Skip to main content

Cross-Fertilizing Children’s Rights and the Capability Approach. The Example of the Right to Be Heard in Organized Leisure

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research ((CHIR,volume 8))

Abstract

The authors explore new ways of conceptualizing children’s citizenship and participation through the capabilities approach (Sen 1999) applied to children (Biggeri et al. 2011). They highlight factors that must be considered when observing how formal entitlements, such as the rights of the child, can (or cannot) be transformed into real freedom to participate. Their study conducted in Switzerland and in France shows the conditions for the right to be heard (art. 12 UNCRC) to be converted into effective participation in organised leisure activities.

The authors identify four sets of factors (economical, political, organisational and personal) that convert or obstruct the child’s entitlement to participate in the definition of organized leisure activities. Two ideal types – bottom-up participation and top-down participation – are built along these lines. The research shows that child participation is mainly induced by professional adults working in youth associations and leisure centres while knowledge of “participation rights” is rather low. Respondents do very seldom use the narrative of “children’s rights” to reflect upon their praxis. This typical line of conduct, or “system of action”, indicates that social relations play a greater role than children’s rights in their subjective evaluation of participatory projects.

The study highlights child participation as a sequential process whereby the actor’s reflexivity plays an important role as a converting factor, and thus enriches the theoretical model used in the capabilities approach (Bonvin 2008). The results have important implications for the paradigm of the social actor and contribute to the theory of child participation (Thomas 2007). They underline the instrumental dimension of participation rights as they become real through the exercise of participation itself. The chapter allows for important theoretical and practical developments in the field of child participation, notably by discussing the issue of agency within structure and suggesting a dynamic framework to understand agency as a system of action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bai, L. (2005). Children at play: A childhood beyond the Confucian shadow. Childhood, 12(1), 9–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggeri, M., Ballet, J., & Comim, F. (2010). The capability approach and research on children: Capability approach and children’s issues. In A. Sabrine, D. Isabell, S. Uwe, & Z. Holger (Eds.), Children and the good life: New challenges for research on children (Children’s well-being: Indicators and research series, Vol. 4, pp. 75–90). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Biggeri, M., Ballet, J., & Comim, F. (2011). Children and the capability approach. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, B. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonvin, J.-M. (2008). Capacités et démocratie. Raisons Pratiques, 19, 237–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonvin, J. M., & Farvaque, N. (2006). Promoting capability for work: the role of local actors. In S. Deneulin et al. (Eds.), Transforming unjust structures: The capability approach (pp. 121–143). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1994). Raisons pratiques. Sur la théorie de l’action. Paris: Le Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2011). Child and youth participation in Finland. A Council of Europe policy review. http://www.coe.int/t/dg3/children/participation/PolicyReview_en.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2013.

  • COE. (2012). Council of Europe. Recommendation CM/Rec(2012)2 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the participation of children and young people under the age of 18 (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 28 March 2012 at the 1138th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies). https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1927229&Site=CM

  • Denzin, N. (1990). Interpretive interactionism (Applied social research methods series, Vol. 16). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. D.C Heath & Co publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1991). La société des individus. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C., & Flaherty, M. (1992). Investigating subjectivity. Research on lived experience. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evaldsson, A.-C., & Corsaro, W. (1998). Play and games in the peer cultures of preschool and preadolescent children: An interpretative approach. Childhood, 5(4), 377–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). The politics of health in the eighteenth century. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Power/knowledge. Brighton: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, B. (1997). The ladder of participation in matters concerning children. In J. Boyden & J. Ennew (Eds.), Children in focus: A manual for participatory research with children. Stockholm: Grafisk Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, K., & Nieuwenhuys, O. (Eds.). (2013). Reconceptualizing children’s rights in international development. Living rights, social justice, translations. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, K., & Vandaele, A. (2003). Working children and international labour law: A critical analysis. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 11(1), 73–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, R. (1992). Children’s participation from tokenism to citizenship. Florence: Innocenti Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A., & Prout, A. (1990). Constructing and reconstructing childhood. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamerman, S. (2010). Preface. In S. B. Kamerman, P. Shelley, & B.-A. Asher (Eds.), From child welfare to child well-being. An international perspective on knowledge in the service of policy making (Children’s well-being: Indicators and research series, Vol. 1, pp. v–x). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown, G. (2005). Can you hear me? The right of young children to participate in decisions affecting them (Early Chilhood Development, Working Papers No 36). The Hague: Bernard Van Leer Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown, G. (2011). A framework for monitoring and evaluating children’s participation. A preparatory draft for piloting. Unpublished draft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A. (2000). Social class and the daily lives of children: A study from the United States. Childhood, 7(2), 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebel, M., in collaboration with Robin, P., & Saadi, I. (2010). Enfants, droits et citoyenneté, Faire émerger la perspective des children sur leur droit. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, H. (2003). Children and regeneration: Setting an agenda for community participation and integration. Children and Society, 17(4), 264–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naftali, O. (2010). Caged golden canaries: Childhood, privacy and subjectivity in contemporary urban China. Childhood, 17(3), 297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nibell, L. N., Shook, J. J., & Finn, J. L. (2009). Childhood, youth, and social work in transformation: Implications for policy. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oke, M., Khattar, A., Pant, P., & Saraswathi, T. S. (1999). A profile of children’s play in urban India. Childhood, 6(2), 207–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oswell, D. (2013). The agency of children. From family to global human rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parazelli, M. (2002). La rue attractive. Parcours et pratiques identitaires des jeunes de la rue. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université du Québec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Percy-Smith, B., & Thomas, N. (Eds.). (2010). A handbook of children and young people’s participation. Perspectives from theory and practice. New-York/Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfaffenberg, B. (1988). Microcomputer applications in qualitative research (Qualitative research methods series 14). Sage Publications: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pufall, P., & Unsworth, R. (2004). Rethinking childhood. London: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynaert, D., Bouverne-de-Bie, M., & Vandevelde, S. (2009). A review of children’s rights literature since the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Childhood, 16(4), 518–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, I. (2003). The capability approach. An interdisciplinary introduction. (Paper, revised version 9 December 2003, written for the training course preceding the 3rd international conference on the capability approach, Pavia, Italy, on 6 September 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roucous, N. (2006). Loisirs de l’enfant et représentation sociale de l’enfant acteur. In R. Sirota (Ed.), Eléments pour une sociologie de l’enfance (pp. 235–243). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, A. (1987). Le chercheur et le quotidien. Phénoménologie des sciences sociales. Paris: Méridiens Klincksieck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shier, H. (2001). Pathways to participation: Openings, opportunities and obligations. Children and Society, 15(2), 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, R., & Franklin, A. (2000). Young people’s participation (Quality Protects Research Briefing, No. 3). London: Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirota, R. (2006). Eléments pour une sociologie de l’enfance. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass Godoy, A. (1999). “Our right is the right to be killed”. Making rights real on the streets of Guatemala. Childhood, 6(4), 423–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoecklin, D. (2009). L’enfant acteur et l’approche participative. In J. Zermatten & D. Stoecklin (Eds.), Le droit des enfants de participer. Norme juridique et réalité pratique: contribution à un nouveau contrat social (pp. 47–71). Sion: IUKB/IDE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoecklin, D. (2013). Theories of action in the field of child participation. In search of explicit frameworks. Childhood, 20(4), 443–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2004). Les fondements de la recherche qualitative. Techniques et procédures de développement de la théorie enracinée. Fribourg: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoburn, J., Lewis, A., & Shemmings, D. (1995). Paternalism or partnership? Family involvement in the child protection process. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, N. (2002). Children, family and the state: Decision-making and child participation. London/Bristol: Macmillan/Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, N. (2007). Towards a theory of children’s participation. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 15, 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treseder, P. (1997). Empowering children and young people. London: Children’s Rights Office/Save the Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRC. (1989). UN convention on the right of the child. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (1984). Developmental psychology and the child-centred pedagogy: The insertion of Piaget into early education. In J. Henriques, W. Hollway, C. Urwin, C. Venn, & V. Walkerdine (Eds.), Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). In R. Guenther & W. Claus (Eds.), Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zermatten, J., & Stoecklin, D. (Eds.). (2009). Le droit des enfants de participer. Norme juridique et réalité pratique: contribution à un nouveau contrat social. Sion: IUKB/IDE.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Stoecklin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stoecklin, D., Bonvin, JM. (2014). Cross-Fertilizing Children’s Rights and the Capability Approach. The Example of the Right to Be Heard in Organized Leisure. In: Stoecklin, D., Bonvin, JM. (eds) Children’s Rights and the Capability Approach. Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9091-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics