Skip to main content

Affiliation Motivation and Daily Experience: Some Issues on Gender Differences

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Applications of Flow in Human Development and Education

Abstract

Study examined the relationship of affiliation motivation to related behaviors and quality of experience. Attention focused on how gender moderates such relationship.

For English language content: Copyright © 1991 by the American Psychological Association. Reproduced with permission from the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991, vol. 60, No. 1, 154–164.

We thank Kathleen Chattin, Ed Donner, Judy LeFevere, Jeanne Nakumura, Kevin Rathunde, Carolyn Schneider, Sam Whalen, Ellen White, Farzin Yazdanfar, Gary Zimmerman, and several other graduate students for their help in organizing the study and coding the data. We would also like to thank Tony Tam for his advice on data analysis.

Correspondence concerning this article should be sent to Maria Mei-ha Wong, Department of Psychology, 5848 South University Avenue, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There is no questionnaire measure of intimacy motivation at present.

  2. 2.

    The longitudinal study, which was designed to examine why students failed to develop their talents, was completed while this article was being revised.

  3. 3.

    Those who had scores above the median were classified as the high group. Regression analyses using affiliation as a continuous variable and sex as a dummy variable were also carried out. The results were similar to the analysis of variance results reported here. However, using affiliation as a continuous variable created difficulties in the repeated measures design that tested the effect of affiliation, sex, and situation (a repeated measure) on the quality of experience There was no easy way to test the interaction between a repeated measure and a continuous variable in the SPSS-X program (SPSS 1986) that we used and other statistical packages that were available to us. To be consistent, we derided to treat affiliation as a categorical variable throughout the report.

  4. 4.

    Note that adolescent girls were significantly higher than boys on succorance, sentience, and nurturance but that boys were significantly higher in dominance in the normative data of the Personality Research Form manual (Jackson 1984). In this sample also, girls were significantly higher on succorance, sentience, and nurturance. The mean scores of succorance and nurturance for boys and girls were significantly different: for succorance, male M = 6.83, Female M = 9.76, t(169) = −5.89, p < 0.001; for sentience, male M = 8.41, female M = 10.79, t(169) = −5.90, p < .001; for nurturance, male M = 9.54, female M = 12.35, t(108.55) = −6.17, p < 0.00.

References

  • Agrawal, T. D. & Upadhyay, S. N, (1983). Sex and age differences in affiliation behavior. Psychological Studies, 28, 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. W. Heyns, R. W, & Veroff, J. (1954), The effect of experimental arousal of the affiliation motive on thematic apperception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 405–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. W. & Raphelson, A. C. (1956). Individual differences in motivation and behavior in particular situations. Journal of Personality, 24, 349-363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belenky, M. F., Clinehy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R. &Tarule, J, M. (1997). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bern, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 42,155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benton, C. J., Hernandez, A. C. R., Schmidt, A., Schmitz, M. D., Stone, A. Weiner, B. (1983). Is hostility linked with affiliation among males and with achievement among females? A critique of Poliak and Gilligan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 45, 167–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berninger. V. W., & DeSoto, C. (1985). Cognitive representation of personal stereotypes. European Journal of Social Psychology. 15, 189–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickman, L. D.(1975). Personality constructs of senior women planning to marry or to live independently soon after college. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. (1972). Sex and social participation. American Sociological Review 37,183–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1973). Affiliation motivation. In D. C. McClelland and R. Steele (Eds.). Human motivation. New York: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, S. S. (1985). Intimate relationships. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, I. Κ., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F, E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28(2), 59–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, A. H., & Finn, S. E. (1987). Classification of personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 432–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1961). Anxiety and the experimental arousal of affiliation need. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 660–662.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, M, A., & Peplau, L, A. (1982). Sex differences in same-sex friendship. Sex Roles, 8, 721–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chusmir, L. H. (1985). Motivation of managers: Is gender a factor? Psychology of Women Quarterly 9,153–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. E. (1973). Measures of achievement and affiliation motivation. Review of Educational Research, 43, 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantian, C. (1982). Solitude: Attitudes, beliefs, and behavior in regard to spending time alone (Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, 1981), Dissertation Abstracts international, 42, 4968B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). From catalog to classification: Murray’s needs and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 258–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cozby, P, C. (1973), Self-disclosure: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 73–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1984). Being adolescent: Conflict and growth in the teenage years. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R, (1987). Validity and reliability of experience-sampling method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 175, 526–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M.t Larson, R., & Prescolt, S. (1977). The ecology of adolescent activity and experience. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 6, 281–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M„ LeFevere, J., & Donner, E. (1987). Disengagement from talent in adolescence: A report to the Spencer Foundation. Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago, Department of Psychology, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, Κ. & Lewis, L. L. (1983). Components of gender stereotypes. Psychological Documents. 13. 25. (Ms. No. 2583).

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCharms, R. (1957). Affiliation motivation and productivity in small groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 222–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiPietro, J. (1979). Rough and tumble play: A function of play. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Department of Psychology, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A Social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eidelson, R. J. (1983). Affiliation and independence issues in marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45,683–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exline, R. (1960). Effects of sex, norms and affiliation motivation upon accuracy of perception of interpersonal preference. Journal of Personality, 28, 397–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exline, R. (1962). Need affiliation and initial communication behavior in problem-solving groups characterized by low interpersonal visibility. Psychological Reports, 10,79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. & Eysenck, M. (1984). Personality and individual differences. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J. L. (1981). Transitions in relationship style from adolescence to young adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 10,11–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, D. B. (1966). Need and expectancy as determinants of affiliative behaviors in small groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4,155–164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • French, E G. (1955). Some correlates of achievement motivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 50, 232–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • French, E. G. (1956). Motivation as a variable in work-partner selection. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53, 96–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geist, C. R., & Hamrick, T. J. (1983). Social avoidance and distress: Its relationship to self-confidence, and needs for affiliation, change, dominance, and deference. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 727–730.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, R. (1981). Sociability: Traits, settings, and interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 340–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giltigan, C. (1982), In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1982). From ace to zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality. In C. D. Spielberger & J. N, Butcher (Eds.). Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 203-234). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, B., & France, H.(1982), Manifest need satisfaction in male and female counsellors. Canadian Counsellor, 17, 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. A. (1987). Affiliation motivation: People who need people but in different ways. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1008–1018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, J. W, & Fischer, J. L, (1979). Sex differences in identity and intimacy development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 8, 37–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, M. E., & Mancini, A. V. (1985). Psychological Reports, 57, 714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. N. (1984). Personality Research Form Manual. Goshen, NY: Research Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, Q P, Goldberg, L. R., & Angleitner, A. (1984). Better than the alphabet: Taxonomies of personality-descriptive terms in English, Dutch, and German, In H. J, C. Bonarius, G. L. M. van Heck, & N. G. Smid (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe: Theoretical and empirical developments (pp, 83–100). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, P., & Barrett, P. (1983). The factors in personality questionnaires among normal subjects. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 5,141–202,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansing, J. B., & Heyns, R. W. (1959). Need for affiliation and the frequency of four types of communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 365–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1983). The experience sampling method. In D. W. Fiske (Series Ed.) & H. T. Reis (Vol. Ed.). Naturalistic approaches to studying social interaction: Vol 15. New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science (pp. 41–56). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, M. F., & Haven, C. (1968). Interaction and adaptation: Intimacy asa critical variable. American Sociological Review, 33,20–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E. (1980). Social development: Psychological growth and the parent-child relationship. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P. (1980). A thematic coding system for the intimacy motive. Journal of Research in Personality, 14, 413–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P. (1982a). Experiences of intimacy and power: Relationships between social motives and autobiographical memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42. 292–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P. (1982b). Intimacy motivation. In A. J. Stewart (Ed.). Motivation and society. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P. (1985). Power, intimacy, and the life story: Personalogical inquiries into identity. Chicago: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P. (1989). Intimacy: The need to be close. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P., & Constantian, C. A. (1983). Intimacy and affiliation motives in daily living: An experience sampling analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 851–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P, Healy, S., & Krause, S. (1984). Social motives and patterns of friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 828–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D, P., Jackson, R. J.,& Kirshnit, C. (1984). Looking, laughing, and smiling in dyads as a function of intimacy motivation and reciprocity. Journal of Personality, 52, 261–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P., Lester. R. M., Brand, P. A., McNamara, W. J., & Lensky, D. B. (1988). Sex and the TAT: Are women more intimate than men? Do men fear intimacy? Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 397–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1980). Motive dispositions: The merits of operant and respondent measures. In L. Wheeler (Ed.). Review of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 1, 10-41). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1987), Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52,81–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., & Busch, C. M. (1986). Evaluating comprehensiveness in personality systems: The California Q-set and the five factor model. Journal of Personality, 54, 430–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. B. (1986). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minton, H. L., & Schneider, F, W (1980). Differential psychology. Belmont, CA: Brooks & Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. (1981). Personality and cognition: Something borrowed, something new? In N. Cantor & J. F. Kihlstrom (Eds.). Personality, cognition, and social interaction (pp. 3-19). Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, P. F., Spence, N. D., & Goldney, R. D. (1986). Mental health in marriage: The role of need for affiliation, sensitivity to rejection, and other factors. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 68–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, H. W (1954). The validity and behavioral manifestations of female need for achievement. Unpublished masters thesis, Wesleyan University, Department of Psychology, Middletown, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Η. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offer, D., Ostrov, E., & Howard, K. (1982). The Offer Self-Image Questionnaire for Adolescents; A manual. Chicago: Michael Reese Hospital.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, M, N., & Schubarth, G. (1984). Fairness and appeasement: Achievement and affiliation motives in interpersonal relations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 364–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peabody, D. (1984). Personality dimensions through trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 384–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, D., & Fehr, B. (1987). The development of intimate relationships. In D. Perlman & S. Duck (Eds.). Intimate relationships: Development, dynamics, and deterioration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, S., & Gilligan, C. (1982). Images of violence in Thematic Apperception Test stories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 159–167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, S., & Gilligan, C. (1983). Differing about differences: The incidence and interpretation of violent fantasies in women and men. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1172–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratliff, E. S. (1980). A follow-up study of achievement-related motivation and behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H. T, (1986). Gender effects in social participation: Intimacy, loneliness, and the conduct of social interaction, In R. Gilmour & S. Duck (Eds.). The emerging field of personal relationships, (pp. 91105). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroth, M. L. (1985). The effect of differing measuring methods on the relationship of motives. Journal of Psychology, 119, 213–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • See, S. B. (1978). Aspects of career achievement and affiliation in business men and women, (Doctoral dissertation, Yeshiva University, 1977). Dissertation Abstracts International, 38,562 5B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipley, T. E., & Veroff, J. A. (1952). A projective measure of need for affiliation, Journal of Experimental Psychology. 43, 349–365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. L., & Kolligian, J. (1987). Personality: Developments in the study of private experience. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 533–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T, & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity; Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS (1986), SPSS-X users guide. Chicago: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, A. J., & Chester, N. L. (1982). Sex differences in human motives: Achievement, affiliation, and power. In A. J. Stewart (Ed.). Motivation and society (pp. 172–218). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Switzer, R., & Taylor, R. B. (1983). Sociability and privacy of residential choices: Impacts of personality and local social lies. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 4, 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veroff, J. (1982). Assertive motivations: Achievement versus power. In A. J. Stewart (Ed.). Motivation and society (pp. 99–132). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veroff, J., & Feld, S. (1970). Marriage and work in America: A study of motives and roles. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B., Stone, A. J., Schmitz, M. D., Schmidt, A., Hernandez, A. C. R., & Benton, C. J. (1983). Compounding the errors: A reply to Pollak and Gilligan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1176–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wong, M.Mh., Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Affiliation Motivation and Daily Experience: Some Issues on Gender Differences. In: Applications of Flow in Human Development and Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9094-9_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics