Advertisement

New Partnerships for Research and Innovation

  • Danièle Clavel
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter describes the main concepts used in the new innovation and sustainable development initiatives implemented in partnership with the different partners (or stakeholders) involved. It also briefly indicates why these initiatives have been made necessary and how the role of research and innovation needs to be re-thought in order to have a social impact and ensure sustainable human progress.

Keywords

Innovation System Produce Reference Local Stakeholder Technical Innovation Mutual Interest 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alter, N. (2000). L’Innovation Ordinaire. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France (PUF).Google Scholar
  2. Beshah, T. (2008). How to get an innovation system to work. Reflections on methodological issues (abstract). In Atelier International ‘Apprentissage Production et Partage d’Innovations (APPRI). Quels outils pour le renforcement des capacités, les mesures d’accompagnement, la coconstruction et la mise en œuvre durable d’innovations dans les zones rurales sèches en Afrique?’, 20–24 Oct 2008, Ouagadougou. http://hal.cirad.fr/cirad-00406316/fr/
  3. Bordenave, J. D., & Pereira, A. M. (1977). Estratégias de Ensino-aprendizagem. Petrópolis: Éditions Vozes.Google Scholar
  4. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS). (2002). CNRS Info, June, 402. http://www.cnrs.fr/Cnrspresse/n402/html/n402rd04.htm
  5. Folke, C., Colding, J., Berkes, F., & Building, F. (2003). Resilience and adaptive capacity in social-ecological systems. In F. Berkes, J. Colding, & C. Folke (Eds.), Navigating social-ecological systems (pp. 352–387). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hocdé, H. (1998). Rural livelihoods, empowerment and the environment, going beyond the farm boundary. In AFSRE 15th international symposium, pp. 1100–1111, 29 Nov–4 Dec 1998, Pretoria. Association for Farming Systems Research Extension.Google Scholar
  7. International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD). (2008). In B. D. McIntyre, H. R. Herren, J. Wakhungu, & R. T. Watson (Eds.), A synthesis of the global and sub-global, International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development. Synthesis report with executive summary. IAASTD Reports. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  8. Latour, B. (2010). Cogitamus. Six lettres sur les humanités scientifiques. Paris: La Découverte. 247 p.Google Scholar
  9. Laverack, G., & Labonte, R. A. (2000). Planning framework for community empowerment goals within health promotion. Health Policy and Planning, 15(3), 255–262.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mercoiret, M.-R. (coord.). (1992). L’Appui aux Producteurs. Montpellier/Paris: CIRAD/French Ministry of Cooperation. 432 p.Google Scholar
  11. Morin, E. (2005). Introduction à la Pensée Complexe. Paris: Point Essais, Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  12. Perrenoud, P. (2004). L’université entre transmission de savoirs et développement de compétences. In Congrès de l’Enseignement Universitaire et de l’Innovation, June 2004, Girona. www.unige.ch/fapse/SSE
  13. Röling, N., & van de Fliert, E. (1994). Transforming extension for sustainable agriculture: The case of integrated pest management in rice in Indonesia. Agriculture and Human Values, 11(2–3), 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stiegler, B. (1996). La Technique et le Temps (La désorientation, Vol. 2). Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
  15. Tonneau, J.-P. (1986). Communication et Recherche-Développement: quel processus pédagogique? Quelques orientations de travail à partir de l’expérience de FARA Pour. Nogent-sur-Marne: Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (CIRAD)/Institut de Recherches Agronomiques Tropicales (IRAT). 10 p.Google Scholar
  16. Tonneau, J.-P., Duqué, G., & Diniz, P. C. O. (2003). Desenvolvimento territorial no nordeste: um método de diagnostico e planejamento participativos. Raizes – Revista de Ciências Sociais e Econômicas, 22(2), 181–191.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© © Éditions Quæ, 2014 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Danièle Clavel
    • 1
  1. 1.Département Bios UMR AGAPCIRADMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations