Advertisement

Emotions in Justice Processes

  • Karen A. HegtvedtEmail author
  • Christie L. Parris
Chapter
Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Abstract

Emotions contribute to how individuals and groups make sense out of their experiences of (in) justice. Classic justice approaches typically cast emotions as a response to perceived (distributive, procedural, and interactional) injustice, which in turn influences behavioral reactions. More recent work recognizes affect as a potential antecedent to the experience of injustice as well as stresses the dynamic relationship between cognitions, emotions, and behavior. Consideration of such dynamics draws attention to the context of the experience of injustice and the role of observers or third parties who do not similarly suffer injustice. This chapter examines basic definitions and theoretical tenets of justice perspectives that address the role of emotions and reviews individual and group-level empirical patterns. The conclusion specifies theoretical directions and empirical pathways, highlighting the complexity of emotions in justice processes.

Keywords

Justice Injustice Equity Emotion Affect Distress Cognition Collective Action Moral Outrage 

References

  1. Adams, J. Stacy (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267–299.Google Scholar
  2. Austin, W., & Walster, E. (1974). Reactions to confirmation and disconfirmation of equity and inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 208–216.Google Scholar
  3. Barclay, L. J., & Whiteside, D. B. (2011). Moving beyond justice perceptions: The role of experience and intensity. In S. W. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, & D. P. Skarlicki (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on organizational justice and ethics (pp. 49–74). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Barclay, L. J., Skarlicki, D. P., & Pugh, S. D. (2005). Exploring the role of emotions in injustice perceptions and retaliation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 629–643.Google Scholar
  5. Barsky, A., Kaplan, S. A., & Beal, D. J. (2011). Just feelings? The role of affect in the formation of organizational fairness judgments. Journal of Management, 37, 248–279.Google Scholar
  6. Batson, C. D. (2006). ‘Not all self-interested after all:’ Economics of empathy-induced altruism. In D. De Cremer, M. Zeelenberg, & K. Murnighan (Eds.), Social psychology and economics (pp. 281–299). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Batson, C. D., Kennedy, C. L., Nord, L.-A., Stocks, E. L., Fleming, D. A., Marzette, C. M., Lishner, D. A., Hayes, R. E., Kolchinsky, L. M., & Zerger, T. (2007). Anger at unfairness: Is it moral outrage? European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1272–1285.Google Scholar
  8. Bies, R. J. (2001). Interactional (in) justice: The sacred and the profane. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 89–118). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Blader, S. L., Wiesenfeld, B. M., Fortin, M., & Wheeler-Smith, S. L. (2013). Fairness lies in the heart of the beholder: How the social emotions of third parties influence reactions to injustice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121, 62–80.Google Scholar
  10. Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame, and reintegration. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Branscombe, N. R. (1998). Thinking about one’s gender group’s privileges or disadvantages: Consequences for well‐being in women and men. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 167–84.Google Scholar
  12. Brockner, J., De Cremer, D., van den Bos, K., & Chen, Y.-R. (2005). The influence of interdependent self construal on procedural fairness effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 155–167.Google Scholar
  13. Carlsmith, K., & Darley, J. M. (2008). Psychological aspects of retributive justice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 193–236). San Diego: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  14. Chan, M. E., & Arvey, R. (2011). The role of forgivingness and anger in unfair events. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 700–705.Google Scholar
  15. Chaudoir, S. R., & Quinn, D. M. (2010). Bystander sexism in the intergroup context: The impact of cat-calls on women’s reactions towards men. Sex Roles, 62, 623–634.Google Scholar
  16. Chebat, J.-C., & Slusarczyk, W. (2005). How emotions mediate the effects of perceived justice on loyalty in service recovery situations: An empirical study. Journal of Business Research, 58, 664–673.Google Scholar
  17. Clayton, S. (1992). The experience of injustice: Some characteristics and correlates. Social Justice Research, 5, 71–92.Google Scholar
  18. Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278–321.Google Scholar
  19. Cole, M. S., Bernerth, J. B., Walter, F., & Holt, D. T. (2010). Organizational justice and individuals’ withdrawal: Unlocking the influence of emotional exhaustion. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 367–390.Google Scholar
  20. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445.Google Scholar
  21. Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Rodell, J. B., Long, D. M., Zapata, C. P., Conlon, D. E., & Wesson, M. J. (2013). Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 199–236.Google Scholar
  22. Cropanzano, R., & Folger, R. (1989). Referent cognitions and task decision autonomy: Beyond equity theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 293–299.Google Scholar
  23. Cropanzano, R., & Folger, R. (1991). Procedural justice and worker motivation. In R. M. Steers & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Motivation and work behavior (pp. 131–143). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  24. Cropanzano, R., Weiss, H. M., Suckow, K., & Grandey, A. A. (2000). Doing justice to workplace emotions. In N. Ashkanasy, C. Hartel, & W. Zerbe (Eds.), Emotions at work (pp. 49–62). Westport: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
  25. Cropanzano, R., Stein, J. H., & Nadisic, T. (2011). Justice and the experience of emotion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Dalbert, C. (2002). Beliefs in a just world as a buffer against anger. Social Justice Research, 15, 123–145.Google Scholar
  27. Darley, J. M., & Gromet, D. M. (2010). The psychology of punishment: Intuition and reason, retribution and restoration. In D. R. Bobcel, A. C. Kay, M. P. Zanna, & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of justice and legitimacy (pp. 229–249). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  28. Darley, J. M., & Pittman, T. S. (2003). The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 324–336.Google Scholar
  29. De Cremer, D. (2004). The influence of accuracy as a function of leader’s bias: The role of trustworthiness in the psychology of procedural justice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 293–304.Google Scholar
  30. De Cremer, D. (2006). When authorities influence followers’ affect: The interactive effect of procedural justice and transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15, 322–351.Google Scholar
  31. De Cremer, D. (Ed.). (2007). Advances in the psychology of justice and affect. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. De Cremer, D., & Den Ouden, N. (2009). ‘When passion breeds justice’: Procedural fairness effects as a function of authority’s passion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 384–400.Google Scholar
  33. De Cremer, D., & Ruiter, R. A. C. (2003). Emotional reactions toward procedural fairness as a function of negative information. Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 793–795.Google Scholar
  34. De Cremer, D., & Stouten, J. (2005). When does giving voice or not matter? Procedural fairness effects as a function of closeness of reference points. Current Psychology, 24, 203–213.Google Scholar
  35. De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T. R. (2005). Am I respected or not? Inclusion and reputation as issues in group membership. Social Justice Research, 18, 121–153.Google Scholar
  36. De Cremer, D., & Bos, K. (2007). Justice and feelings: Toward a new era in justice research. Social Justice Research, 20, 1–9.Google Scholar
  37. De Cremer, D., & van Hiel, A. (2010). ‘Becoming anger when another is treated fairly’: On understanding when own and other’s fair treatment influences negative reactions. British Journal of Management, 21, 280–298.Google Scholar
  38. De Cremer, D., & Wubben, M. (2010). When does voice have to be more than only listening? Procedural justice effects as a function of confident leadership. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9, 69–78.Google Scholar
  39. De Cremer, D., Stinglhamber, F., & Eisenberger, R. (2005). Effects of own versus other’s fair treatment on positive emotions: A field study. Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 741–744.Google Scholar
  40. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137–149.Google Scholar
  41. Doan, L. (2012). A social model of persistent mood states. Social Psychology Quarterly, 75, 198–218.Google Scholar
  42. Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872–886.Google Scholar
  43. Fischer, A. H., & Roseman, I. J. (2007). Beat them or ban them: The characteristics and social functions of anger and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 103–115.Google Scholar
  44. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2013). Social cognition: From brains to culture. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Folger, R. (1986). Rethinking equity theory: A referent cognitions model. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations (pp. 145–162). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  46. Folger, R. (1993). Reactions to mistreatment at work. In J. K. Murnighan (Ed.), Social psychology in organizations: Advances in theory and research (pp. 161–183). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  47. Folger, R., & Martin, C. (1986). Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: Distributive and procedural justice effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 531–546.Google Scholar
  48. Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness as theory: Justice as accountability. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 1–55). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Folger, R., Rosenfield, D. D., & Robinson, T. (1983). Relative deprivation and procedural justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 268–273.Google Scholar
  50. Frijda, N. H. (1987). Emotion, cognitive structure, and action tendency. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 115–143.Google Scholar
  51. Goldman, B. M. (2003). The application of reference cognitions theory to legal-claiming by terminated workers: The role of organizational justice and anger. Journal of Management, 29, 705–728.Google Scholar
  52. Gollwitzer, M., & Bucklein, K. (2007). Are ‘we’ more punitive than ‘me’? Self-construal styles, justice-related attitudes, and punitive judgments. Social Justice Research, 20, 457–478.Google Scholar
  53. Goodwin, J., Jasper, J. M., & Polletta, F. (Eds.). (2001). Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  54. Guerrero, L. K., La Valley, A. G., & Farinelli, L. (2008). The experience and expression of anger, guilt, and sadness in marriage: An equity theory explanation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 699–724.Google Scholar
  55. Gunn, G. R., & Wilson, A. E. (2011). Acknowledging the skeletons in our closet: The effect of group affirmation on collective guilt, collective shame, and reparatory attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1474–1487.Google Scholar
  56. Gray-Little, B., & Teddlie, C. B. (1978). Racial differences in children’s responses to inequity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 107–117.Google Scholar
  57. Hafer, C. L., & Correy, B. L. (1999). Mediators of the relation between beliefs in a just world and emotional responses to negative outcomes. Social Justice Research, 12, 189–204.Google Scholar
  58. Hafer, C. L., & Olson, J. M. (1998). Individual differences in belief in a just world and responses to personal misfortune. In L. Montada & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world (pp. 65–86). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  59. Harris, N., Walgrave, L., & Braithwaite, J. (2004). Emotional dynamics in restorative conferences. Theoretical Criminology, 8, 191–210.Google Scholar
  60. Hegtvedt, K. A. (1990). The effects of relationship structure on emotional responses to inequity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 214–228.Google Scholar
  61. Hegtvedt, K. A. (2006). Justice frameworks. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 46–69). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Hegtvedt, K. A., & Killian, C. (1999). Fairness and emotions: Reactions to the process and outcomes of negotiations. Social Forces, 78, 269–303.Google Scholar
  63. Hillebrandt, A., & Barclay, L. J. (2013). Integrating organizational justice and affect: New insights, challenges, and opportunities. Social Justice Research, 26, 513–531.Google Scholar
  64. Hsu, M., Anen, C., & Quartz, S. R. (2008). The right and the good: Distributive justice and neural encoding of equity and efficiency. Science, 320, 1092–1095.Google Scholar
  65. Homans, G. C. (1974). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
  66. Howard, L. W., & Cordes, C. L. (2010). Flight from unfairness: Effects of perceived injustice on emotional exhaustion and employee withdrawal. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 409–428.Google Scholar
  67. Jasso, G. (1980). A new theory of distributive justice. American Sociological Review, 45, 3–32.Google Scholar
  68. Jasso, G. (2007). Emotion in justice processes. In J. E. Stets & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions (pp. 321–346). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  69. Johnson, C., Hegtvedt, K. A., Brody, L. M., & Waldron, K. W. (2007). Feeling injustice, expressing injustice: How gender and context matter. Advances in Group Processes, 24, 149–186.Google Scholar
  70. Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2010). Social justice: History, theory, and research. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, (Vol. 2, pp. 1122–1165). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  71. Khan, A. K., Quratulain, S., & Crawshaw, J. R. (2013). The mediating role of discrete emotions in the relationship between injustice and counterproductive work behaviors: A study in Pakistan. Journal of Business and Psychology, 28, 49–61.Google Scholar
  72. Krehbiel, P. J., & Cropanzano, R. (2000). Procedural justice, outcome favorability, and emotion. Social Justice Research, 13, 339–360.Google Scholar
  73. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 819–834.Google Scholar
  74. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  75. Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J. Jr., & Fry, W. R. (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction (pp. 167–218). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  76. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  77. Lively, K. J. (2000). Reciprocal emotion management. Work and Occupations, 27, 32–63.Google Scholar
  78. Lively, K. J., Steelman, L. C., & Powell, B. (2010). Equity, emotion, and household division of labor. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73, 358–379.Google Scholar
  79. Longmore, M. A., & Demaris, A. (1997). Perceived inequity and depression in intimate relationships: The moderating effect of self-esteem. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 172–134.Google Scholar
  80. Lotz, S., Baumert, A., Schlösser, T., Gresser, F., & Fechenhauer, D. (2011a). Individual differences in third-party interventions: How justice sensitivity shapes altruistic punishment. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 4, 297–313.Google Scholar
  81. Lotz, S., Okimoto, T. G., Schlösser, T., & Fechenhauer, D. (2011b). Punitive versus compensatory reactions to injustice: Emotional antecedents to third-party interventions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 477–480.Google Scholar
  82. Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602–616.Google Scholar
  83. Markovsky, B. (1988). Injustice and arousal. Social Justice Research, 51, 213–224.Google Scholar
  84. Mayer, D. M. (2012). Justice. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 316–324). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  85. McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  86. Mikula, G. (1986). The experience of injustice: Towards a better understanding of its phenomenology. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice and social relationships (pp. 103–123). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  87. Mikula, G., Scherer, K., & Athenstaedt, U. (1998). The role of injustice in the elicitation of differential emotional reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 769–783.Google Scholar
  88. Miron, A. M., Branscombe, N. R., & Schmitt, M. T. (2006). Collective guilt as distress over illegitimate intergroup inequality. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 163–180.Google Scholar
  89. Montada, L. (1994). Injustice in harm and loss. Social Justice Research, 7, 5–28.Google Scholar
  90. Mullen, E. (2007). The reciprocal relationship between affect and perceptions of fairness. In K. Törnblom & R. Vermunt (Eds.), Distributive and procedural justice: Research and social applications (pp. 15–37). Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  91. Murphy, K. (2009). Procedural justice and affect intensity: Understanding reactions to regulatory authorities. Social Justice Research, 22, 1–30.Google Scholar
  92. Murphy, K., & Tyler, T. R. (2008). Procedural justice and compliance behaviour: The mediating role of emotions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 652–668.Google Scholar
  93. Napier, J. L., Mandisodza, A. N., Andersen, S. M., & Jost, J. T. (2006). System justification in responding to the poor and displaced in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 6, 57–73.Google Scholar
  94. Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., Zebel, S., & Fischer, A. H. (2007). The past and the pending: The antecedents and consequences of group-based anger in historically and currently disadvantaged groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10, 41–55.Google Scholar
  95. Pew Research Center. (2005). Huge racial divide over Katrina and its consequences: Two-in-three critical of bush’s relief efforts. http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/255.pdf. Accessed 2 Nov 2013
  96. Reuben, E., & van Winden, F. (2010). Fairness perceptions and prosocial emotions in the power to take. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, 908–922.Google Scholar
  97. Rossner, M. (2011). Emotion and interaction ritual: A micro analysis of restorative justice. British Journal of Criminology, 51, 95–119.Google Scholar
  98. Roy, J., Bastounis, M. L., & Minibas-Poussard, J. (2012). Interactional justice and counterproductive work behaviors: The mediating role of negative emotions. Social Behavior and Personality, 40, 1341–1356.Google Scholar
  99. Rupp, D. E., & Spencer, S. (2006). When customers lash out: The effects of customer interactional injustice on emotional labor and the mediating role of discrete emotions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 971–978.Google Scholar
  100. Rupp, D. E., McCance, S. A., Spencer, S., & Sonntag, K. (2008). Customer (in) justice and emotional labor: The role of perspective taking, anger, and emotional regulation? Journal of Management, 34, 903–924.Google Scholar
  101. Schafer, R. B., & Keith, P. M. (1980). Equity and depression among married couples. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 430–435.Google Scholar
  102. Scher, S. J., & Heise, D. R. (1993). Affect and the perception of injustice. Advances in Group Processes, 10, 223–252.Google Scholar
  103. Sinclair, R. C., & Mark, M. M. (1992). The influence of mood state on judgment and action: Effects on persuasion, categorization, social justice, person perception, and judgmental accuracy. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp. 165–193). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  104. Skarlicki, D., & Kulik, C. T. (2005). Third-party reactions to employee (mis) treatment: A justice perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 183–229.Google Scholar
  105. Skarlicki, D., & Rupp, D. E. (2010). Dual processing and organizational justice: The role of rational versus experiential processing in third-party reactions to workplace mistreatment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 944–952.Google Scholar
  106. Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W., & Mullen, E. (2008). Morality and justice: An expanded theoretical perspective and empirical review. Advances in Group Processes, 25, 1–27.Google Scholar
  107. Smith, E. R. (1999). Affective and cognitive implications of a group becoming part of the self: New models of prejudice and of the self-concept. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 183–196). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  108. Spencer, S., & Rupp, D. E. (2009). Angry, guilty, and conflicted: Injustice toward coworkers heightens emotional labor through cognitive and emotional mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 429–444.Google Scholar
  109. Sprecher, S. (1986). The relationship between inequity and emotions in close relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49, 309–321.Google Scholar
  110. Sprecher, S. (1992). How men and women expect to feel and behave in response to inequity in close relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 57–69.Google Scholar
  111. Sprecher, S. (2001). A comparison of emotional consequences of and changes in equity over time using global and domain-specific measures of equity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 477–501.Google Scholar
  112. Srivastava, J., Espinoza, F., & Fedorikhin, A. (2009). Coupling and decoupling of unfairness and anger in ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22, 475–489.Google Scholar
  113. Stecher, M. D., & Rosse, J. G. (2005). The distributive side of interactional justice: The effects of interpersonal treatment on emotional arousal. Journal of Managerial Issues, 17, 229–246.Google Scholar
  114. Stets, J. E., & Osborn, S. N. (2008). Injustice and emotions using identity theory. Advances in Group Processes, 25, 151–179.Google Scholar
  115. Stouten, J., Ceulemans, E., van Timmerman, M. E. & van Hiel, A. (2011). Tolerance of justice violations: The effects of need on emotional reactions after violating equality in social dilemmas. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 357–380.Google Scholar
  116. Swim, J. K., & Miller, D. L. (1999). White guilt: Its antecedents and consequences for attitudes toward affirmative action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 500–514.Google Scholar
  117. Tabibnia, G., Satpute, A. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2008). The sunny side of fairness: Preference for fairness activates reward circuitry (and disregarding unfairness activates self-control circuitry). Psychological Science, 19, 339–347.Google Scholar
  118. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup conflict. In S. Worschel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-HallGoogle Scholar
  119. Tausch, N., Becker, J. C., Spears, R., Christ, O., Saab, R., Singh, P., & Siddiqui, R. N. (2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 129–148.Google Scholar
  120. Tepper, B. J. (2001). Health consequences of organizational injustice: Test of main and interactive effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 197–215.Google Scholar
  121. Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  122. Turner, J. H. (2007). Justice and emotions. Social Justice Research, 20, 288–311.Google Scholar
  123. Turner, R. H., & Killian, L. M. (1987). Collective behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  124. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in experimental social psychology, 25, 115–191.Google Scholar
  125. Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  126. van den Bos, K. (2003). On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 482–498.Google Scholar
  127. van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2001). The psychology of procedural and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of fairness heuristic theory. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the Workplace (pp. 49–66). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  128. van Ness, D. W., & Strong, K. H. (2010). Restoring justice: An introduction to restorative justice. New Providence: Matthew Bender & Co.Google Scholar
  129. van Prooijen, J.-W., De Cremer, D., van Beest, I., Ståhl, T., van Dijke, M., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2008). The egocentric nature of procedural justice: Social value orientation a moderator of reactions to decision-making procedures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1303–1315.Google Scholar
  130. van Stekelenburg, J., & Klandermans, B. (2007). Individuals in movements: A social psychology of contention. In B. Klandermans & C. M. Roggeband (Eds.), The handbook of social movements across disciplines (pp. 157–204). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  131. van Stekelenburg, J., & Klandermans, B. (2013). The social psychology of protest. Current Sociology, 61, 1–20.Google Scholar
  132. Vidmar, N. (2002). Retributive justice: Its social context. In M. Ross & D. T. Miller (Eds.), The justice motive in everyday life (pp. 291–313). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  133. Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  134. Weiss, H. M., Suckow, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). The effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 786–794.Google Scholar
  135. Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T. G., Feather, N. T., & Platow, M. J. (2010). Justice through consensus: Shared identity and the preference for a restorative notion of justice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 909–930.Google Scholar
  136. White, I. K., Philpot, T. S., Wylie, K., & McGowen, E. (2007). Feeling the pain of my people: Hurricane Katrina, racial inequality, and the psyche of Black America. Journal of Black Studies, 37, 523–538.Google Scholar
  137. Williams, S. (1999). The effects of distributive and procedural justice on performance. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 133, 183–193.Google Scholar
  138. Wohl, M. J. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Klar, Y. (2006). Collective guilt: Emotional Reactions when one’s group has done wrong or been wronged. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 1–37.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Emory UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations