Skip to main content

An Empirical Study of the Effectiveness of Selected Cognitive Aids on Multiple Design Tasks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design Computing and Cognition '12

Abstract

The objective of this work is to study the concept generation effectiveness of three cognitive design aids: TRIZ—an ideation method, Sketching—a representation format, and use of the Smartpen—a journaling technology. The hypothesis is that TRIZ, Sketching and Smartpen, each improve the effectiveness of the concept generation process. The participating subjects belong to Penn State’s Introduction to Work Design (IE 327) course. The course focuses on concepts of work design and measurement applied to manufacturing and service industries with a focus on improving worker performance, health and safety analyses. In the paper, we report on two sequentially completed design case studies, which allowed us to study the same group of subjects under two conditions. The first case study involved redesigns of a wire-cutter and a screw driver to improve work productivity. The second case consisted of analyzing an ultrasound operation for which students suggested improvements to the workplace and a redesign of the ultrasound transducer taking into account ergonomics and human factors principles. Our results indicate that indeed the tested design aids improved the ideation effectiveness; Smartpen has done the best in terms of increasing quantity of ideas generated, and TRIZ was the best in enhancing novelty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Goller I, Kobe C (2008) Developing a team creativity training for engineers. In: Proceedings of 9th CINet conference 2008, Valencia, 7–9 Sept 2008

    Google Scholar 

  2. Court AW (1998) Improving creativity in engineering design education. Eur J Eng Educ 23(2):141–154

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Okudan GE, Vargas Hernandez N, Schmidt L, Linsey J, Chiu M-C, Lin C-Y (2010) A pilot exploration of systematic ideation methods and tools on design learning. In: ITHET’10 proceedings of the 9th international conference on information technology based higher education and training

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rodriguez SM, Gonzalez Macias R, Mendoza M, Vargas Hernandez N, Okudan GE, Schmidt L (2011) Guidelines for engineering design creativity: design of experiments. In: Proceedings of the international design engineering technical conferences paper no. DETC2011-48402, Washington, DC, 28–31 Aug, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  5. McCormick D (2007) Seeing mechanical. Mechanical engineering. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, pp 35–36

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shah JJ, Vargas-Hernandez N, Summers JD, Kulkarni S (2001) Collaborative sketching (C-Sketch)—an idea generation technique for engineering design. J Creative Behav 35(3):168–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bilda Z, Gero JS, Purcell T (2006) To sketch or not to sketch? That is the question. Des Stud 27(5):587–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Altshuller G, Shulyak L (2002) 40 principles: TRIZ keys to technical innovation. Technical Innovation Center Inc, Worcester, MA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ogot M, Okudan GE (2006) Integrating systematic creativity into first-year engineering design curriculum. Int J Eng Educ 22(1):109–115

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shirwaiker RA, Okudan GE (2008) TRIZ and axiomatic design: a review of case-studies and a proposed synergistic use. J Intell Manuf 19(1):33–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shirwaiker RA, Okudan GE (2007) Using TRIZ and axiomatic design synergistically: a case study. Int J Innov Technol Manage (IJITM) 4(2):155–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Okudan Kremer GE, Chiu MC, Lin C-Y, Gupta S, Claudio D, Thevenot H (2012) Application of axiomatic design, TRIZ and mixed integer programming to develop innovative designs: a locomotive ballast arrangement case study. Int J Adv Manuf Technol (in press, DOI 10.1007/soo170-011-3752-1)

  13. Stavridou A, Furnham A (1996) The relationship between psychoticism, trait-creativity and the attentional mechanism of cognitive inhibition. Pers Individ Differ 21:143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dorst K, Cross N (2001) Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem-solution. Des Stud 22(5):425–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shah J, Vargas-Hernandez N, Smith S (2003) Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Des Stud 24(2):111–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lopez R, Linsey JS, Smith SM (2011) Characterizing the effect of domain distance in design-by-analogy. In: Proceedings of the ASEM 2011 international

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vargas Hernandez N, Kremer G, Linsey J, Schmidt L (2010) Systematic ideation curriculum effectiveness investigation & deployment to enhance design learning. In: Proceedings of the 2010 American society for engineering education annual conference and exposition, Louisville, Kentucky, 20–23 June, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yang MC (2009) Observations on concept generation and sketching in engineering design. Res Eng Des 20(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Linsey JS, Clauss EF, Kurtoglu T, Murphy JT, Wood KL, Markham AB, (2010) An experimental study of group ideation generation techniques: understanding the roles of idea representation and viewing methods. J Mech Des, vol 133, Mar 2011

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chan J, Fu K, Schunn C, Cagan J, Wood K, Kotovsky K (2011) On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design: ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples. In: Chen W, Lewis K, Schmidt LC (eds) Decision making in engineering design, vol 133. Aug 2011, ASME Press, Two Park Avenue 2006 (Journal of Mechanical Design)

    Google Scholar 

  21. White C, Talley A, Jensen D, Wood K, Szmerekovsky A, Crawford R (2010) From brainstorming to C-sketch to principles of historical innovators: ideation techniques to enhance student creativity. In: Proceedings of the 2010 American society for engineering education annual conference and exposition, Louisville, Kentucky, 20–23 June, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  22. Purcell AT, Gero JS (1998) Drawings and the design process: a review of protocol studies in design and other disciplines and related research in cognitive psychology. Des Stud 19(4):389–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cardella ME, Atman CJ, Adams RS (2006) Mapping between design activities and external representations for engineering student designers. Des Stud 27(1):5–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Westmoreland SN, Grenier A, Schmidt L (2008) Analysis of capstone design reports: visual representations. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2008 international design engineering technical conferences & computers and information in engineering conference, IDETC/CIE 2008, New York, 3–6 Aug, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bilda Z, Gero JS (2007) The impact of working memory limitations on the design process during conceptualization. Des Stud 28:343–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Goel V (1995) Sketches of thought. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chen W, Lewis K, Schmidt LC (eds) (2006) Decision making in engineering design, ASME Press, Two Park Avenue

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cardoso C, Badke-Schaub P (2011) The influence of different pictorial representations during idea generation. J Creative Behav 45(2):130–146

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noe Vargas Hernandez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A: Samples for Ideas Generated

Appendix A: Samples for Ideas Generated

(Fig. 3)

Fig. 3
figure 3

Set 1 old pliers (Less Torque) new pliers (More Torque) and wire cutter redesign

(Fig. 4)

Fig. 4
figure 4

Set 2 compressed activated pliers and ratcheting screwdriver

(Fig. 5)

Fig. 5
figure 5

Set 3 screw driver redesign and wire cutter redesign

(Fig. 6)

Fig. 6
figure 6

Set 4 screwdriver redesign and wire cutter redesign

(Fig. 7)

Fig. 7
figure 7

Set 5 screw driver redesign wire cutter redesign

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hernandez, N.V., Schmidt, L.C., Kremer, G.O., Lin, CY. (2014). An Empirical Study of the Effectiveness of Selected Cognitive Aids on Multiple Design Tasks. In: Gero, J. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition '12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9112-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9112-0_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9111-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9112-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics