Creativity and Genius: A Systems Perspective



The title of this volume, Genius and the mind, suggests that one should look for the explanation to the mysteries of genius inside the human cranium. My goal in this chapter will be to argue that while the mind has quite a lot to do with genius and creativity, it is not the place where these phenomena can be found. The location of genius is not in any particular individual’s mind, but in a virtual space, or system, where an individual interacts with a cultural domain and with a social field. It is only in the relation of these three separate entities that creativity, or the work of genius, manifests itself. In popular usage, ‘genius’ is sometimes used as a noun that stands by itself, yet in reality it appears always with a modifier: musical genius, mathematical genius, scientific genius, and so forth. Genius cannot show itself except when garbed in a concrete symbolic form.


Nobel Prize Creative Process Symbolic System Creativity Research Divergent Thinking 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The research reported herein was supported by a grant from the Spencer Foundation.


  1. Baer, J. (1993). Creativity and divergent thinking. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Barron, F. (1969). Creative person and creative process. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  3. Barron, F. (1988). Putting creativity to work. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 76–98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, D. T. (1976). Evolutionary epistemology. In D. A. Schlipp (Ed.), The library of living philosophers: Karl Popper (pp. 413–463). La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar
  5. Coren, S. (1992). The left-handed syndrome: the causes and consequences of left-handedness. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cox, C. (1926). The early mental traits’ of three hundred geniuses. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988a). Motivation and creativity: toward a synthesis of structural and energistic approaches to cognition. New Ideas Psychology, 6, 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988b). Society, culture, person: a systems view of creativity. In: R.J. Sternberg The nature of creativity, pp. 325–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988c). Solving a problem is not finding a new one: a reply to Simon. New Ideas Psychology, 6, 183–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domain of creativity. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 190–212). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). The evolving self: a psychology for the third millennium. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  12. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  13. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Getzels, J. W. (1973). The personality of young artists: an empirical and theoretical exploration. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 91–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Getzels, J. W. (1988). Creativity and problem finding. In F. G. Farley & R. W. Neperole (Eds.), The foundations of aesthetics, art, and art education (pp. 91–106). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  15. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Sawyer, K. (1995). Shifting the focus from individual to organizational creativity. In C. M. Ford & D. A. Gioia (Eds.), Creative action in organizations (pp. 167–172). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Getzels, J.W., & Kahn, S.P. (1984). Talent and achievement: a longitudinal study of artists. A report to the Spencer Foundation. Chicago: The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  17. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: the roots of success and failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Darwin, F. (1914). The Galton lecture. London: The Eugenic Society.Google Scholar
  19. Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Einstein, A., & Infeld, L. (1938). The evolution of physics. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  21. Feldman, D. (1986). Nature’s gambit: child prodigies and the development of human potential. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Feldman, D., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Gardner, H. (1994). Changing the world: a framework for the study of creativity. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  23. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: the theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  24. Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  25. Gardner, H., Komhaber, M. L., & Wake, W. K. (1996). Intelligence: multiple perspectives. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  26. Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: a longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Gruber, H. (1988). The evolving systems approach to creative work. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. NewYork: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  29. Harrington, D. M. (1990). The ecology of human creativity: a psychological perspective. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 143–169). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Hauser, A. (1951). The social history of art. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  31. Jablow, H. D., & Lieb, J. (1988). The key to genius: manic-depression and the creative life. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  32. Jacobson, A. C. (1912). Literary genius and manic depressive insanity. Medical Record, 82, 937–939.Google Scholar
  33. Jamison, K. R. (1989). Mood disorders and patterns of creativity in British writers and artists. Psychiatry, 52, 125–134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kasof, J. (1995). Explaining creativity: the attributional perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 311–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kris, E. (1952). Psychoanalytic explorations in art. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Lombroso, C. (1891). The man of genius. London: Walter Scott.Google Scholar
  38. Martindale, C. (1989). Personality, situation, and creativity. In R. R. J. Glover & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 211–232). NewYork: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maslow, A. H. (1963). The creative attitude. The Structuralist, 3, 4–10.Google Scholar
  40. Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  41. Milgram, R. M. (1990). Creativity: an idea whose time has come and gone? In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 215–233). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  42. Mitchell, A. R. (1972). Schizophrenia: the meaning of madness. New York: Taplinger.Google Scholar
  43. Paul, D. (1993). Left-handed helpline. Manchester: Dextral Books.Google Scholar
  44. Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  45. Piechowski, M. J. (1991). Emotional development and emotional giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 285–306). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  46. Richards, R. (1990). Everyday creativity, eminent creativity, and health. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 300–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Runco, M. A. (1991). Divergent thinking. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
  48. Runco, M. A. (Ed.). (1995). Problem finding. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
  49. Russ, S. W. (1993). Affect and creativity. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  50. Simon, H.A. (1985). Psychology of scientific discovery. Keynote presentation at the 93rd annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  51. Simon, H. A. (1988). Creativity and motivation: a response to Csikszentmihalyi. New Ideas Psychology, 6, 177–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Simonton, D. K. (1988). Scientific genius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Simonton, D. K. (1990). Political pathology and societal creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Simonton, D. K. (1991). Personality correlates of exceptional personal influence. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 67–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: who makes history and why. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  56. Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. Journal of Psychology, 36, 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stein, M. I. (1963). A transactional approach to creativity. In C. W. Taylor & F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity (pp. 217–227). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  58. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  59. Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 43–75). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Wehner, L., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Magyari-Beck, I. (1991). Current approaches used in studying creativity: an exploratory investigation. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Claremont Graduate UniversityClaremontUSA

Personalised recommendations