19, 111–142.Google Scholar
  126. Staske, S. A. (1998). The normalization of problematic emotion in conversations between close relational partners: Interpersonal emotion work. Symbolic Interaction, 21, 59–92.Google Scholar
  127. Staske, S. A. (1999). Creating relational ties in talk: The collaborative construction of relational jealousy. Symbolic Interaction, 22, 213–237.Google Scholar
  128. Stenross, B., & Kleinman, S. (1989). The highs and lows of emotional labor: Detectives’ encounters with criminals and victims. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 17, 435–452.Google Scholar
  129. Stets, J. E. (2003). Emotions and sentiments. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 309–335). New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  130. Stets, J. E. (2004). Emotions in identity theory. The effect of status. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research on human emotions (pp. 51–76). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  131. Stets, J. E. (2005). Examining emotions in identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 39–74.Google Scholar
  132. Stets, J. E., & Harrod, M. M. (2004). Verification across multiple identities: The role of status. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 155–171.Google Scholar
  133. Stets, J. E., & Tsushima, T. M. (2001). Negative emotion and coping responses within identity control theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64, 283–295.Google Scholar
  134. Stets, J. E., & Turner, J. H. (2007). Handbook of the sociology of emotions. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  135. Stets, J. E., & Turner, J. H. (2008). The sociology of emotions. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. Feldman Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 32–46). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  136. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2013). Subjective well-being and income. American Economic Review, 103, 598–604.Google Scholar
  137. Strodtbeck, F. L., James, R. M., & Hawkins, C. (1957). Social status in jury deliberations. American Sociological Review, 22, 713–719.Google Scholar
  138. Strodtbeck, F. L., & Mann, R. D. (1956). Sex role differentiation in jury deliberations. Sociometry, 19, 3–11.Google Scholar
  139. Suls, J., & Miller, M. (1978). Ability comparison and its effects on affiliation preferences. Human Relations, 31, 267–282.Google Scholar
  140. Sutton, R. (1991). Maintaining norms about expressed emotion: The case of bill collectors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 245–268.Google Scholar
  141. Tajeddin, G., Safayeni, F., Connelly, C. E., & Tasa, K. (2012). The influence of emergent expertise on group decision processes. Small Group Research, 43, 50–74.Google Scholar
  142. Talley, J., & Berger, J. (1983). Social control as a state organizing process. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Sociology, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  143. Thamm, R. A. (1992). Social structure and emotion. Sociological Perspectives, 35, 649–671.Google Scholar
  144. Thamm, R. A. (2004). Towards a universal power and status theory of emotion. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Advances in group processes (pp. 189–222). San Diego: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  145. Thamm, R. A. (2007). The classification of emotions. In J. E. Stets & J. H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions (pp. 11–37). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  146. Thoits, P. A. (1986). Multiple identities: Examining gender and marital status differences in distress. American Sociological Review, 51, 259–272.Google Scholar
  147. Thoits, P. A. (1989). The sociology of emotions. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 317–342.Google Scholar
  148. Thoits, P. A. (1991). Gender differences in coping with emotional distress. In J. Eckenrode (Ed.), The social context of coping (pp. 107–138). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  149. Thoits, P. A. (1996). Managing the emotions of others. Symbolic Interaction, 19, 85–109.Google Scholar
  150. Thye, S. R. (2000). A status value theory of power in exchange relations. American Sociological Review, 65, 407–432.Google Scholar
  151. Thye, S. R., Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. (2008). Social exchange and the maintenance of order in status-stratified systems. In J. Clay-Warner & D. T. Robinson (Eds.), Social structure and emotion (pp. 37–63). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  152. Tiedens, L. Z. (2001). Anger and advancement versus sadness and subjugation: The effect of negative emotion expressions on social status conferral. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 86–94.Google Scholar
  153. Tiedens, L. Z., Ellsworth, P. C., & Mesquita, B. (2000). Sentimental stereotypes: Emotional expectations for high-and low-status group members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 560–575.Google Scholar
  154. Tiedens, L. Z., & Fragale, A. R. (2003). Power moves: Complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 558–568.Google Scholar
  155. Totterdell P. 2000. Catching moods and hitting runs: mood linkage and subjective performance in professional sport teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 848–859.Google Scholar
  156. Turner, J. H. (2000). On the origins of human emotions: A sociological inquiry into the evolution of human affect. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  157. Turner, J. H. (2004). Advances in group processes: Theory and research on human emotions. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  158. Turner, J. H. (2011). Theoretical principles of sociology, volume 2 microdynamics. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  159. Turner, J. H. (2013). Contemporary sociological theories. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  160. Turner, J. H., & Stets, J. E. (2005). The sociology of emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  161. Turner, J. H., & Stets, J. E. (2006). Sociological theories of human emotions. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 25–52.Google Scholar
  162. Turner, R. J., & Avison, W. R. (2003). Status variations in stress exposure: Implications for the interpretation of research on race, socioeconomic status, and gender. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44, 488–505.Google Scholar
  163. Verba, S. (1961). Small group and political behavior: A study of leadership. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  164. Wagner, D. G., & Berger, J. (2002). Expectation states theory: An evolving research program. In J. Berger & M. Zelditch, Jr. (Eds.), New directions in contemporary sociological theory (pp. 41–76). New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  165. Walker, H. A., & Cohen, B. P. (1985). Scope statements: Imperatives for evaluating theory. American Sociological Review, 50, 288–301.Google Scholar
  166. Walker, H. A., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1993). Power, legitimacy, and the stability of authority: A theoretical research program. In J. Berger & M. Zelditch, Jr. (Eds.), Theoretical research programs: Studies in the growth of theory (pp. 364–384). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  167. Wang, L., Northcraft, G. B., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2012). Beyond negotiated outcomes: The hidden costs of anger expression in dyadic negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119, 54–63.Google Scholar
  168. Webster, M, Jr. (1984). Social structures and the sense of justice. In E. J. Lawler & S. Bachrach (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 3, pp. 59–94). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  169. Webster, M. Jr., & Driskell, J E. (1978). Status generalization. A review and some new data. American Sociological Review, 43, 220–236.Google Scholar
  170. Webster, M., Jr., & Rashotte, L. S. (2009). Fixed roles and situated actions. Sex Roles, 61, 325–337.Google Scholar
  171. Willer, D., Lovaglia, M. J., & Markovsky, B. (1997). Power and influence: A theoretical bridge. Social Forces, 76, 571–603.Google Scholar
  172. Wiltermuth, S. S., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2011). Incidental anger and the desire to evaluate. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 55–65.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of North CarolinaCharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations