Skip to main content

Creativity and Genius: A Systems Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Systems Model of Creativity

Abstract

The title of this volume, Genius and the mind, suggests that one should look for the explanation to the mysteries of genius inside the human cranium. My goal in this chapter will be to argue that while the mind has quite a lot to do with genius and creativity, it is not the place where these phenomena can be found. The location of genius is not in any particular individual’s mind, but in a virtual space, or system, where an individual interacts with a cultural domain and with a social field. It is only in the relation of these three separate entities that creativity, or the work of genius, manifests itself. In popular usage, ‘genius’ is sometimes used as a noun that stands by itself, yet in reality it appears always with a modifier: musical genius, mathematical genius, scientific genius, and so forth. Genius cannot show itself except when garbed in a concrete symbolic form.

Copyright statement article “Creativity and Genius: A Systems Perspective” By Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi:

Reproduced with permission from M. Csikszentmihalyi, chapter 3. “Creativity and Genius: A Systems Perspective”, from “Genius and the Mind”, Andrew Steptoe (Ed.), pp. 39–66. By permission of © 1998, Oxford University Press www.oup.com”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baer, J. (1993). Creativity and divergent thinking. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. (1969). Creative person and creative process. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. (1988). Putting creativity to work. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 76–98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1976). Evolutionary epistemology. In D. A. Schlipp (Ed.), The library of living philosophers: Karl Popper (pp. 413–463). La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coren, S. (1992). The left-handed syndrome: the causes and consequences of left-handedness. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, C. (1926). The early mental traits’ of three hundred geniuses. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988a). Motivation and creativity: toward a synthesis of structural and energistic approaches to cognition. New Ideas Psychology, 6, 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988b). Society, culture, person: a systems view of creativity. In: R.J. Sternberg The nature of creativity, pp. 325–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988c). Solving a problem is not finding a new one: a reply to Simon. New Ideas Psychology, 6, 183–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domain of creativity. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 190–212). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). The evolving self: a psychology for the third millennium. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Getzels, J. W. (1973). The personality of young artists: an empirical and theoretical exploration. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 91–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Getzels, J. W. (1988). Creativity and problem finding. In F. G. Farley & R. W. Neperole (Eds.), The foundations of aesthetics, art, and art education (pp. 91–106). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Sawyer, K. (1995). Shifting the focus from individual to organizational creativity. In C. M. Ford & D. A. Gioia (Eds.), Creative action in organizations (pp. 167–172). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., Getzels, J.W., & Kahn, S.P. (1984). Talent and achievement: a longitudinal study of artists. A report to the Spencer Foundation. Chicago: The University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: the roots of success and failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, F. (1914). The Galton lecture. London: The Eugenic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A., & Infeld, L. (1938). The evolution of physics. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. (1986). Nature’s gambit: child prodigies and the development of human potential. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Gardner, H. (1994). Changing the world: a framework for the study of creativity. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: the theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H., Komhaber, M. L., & Wake, W. K. (1996). Intelligence: multiple perspectives. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: a longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. (1988). The evolving systems approach to creative work. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 27–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. NewYork: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, D. M. (1990). The ecology of human creativity: a psychological perspective. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 143–169). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, A. (1951). The social history of art. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablow, H. D., & Lieb, J. (1988). The key to genius: manic-depression and the creative life. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, A. C. (1912). Literary genius and manic depressive insanity. Medical Record, 82, 937–939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamison, K. R. (1989). Mood disorders and patterns of creativity in British writers and artists. Psychiatry, 52, 125–134.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kasof, J. (1995). Explaining creativity: the attributional perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 311–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kris, E. (1952). Psychoanalytic explorations in art. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombroso, C. (1891). The man of genius. London: Walter Scott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martindale, C. (1989). Personality, situation, and creativity. In R. R. J. Glover & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 211–232). NewYork: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1963). The creative attitude. The Structuralist, 3, 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, R. M. (1990). Creativity: an idea whose time has come and gone? In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 215–233). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, A. R. (1972). Schizophrenia: the meaning of madness. New York: Taplinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, D. (1993). Left-handed helpline. Manchester: Dextral Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piechowski, M. J. (1991). Emotional development and emotional giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 285–306). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. (1990). Everyday creativity, eminent creativity, and health. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 300–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1991). Divergent thinking. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (Ed.). (1995). Problem finding. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ, S. W. (1993). Affect and creativity. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1985). Psychology of scientific discovery. Keynote presentation at the 93rd annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1988). Creativity and motivation: a response to Csikszentmihalyi. New Ideas Psychology, 6, 177–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1988). Scientific genius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1990). Political pathology and societal creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1991). Personality correlates of exceptional personal influence. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 67–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: who makes history and why. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. Journal of Psychology, 36, 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. I. (1963). A transactional approach to creativity. In C. W. Taylor & F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity (pp. 217–227). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 43–75). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner, L., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Magyari-Beck, I. (1991). Current approaches used in studying creativity: an exploratory investigation. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The research reported herein was supported by a grant from the Spencer Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Creativity and Genius: A Systems Perspective. In: The Systems Model of Creativity. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9085-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics