Advertisement

Emotions and Group Ties in Social Exchange

  • Edward J. LawlerEmail author
  • Shane R. Thye
  • Jeongkoo Yoon
Chapter
Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Abstract

This chapter presents a general theory specifying how people develop affective ties and commitments to groups. The foundation is research and theorizing about the role of emotion in social exchange. A central question is: When will people in social interaction or exchange attribute emotions felt to a group entity? The group can be a small local entity, a larger organization, or even a nation state. The research documents that positive emotions mediate the effects of social exchange on the formation of affective group ties, in part because people make social unit attributions of their emotions. Moreover, people make social unit attributions especially when they work on joint tasks that generate a sense of shared responsibility. Shared responsibility drives or moderates the interaction-to- emotion-to-group-tie process. Affective group ties enhance group-oriented behaviors and create more resilient social orders than instrumental ties.

Keywords

Group processes Emotion Social exchange Commitment Collective action Social order 

References

  1. Anthony, D. (2005). Cooperation in microcredit borrowing groups. American Sociological Review, 70(3), 496–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bar-Tal, D., Halperin, E., & de Rivera, J. (2007). Collective emotions in conflict situations: Societal implications. Journal of Social Issues, 63(2):441–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barsade, S. G. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4):644–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bearman, P. S. (1997). Generalized exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 102(5):1383–1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bearman, P. S., Moody, J., & Stovel, K. (2004). Chains of affection: The structure of adolescent romantic and sexual networks. American Journal of Sociology, 110(1), 44–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cacioppo, J. T., & Patrick, W. (2008). Loneliness: Human nature and the need for social connection. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  8. Cappelli, P. (1999). The new deal at work: Managing the market-driven workforce. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  9. Carnevale, P. J., & Isen, A. M. (1986). The influence of positive affect and visual access on the discovery of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collins, R. (1975). Conflict sociology: Toward an explanatory science. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  11. Collins, R. (1981). On the microfoundations of macrosociology. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 984–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Condon, W. S., & Ogston, W. D. (1966). Sound film analysis of normal and pathological behavior patterns. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 143(4), 338–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cook, K. S., Emerson, R., Gillmore, M. R., & Yamagishi, T. (1983). The distribution of power in exchange networks: Theory and experimental evidence. American Journal of Sociology, 89(2), 275–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Damasio, A. R. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  16. Durkheim, E. (1915). The elementary forms of religious life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ekeh, P. (1974). Social exchange theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Emerson, R. M. (1972a). Exchange theory. Part I: A psychological basis for social exchange. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (pp. 38–57). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  19. Emerson, R. M. (1972b). Exchange theory. Part II: Exchange rules and networks. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (pp. 58–87). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  20. Emerson, R. M. (1981). Social exchange theory. In M. Rosenberg & R. H. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 30–65). New York: Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar
  21. Fischer, C. S. (2011). Still connected: Family and friends in America since 1970. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  22. Frank, R. H. (1988). Passions within reason: The strategic role of emotions. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  23. Gilmore, D. D. (1987). Honor, honesty, shame: Male status in contemporary andalusia. In D. D. Gilmore (Ed.), Honor and shame and the unity of the mediterranean (pp. 90–103). Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar
  24. Gasper, K., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychological Science, 13(1), 34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graham, S. (1991). A review of attribution theory in achievement contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 3(1), 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haidt, J. (2010). Moral psychology must not be based on faith and hope. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(2):182–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haidt, J., & Kesebir, S., (2010). Morality. In S. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 797–832). Hobeken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Hechter, M. (1987). Principles of group solidarity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hechter, M., & Horne, C. (2009). Theories of social order: A reader. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Heise, D. R. (1979). Understanding events: Affect and the construction of social action. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85(3):551–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: The commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hogg, M. A. (2001). Social categorization, depersonalization, and group behavior. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 56–85). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1985). When liking begets solidarity: An experiment on the role of interpersonal attraction in psychological group formation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24(4):267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Homans, G. C. (1950). The human group. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  36. Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt Brace and Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  37. Isen, A. M. (1987). Positive affect, cognitive processes and social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 203–253). New York: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Izard, C. E. (1977). Human emotions. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kanter, R. M. (1968). Commitment and social organization: A study of commitment mechanism in utopian communities. American Sociological Review, 33(4), 499–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kalkhoff, W., Thye, S. R., & Lawler, E. J. (2011). Relational Cohesion and Commitment in Exchange Relations: The Role of Inter-Brain Synchronization. The Conference for Theory and Research on Group Processes, Los Vegas, NV.Google Scholar
  41. Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine & D. E. Berlyne (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 220–2 66). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kemper, T. D. (1978). A sociological interactional theory of emotions. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. Klinenberg, E. (2012). Going solo: The extraordinary rise and surprising appeal of living alone. London: Penguin Books, Ltd.Google Scholar
  44. Kollock, P. (1998). The emergence of exchange structures: An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment, and trust. American Journal of Sociology, 100(2), 183–214.Google Scholar
  45. Kuwabara, K. (2011). Cohesion, cooperation, and the value of doing things together: How economic exchange creates relational bonds. American Sociological Review, 76(4), 560–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lawler, E. J. (1992). Power processes in bargaining. Sociological Quarterly, 33(1), 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lawler, E. J. (2001). An affect theory of social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 107(2):321–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lawler, E. J., & Thye, S. R. (2006). Social exchange theory of emotions. In J. E. Stets & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions (pp. 295–320). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. 1993. Power and the emergence of commitment behavior in negotiated exchange. American Sociological Review, 58(4):465 –481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. (1996). Commitment in exchange relations: Test of a theory of relational cohesion. American Sociological Review, 61(1), 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. (1998). Network structure and emotion in exchange relations. American Sociological Review, 63(6), 871–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lawler, E. J. & Thye, S. R. (1999). Bringing emotions into social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 217–244.Google Scholar
  53. Lawler, E. J., Thye, S. R., & Yoon, J. (2000). Emotion and group cohesion in productive exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 106(3):616–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lawler, E. J., Thye, S. R., & Yoon, J. (2008). Social exchange and micro social order. American Sociological Review, 73(4), 519–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lawler, E. J., Thye, S. R., & Yoon, J. (2009). Social commitments in a depersonalized world. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  56. Lawler, E. J., Thye, S. R., & Yoon, J. (2013). The emergence of collective emotions in social exchange. In C. Scheve & M. Salmela (Eds.), Collective emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Malinowski, B. (1920). Kula: The circulating exchange of valuables in the archipelagoes of Eastern New Guinea. Man, 20(51), 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. London: George Routledge & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
  59. Markovsky, B., Willer, D., & Patton, T. (1988). Power relations in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 53(2):220–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Brashears, M. E. (2006). Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review, 71(3):353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mead, G. H. (1936). Movements of thought in the nineteenth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  62. Molm, L. D. (1994). Dependence and risk: Transforming the structure of social exchange. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(3):163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Molm, L. D., Peterson, G., & Takahashi, N. (1999). Power in negotiated and reciprocal exchange. American Sociological Review, 64(6):876–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Molm, L. D., Takahashi, N., & Peterson, G. (2000). Risk and trust in social exchange: An experimental test of a classical proposition. American Journal of Sociology, 105(5):1396–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Molm, L. D., Collett, J. L., & Schaefer, D. R. (2007). Building solidarity through generalized exchange: A theory of reciprocity. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 205–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mueller, C. W., & Lawler, E. J. (1999). Commitment to nested organizational units: Some basic principles and preliminary findings. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62(4), 325–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  68. Price, H. E., & Collett, J. L. (2012). The role of exchange and emotion on commitment: A study of teachers. Social Science Research, 41, 1469–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of american community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  70. Putnam, R. D. (2001). Social capital: Measurement and consequences. Isuma: Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2, 41–51.Google Scholar
  71. Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus Unum: Civic engagement in a diverse and changing society. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Riesman, D. (1950). The lonely crowd. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  74. Stolle, D. & Hooghe, M. (2004). Inaccurate, exceptional, one-sided, or irrelevant: The debate about the alleged decline of social capital and civic engagement in western societies. British Journal of Political Science, 35(1), 149–167.Google Scholar
  75. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. H. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup relations. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  76. Taylor, C., & Pillemer, K. (2009). Using affect to understand employee turnover: A context specific application of a theory of social exchange. Sociological Perspectives, 52(4), 481–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Thye, S. R., & Lawler, E. J. (2010). Collaborative Research: The Emergence of Social Order in Groups. National Science Foundation Grant; SES-0956796 to USC & SES-0957982 to Cornell; 5/15/2010-5/14/2012.Google Scholar
  78. Thye, S. R., Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. (2011). The emergence of embedded relations and group formation in networks of competition. Social Psychology Quarterly, 74(6), 387–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Thye, S. R., Yoon, J., & Lawler, E. J. (2002). The theory of relational cohesion: Review of a research program. In S. R. Thye & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Advances in group process (pp. 89–102). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  80. Triplett, J., & Thye, S. R. (2007). Eliciting cooperation in generalized exchange: The impact of social identity and non-anonymity. The Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  81. Turner, J. H. (2007). Human emotions: A sociological theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  82. Uehara, E. (1990). Dual exchange: Theory, social networks, and informational social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 521–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Weiner, B. (1985). ‘Spontaneous’ casual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 97(1), 74–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wesch, M. (2009). YouTube and you: Experiences of self-awareness in the context collapse of the recording webcam. Exploration in Media Ecology, 8(2), 19–34.Google Scholar
  85. Williamson, O. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  86. Willer, D. (1999). Network exchange theory. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  87. Willer, R., Flynn, F., & Zak, S. (2012). Structure, identity, and solidarity: A comparative field study of generalized and direct exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57(1), 119–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wrong, D. H. (1995). Power: Its forms, bases, and uses. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  89. Yoon, J., & Thye, S. R. (2002). A dual process model of organizational commitment: Job satisfaction and organizational support. Work and Occupations, 29(1), 97–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward J. Lawler
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shane R. Thye
    • 2
  • Jeongkoo Yoon
    • 3
  1. 1.Cornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.University of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  3. 3.Ewha Womans UniversitySeoulUSA

Personalised recommendations