Society, Culture, and Person: A Systems View of Creativity



It is customary to date the renewal of interest in creativity among psychologists to Guillord’s presidential address to the APA more than 30 years ago (Guilford 1950). Ever since that date, an increasing tide of publications on the subject has been appearing in our journals. Many of these books and articles have tried to answer what has been thought to be the most fundamental question: What is creativity? But no one has raised the simple question that should precede attempts at defining, measuring, or enhancing, namely: Where is creativity?


Creative Process Silken Textile Creative Idea Creative Individual Gifted Child 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Amabite, T. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bamberger, J. (1986). Cognitive issues in ihe development of musically gifted children. In: R. J. Stemberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 388–416). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bloom, B. (1985). Developing talent in young children. New York: Bailantine.Google Scholar
  4. Borghero, G. (1986). Thyssen-Bornemisza collection. Catalogue raisonne. Milano: Edizioni Electa.Google Scholar
  5. Brannigan, A. (1981). The social basis of scientific discoveries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, D. T. (1965). Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution. In: H. R. Borringer, G. I. Blankston, & R. W. Monk (Eds.), Social change in developing areas (pp. 9–42). Cambridge: Schenkman.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, D. T. (1976). Evolutionary epistemology. In P. A. Schlipp (Ed.), The library of living philosophers (pp. 413–463). La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar
  8. Cheyney, E. P. (1936). The dawn of a new era: 12501453. New York: Harper & Bros.Google Scholar
  9. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1978). Attention and the holistic approach to behavior. In K. S. Pope & J. L. Singer (Eds.), The stream of consciousness (pp. 335–358). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  10. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1979). Art and problem finding. Paper presented at the 87th annual convention of the APA, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Csikszentmihalyi M (1986) Motivation and creativity: Towards a synthesis of structural and energistic approaches to cognition. New ideas in psychology (in press). Google Scholar
  12. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Getzels, J. W. (1971). Discovery-oriented behavior and the originality of creative products. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19(1), 47–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Getzels, J. W. (1973). The personality of young artists: An empirical and theoretical exploration. British Journal of Psychology, 64(1), 91–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Csiksientmihalyi, M. & Getzels, J. W. (1988). Creativity and problem finding in art. In F. H. Farley, & R. W. Neperud (Eds.) The foundations of aesthetics, art, and art education. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  15. Csiksientmihalyi, M., Gelzels, J. W. & Kahn, S. (1984). Talent and achievement: A longitudinal study with artists. Chicago: University of Chicago (Unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
  16. Csikszentmihaiyi, M., & Massimini, R. (1985). On the psychological selection of bio-cultural information. New Ideas in Psychology, 3(2), 115–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish game. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Feldman, D. (1980). Beyond universals in cognitive development. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
  19. Feldman, D. (1986). Nature’s gambit. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  20. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  21. Gardner, H. (1985). The mind’s new science. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Gardner, H. (1986). Freud in three frames. Daedalus, 115, 105–134.Google Scholar
  23. Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1968). On the rules, values, and performance of future artists: A conceptual and empirical exploration. Sociological Quarterly, 9, 516–530.Google Scholar
  24. Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Gruber, H. (1981). Darwin on man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hartt, F. (1979). History of Italian renaissance art. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  28. Hauser, A. (1951). The social history of art (Vol. 2). New York: Vinlage.Google Scholar
  29. Heydenreich, L. H. (1974). II primo Rinaseimento. Milano: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
  30. Kermode, P. (1985). Forms of attention. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Kuhn, T. S. (1974). Second thoughts on paradigms. In F. Suppe (Ed.) The structure of scientific theories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  33. Lecourt, D. (1977). Proletarian science. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
  34. Medvedev, Z. (1971). The rise and fail of Dr. Lysenko. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  35. Perkins, D. (1981). The mind’s best work. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Roe, A. (1946). The personality of artists. Education and Personality Measure, 6, 401–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Siegler, R. S. & Shrager, J. (1984). A model of strategic choice. In: C. Sophian (Ed.) Origins of cognitive skills. Hilisdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  38. Simon, H. A. (1985). Psychology of scientific discovery. Paper presented at the 93rd Annual APA Meeting, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  39. Simonton, D. K. (1978). History and the eminent person. Gifted Child Quarterly, 22, 187–195.Google Scholar
  40. Simonton, D. K. (1984). Genius, creativity, and leadership. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sternberg, R. J. (1984). Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(2), 269–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wallers, J. & Gardner, H. (1986). The crystallizing experience. In: R. Stemberg, & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 306–331). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Claremont Graduate UniversityClaremontUSA

Personalised recommendations